Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We're not talking about the EC, nitwit.Was slavery preserved by the Constitution for good reason?
I'm not surprised a 'neck like you believes that.
11 million that seems way to high, thankfully due to the Electoral College California and NY aren't the only ones in the country who choose the President.
We can swear Hillary in as the loser if that would make you feel better.
Folks, that cements it! Carebear is NOT an illiterate out of the public schools, he is a DNC astro turfer, paid DNC poster.
How do we know this?
He proclaims how many more votes the left got for the senate, lol Is he NOW trying to suggest that senators be elected by popular vote? That is correct folks, the next senator from Alabama should be elected by those 6 or 7 million illegals in California. Typical lefty.
But more than that, he neglects to tell you something.......didn't you, you sneaky little Carebear of the DNC, lol..........what he forget to mention was, not every state had a senator up for re-election....and wouldn't you know that the State of Texas happened not to have one. Oh yes, it is true!
I would like ALL of you to check this out if you doubt me----------->every Republican senator that won re-election got more votes than Trump did in their state. Oh yes they did, true statement! So isn't it amazing the differential that Carebear just told you in the OP! Is he lying? No, unless you believe omission of some relevant facts are deceptive, but being a dnc paid astro turfing operative, he knows that Texas had no senate race, along with how big the California landslide was. Did the republicans even run a candidate?
Oh wait......you sneaky little Carebear you little WHINY the POOH you-) Is not the law in California that the two highest vote getters in the primaries face off against each other for the senate, regardless of party affiliation? Umm, exactly WHAT PARTY were the two senators from that faced off in California?
OMG, WHINY THE POOH, AKA Carebear; did I just screw up your whole thread. Sorry their Mr Pooh-Pooh, I am just trying to heeeeeeelp you, and Jakey the snakey, and the rest of your clan of losers-) Never fear, I will keep injecting reality into your liberal la-la land, hehehehehehehehe.
"lol Is he NOW trying to suggest that senators be elected by popular vote?"
WTF?
Senators are elected by popular vote.
As are congressfolks, as are governors as are state senators, etc. etc...
Are you dense?
I meant the popular vote across the country, not in the state, but you knew that.
But then, did you know the Senators were NOT supposed to be elected by popular vote? Yep, that is true. It needs to be changed back, but that will go the way of the do-do bird, just like far leftists wanting to do away with the EC.
We go by state when it comes to state senator elections. Derp.
Popular vote elections. And no, the right wing pipedream cake of abolishing the 17th amendment is not going to happy, Gomer.
And neither is the EC, DERP! (whatever a Derp is, I capitalized it, so I guess I out DERPed him, lol) But, we almost have enough states by ourselves to call, and control, an article 5, DERP! (out derped him again, hehehehe) When that happens, you will need a diaper, in fact a double diaper, because you will be crapping all over yourself, 5 times a day-)
Did R's overall gain final seats -- or lose them?Democrats couldn't even win back fucking Senate seats in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin during a presidential election season, moron.So when are getting sworn into office?
The Democrats gained seats in the Senate. Jesus Christ pay attention.
14 Republicans were up for re-election and 12 of them were re-elected, you failed.
Need the final number count? It's in the OP link.
That is NOT the question, or Mr Misdirection, the real question is-------------->who gained more power, the Dems, or the Repubs, lololol!
YOU are on the outside looking in EVERYWHERE in the federal government, and in MOST state governments.
Last election, you could veto anything, now you can not STOP ANYTHING. Good luck, and enjoy the next 1 or 2 Scalias also on the Supreme Court. Couldn't happen to nicer bunch of leftists-)
the dems gained 2 seats, the repubderps still have control... but not enough to break a senate filibuster ...
.
Did R's overall gain final seats -- or lose them?Democrats couldn't even win back fucking Senate seats in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin during a presidential election season, moron.The Democrats gained seats in the Senate. Jesus Christ pay attention.
14 Republicans were up for re-election and 12 of them were re-elected, you failed.
Need the final number count? It's in the OP link.
That is NOT the question, or Mr Misdirection, the real question is-------------->who gained more power, the Dems, or the Repubs, lololol!
YOU are on the outside looking in EVERYWHERE in the federal government, and in MOST state governments.
Last election, you could veto anything, now you can not STOP ANYTHING. Good luck, and enjoy the next 1 or 2 Scalias also on the Supreme Court. Couldn't happen to nicer bunch of leftists-)
the dems gained 2 seats, the repubderps still have control... but not enough to break a senate filibuster ...
