The Coming Democratic Meltdown: AG Barr Says He Found A Way to Get Key Citizenship Question OnCensus

The census Citizenship question is essential in order to preserving White European heritage and culture in America. The question is a key ingredient to making America great again! Without White people in charge, as we have been since our country's founding, America will slip into the abyss of doom and destruction and we will cease to be a nation with borders, language, and culture created by White European Americans.
OH, so Whites are citizens and blacks aren't???

Sorry if following election laws screws up your plans to take power so you can get busy killing whitey.


~~~~~~
Please highlight and quote where that statement was made.
 
The Coming Democratic Meltdown: AG Barr Says He Found A Way to Get Key Citizenship Question On Census



The Coming Democratic Meltdown: AG Barr Says He Found A Way to Get Key Citizenship Question On Census
July 8, 2019 ~ By Matt Vespa
Cue the meltdown because one looks like one could hit liberal America very soon. We’ve been haggling over the citizenship question in the 2020 census. It’s been asked before in past surveys. As the Department of Justice was ordered to look into ways to include the key question, AG Barr recently announced that a path might have been found (via Post and Courier ): Attorney General Barr tells SC reporters he's found a legal recourse on Census question | News | postandcourier.com
Again, the Democrats are going to go ballistic, so grab some popcorn. We’ll see what happens.


Comment:
I have no problem with illegals being counted... it's nice to know where they're at so we can direct our ICE resources to the right areas. I have a problem with illegals being used for apportionment of Congressional Districts. Besides... Progressive Marxist Socialists/DSA Democrats shouldn't need the illegals with all the dead people they have voting. The Constitution demands that a citizenship question be included on the decadal census. (See: Article 1, Section 2, "The 3/5ths Compromise"). Now, this might seem a strange place to start, but bear with me because the 3/5th compromise is relevant to the constitutional amendment which articulates the need for the citizenship question. That amendment is the 14th Amendment which provided full citizenship for everyone regardless of race. Section '1' of the 14th Amendment defines the criteria for being a U.S. citizen and also states that anyone who is a U.S. citizen is a citizen in all states.
The Coming Democratic Meltdown: AG Barr Says He Found A Way to Get Key Citizenship Question On Census



The Coming Democratic Meltdown: AG Barr Says He Found A Way to Get Key Citizenship Question On Census
July 8, 2019 ~ By Matt Vespa
Cue the meltdown because one looks like one could hit liberal America very soon. We’ve been haggling over the citizenship question in the 2020 census. It’s been asked before in past surveys. As the Department of Justice was ordered to look into ways to include the key question, AG Barr recently announced that a path might have been found (via Post and Courier ): Attorney General Barr tells SC reporters he's found a legal recourse on Census question | News | postandcourier.com
Again, the Democrats are going to go ballistic, so grab some popcorn. We’ll see what happens.


Comment:
I have no problem with illegals being counted... it's nice to know where they're at so we can direct our ICE resources to the right areas. I have a problem with illegals being used for apportionment of Congressional Districts. Besides... Progressive Marxist Socialists/DSA Democrats shouldn't need the illegals with all the dead people they have voting. The Constitution demands that a citizenship question be included on the decadal census. (See: Article 1, Section 2, "The 3/5ths Compromise"). Now, this might seem a strange place to start, but bear with me because the 3/5th compromise is relevant to the constitutional amendment which articulates the need for the citizenship question. That amendment is the 14th Amendment which provided full citizenship for everyone regardless of race. Section '1' of the 14th Amendment defines the criteria for being a U.S. citizen and also states that anyone who is a U.S. citizen is a citizen in all states.

One has to wonder what all the fuss is about anyway. The same question is on the long form and has been for ages so what's all the fuss about the same question being on the short form? It was also on the form for previous administrations including Obummer and Clinton. Me thinks the demodummies just look for crap to whine about and if there isn't anything they'll invent something.

It has not been on the census form for nearly 70 years. Me thinks Trumpdummies are racist.


