Some folks are thinking the same as me.

[evenflow1969]

That's neat. But I'm still trying to figure out what this means in practice.

Hypothetically speaking, let's suppose that I didn't consider Trump a legitimate president. What exactly could I have resisted from his administration?

These factions are talking about armed resistance. Most likely in the form of asymmetric warfare. In other words terrorists

 

[Indeependent]

That's neat. But I'm still trying to figure out what this means in practice.

Hypothetically speaking, let's suppose that I didn't consider Trump a legitimate president. What exactly could I have resisted from his administration?

What legislation did Trump sign into law that would have made you rebel?

None. What could I have even rebelled against? Give me an example of how I could have done so.

Nice dodge.
You didn’t answer the question because, in reality, Trump did nothing to disrupt your life.

You dodged my question, moron. Notice my question came first.

To address your question, I wouldn’t rebel against legislation because I don’t even know what that would consist of. Which was kind of the entire point of mine that you conveniently ignored.

So you are faking bravado over some fantasy Trump legislation that either you never knew was signed into law or you never knew the effect of the legislation.
Yet you complain about how Trump’s legislation ruined the US.
Are you expecting me to take you seriously?

How am I faking bravado? Geez you’re dumb.

What Trump legislation would have made you rebel?

Let me try to spell this out for you one last time. Take any action done by the president that you don’t like and consider what would it even look like to rebel against that.

Here’s an example: I didn’t like the appointment of Barrett. How specifically would I rebel against that?

Example: I didn’t like the assassination of Soleimani. How would I rebel against that?

Example: I didn’t like leaving the Paris climate accord. How would I rebel against that?

Give me an example of what rebelling would look like. I don’t know how that would be done effectively.

Do you get it now? Probably not.

So you like sending US money to pay the bills of other nations and you like terrorism.
See how easy that was?

I tried to walk you through it and you couldn’t answer those simple questions.

It’a not your fault. You’re just not very bright.

Explain to me why we need to part of the Paris Climate Accords when private industry is already doing it.
Presuming you know anything about advancements in technology.

Address the point I made or I will consider you the moron that you are. I’m not interested in expanding this conversation with you as you have proven that you have the attention span of a kid with ADHD.

You cri

That's neat. But I'm still trying to figure out what this means in practice.

Hypothetically speaking, let's suppose that I didn't consider Trump a legitimate president. What exactly could I have resisted from his administration?

What legislation did Trump sign into law that would have made you rebel?

None. What could I have even rebelled against? Give me an example of how I could have done so.

Nice dodge.
You didn’t answer the question because, in reality, Trump did nothing to disrupt your life.

You dodged my question, moron. Notice my question came first.

To address your question, I wouldn’t rebel against legislation because I don’t even know what that would consist of. Which was kind of the entire point of mine that you conveniently ignored.

So you are faking bravado over some fantasy Trump legislation that either you never knew was signed into law or you never knew the effect of the legislation.
Yet you complain about how Trump’s legislation ruined the US.
Are you expecting me to take you seriously?

How am I faking bravado? Geez you’re dumb.

What Trump legislation would have made you rebel?

Let me try to spell this out for you one last time. Take any action done by the president that you don’t like and consider what would it even look like to rebel against that.

Here’s an example: I didn’t like the appointment of Barrett. How specifically would I rebel against that?

Example: I didn’t like the assassination of Soleimani. How would I rebel against that?

Example: I didn’t like leaving the Paris climate accord. How would I rebel against that?

Give me an example of what rebelling would look like. I don’t know how that would be done effectively.

Do you get it now? Probably not.

So you like sending US money to pay the bills of other nations and you like terrorism.
See how easy that was?

I tried to walk you through it and you couldn’t answer those simple questions.

It’a not your fault. You’re just not very bright.

Explain to me why we need to part of the Paris Climate Accords when private industry is already doing it.
Presuming you know anything about advancements in technology.

Address the point I made or I will consider you the moron that you are. I’m not interested in expanding this conversation with you as you have proven that you have the attention span of a kid with ADHD.

It will be interesting to see how politicians react to non-BLM or Antifa people doing what BLM and Antifa have done.
Unlike how the cowards reacted to BLM and Antifa, police action will be taken against those who are pro-US.

That's nice, moron. Go play with your crayons.

Thanks...feel free to send your post-tax income to Europe.

I'd ask you why I would want to do that, but your answer wouldn't make sense anyway.

So just stick with the crayons.

I don't want to do that; you want to be taxed by the Paris Climate Accords.

Look at how far off base you have gone due to your inability to answer a simple question.

It’s not your fault. You were probably dropped on your head as a child.

It doesn't matter as almost anything the Squad wants will be rejected by the Democrats anyway.
Yes, the Democrats that no one interviews are normal.

