Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I read them all. Now you read them. You see the part that references another crime? What was the other crime?You can read all the charges here.
Plenty of crimes contained in it.
What's your beef?Are you a Rightwinger clone?
Go apply for a job at a supermarket tabloid.
If he's being unjustly persecuted and she is something other than a trophy bride...Why would she be?
I read them all. Now you read them. You see the part that references another crime? What was the other crime?
In your head maybe.If he's being unjustly persecuted and she is something other than a trophy bride...
They will absolutely make a motion to dismiss the indictment. The indictment (as it stands) is defective.Trump's lawyers should make a motion to dismiss the indictment for failure to state a crime.
What Bragg is trying to prove is that in 2017, Trump defrauded the public out of their 2016 vote.The crime before the previous crime and the same crimes before that!
Itsa Nig*a Rig!!!
What Bragg is trying to prove is that in 2017, Trump defrauded the public out of their 2016 vote.
It seems to be that Bragg is claiming that when Trump entered the payment for the NDA on the wrong line, he influenced the election. The problem is….he entered that AFTER the election.I read them all. Now you read them. You see the part that references another crime? What was the other crime?
How about the trial that's happening with Leonardo DiCaprio foreign including of the 2012 election Obama was the one who benefited.Good extend this tradition down the line. What did George Bush know about 9/11 and when did he know it? When did Clinton first meet Eppstein and how many Kilos came through Mena Airport. How much did Bush know about Iran Contra and Nugen-Hand Bank? When did Regan know of the October Suprise?
Apparently this supposed bastion of the law never heard of double jeopardy.Thirty four counts of “falsifying business records in the first degree.”
It’s ridiculous. It is unnecessarily duplicative. The underlying alleged crime doesn’t even exist.
Bragg said he falsified business records with intent to conceal a serious crime. WHAT is the crime?Thirty four counts of “falsifying business records in the first degree.”
It’s ridiculous. It is unnecessarily duplicative. The underlying alleged crime doesn’t even exist.
I know….so sad.Apparently this supposed bastion of the law never heard of double jeopardy.
Is this really the law now? This is how it's going to be? This is NOT the America I grew up in. People had rights then.
There isn’t one. Trump is allowed to give anyone he wants some of his money, as long as it’s part of a legal transaction. An NDA is perfectly legal.I read them all. Now you read them. You see the part that references another crime? What was the other crime?