Soon Trump will face real courts

Once impeachment is over, the threat to Trump shifts to real courtrooms


As the Senate trial judging Donald Trumpā€™s second impeachment got underway on Tuesday, his lead defense attorney, Bruce Castor, offered an unexpected rationale for setting the impeachment aside.
ā€œThere is no opportunity where the president of the United States can run rampant in January at the end of his term and just go away scot-free,ā€ Castor said. ā€œThe Department of Justice does know what to do with such people.ā€

After all, if the president had committed crimes, ā€œafter heā€™s out of office, you go and arrest him,ā€ he said.
Reporting suggests that Trump, watching from Mar-a-Lago, wasnā€™t happy with Castorā€™s performance. Given his attorneyā€™s embrace of potentially having his client arrested, one can understand why.
Thatā€™s not likely to happen, mind you. While the D.C. attorney general did suggest shortly after the Capitol was overrun by a pro-Trump mob on Jan. 6 that Trump himself might be charged with a misdemeanor for inciting the violence, that remains unlikely. But the discussion of Trumpā€™s liability to criminal prosecution does serve as a reminder that this is very much still a non-theoretical threat the former president faces.
For example, we learned this week that investigators in Georgia were beginning the process of potentially bringing charges against Trump for another facet of his impeachment: his effort to get Georgiaā€™s secretary of state to ā€œfindā€ enough votes in the state to give Trump a victory there in the 2020 presidential contest. (Secretary Brad Raffensperger declined to do so.)
Itā€™s unlikely that this will result in charges, but itā€™s not a casual investigation. Speaking to MSNBCā€™s Rachel Maddow on Thursday, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis (D) explained that her officeā€™s probe extends beyond the recorded call with Raffensperger first obtained by The Washington Post last month. The investigation being led by Willis is also separate from a similar one initiated at the state level.
Trump faces similar multitiered investigations in other places as well.
For example, the fundraising and spending of his 2017 inaugural committee is reportedly under investigation from at least three entities.
ā€œIā€™m working with three different prosecutors, and itā€™s taken over my life,ā€ former Melania Trump aide Stephanie Wolkoff told ā€œGood Morning Americaā€ in August. That includes the Southern District of New York at the federal level and attorneys general in D.C. and New Jersey.
In 2019, a donor to the inaugural committee pleaded guilty to having attempted to obstruct the federal probe into the committeeā€™s finances. Last month, the D.C. attorney generalā€™s office alerted Donald Trump Jr. that it wanted to interview him on the subject.
Then there are the investigations into Trumpā€™s personal business. In his testimony before Congress in 2019, Trumpā€™s former personal attorney Michael Cohen suggested that the Trump Organization had been engaged in efforts to misstate the value of properties to reduce property tax obligations. That appears to have helped trigger more scrutiny for his former employer.
The office of New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) is engaged in a civil probe of the Trump Organizationā€™s finances. That effort had a recent court victory, with the stateā€™s Supreme Court ordering the Trump Organization to turn over tax documents. In New York City, the Manhattan district attorney is well into a criminal probe with the same focus. In December, the New York Times reported that this investigation had ā€œintensifiedā€ following the election, though it ā€œremains unclear whether the office of the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., will ultimately bring charges.ā€
One cloud hanging over Trump has cleared, however. Last week, the Associated Press reported that an investigation into campaign finance violations related to hush-money payments made before the 2016 election was ā€œdead.ā€ Cohen himself had pleaded guilty to violating federal law for his role in facilitating the payments to two women whoā€™d alleged extramarital relationships with the then-candidate. In doing so, he directly implicated Trump ā€” but a probe into the former president will likely not move forward.
Trumpā€™s exposure to legal risk is broader than these investigations. He is also the target of a defamation lawsuit from journalist E. Jean Carroll.
In 2019, Carroll came forward with an allegation that Trump had sexually assaulted her in the 1990s. Trump dismissed the allegation, saying that she was lying to sell books and that she was ā€œnot my type.ā€ Carroll sued in late 2019.
While he was president, Trump was shielded from criminal indictment and saw the Justice Department he ran intervene to try to derail the Carroll lawsuit. He no longer has those protections. Heā€™s not likely to face any criminal charges related to the events of Jan. 6, which are at the heart of the impeachment trial, but he may come to appreciate the relatively low stakes this trial involves.

I'll play along as long as you promise to star in a snuff film if President Trump is still playing golf and banging his supermodel wife 6 months from now. Think about it, you'll finally contribute something to society.... albeit a handful of soulless degenerates jacking off to your death.....

We good?
He's not banging Melania, that's the pool boy.

Joe Biden is trying to hump the family dog
And pervert trump wanted to hump anything wearing a skirt

YAWNā€¦ The above properly saw nothing wrong with Clinton If anything, he became a Hero !
the best president in your lifetime didn't need 130k to pay off some prostitute like the swine trump did
So? Still doesnā€™t explain why after Clinton was exposed ( no pun) he became even more popular
JFK had someone killed and he was still a popular President
Ted Kennedy let someone deliberately drown; didnā€™t hurt his reputation much
And repubs had JFK killed
Thread? Even if that was true, so what? He still went out a here after killing somebody
 
Here you go Eddie

Lots of links saying the same thing.
So they weren't divorced Whats the diff ? they were going that way Did he rape his wife like trump did??
Tell us who Trump raped
HIS first wife Don't you keep up ?? Trump
Here you go Eddie

Lots of links saying the same thing.
So they weren't divorced Whats the diff ? they were going that way Did he rape his wife like trump did??
Tell us who Trump raped
HIS first wife Don't you keep up ?? Trump is a SB
Thread, please . Of course there wonā€™t be any
is a SB
 
Here Israeli killer

Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia​

https://en.wikipedia.org ā€ŗ wiki ā€ŗ Donald_Trump_sexual...




Donald Trump, the former president of the United States, has been accused of rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment, including non-consensual kissing or ...
ā€ŽAccusations filed in court... Ā· ā€ŽThe New York Times May... Ā· ā€ŽPublic allegations since...



The 26 Women Who Have Accused Trump of Sexual Misconduct​

https://www.businessinsider.com ā€ŗ Politics ā€ŗ News




Sep 17, 2020 ā€” At least 26 women have accused President Donald Trump of sexual misconduct ... The president said these "false allegations" against him were made by ... first wife and the mother of his three eldest children Ivana Trump accused her ... she hadn't accused Trump of raping her "in a literal or criminal sense.
 
So, here's the question: How long will it take for you TDS folks to acknowledge that all of the accusations are bullshit, and will come to nothing? Mr./President Trump has had a huge target on his back for generations. Just STFU until something comes of at least one of these accusations.
 
Here you go Eddie

Lots of links saying the same thing.
So they weren't divorced Whats the diff ? they were going that way Did he rape his wife like trump did??
Trump didn't rape his wife.
She said he did.
 
Here you go Eddie

Lots of links saying the same thing.
So they weren't divorced Whats the diff ? they were going that way Did he rape his wife like trump did??
Trump didn't rape his wife.
She said he did.
Not in court she didn't. You lose.
 
Here you go Eddie

Lots of links saying the same thing.
So they weren't divorced Whats the diff ? they were going that way Did he rape his wife like trump did??
Trump didn't rape his wife.
She said he did.
Not in court she didn't. You lose.
She said it.
 
Here you go Eddie

Lots of links saying the same thing.
So they weren't divorced Whats the diff ? they were going that way Did he rape his wife like trump did??
Trump didn't rape his wife.
She said he did.
Not in court she didn't. You lose.
She said it.
Who cares? She did nothing about it. Are you this worried about finger raped Tara Reade?
 
Here you go Eddie

Lots of links saying the same thing.
So they weren't divorced Whats the diff ? they were going that way Did he rape his wife like trump did??
Trump didn't rape his wife.
She said he did.
Not in court she didn't. You lose.
She said it.
Who cares? She did nothing about it. Are you this worried about finger raped Tara Reade?
Didn't happen.

Your desperate deflections don't change facts.
 
Once impeachment is over, the threat to Trump shifts to real courtrooms


As the Senate trial judging Donald Trumpā€™s second impeachment got underway on Tuesday, his lead defense attorney, Bruce Castor, offered an unexpected rationale for setting the impeachment aside.
ā€œThere is no opportunity where the president of the United States can run rampant in January at the end of his term and just go away scot-free,ā€ Castor said. ā€œThe Department of Justice does know what to do with such people.ā€