~~~~~~
EXCLUSIVE: Citizenship Question Used on Census for 175 ...
EXCLUSIVE: Citizenship Question Used on Census for 175 Years, GOP Report Shows
Apr 11, 2019 · A new report from House Republicans shows a citizenship question appeared on the U.S. census in one form or another for nearly 175 years, and argues that its addition to the 2020 census should not ...
************
Obama's Census Bureau Asked About Citizenship in Yearly ...
Obama's Census Bureau Asked About Citizenship in Yearly Survey | NTK Network
Mar 27, 2018 · The Obama administration asked ACS recipients for all relevant Census information, including citizenship status in every year of its incumbency. According to the Census Bureau, 3.5 million households receive the survey every year, meaning the Obama Census Bureau would have contacted 28 million households over its tenure.
************
When Did the U.S. Census Stop Asking About Citizenship?
When Did the U.S. Census Stop Asking About Citizenship?
Apr 02, 2018 · It’s misleading, moreover, to claim that the citizenship question was “removed” from the census in 2010. As noted above, it was a standard question on census forms through 1950, then, for unexplained reasons, was omitted in 1960 for everyone except residents of New York City and Puerto Rico.


 
The Coming Democratic Meltdown: AG Barr Says He Found A Way to Get Key Citizenship Question On Census



The Coming Democratic Meltdown: AG Barr Says He Found A Way to Get Key Citizenship Question On Census
July 8, 2019 ~ By Matt Vespa
Cue the meltdown because one looks like one could hit liberal America very soon. We’ve been haggling over the citizenship question in the 2020 census. It’s been asked before in past surveys. As the Department of Justice was ordered to look into ways to include the key question, AG Barr recently announced that a path might have been found (via Post and Courier ): Attorney General Barr tells SC reporters he's found a legal recourse on Census question | News | postandcourier.com
Again, the Democrats are going to go ballistic, so grab some popcorn. We’ll see what happens.


Comment:
I have no problem with illegals being counted... it's nice to know where they're at so we can direct our ICE resources to the right areas. I have a problem with illegals being used for apportionment of Congressional Districts. Besides... Progressive Marxist Socialists/DSA Democrats shouldn't need the illegals with all the dead people they have voting. The Constitution demands that a citizenship question be included on the decadal census. (See: Article 1, Section 2, "The 3/5ths Compromise"). Now, this might seem a strange place to start, but bear with me because the 3/5th compromise is relevant to the constitutional amendment which articulates the need for the citizenship question. That amendment is the 14th Amendment which provided full citizenship for everyone regardless of race. Section '1' of the 14th Amendment defines the criteria for being a U.S. citizen and also states that anyone who is a U.S. citizen is a citizen in all states.

The courts will bar Barr from doing so. There is no way it will happen. The Constitution does not require a citizenship question as it has not been asked since 1950.
The 14th Amendment contains semi-colons between sentences, not periods.
Thus, the clauses contained within concern those legally within the US.
The Fed cannot blithely Tax US citizens and visa holders to support trespassers.

The 14th Amendment contains NOTHING that Barr can use. Not even semi-colons. You really need to read the shit you're trying to hang your hat on because it doesn't say what you've been told it says.
We’ll see.
I read it, did you?

Explain to me what YOU think it says.
 
The census is for counting ALL people and as many times in the past, for knowing how many are actual citizens and who are not. It does not say anything about whether you are a LEGAL or ILLEGAL non-citizen, so those that choose not to answer it do so at their own free choice.

Please do yourself and others who have to read your ignorant bullshit a favor and familiarize yourself with the current methology of counting illegals:

[People Not Born Here, as per Census] - [legal migrants, who are all registered and tracked] = Illegals

Everything that we need to ask on the Census to find out Illegal counts we already ask.

How Pew Research Center estimates illegal immigration


Which leaves only ONE sane reason to add the new question - surpression of participation. Not only that, the administration was already caught directly looking for exactly that outcome in their communications with GOP operatives.
 