They need 8 Democrats to break a filibuster. Who might they be?
Did R's overall gain final seats -- or lose them?Democrats couldn't even win back fucking Senate seats in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin during a presidential election season, moron.The Democrats gained seats in the Senate. Jesus Christ pay attention.
14 Republicans were up for re-election and 12 of them were re-elected, you failed.
Need the final number count? It's in the OP link.
That is NOT the question, or Mr Misdirection, the real question is-------------->who gained more power, the Dems, or the Repubs, lololol!
YOU are on the outside looking in EVERYWHERE in the federal government, and in MOST state governments.
Last election, you could veto anything, now you can not STOP ANYTHING. Good luck, and enjoy the next 1 or 2 Scalias also on the Supreme Court. Couldn't happen to nicer bunch of leftists-)
the dems gained 2 seats, the repubderps still have control... but not enough to break a senate filibuster ...
They need 8 Democrats to break a filibuster. Who might they be?
Is your reading comprehension so poor you don't recognize the discussion is about the senate vote?BTW, after today, no one is credibly speaking of the popular vote, except sore butt-hurt liberal lyin' losers..........
Did R's overall gain final seats -- or lose them?Democrats couldn't even win back fucking Senate seats in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin during a presidential election season, moron.So when are getting sworn into office?
The Democrats gained seats in the Senate. Jesus Christ pay attention.
14 Republicans were up for re-election and 12 of them were re-elected, you failed.
Need the final number count? It's in the OP link.
That is NOT the question, or Mr Misdirection, the real question is-------------->who gained more power, the Dems, or the Repubs, lololol!
YOU are on the outside looking in EVERYWHERE in the federal government, and in MOST state governments.
Last election, you could veto anything, now you can not STOP ANYTHING. Good luck, and enjoy the next 1 or 2 Scalias also on the Supreme Court. Couldn't happen to nicer bunch of leftists-)
the dems gained 2 seats, the repubderps still have control... but not enough to break a senate filibuster ...
Until 2018.....Did R's overall gain final seats -- or lose them?Democrats couldn't even win back fucking Senate seats in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin during a presidential election season, moron.The Democrats gained seats in the Senate. Jesus Christ pay attention.
14 Republicans were up for re-election and 12 of them were re-elected, you failed.
Need the final number count? It's in the OP link.
That is NOT the question, or Mr Misdirection, the real question is-------------->who gained more power, the Dems, or the Repubs, lololol!
YOU are on the outside looking in EVERYWHERE in the federal government, and in MOST state governments.
Last election, you could veto anything, now you can not STOP ANYTHING. Good luck, and enjoy the next 1 or 2 Scalias also on the Supreme Court. Couldn't happen to nicer bunch of leftists-)
the dems gained 2 seats, the repubderps still have control... but not enough to break a senate filibuster ...
Is your reading comprehension so poor you don't recognize the discussion is about the senate vote?BTW, after today, no one is credibly speaking of the popular vote, except sore butt-hurt liberal lyin' losers..........
Which is a pure democratic vote.
Did R's overall gain final seats -- or lose them?Democrats couldn't even win back fucking Senate seats in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin during a presidential election season, moron.The Democrats gained seats in the Senate. Jesus Christ pay attention.
14 Republicans were up for re-election and 12 of them were re-elected, you failed.
Need the final number count? It's in the OP link.
That is NOT the question, or Mr Misdirection, the real question is-------------->who gained more power, the Dems, or the Repubs, lololol!
YOU are on the outside looking in EVERYWHERE in the federal government, and in MOST state governments.
Last election, you could veto anything, now you can not STOP ANYTHING. Good luck, and enjoy the next 1 or 2 Scalias also on the Supreme Court. Couldn't happen to nicer bunch of leftists-)
the dems gained 2 seats, the repubderps still have control... but not enough to break a senate filibuster ...
Until 2018.....Did R's overall gain final seats -- or lose them?Democrats couldn't even win back fucking Senate seats in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin during a presidential election season, moron.
14 Republicans were up for re-election and 12 of them were re-elected, you failed.
Need the final number count? It's in the OP link.
That is NOT the question, or Mr Misdirection, the real question is-------------->who gained more power, the Dems, or the Repubs, lololol!
YOU are on the outside looking in EVERYWHERE in the federal government, and in MOST state governments.