Neat. Well that has nothing to do with anything I’ve been saying so it’s completely irrelevant to the conversation.

Which is completely expected from you.

Conservatives have rhetoric; Liberals destroyed private and public property.
The Liberal mayors told the police to do nothing.

That's bullshit.
You guys obsess over Portland and have morphed it into a national scenario that just isn't true.
Go for facts or GFY.

I know someone who lives there and I read Reuters and AP.
Go for facts or GFY.

Where? Portland?
So what?
You're painting the whole country from what happened in Portland.
Here's a fact for you, fuckface.
Out of the largest 100 cities in the U.S., 64 of them are led by Dem mayors.

" Party affiliation of the mayors of the 100 largest cities

Democratic 64
Republican 27
Independent 2
Nonpartisan 7

Last updated December 15, 2020""

Party affiliation of the mayors of the 100 largest cities

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics

ballotpedia.org

well there was chicago and minnesota,

Not where BS looks for his "news".

 

[jc456]

Meanwhile, I'm confident you won't condemn your fellow Rambo wannabe Trumpsters.

Hell no I won't...I'm praying for all hell to break loose...for El Paso, TX Walmart like incidents to happen daily.
Lets do this shit already!

See how well I know you guys?

I've been telling you for years bud...you gotta let go of your hope for bipartisanship. We'll never be friends, conservatives will never make deals with their worse enemy. We want the Left in concentration camps and hanged in public...Sorry bud, that's where we're at.

Speak for yourself. Many of your decent Republicans do not agree with you. I respect them for standing against hate and rage, stood up for the rule of law. They deserve respect. You do not because you are still in that hate stage.

Saying things like "we" makes people like this a little more comfortable with their impotent rage. Of course, most people are not like this. The problem is that these folks are the loudest and therefore very influential.

My guess is that this can only be fixed through the culture. The two sides of the spectrum have to be brave enough to marginalize their worst elements, even if it means possible short term political disadvantage.

it would help if illegal balloting counting didn't exist. there's that.

You folks were like this long before November.

we knew it was coming because secretaries of states can't change mail in balloting rules. there's that. that happened before the election. It's illegal. they have now followed through with that intent. illegal.

And yet Republican governors, Republican election officials, Trump-appointed lower court judges and the Supreme Court don't seem concerned.

Why do you suppose that is? Have they all gone commie?

dude, completely agree that they failed the constitution. it's the constitution. I thought you were all about that document. I see now you're not.

So you're more in touch with the Constitution than Republican governors, Republican election officials, Trump-appointed lower court judges and the Supreme Court.

Damn, I have to say. That's impressive. You GO!

I guess so, the 14th amendment is there.

 

[jc456]

That's neat. But I'm still trying to figure out what this means in practice.

Hypothetically speaking, let's suppose that I didn't consider Trump a legitimate president. What exactly could I have resisted from his administration?

These factions are talking about armed resistance. Most likely in the form of asymmetric warfare. In other words terrorists

what are you going to do?

 

[Agit8r]

You identify with violent idiots with guns who threaten people. My link was to point out what is going on right now, which DIRECTLY relates to your OP. You're a sick individual if you approve of these tactics which are incited by Dear Leader.

If democrats had shutdown the violent leftwing riots during the spring, summer and fall you would have the moral creds to complain about conservatives now

which you dont have

Who do you think sent the police in to beat the protestors. Were they acting unilaterally?

 

[Blaine Sweeter]

I notice that TrumpToids rarely post links to verifiable, reliable news sources.
For the record, I don't acknowledge Gateway Pundit, Breitbart, HotAir or Alex Jones, Rush Limpballs as legitimate.
Fox must be coming around because Trump can't bash them enough on Twitter.

Oh, and forget NewsMax and OANN...they are both heat-seeking missiles for Trump's ass.

 

[jc456]

You identify with violent idiots with guns who threaten people. My link was to point out what is going on right now, which DIRECTLY relates to your OP. You're a sick individual if you approve of these tactics which are incited by Dear Leader.

If democrats had shutdown the violent leftwing riots during the spring, summer and fall you would have the moral creds to complain about conservatives now

which you dont have

Who do you think sent the police in to beat the protestors. Were they acting unilaterally?

where?

 

[jc456]

I notice that TrumpToids rarely post links to verifiable, reliable news sources.
For the record, I don't acknowledge Gateway Pundit, Breitbart, HotAir or Alex Jones, Rush Limpballs as legitimate.
Fox must be coming around because Trump can't bash them enough on Twitter.

Oh, and forget NewsMax and OANN...they are both heat-seeking missiles for Trump's ass.

you need me to provide you the 14th amendment? hahahaahahahahahahaha

 

[XponentialChaos]

Your ad hominems are as weak as your occasional insistence that you are an Independent.