Last edited:
The Coming Democratic Meltdown: AG Barr Says He Found A Way to Get Key Citizenship Question On Census



The Coming Democratic Meltdown: AG Barr Says He Found A Way to Get Key Citizenship Question On Census
July 8, 2019 ~ By Matt Vespa
Cue the meltdown because one looks like one could hit liberal America very soon. We’ve been haggling over the citizenship question in the 2020 census. It’s been asked before in past surveys. As the Department of Justice was ordered to look into ways to include the key question, AG Barr recently announced that a path might have been found (via Post and Courier ): Attorney General Barr tells SC reporters he's found a legal recourse on Census question | News | postandcourier.com
Again, the Democrats are going to go ballistic, so grab some popcorn. We’ll see what happens.


Comment:
I have no problem with illegals being counted... it's nice to know where they're at so we can direct our ICE resources to the right areas. I have a problem with illegals being used for apportionment of Congressional Districts. Besides... Progressive Marxist Socialists/DSA Democrats shouldn't need the illegals with all the dead people they have voting. The Constitution demands that a citizenship question be included on the decadal census. (See: Article 1, Section 2, "The 3/5ths Compromise"). Now, this might seem a strange place to start, but bear with me because the 3/5th compromise is relevant to the constitutional amendment which articulates the need for the citizenship question. That amendment is the 14th Amendment which provided full citizenship for everyone regardless of race. Section '1' of the 14th Amendment defines the criteria for being a U.S. citizen and also states that anyone who is a U.S. citizen is a citizen in all states.


I love how Trump Flucks with the Tards………...
 
Which leaves only ONE sane reason to add the new question - surpression of participation.

HEY DUMBASS, when someone is here ILLEGALLY, it means they've committed a CRIME. They only need participate in TWO THINGS:
  1. Hard time in the federal pen while they pay off their $5,000 fine.
  2. Getting their sorry asses kicked out of the country with a chip inserted subcutaneously, that if caught back in the country again, automatic death sentence. No lawyers, no trial, just shot on sight under suspicion of being an alien espionage spy.
Be my guest in joining them.



Screen Shot 2019-01-04 at 6.09.24 PM.jpg
 
Which leaves only ONE sane reason to add the new question - surpression of participation. Not only that, the administration was already caught directly looking for exactly that outcome in their communications with GOP operatives.
Which is a damn good reason.

.
 
Which leaves only ONE sane reason to add the new question - surpression of participation. Not only that, the administration was already caught directly looking for exactly that outcome in their communications with GOP operatives.
Which is a damn good reason.

.
280.jpg


It's a damn UNCONSTITUTIONAL reason.

Constitution states clearly that the apportionment is to be based on the entirety of population, not just citizens. Messing with the Census specifically to undercount population is a blatant act of trying to circumvent the law.
 
Which leaves only ONE sane reason to add the new question - surpression of participation. Not only that, the administration was already caught directly looking for exactly that outcome in their communications with GOP operatives.
Which is a damn good reason.

.
280.jpg


It's a damn UNCONSTITUTIONAL reason.

Constitution states clearly that the apropotionment is to be based on the entirety of population, not just citizens.
...but excludes Indians who are not taxed (see art 1, sec 2).

Most illegals are of Indian decent and because they are illegal they are not taxed.

Constitutional, bitch.

:dance:

.
 
Which leaves only ONE sane reason to add the new question - surpression of participation. Not only that, the administration was already caught directly looking for exactly that outcome in their communications with GOP operatives.
Which is a damn good reason.

.
280.jpg


It's a damn UNCONSTITUTIONAL reason.

Constitution states clearly that the apropotionment is to be based on the entirety of population, not just citizens.
...but excludes Indians who are not taxed (see art 1, sec 2).

Most illegals are of Indian decent and are illegal, so they are not taxed.

Constitutional, bitch.

