🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Sponsors are dropping rush.

Wow, great argument and the source, so informed, so unbiased, so ... Randian(?). Good grief man, you need to expand your information base and delete most of those which reinforce your opinions. You believe what you believe and that's fine, but such beliefs (my opinion) NEED to be challenged and it is good for you to critically examine what you believe.

The way Little Rebecca uses Google is like this.......

She googles whatever she's arguing about at the time, looks for sites that will prove her assertations (whether factual or not), and posts the "link".

It's called willfull ignorance.
 
Last edited:
Wow, great argument and the source, so informed, so unbiased, so ... Randian(?). Good grief man, you need to expand your information base and delete most of those which reinforce your opinions. You believe what you believe and that's fine, but such beliefs (my opinion) NEED to be challenged and it is good for you to critically examine what you believe.

The way Little Rebecca uses Google is like this.......

She googles whatever she's arguing about at the time, looks for sites that will prove her assertations (whether factual or not), and posts the "link".

It's called willull ignorance.

What is willull?
 
Thats what the number 1 progressive talk show host Thom Hartmann said. After all he is one of your's Almost as famous as Rush Limbaugh.
IF he said it, he was wrong.

Do you still claim that it's only 12?

If you disagree with him that means he was right .
I am glad that you have finally realized that Liberal talk show hosts are correct, even when they are not.

How long have you been listening to Hartmann?
 
The way Little Rebecca uses Google is like this.......

She googles whatever she's arguing about at the time, looks for sites that will prove her assertations (whether factual or not), and posts the "link".

It's called willull ignorance.

What is willull?

What does it mean to you? Maybe it is a secret coded message to the muslim underground terrorists that support Obama and seek out red neck fuckwits to do them harm.
 
IF he said it, he was wrong.

Do you still claim that it's only 12?

If you disagree with him that means he was right .
I am glad that you have finally realized that Liberal talk show hosts are correct, even when they are not.

How long have you been listening to Hartmann?
In other words you have no answer but just need to get your frustrations out because Rush scares you to death and theirs nothing you can do to protect the defeat of obama in 2012 because of the fucked up obama economy? Is that it?
 
Rush started out with over 18,000 advertisers, including local advertisers. Some advertisers chose not to take advange of his sizeable audience and left. They have been replaced. What's the net loss of advertisers? Most likely none.
 
Sponsors are dropping rush

Up to 98 so far and still counting.

You people are still on this non-story?
Get this straight..It doesn't matter.
In fact, some of those which boilted are asking to come back. All have been denied.
Limbaugh's show is not (much to your chagrin) going off the air. Deal with it.
 
This memo from Premiere Networks states that the number of advertisers no longer sponsoring Rush is now 350. Many are also pulling their spots from Hannity and Levin. I guess they finally figured out that women are consumers as well.

Your illusion of the RNC being Anti Woman, is growing tiresome. It's only a matter of time before it turns on you, and bites you in the Ass. Looking forward to the display. I guess, for people like you, at least in your mind, having a corrupted message, is better than having no message. Keep thinking Kool-Aid, it's what you are good at.
 
This memo from Premiere Networks states that the number of advertisers no longer sponsoring Rush is now 350. Many are also pulling their spots from Hannity and Levin. I guess they finally figured out that women are consumers as well.

Your illusion of the RNC being Anti Woman, is growing tiresome. It's only a matter of time before it turns on you, and bites you in the Ass. Looking forward to the display. I guess, for people like you, at least in your mind, having a corrupted message, is better than having no message. Keep thinking Kool-Aid, it's what you are good at.

Where in that post did I mention the RNC? Many Republican women, including several US Senators, spoke out on Rush's outrageous statements. But since you brought it up, some Republican women, like Senator Murkowski, took a lot of heat for supporting the anti-woman, Blunt amendment, and came out saying they made a mistake.

Believe it or not, many Republicans practice contraception.
 
This memo from Premiere Networks states that the number of advertisers no longer sponsoring Rush is now 350. Many are also pulling their spots from Hannity and Levin. I guess they finally figured out that women are consumers as well.

Your illusion of the RNC being Anti Woman, is growing tiresome. It's only a matter of time before it turns on you, and bites you in the Ass. Looking forward to the display. I guess, for people like you, at least in your mind, having a corrupted message, is better than having no message. Keep thinking Kool-Aid, it's what you are good at.

Where in that post did I mention the RNC? Many Republican women, including several US Senators, spoke out on Rush's outrageous statements. But since you brought it up, some Republican women, like Senator Murkowski, took a lot of heat for supporting the anti-woman, Blunt amendment, and came out saying they made a mistake.

Believe it or not, many Republicans practice contraception.

Yes, but they don't expect others to pay for it.
You people have twisted this issue into something it's not.
The issue is not the availability of contraception devices, it is whether or not the user should pay for them or not.
Your side believes "the pill" and abortion should be someone else's responsibility.
We object based on the premise that the need for these things is the result of "choice".
 
We object based on the premise that the need for these things is the result of "choice".

So's Viagra. You, and your side, doesn't seem to get the fact that the "choice" is of the woman who owns the body, not by a bunch of middle-aged, white males, who want to ignore the prohibition of the first amendment regarding creation of laws recognizing any establishment, so they may create their own form of an American theocracy.

You do realize, btw, that there's many off-label uses for female contraception, including reduction of the hassle of menopause? Probably not.
 

Forum List

Back
Top