He is all talk. His actions aka voting supports antisemitism.I don't think that this is a particularly useful attack on someone who seems to be tireless in efforts to publicize what israel accomplishes and how Israel and Jews are being victimized. Trying to tie a person's political identification with an attitude when that person's attitude doesn't seem to correlate with the assumed acts of the group is not helpful.
The American partisan political system was based in different approaches to the size, breadth and role of government. That there is some extension which certain parts of the party indulge in, connecting their political identity with their views on other issues might be interesting to read but it isn't then foundational to the definitions of the political parties.
I can be a democrat because of my view of domestic policies and still be an ardent Zionist. Claiming that there is a necessary and inevitable schism between those two aspects of identity is flawed.
That’s my opinion. Is this not an opinion forum?