The college majors that make you the most and the least money

Ahh yes the great and powerful UKUNTHAIR knows all sees all yet doesn't know the difference between apathy and hate.


I know about your misanthropy because you've gone out of your way to demonstrate it so many times, Francis. You're a bitter, squirrelly shut-in who peeks out through the boards over the one window on your bunker, grinding your teeth and mumbling under your breath about how you "don't need nobody ur nuthin!" :cuckoo:

This from the narcissistic ass wipe who thinks the world is a better place for the gift of his loins.

And I never said I don't need anyone. I'd be lost without my lovely wife. I just don't delude myself that everyone cares about everyone else like you do.

For example you could drop dead tomorrow and I wouldn't know or care.

And you seem to go out of your way to taunt me why is that?

Maybe a little projection as you sit in your rat infested shit hole in Dorchester.

Unk only cares about people that agree with him. You pretty much nailed the "narcissistic ass wipe" part.
 
How did you get liberals hate wealth out of that? Do you even know what wealth is or how its measured?
:lol: Too complicated? Maybe some visual aids will help:

Is my question too complicated? If you can answer that then you would know that your statement was false.
And yet, oddly, your passionate cry of "Nuh-UH!!", while impressive in its volume, does little to refute the point I clearly proved.
 
:lol: Too complicated? Maybe some visual aids will help:

Is my question too complicated? If you can answer that then you would know that your statement was false.
And yet, oddly, your passionate cry of "Nuh-UH!!", while impressive in its volume, does little to refute the point I clearly proved.


That would be impressive if your pictures of people protesting actually proved your point. Please explain how wealth is measured so I know if this is even a conversation worth carrying on.
 
Is my question too complicated? If you can answer that then you would know that your statement was false.
And yet, oddly, your passionate cry of "Nuh-UH!!", while impressive in its volume, does little to refute the point I clearly proved.


That would be impressive if your pictures of people protesting actually proved your point. Please explain how wealth is measured so I know if this is even a conversation worth carrying on.
Ummm...we're using the standard measure: The amount of money and assets one possesses.
 
And yet, oddly, your passionate cry of "Nuh-UH!!", while impressive in its volume, does little to refute the point I clearly proved.


That would be impressive if your pictures of people protesting actually proved your point. Please explain how wealth is measured so I know if this is even a conversation worth carrying on.
Ummm...we're using the standard measure: The amount of money and assets one possesses.

Thats not it but at least you gave it a try. Its measured in time BTW. One of the principles of wealth is that you give back in time and money. If liberals hated wealthy people then they would be hating people that donate to liberal causes. i think you mean they hate greedy people. Does that make any sense to you?
 
That would be impressive if your pictures of people protesting actually proved your point. Please explain how wealth is measured so I know if this is even a conversation worth carrying on.
Ummm...we're using the standard measure: The amount of money and assets one possesses.

Thats not it but at least you gave it a try. Its measured in time BTW. One of the principles of wealth is that you give back in time and money. If liberals hated wealthy people then they would be hating people that donate to liberal causes. i think you mean they hate greedy people. Does that make any sense to you?
No. You don't get to dictate the meanings of words.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/wealthy
: having a lot of money and possessions​
 
Ummm...we're using the standard measure: The amount of money and assets one possesses.

Thats not it but at least you gave it a try. Its measured in time BTW. One of the principles of wealth is that you give back in time and money. If liberals hated wealthy people then they would be hating people that donate to liberal causes. i think you mean they hate greedy people. Does that make any sense to you?
No. You don't get to dictate the meanings of words.

Wealthy - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
: having a lot of money and possessions​

Dont believe every single thing you read. Wealth is the amount of time you can maintain your present lifestyle without earning another dollar. If you live check to check that would make you 1 or 2 weeks wealthy.
 
Thats not it but at least you gave it a try. Its measured in time BTW. One of the principles of wealth is that you give back in time and money. If liberals hated wealthy people then they would be hating people that donate to liberal causes. i think you mean they hate greedy people. Does that make any sense to you?
No. You don't get to dictate the meanings of words.

Wealthy - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
: having a lot of money and possessions​

Dont believe every single thing you read.
Okay. I'll dismiss your crap, and stick with the dictionary.
Wealth is the amount of time you can maintain your present lifestyle without earning another dollar. If you live check to check that would make you 1 or 2 weeks wealthy.
You're really very desperate to win this debate -- but you're simply not going to.
 
No. You don't get to dictate the meanings of words.

Wealthy - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
: having a lot of money and possessions​

Dont believe every single thing you read.
Okay. I'll dismiss your crap, and stick with the dictionary.
Wealth is the amount of time you can maintain your present lifestyle without earning another dollar. If you live check to check that would make you 1 or 2 weeks wealthy.
You're really very desperate to win this debate -- but you're simply not going to.