:dance:

.

Ok idiot, whatever you say.
 
Which leaves only ONE sane reason to add the new question - surpression of participation. Not only that, the administration was already caught directly looking for exactly that outcome in their communications with GOP operatives.
Which is a damn good reason.

.
280.jpg


It's a damn UNCONSTITUTIONAL reason.

Constitution states clearly that the apropotionment is to be based on the entirety of population, not just citizens.
...but excludes Indians who are not taxed (see art 1, sec 2).

Most illegals are of Indian decent and are illegal, so they are not taxed.

Constitutional, bitch.

:dance:

.

Ok idiot, whatever you say.
Go read it for yourself.

:dunno:

.
 
Which leaves only ONE sane reason to add the new question - surpression of participation. Not only that, the administration was already caught directly looking for exactly that outcome in their communications with GOP operatives.
Which is a damn good reason.

.
280.jpg


It's a damn UNCONSTITUTIONAL reason.

Constitution states clearly that the apropotionment is to be based on the entirety of population, not just citizens.
...but excludes Indians who are not taxed (see art 1, sec 2).

Most illegals are of Indian decent and are illegal, so they are not taxed.

Constitutional, bitch.

:dance:

.

Ok idiot, whatever you say.
Go read it for yourself.

:dunno:

.

No YOU need to go read it and stop making a clown of yourself.

All Native Americans were given birthright citizenship in 1924, they ARE NOT illegals and are subject to taxes just like everyone else unless they live on the reservations.

Indian Citizenship Act
 
Last edited:
Which is a damn good reason.

.
280.jpg


It's a damn UNCONSTITUTIONAL reason.

Constitution states clearly that the apropotionment is to be based on the entirety of population, not just citizens.
...but excludes Indians who are not taxed (see art 1, sec 2).

Most illegals are of Indian decent and are illegal, so they are not taxed.

Constitutional, bitch.

:dance:

.

Ok idiot, whatever you say.
Go read it for yourself.

:dunno:

.

No YOU need to go read it and stop making a clown of yourself.

All Native Americans were given birthright citizenship in 1924, they ARE NOT illegals and are subject to taxes just like everyone else unless they live on the reservations.

Indian Citizenship Act
First off, Citizenship of Injuns is irrelevant.

But, okay, let's read it together.

Art 1, Sec 2 (has never been repealed):

"Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons."

99% of all Illegals are Indians (Aztec, Mayan, etc) who are not taxed (because they are illegal).

Illegals are NOT supposed to be counted, PER THE CONSTITUTION.

So, lick my butt and suck on my balls.

.
 
Which leaves only ONE sane reason to add the new question - surpression of participation.

HEY DUMBASS, when someone is here ILLEGALLY, it means they've committed a CRIME. They only need

Great point...thats has exactly nothing to do with Census's constitutional mandate to accurately count population.

Try again dummy.

The point of the census is to determine representation and other resources. Illegal people aren't "represented," that would be like being a Ford dealer and keeping a running inventory of how many Chevys your competition snuck onto your lot during the night you need to sell for him at your expense to help with his profit margin. What next, have North Korea or Iran to start infiltrating our country with hostile agents and our needing to make sure they get their "fair share" of representation and resources as well? I get so tired having to explain and fight over things to idiots like you that should be obvious and self-evident to any two year old.
 
We should keep a track of visas and asylum seekers because they use publicly funded services.

But this is the problem. Half of the "illegals" are not people who snuck under a fence, they are people who came here on visas that are no longer valid.
 
99% of all Illegals are Indians (Aztec, Mayan, etc) who are not taxed (because they are illegal).

Illegals are NOT supposed to be counted, PER THE CONSTITUTION.

So, lick my butt and suck on my balls.

Um, no. First, this section of the constitution was overridden by the 14th Amendment.

Secondly, at that time, Indians were counted because their territories were considered their own nations within the nation. Before we wanted their stuff and genocided the fuck out them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top