Last election, you could veto anything, now you can not STOP ANYTHING. Good luck, and enjoy the next 1 or 2 Scalias also on the Supreme Court. Couldn't happen to nicer bunch of leftists-)
the dems gained 2 seats, the repubderps still have control... but not enough to break a senate filibuster ...
Don't believe him PTBW, he is again, using a misdirection. Did the Democrats have a filibuster proof majority when they put in Obamacare?
Of course not! Harry (the far leftist) Reid, got with her heind-end Nancy, plastic surgery Pelosi, and concocted a way to go around regular rules. They were warned that it could come back to bite them, so after they pulled that one off, they decided to use EOs to implement most of the rest of their agenda.
What they never thought was possible has happened, the roles are now reversed, and THEY have set the rules on how to over ride. The difference is-------->after seeing how EASY it is to over ride EOs, the Repubs will pass laws, meaning if the Democrats don't control all 3 branches, they are screwed.
Why?
Because this time they WILL get an activist Supreme Court, but it will be installed by the Repubs. Without 3 branches, the Dems will be tied up for years, which is why immigration is sooooo important. By the time the Democrats break that log jam......if ever.....those here will be assimilated into American culture, and laugh at the far leftists, just like we do-)
(man, that has to gall them.......and how do I know it is true? Because I am 2nd generation Hispanic, and all of us laugh at them, along with most all the 2nd generation Hispanics we know. We are hard working capitalists, and want to keep our money too, lol)
We're not talking about the EC, nitwit.Folks, that cements it! Carebear is NOT an illiterate out of the public schools, he is a DNC astro turfer, paid DNC poster.
How do we know this?
He proclaims how many more votes the left got for the senate, lol Is he NOW trying to suggest that senators be elected by popular vote? That is correct folks, the next senator from Alabama should be elected by those 6 or 7 million illegals in California. Typical lefty.
But more than that, he neglects to tell you something.......didn't you, you sneaky little Carebear of the DNC, lol..........what he forget to mention was, not every state had a senator up for re-election....and wouldn't you know that the State of Texas happened not to have one. Oh yes, it is true!
I would like ALL of you to check this out if you doubt me----------->every Republican senator that won re-election got more votes than Trump did in their state. Oh yes they did, true statement! So isn't it amazing the differential that Carebear just told you in the OP! Is he lying? No, unless you believe omission of some relevant facts are deceptive, but being a dnc paid astro turfing operative, he knows that Texas had no senate race, along with how big the California landslide was. Did the republicans even run a candidate?
Oh wait......you sneaky little Carebear you little WHINY the POOH you-) Is not the law in California that the two highest vote getters in the primaries face off against each other for the senate, regardless of party affiliation? Umm, exactly WHAT PARTY were the two senators from that faced off in California?
OMG, WHINY THE POOH, AKA Carebear; did I just screw up your whole thread. Sorry their Mr Pooh-Pooh, I am just trying to heeeeeeelp you, and Jakey the snakey, and the rest of your clan of losers-) Never fear, I will keep injecting reality into your liberal la-la land, hehehehehehehehe.
"lol Is he NOW trying to suggest that senators be elected by popular vote?"
WTF?
Senators are elected by popular vote.
As are congressfolks, as are governors as are state senators, etc. etc...
Are you dense?
I meant the popular vote across the country, not in the state, but you knew that.
But then, did you know the Senators were NOT supposed to be elected by popular vote? Yep, that is true. It needs to be changed back, but that will go the way of the do-do bird, just like far leftists wanting to do away with the EC.
We go by state when it comes to state senator elections. Derp.
Popular vote elections. And no, the right wing pipedream cake of abolishing the 17th amendment is not going to happy, Gomer.
And neither is the EC, DERP! (whatever a Derp is, I capitalized it, so I guess I out DERPed him, lol) But, we almost have enough states by ourselves to call, and control, an article 5, DERP! (out derped him again, hehehehe) When that happens, you will need a diaper, in fact a double diaper, because you will be crapping all over yourself, 5 times a day-)
We are talking about the popular *pure democratic* vote for senator.
Of which you stupidly said of the OP:
"lol Is he NOW trying to suggest that senators be elected by popular vote?"
Go hang your head in shame.
Who wants to guess what the national total was for the Senate races in 2016.
Bzzzt...time's up!