Show me where I said that I’m an independent. I’ll wait.

 

[Agit8r]

You identify with violent idiots with guns who threaten people. My link was to point out what is going on right now, which DIRECTLY relates to your OP. You're a sick individual if you approve of these tactics which are incited by Dear Leader.

If democrats had shutdown the violent leftwing riots during the spring, summer and fall you would have the moral creds to complain about conservatives now

which you dont have

Who do you think sent the police in to beat the protestors. Were they acting unilaterally?

where?

NYC for instance. Dem Mayor

Louisville, Ky; Dem Mayor

Salt Lake City; Dem Mayor

etc.

 

[Leo123]

America’s largest militia says it will refuse to recognise Biden as president and ‘resist’ his administration

‘Anything he signs into law we won’t recognise as legitimate,’ Oath Keepers founder says

news.yahoo.com

America’s largest militia says it will refuse to recognise Biden as president and ‘resist’ his administration

Griffin Connolly and Richard Hall
November 15, 2020

A sense that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump, which there has been no evidence for, pervaded among his supporters who marched in Washington on Saturday. (Getty Images)
The largest militia group in the US will refuse to recognise President-elect Joe Biden as the nation’s duly elected leader when he is sworn in on 20 January 2021.
The Oath Keepers, an armed right-wing organisation that boasts tens of thousands of members with law enforcement and military backgrounds, was one of several groups to demonstrate in Washington over the weekend at the “Million MAGA March” in support of Donald Trump, whom news networks project has lost the 2020 election.
“I think about half this country won’t recognise Biden as legitimate. They won’t recognise this election,” Stewart Rhodes, who founded the Oath Keepers, told The Independent on Saturday in the nation’s capital.
- ADVERTISEMENT -

“What that means is that everything that comes out of his mouth will be considered not of any force or effect, anything he signs into law we won’t recognise as legitimate. We’ll be very much like the founding fathers. We’ll end up nullifying and resisting,” Mr Rhodes said.

Thousands of Trump supporters — including members of far-right groups such as the Proud Boys, the Boogaloo Boys, and the Oath Keepers, as well as ordinary American citizens — participated in the march, which was pervaded by a sense that the 2020 election was stolen from Mr Trump.

The evidence wasn't seen because the observers were kicked out of one precinct, unfolded ballots were already counted in another, voting machines were subject to vote changing, and courts refused to grant lawsuits. SCOTUS punted 7 to 2 not wanting to upend an election and used the 'no evidence' excuse. Trump won more votes than last time and won in areas no republican had won before. The ballot counting shut down happened while Trump was winning by a large margin and, not so consequently, in the swing States. When the polls reopened, magically, they 'found' a whole bunch of votes for Biden that, as a video shows, came out from under a table after poll watchers were kicked out for a supposed water main break which turned out to be nothing but an overflowed urinal. Biden did not really campaign and all the people that supposedly voted for him are strangely absent in celebrating his ill-gotten victory. To say there is 'no evidence' is ignorant at best and purposefully misleading at worst.

 

[bendog]

That's neat. But I'm still trying to figure out what this means in practice.

Hypothetically speaking, let's suppose that I didn't consider Trump a legitimate president. What exactly could I have resisted from his administration?

What legislation did Trump sign into law that would have made you rebel?

None. What could I have even rebelled against? Give me an example of how I could have done so.

Nice dodge.
You didn’t answer the question because, in reality, Trump did nothing to disrupt your life.

You dodged my question, moron. Notice my question came first.

To address your question, I wouldn’t rebel against legislation because I don’t even know what that would consist of. Which was kind of the entire point of mine that you conveniently ignored.

So you are faking bravado over some fantasy Trump legislation that either you never knew was signed into law or you never knew the effect of the legislation.
Yet you complain about how Trump’s legislation ruined the US.
Are you expecting me to take you seriously?

How am I faking bravado? Geez you’re dumb.

What Trump legislation would have made you rebel?

What legislation did trump get congress to enact?

 

[Lesh]

NYC was destroyed and the Governor and Mayor told the police to stand down.
Chicago was destroyed and the Mayor told the police to stand down.

Neither were "destroyed". In fact I was just down to NYC a month ago. Looked fine

 

[Beef_Supreme]

Who cares? Militias use to be important as every able body white male property owner was required to not only join the militia but to actively train with the weapons of war to defend the nation. The world of war has moved on. These guys are just thugs looking for a fight.

