The actual Trump indictment in NY text

Actually all of the checks purportedly business records are from the Trump Revocable Trust. What business was the Revocable Trust engaged in?
 
Trump's lawyers should make a motion to dismiss the indictment for failure to state a crime.
They will absolutely make a motion to dismiss the indictment. The indictment (as it stands) is defective.

The People will get a chance to specify (in their bill of particulars) which underlying crime they are alleging in the indictment. But that’s a minefield, too. And I’m not sure the prosecution fully grasps the dangers. 😁
 
Trump is the only man in American presidential history who could pay off two porn stars and have people think that it was trivial. But this was a conspiracy and a coverup in the crucial days of a presidential campaign
 
I read them all. Now you read them. You see the part that references another crime? What was the other crime?
It seems to be that Bragg is claiming that when Trump entered the payment for the NDA on the wrong line, he influenced the election. The problem is….he entered that AFTER the election.

Even most Democrats see this for what it is - a witch-hunt over nothing. Trump has been strengthened by this.
 
Good extend this tradition down the line. What did George Bush know about 9/11 and when did he know it? When did Clinton first meet Eppstein and how many Kilos came through Mena Airport. How much did Bush know about Iran Contra and Nugen-Hand Bank? When did Regan know of the October Suprise?
How about the trial that's happening with Leonardo DiCaprio foreign including of the 2012 election Obama was the one who benefited.
 
Thirty four counts of “falsifying business records in the first degree.”

It’s ridiculous. It is unnecessarily duplicative. The underlying alleged crime doesn’t even exist.
Apparently this supposed bastion of the law never heard of double jeopardy.

Is this really the law now? This is how it's going to be? This is NOT the America I grew up in. People had rights then.
 
Thirty four counts of “falsifying business records in the first degree.”

It’s ridiculous. It is unnecessarily duplicative. The underlying alleged crime doesn’t even exist.
Bragg said he falsified business records with intent to conceal a serious crime. WHAT is the crime?
 
I read them all. Now you read them. You see the part that references another crime? What was the other crime?
There isn’t one. Trump is allowed to give anyone he wants some of his money, as long as it’s part of a legal transaction. An NDA is perfectly legal.
 

Forum List

Back
Top