The Democrats won by 11 million votes. Yes, the party that the nutcases around here would have you believe is disappearing, swamped the GOP.
United States Senate elections, 2016 - Wikipedia
The Democrats won by 11 million votes.
How many Senate votes did the Republicans get in California?
the party that the nutcases around here would have you believe is disappearing, swamped the GOP.
Of course, they swamped the GOP and gained.......2 seats.
While the GOP gained 2 governorships.
We get it. Votes don't matter to you people.
lol.
Yes, we don't need crazy Cali and nutcase New York determining the president of United States...11 million that seems way to high, thankfully due to the Electoral College California and NY aren't the only ones in the country who choose the President.
We're not talking about the EC, nitwit."lol Is he NOW trying to suggest that senators be elected by popular vote?"
WTF?
Senators are elected by popular vote.
As are congressfolks, as are governors as are state senators, etc. etc...
Are you dense?
I meant the popular vote across the country, not in the state, but you knew that.
But then, did you know the Senators were NOT supposed to be elected by popular vote? Yep, that is true. It needs to be changed back, but that will go the way of the do-do bird, just like far leftists wanting to do away with the EC.
We go by state when it comes to state senator elections. Derp.
Popular vote elections. And no, the right wing pipedream cake of abolishing the 17th amendment is not going to happy, Gomer.
And neither is the EC, DERP! (whatever a Derp is, I capitalized it, so I guess I out DERPed him, lol) But, we almost have enough states by ourselves to call, and control, an article 5, DERP! (out derped him again, hehehehe) When that happens, you will need a diaper, in fact a double diaper, because you will be crapping all over yourself, 5 times a day-)
We are talking about the popular *pure democratic* vote for senator.
Of which you stupidly said of the OP:
"lol Is he NOW trying to suggest that senators be elected by popular vote?"
Go hang your head in shame.
What is the problem SNOWFLAKE, you butt hurt-) Go melt, you have no power for 2 years at the least, so go spit into the wind. Come back and be threatening when you get some power back. Right now, you and your far leftist friends, can't do a thing, cya, wouldn't want to be ya-)
The OP was specifically about the Senate race.NYCabinQueer flunked basic civics (and has alot of butt-hurt company). They do not know the difference between a representative Republic and a direct Democracy. Obla dee, oblah dah, our political system goes on..........
The OP was specifically about the Senate race.NYCabinQueer flunked basic civics (and has alot of butt-hurt company). They do not know the difference between a representative Republic and a direct Democracy. Obla dee, oblah dah, our political system goes on..........
Tell us genius, are Senators elected by direct democratic vote?
Think on this.
Hard.
The OP was specifically about the Senate race.NYCabinQueer flunked basic civics (and has alot of butt-hurt company). They do not know the difference between a representative Republic and a direct Democracy. Obla dee, oblah dah, our political system goes on..........
Tell us genius, are Senators elected by direct democratic vote?
Think on this.
Hard.
We're not talking about the EC, nitwit.I meant the popular vote across the country, not in the state, but you knew that.
But then, did you know the Senators were NOT supposed to be elected by popular vote? Yep, that is true. It needs to be changed back, but that will go the way of the do-do bird, just like far leftists wanting to do away with the EC.
We go by state when it comes to state senator elections. Derp.
Popular vote elections. And no, the right wing pipedream cake of abolishing the 17th amendment is not going to happy, Gomer.
And neither is the EC, DERP! (whatever a Derp is, I capitalized it, so I guess I out DERPed him, lol) But, we almost have enough states by ourselves to call, and control, an article 5, DERP! (out derped him again, hehehehe) When that happens, you will need a diaper, in fact a double diaper, because you will be crapping all over yourself, 5 times a day-)
We are talking about the popular *pure democratic* vote for senator.
Of which you stupidly said of the OP:
"lol Is he NOW trying to suggest that senators be elected by popular vote?"
Go hang your head in shame.
What is the problem SNOWFLAKE, you butt hurt-) Go melt, you have no power for 2 years at the least, so go spit into the wind. Come back and be threatening when you get some power back. Right now, you and your far leftist friends, can't do a thing, cya, wouldn't want to be ya-)
Ah, Ok. You were shown to have a vapid argument, so Ah Hom is your route.
I don't give a shit if this is your punt, but you sure as hell don't understand facts and history, and I intent to highlight your idiocy when you say stupid things like this:
"lol Is he NOW trying to suggest that senators be elected by popular vote?"