The world has moved on?
Our decades long fighting in the Middle East is essentially a fight against a militia. That militia did pretty damn well.
The Russians fought a militia in the 80’s, and wound up being pushed out.
A large part of the forces we fought in Vietnam were militia. We know how that went.
To discount the militia ( an armed populace, with or without training really) is a serious, serious miscalculation.
now mind you, I think all of this is just posturing. With all the belly aching and pissing and moaning, even by yours truly, I don’t think any type of armed conflict is going to come out of this. Things would have to seriously deteriorate for that to happen. Yes, there may be little skirmishes with armed citizens blasting rioters if that rioting shit continues, but actual “civil war”?? I highly highly doubt it.
But I will again say, to those who dismiss the seriousness of going up against an armed populace, especially one as well armed as the American citizens... huge freaking mistake. Huge.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

America’s largest militia says it will refuse to recognise Biden as president and ‘resist’ his administration

‘Anything he signs into law we won’t recognise as legitimate,’ Oath Keepers founder says

news.yahoo.com

America’s largest militia says it will refuse to recognise Biden as president and ‘resist’ his administration

Griffin Connolly and Richard Hall
November 15, 2020

A sense that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump, which there has been no evidence for, pervaded among his supporters who marched in Washington on Saturday. (Getty Images)
The largest militia group in the US will refuse to recognise President-elect Joe Biden as the nation’s duly elected leader when he is sworn in on 20 January 2021.
The Oath Keepers, an armed right-wing organisation that boasts tens of thousands of members with law enforcement and military backgrounds, was one of several groups to demonstrate in Washington over the weekend at the “Million MAGA March” in support of Donald Trump, whom news networks project has lost the 2020 election.
“I think about half this country won’t recognise Biden as legitimate. They won’t recognise this election,” Stewart Rhodes, who founded the Oath Keepers, told The Independent on Saturday in the nation’s capital.
- ADVERTISEMENT -

“What that means is that everything that comes out of his mouth will be considered not of any force or effect, anything he signs into law we won’t recognise as legitimate. We’ll be very much like the founding fathers. We’ll end up nullifying and resisting,” Mr Rhodes said.

Thousands of Trump supporters — including members of far-right groups such as the Proud Boys, the Boogaloo Boys, and the Oath Keepers, as well as ordinary American citizens — participated in the march, which was pervaded by a sense that the 2020 election was stolen from Mr Trump.

Looks like those FEMA camps are going to finally come in handy.

For quislings such as yourself?

 

[jc456]

You identify with violent idiots with guns who threaten people. My link was to point out what is going on right now, which DIRECTLY relates to your OP. You're a sick individual if you approve of these tactics which are incited by Dear Leader.

If democrats had shutdown the violent leftwing riots during the spring, summer and fall you would have the moral creds to complain about conservatives now

which you dont have

Who do you think sent the police in to beat the protestors. Were they acting unilaterally?

where?

NYC for instance. Dem Mayor

Louisville, Ky; Dem Mayor

Salt Lake City; Dem Mayor

etc.

nowhere were cops ever sent in, there's that. you have to prove where they sent the cops in to break up the protestors, shit dude, not even in Milwaukee did they do that. never a fact to back your shit up you loud mouth loser.

 

[Leo123]

Neither were "destroyed". In fact I was just down to NYC a month ago. Looked fine

"ASTORIA, NYC- I have an apartment in the waitress‘s district of Queens — a front row seat to a live lesson on how to destroy a city. What was once a vibrant, diverse neighborhood of unique, locally-owned shops and restaurants was turned into a gauntlet of vacant commercial cavities adorned with for rent signs. "

"Manhattan remains a ghost town — the wealthy residents split long ago and travel bans annihilated any semblance of tourism. "

How de Blasio And Cuomo Destroyed New York City

This was once a nice place to live.

www.vagabondjourney.com

Doesn't seem or look fine to me.

 

[Indeependent]

Your ad hominems are as weak as your occasional insistence that you are an Independent.

Show me where I said that I’m an independent. I’ll wait.

You never said it explicitly, you have said that there is good and bad on both sides.
I thought you had some common sense.

 

[dudmuck]

I notice that TrumpToids rarely post links to verifiable, reliable news sources.
For the record, I don't acknowledge Gateway Pundit, Breitbart, HotAir or Alex Jones, Rush Limpballs as legitimate.
Fox must be coming around because Trump can't bash them enough on Twitter.

Oh, and forget NewsMax and OANN...they are both heat-seeking missiles for Trump's ass.

you need me to provide you the 14th amendment? hahahaahahahahahahaha

14th was intended for racial justice, and Trump undermined it with his census policy.

 

[Indeependent]

NYC was destroyed and the Governor and Mayor told the police to stand down.
Chicago was destroyed and the Mayor told the police to stand down.

Neither were "destroyed". In fact I was just down to NYC a month ago. Looked fine

Yeah, after a few hundred million was spent repairing the damage.
Of course, many of the businesses will never reopen.