Ok you won.
 
Dont believe every single thing you read.
Okay. I'll dismiss your crap, and stick with the dictionary.
Wealth is the amount of time you can maintain your present lifestyle without earning another dollar. If you live check to check that would make you 1 or 2 weeks wealthy.
You're really very desperate to win this debate -- but you're simply not going to.

Ok you won.
I proved my claim. If that's winning, cool.
 
And you seem to go out of your way to taunt me why is that?.




Oh, poor little Francis! Have you been "taunted," precious?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8fYw6F34Ws]The Cutest Crying Baby in the World - YouTube[/ame]
 
And you seem to go out of your way to taunt me why is that?.




Oh, poor little Francis! Have you been "taunted," precious?


And why is it you never respond to a post but rather edit out single lines?

You might want to start looking at yourself and find out what your problems are other than narcissism that is.

Here's a tip, Ukunthair

Not everyone is going to agree with you or like in fact most won't. Get over it and stop taking it so personally. The world does not revolve around you. In fact the vast majority of people don't give the tiniest shit about you.

Stop deluding yourself
 
Don't you just love how the democrats simultaneously complain that the republicans are evil rich bastards that make too much money then turn right around and brag about how much money the evil rich republicans making in their states?

The Republican base support their corporate masters. No one said all Republicans are rich. Look at USMB Republicans. Most of the ones not on welfare or disability live from paycheck to paycheck.

Course, you already knew that. You just like to make shit up and then attack the other side for shit you made up. Typical of right wingers. It's who they are. What they do.
Where did I use the word all? jerk off.

Then we agree. Not "ALL" Republicans are rich. And as for the other part:

Look at USMB Republicans. Most of the ones not on welfare or disability live from paycheck to paycheck.

I suspect that's pretty much true.

It's not that Republicans are against welfare and food stamps, it's that when they get it, they feel they deserve it, but when blacks or someone else gets it, it's because they are lazy.



Look at what Grampa wrote:

Grampa Murked U - Where, if anywhere, does personal responsibility fit into that? I made shit wages when I started out in life. In fact my first two bosses only hired me because of the tax incentives they got for hiring an ex con.

He's talking about "personal responsibility", meaning people should do it on their own. Then he talks about getting "helped". Republicans believe American helping American is socialism, unless you are helping a Republican. Then it's different.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Republican base support their corporate masters. No one said all Republicans are rich. Look at USMB Republicans. Most of the ones not on welfare or disability live from paycheck to paycheck.

Course, you already knew that. You just like to make shit up and then attack the other side for shit you made up. Typical of right wingers. It's who they are. What they do.
Where did I use the word all? jerk off.

Then we agree. Not "ALL" Republicans are rich. And as for the other part:

Look at USMB Republicans. Most of the ones not on welfare or disability live from paycheck to paycheck.

I suspect that's pretty much true.

It's not that Republicans are against welfare and food stamps, it's that when they get it, they feel they deserve it, but when blacks or someone else gets it, it's because they are lazy.



Look at what Grampa wrote:

Grampa Murked U - Where, if anywhere, does personal responsibility fit into that? I made shit wages when I started out in life. In fact my first two bosses only hired me because of the tax incentives they got for hiring an ex con.

He's talking about "personal responsibility", meaning people should do it on their own. Then he talks about getting "helped". Republicans believe American helping American is socialism, unless you are helping a Republican. Then it's different.


Of course I agree that not all republicans are rich. Doing things right does not always end up in one becoming rich. Further, what is rich? Rich is an entirely subjective term. Still further, living from paycheck to paycheck is a time honored tradition of some folks. It's a goal they have. Even further, your politics do not entitle you to be rich. Even still further, there is zero reason a democrat can't get rich doing what democrats do. Skin color has nothing to do with whether or not you are rich. Skin color has nothing to do with laziness. However, if you are a lazy good for nothing democrat or republican you are probably not gonna go from being subjectively poor to subjectively rich by sitting on your fat ass collecting welfare instead of getting up off your ass and doing something that produces something someone is willing to pay for that pays more, or at least will lead to paying than welfare.

Course, that's the problem with the lazy, welfare is good enough for many.

You have to decide what path you are on. The democrat path of welfare, the democrat path of tyrant, the libertarian path of independence and responsibility for oneself that many republicans also profess. Anyone can get rich. It's damn easy. But you will never get there on welfare.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The irony is college is not supposed to be a trade school, but to broaden one's horizons. It should be a mix of arts and science. As far as petro industry, that is as bad as as any with downsizing and jobs available on offshore oil rigs. Have fun with that. Ungrad degree major doesn't matter. The graduate degree major doesn't matter that much either. It is who you know.
 

Forum List

Back
Top