Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Didn't those action result from some "injury"?The courts will decide that it has been done before Jimmy Carter with Iran during the 79 hostage crisis and Obama in with Iraq in 2011 I believe with ISIS running wild there.His changing immigration law with an executive order struck down by the courts.for example?And after eight years of it you left wingers suddenly have an issue with it. I don't care for governing by executive order not now with Trump nor when Obama did it we have a government with checks and balances for a reason there is hypocrisy on the right over this but those on the left who had nothing to say when Obama decided to govern with just his phone and pen have no room to talk about hypocrisy.
I see; and, the national socialist right wing, complained about this:
There is little doubt that the Executive adopted the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (“DAPA”) program as part of an explicit effort to circumvent the legislative process.
But is ok with conflicts of interest regarding "terrorist" States.
Mr. Trump's actions seem, "proactive" with no actual, "injury" to the People.
Is our current President, merely "making good on his pander".
No i am not; why don't You have a valid rebuttal instead of begging the question.Didn't those action result from some "injury"?The courts will decide that it has been done before Jimmy Carter with Iran during the 79 hostage crisis and Obama in with Iraq in 2011 I believe with ISIS running wild there.His changing immigration law with an executive order struck down by the courts.for example?
I see; and, the national socialist right wing, complained about this:
There is little doubt that the Executive adopted the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (“DAPA”) program as part of an explicit effort to circumvent the legislative process.
But is ok with conflicts of interest regarding "terrorist" States.
Mr. Trump's actions seem, "proactive" with no actual, "injury" to the People.
Is our current President, merely "making good on his pander".
"no actual injsry to people? You are kidding.
I can understand why he did it with all those terrorist acts by Syrian refuge......wait....there have been none? But this is a good chance for Bannon to use his Orange Puppet to install some racist doctrines...
the difference is liberal socialism versus national socialism.Suddenly Libs have problem with executive overreach? This has already probably been posted as its the easiest rebuttal in the history of rebuttals. Same thing was said about Bush and so on all the way since who knows when. Opposite of those you support is bad.
There was no overreach in Trumps EO...completely legal and 100% within the powers of the office.
But tomorrow Dems will be hunky dory with blocking a presidents Supreme Court appointment indefinitely.
Yes, and I hope they can block it for four years, since the person making the appointment is a Russian loving, pus*y grabbing, idiot.
Yep. They do things they complained about when done against them. They do things like this and say, like children, "well THEY did it FIRST".Frigin Hypocrites....
Just like Democrats.
Right?
.
Remember that when the Dems are in control...
the difference is liberal socialism versus national socialism.Suddenly Libs have problem with executive overreach? This has already probably been posted as its the easiest rebuttal in the history of rebuttals. Same thing was said about Bush and so on all the way since who knows when. Opposite of those you support is bad.
nope; just right wing special pleading, like usual.And Obama was struck down by the federal and supreme court on the Executive orders that were not constitutional, the EO's that were, stood.And after eight years of it you left wingers suddenly have an issue with it. I don't care for governing by executive order not now with Trump nor when Obama did it we have a government with checks and balances for a reason there is hypocrisy on the right over this but those on the left who had nothing to say when Obama decided to govern with just his phone and pen have no room to talk about hypocrisy.
Trump needs to be sued, just like Republicans sued Obama's E/O's.
Good luck with that since Obama used the exact same law.
Didn't those action result from some "injury"?The courts will decide that it has been done before Jimmy Carter with Iran during the 79 hostage crisis and Obama in with Iraq in 2011 I believe with ISIS running wild there.His changing immigration law with an executive order struck down by the courts.for example?
I see; and, the national socialist right wing, complained about this:
There is little doubt that the Executive adopted the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (“DAPA”) program as part of an explicit effort to circumvent the legislative process.
But is ok with conflicts of interest regarding "terrorist" States.
Mr. Trump's actions seem, "proactive" with no actual, "injury" to the People.
Is our current President, merely "making good on his pander".
"no actual injsry to people? You are kidding.
I can understand why he did it with all those terrorist acts by Syrian refuge......wait....there have been none? But this is a good chance for Bannon to use his Orange Puppet to install some racist doctrines...
and suddenly, libs have a problem with it. frigin hypocrites
at the rate the right is going? should the left be happy if Mr. Trump "loses" all of the "goodwill" toward the right.Yep. They do things they complained about when done against them. They do things like this and say, like children, "well THEY did it FIRST".Frigin Hypocrites....
Just like Democrats.
Right?
.
Remember that when the Dems are in control...
At the rate they are going, there may never be another Democrat in control of anything outside of NY or California.
liberal socialism is about promoting the general welfare; national socialism is about promoting the general warfare. does that simplify it for you.the difference is liberal socialism versus national socialism.Suddenly Libs have problem with executive overreach? This has already probably been posted as its the easiest rebuttal in the history of rebuttals. Same thing was said about Bush and so on all the way since who knows when. Opposite of those you support is bad.
You can't define either one, so why bother listening to your claptrap?
i love how the fantastical right wing has nothing but fallacy instead of Any form of valid arguments.nope; just right wing special pleading, like usual.And Obama was struck down by the federal and supreme court on the Executive orders that were not constitutional, the EO's that were, stood.And after eight years of it you left wingers suddenly have an issue with it. I don't care for governing by executive order not now with Trump nor when Obama did it we have a government with checks and balances for a reason there is hypocrisy on the right over this but those on the left who had nothing to say when Obama decided to govern with just his phone and pen have no room to talk about hypocrisy.
Trump needs to be sued, just like Republicans sued Obama's E/O's.
Good luck with that since Obama used the exact same law.
The only pleading is from the left wing crybabies.
I love how you keep throwing out terms you have read but have no concept as to their meaning. It is like you threw up a law book.
And after eight years of it you left wingers suddenly have an issue with it. I don't care for governing by executive order not now with Trump nor when Obama did it we have a government with checks and balances for a reason there is hypocrisy on the right over this but those on the left who had nothing to say when Obama decided to govern with just his phone and pen have no room to talk about hypocrisy.
So now when your black boy isn't in office it's overreach?
Democrats suddenly care about executive overeach.
So now when your black boy isn't in office it's overreach?
Your racist collar is showing...
