No need to, the Ethics departmnt of the Department of Justice said that Barr should recuse himself on this issue....did not find enough evidence to ESTABLISH a crime, without a reasonable doubt, does not mean there was no evidence...Can you gusy do a Google search at all? Jesus the left is lazy as fuck......no wonder you are all on welfare. And no wonder you vote for the left, you don't try to find anything out.....Debunked? how? the collusion story was debunked, there was a real investigation and you got nothing.....show me the investigation into Uranium One?
So where does Mueller say that Trump did not collude??? I thought it said they found no evidence of collusion.
Mueller was clear in finding no collusion, but punted on the matter of obstruction
On coordination with the Russians, special counsel Robert Mueller was clear, according to the attorney general's letter to Congress Sunday: He did not find "that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election."
Based on that, Barr, along with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, decided that the evidence collected by Mueller did not establish that Trump committed the crime of obstruction of justice.
I mean he didn't do it, we all knew it......can you guys THINK for once? Look at multiple sources....I just posted NBC......a source I hate....but I do look at their stuff in case my side is full of shit.......which it rarely is.....
you guys really are in the Matrix......just sitting there sucking up what Rachel Maddow says and that's it.
Muelerr said that "did not find...", not that Trump didn't.
people keep jumping over that ''establish'' word...
the administration and Barr, played right in to the Russian hands of continuing to divide us, by not releasing the Mueller report, at the same time as Barr's summary, and by Barr not following the ethics rule of recusing himself on this issue... after he had written a 19 page job interview for Trump's lawyers stating basically a President can never obstruct and break the law.... only if they are Democrats like Bill Clinton, can this happen....![]()
and by Barr not following the ethics rule of recusing himself on this issue...
Can you post the ethics rule that says an appointee can't have a legal opinion?
You recuse when there is simply the appearance of not being able to be fair and just....
Last edited: