Speaking of the Popular Vote...

[blackhawk]

I guess thats why the Democrats will control the Senate starting next year........... Oh wait they won't.

 

[paperview]

NYCabinQueer flunked basic civics (and has alot of butt-hurt company). They do not know the difference between a representative Republic and a direct Democracy. Obla dee, oblah dah, our political system goes on..........

The OP was specifically about the Senate race.

Tell us genius, are Senators elected by direct democratic vote?

Think on this.

Hard.

I am not responsible for the hallucinations that you are currently having over what you thought I said or what you thought I might have inferred. Get help quick!, if you can afford it.

Trouble answering the question? Are Senators elected by direct democratic vote?

 

[paperview]

We go by state when it comes to state senator elections. Derp.

Popular vote elections. And no, the right wing pipedream cake of abolishing the 17th amendment is not going to happy, Gomer.

And neither is the EC, DERP! (whatever a Derp is, I capitalized it, so I guess I out DERPed him, lol) But, we almost have enough states by ourselves to call, and control, an article 5, DERP! (out derped him again, hehehehe) When that happens, you will need a diaper, in fact a double diaper, because you will be crapping all over yourself, 5 times a day-)

We're not talking about the EC, nitwit.

We are talking about the popular *pure democratic* vote for senator.
Of which you stupidly said of the OP:


"lol Is he NOW trying to suggest that senators be elected by popular vote?"

Go hang your head in shame.

What is the problem SNOWFLAKE, you butt hurt-) Go melt, you have no power for 2 years at the least, so go spit into the wind. Come back and be threatening when you get some power back. Right now, you and your far leftist friends, can't do a thing, cya, wouldn't want to be ya-)

Ah, Ok. You were shown to have a vapid argument, so Ah Hom is your route.

I don't give a shit if this is your punt, but you sure as hell don't understand facts and history, and I intent to highlight your idiocy when you say stupid things like this:

"lol Is he NOW trying to suggest that senators be elected by popular vote?"

Another MISDIRECTIONIST, trying to take something out of context, so they don't have to answer to the real problem.

What is the real deal/problem?

They are screwed for 2 years at the least, the OP also MISDIRECTED by NOT telling you that Texas did NOT have a senate race, nor that 2 DEMOCRATS ran for Senate in California.......meaning EVERY vote cast there was for a Democrat, lol.

Now, what do you as a person wanting to be informed think is more important-------->

1. That I was taken out of context, and that what I ADMIT I meant was is that the OP is now suggesting that the popular vote ACROSS THE COUNTRY elect senators........or

''''''''''''rather.........

that your OP author, and his obvious friend "toiletpaper," keep attempting to try and NOT let you know that every vote cast for senator in California this election was a vote for a DEMOCRAT, and that there was not a senate race in Texas, which means no votes for a Republican was cast there!

I will ADMIT that I misposted, if they admit that all senate votes in California in 2016 were for Democrats, and that not 1 vote for senate was posted for a republican in 2016 in Texas-)

Now ya see, who is trying to mislead you? Me, or these far leftists-)

You sound drunk.

 

[Papageorgio]

Who wants to guess what the national total was for the Senate races in 2016.

Bzzzt...time's up!

The Democrats won by 11 million votes. Yes, the party that the nutcases around here would have you believe is disappearing, swamped the GOP.

United States Senate elections, 2016 - Wikipedia

Considering the Democrats told us they would gain control of the Senate after this election, this is great news.

 

[AntonToo]

Anomalies in our election process won't save conservatism.

No...Trump will save conservatism!

 

[paperview]

BTW, after today, no one is credibly speaking of the popular vote, except sore butt-hurt liberal lyin' losers...........

Is your reading comprehension so poor you don't recognize the discussion is about the senate vote?

Which is a pure democratic vote.

Go see a shrink (even tho' you'll pay out of pocket cause your Obamacare won't....).

brilliant rebuttal!

 

[imawhosure]

And neither is the EC, DERP! (whatever a Derp is, I capitalized it, so I guess I out DERPed him, lol) But, we almost have enough states by ourselves to call, and control, an article 5, DERP! (out derped him again, hehehehe) When that happens, you will need a diaper, in fact a double diaper, because you will be crapping all over yourself, 5 times a day-)

We're not talking about the EC, nitwit.

We are talking about the popular *pure democratic* vote for senator.
Of which you stupidly said of the OP:


"lol Is he NOW trying to suggest that senators be elected by popular vote?"

Go hang your head in shame.

What is the problem SNOWFLAKE, you butt hurt-) Go melt, you have no power for 2 years at the least, so go spit into the wind. Come back and be threatening when you get some power back. Right now, you and your far leftist friends, can't do a thing, cya, wouldn't want to be ya-)

Ah, Ok. You were shown to have a vapid argument, so Ah Hom is your route.

I don't give a shit if this is your punt, but you sure as hell don't understand facts and history, and I intent to highlight your idiocy when you say stupid things like this:

"lol Is he NOW trying to suggest that senators be elected by popular vote?"

Another MISDIRECTIONIST, trying to take something out of context, so they don't have to answer to the real problem.

What is the real deal/problem?

They are screwed for 2 years at the least, the OP also MISDIRECTED by NOT telling you that Texas did NOT have a senate race, nor that 2 DEMOCRATS ran for Senate in California.......meaning EVERY vote cast there was for a Democrat, lol.

Now, what do you as a person wanting to be informed think is more important-------->

1. That I was taken out of context, and that what I ADMIT I meant was is that the OP is now suggesting that the popular vote ACROSS THE COUNTRY elect senators........or

''''''''''''rather.........

that your OP author, and his obvious friend "toiletpaper," keep attempting to try and NOT let you know that every vote cast for senator in California this election was a vote for a DEMOCRAT, and that there was not a senate race in Texas, which means no votes for a Republican was cast there!

I will ADMIT that I misposted, if they admit that all senate votes in California in 2016 were for Democrats, and that not 1 vote for senate was posted for a republican in 2016 in Texas-)

Now ya see, who is trying to mislead you? Me, or these far leftists-)

You sound drunk.

Another far leftist proven to be a propagandist, still not wanting to discuss the subject of the thread. It is OK, we know you lost the debate, so you and the OP author can go find another far leftist talking point to start a thread about, and we conservatives will make you look silly, and inept again-)