After all, if the president had committed crimes, ā€œafter heā€™s out of office, you go and arrest him,ā€ he said.
Reporting suggests that Trump, watching from Mar-a-Lago, wasnā€™t happy with Castorā€™s performance. Given his attorneyā€™s embrace of potentially having his client arrested, one can understand why.
Thatā€™s not likely to happen, mind you. While the D.C. attorney general did suggest shortly after the Capitol was overrun by a pro-Trump mob on Jan. 6 that Trump himself might be charged with a misdemeanor for inciting the violence, that remains unlikely. But the discussion of Trumpā€™s liability to criminal prosecution does serve as a reminder that this is very much still a non-theoretical threat the former president faces.
For example, we learned this week that investigators in Georgia were beginning the process of potentially bringing charges against Trump for another facet of his impeachment: his effort to get Georgiaā€™s secretary of state to ā€œfindā€ enough votes in the state to give Trump a victory there in the 2020 presidential contest. (Secretary Brad Raffensperger declined to do so.)
Itā€™s unlikely that this will result in charges, but itā€™s not a casual investigation. Speaking to MSNBCā€™s Rachel Maddow on Thursday, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis (D) explained that her officeā€™s probe extends beyond the recorded call with Raffensperger first obtained by The Washington Post last month. The investigation being led by Willis is also separate from a similar one initiated at the state level.
Trump faces similar multitiered investigations in other places as well.
For example, the fundraising and spending of his 2017 inaugural committee is reportedly under investigation from at least three entities.
ā€œIā€™m working with three different prosecutors, and itā€™s taken over my life,ā€ former Melania Trump aide Stephanie Wolkoff told ā€œGood Morning Americaā€ in August. That includes the Southern District of New York at the federal level and attorneys general in D.C. and New Jersey.
In 2019, a donor to the inaugural committee pleaded guilty to having attempted to obstruct the federal probe into the committeeā€™s finances. Last month, the D.C. attorney generalā€™s office alerted Donald Trump Jr. that it wanted to interview him on the subject.
Then there are the investigations into Trumpā€™s personal business. In his testimony before Congress in 2019, Trumpā€™s former personal attorney Michael Cohen suggested that the Trump Organization had been engaged in efforts to misstate the value of properties to reduce property tax obligations. That appears to have helped trigger more scrutiny for his former employer.
The office of New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) is engaged in a civil probe of the Trump Organizationā€™s finances. That effort had a recent court victory, with the stateā€™s Supreme Court ordering the Trump Organization to turn over tax documents. In New York City, the Manhattan district attorney is well into a criminal probe with the same focus. In December, the New York Times reported that this investigation had ā€œintensifiedā€ following the election, though it ā€œremains unclear whether the office of the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., will ultimately bring charges.ā€
One cloud hanging over Trump has cleared, however. Last week, the Associated Press reported that an investigation into campaign finance violations related to hush-money payments made before the 2016 election was ā€œdead.ā€ Cohen himself had pleaded guilty to violating federal law for his role in facilitating the payments to two women whoā€™d alleged extramarital relationships with the then-candidate. In doing so, he directly implicated Trump ā€” but a probe into the former president will likely not move forward.
Trumpā€™s exposure to legal risk is broader than these investigations. He is also the target of a defamation lawsuit from journalist E. Jean Carroll.
In 2019, Carroll came forward with an allegation that Trump had sexually assaulted her in the 1990s. Trump dismissed the allegation, saying that she was lying to sell books and that she was ā€œnot my type.ā€ Carroll sued in late 2019.
While he was president, Trump was shielded from criminal indictment and saw the Justice Department he ran intervene to try to derail the Carroll lawsuit. He no longer has those protections. Heā€™s not likely to face any criminal charges related to the events of Jan. 6, which are at the heart of the impeachment trial, but he may come to appreciate the relatively low stakes this trial involves.

I'll play along as long as you promise to star in a snuff film if President Trump is still playing golf and banging his supermodel wife 6 months from now. Think about it, you'll finally contribute something to society.... albeit a handful of soulless degenerates jacking off to your death.....

We good?
He's not banging Melania, that's the pool boy.

Joe Biden is trying to hump the family dog
And pervert trump wanted to hump anything wearing a skirt

YAWNā€¦ The above properly saw nothing wrong with Clinton If anything, he became a Hero !
the best president in your lifetime didn't need 130k to pay off some prostitute like the swine trump did
So? Still doesnā€™t explain why after Clinton was exposed ( no pun) he became even more popular
JFK had someone killed and he was still a popular President
Ted Kennedy let someone deliberately drown; didnā€™t hurt his reputation much
And repubs had JFK killed
Really? So LBJ would become President?

Deeo State killed JFK
 
So, here's the question: How long will it take for you TDS folks to acknowledge that all of the accusations are bullshit, and will come to nothing? Mr./President Trump has had a huge target on his back for generations. Just STFU until something comes of at least one of these accusations.
You really need more ,,a court judgement to know what a slime bag Trump is ?? A history of slime follows him wherever he goes I don't need a court to know what he's all about
 
Here you go Eddie

Lots of links saying the same thing.
So they weren't divorced Whats the diff ? they were going that way Did he rape his wife like trump did??
Trump didn't rape his wife.
She said he did.
Not in court she didn't. You lose.
You mean if the glove don't fit you must acquit??? BS He was guilty and so is this grifting scum trump
 
What I mean is, when some is constantly accused for DECADES and nothing ever comes of it other than the occasional payoff to get someone to go back into their hole, then somebody had better produce some EVIDENCE OF WRONGDOING before they can be considered anything other than an attention-seeking [vulgar word for vagina].
 
What I mean is, when some is constantly accused for DECADES and nothing ever comes of it other than the occasional payoff to get someone to go back into their hole, then somebody had better produce some EVIDENCE OF WRONGDOING before they can be considered anything other than an attention-seeking [vulgar word for vagina].
MONEY TALKS
 

Forum List

Back
Top