The two party system is fine as long as both parties are actually trying to improve the country.
The right wants this government dead.
You're right, as long as both parties want to improve this country.
Which is again, why the two parties suck.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The two party system is fine as long as both parties are actually trying to improve the country.
The right wants this government dead.
Gingrich wants to destroy an entire third of our system of government. He wants to be able to jail judges that he doesn't personally agree with.
This country is finished.
You need a sense of history.
We have survived robber barons, a Red Scare, Mutual Assured Destruction, four presidential assassinations, two Presidential impeachments, one Presidental resignation, two world wars, two great depressions, countless other mini depressions, the KKK movement, the 1800 election, George W. Bush, Jimmy Carter, and a Civil War.
This country is finished. I didn't think it would happen in my lifetime, but I'm watching the whole thing unfold in this election. The idiot masses have propped up party politics above the constitution and their own country. Beating the opposition matters more to them than their own freedom. The politicians know this, and they will run with it for all it's worth. The NDAA took away our right to fair trial, but instead of banding together to stop the BI-PARTISAN group that created and passed the law, you numbnuts are too busy trying to find ways to score political points and blame the other guy.
Republicans have two front runners right now, Romney and Gingrich. Romney not only supports passing many more free-trade agreements, which will further destroy the middle class, but he also fully and openly supports the NDAA. But hey, as long as he can beat Obama then it doesn't matter how he fucks up this country.
Gingrich wants to destroy an entire third of our system of government. He wants to be able to jail judges that he doesn't personally agree with. If judges are too afraid to rule against his desires, then the constitution is royally fucked. But hey, it would be funny to watch him debate Obama.
Even Democrats, who still support Obama, are just as bad. Obama signed the fucking NDAA, and no lame excuse can even begin to justify why he supported taking away our right to a fair trial. He also has no issue forcing us to purchase a commodity just for being alive through his "Health Insurance giveaway reform" (I swear to god the first person that tries to compare it to car insurance will get bitch slapped).
This country is over. Bow down to your rulers and masters in washington. Because they can do whatever the fuck they want and you retards will just keep voting for them, all in the name of party politics. Thanks for ruining a great thing you fucking dipshits.
Ron Paul Introduces Bill to Repeal NDAA's Indefinite Detention.
Ron Paul is looking better to me all the time.
Ron Paul Introduces Bill to Repeal NDAA's Indefinite Detention.
Ron Paul is looking better to me all the time.
You're falling into the fallacy of good intentions
Ron Paul Introduces Bill to Repeal NDAA's Indefinite Detention.
Ron Paul is looking better to me all the time.
You're falling into the fallacy of good intentions
Exactly, better to vote for people with terrible intentions since the good intentions won't be voted in favor of by those with terrible intentions.
Gingrich/Romney 2012!!!!
You're falling into the fallacy of good intentions
Exactly, better to vote for people with terrible intentions since the good intentions won't be voted in favor of by those with terrible intentions.
Gingrich/Romney 2012!!!!
Merely having good intentions isn't the same as actually being able to deliver a result. Obama can preach about eliminating income inequality but that doesnt mean he can do jack shit about it.
Ron Paul can introduce a bill to require a balanced budget and free bags of weed for everyone under 30 but that doesnt mean it has a ghost of a chance of passing. Like every bill he's pushed for 30 years.
Mr. Shaman, your psychedelic posts actually make it difficult to discern your message and to take it seriously.
Ron Paul Introduces Bill to Repeal NDAA's Indefinite Detention.
Ron Paul is looking better to me all the time.
Mr. Shaman, your psychedelic posts actually make it difficult to discern your message and to take it seriously.Yeah......content always has been a problem for Teabaggers.
Exactly, better to vote for people with terrible intentions since the good intentions won't be voted in favor of by those with terrible intentions.
Gingrich/Romney 2012!!!!
Merely having good intentions isn't the same as actually being able to deliver a result. Obama can preach about eliminating income inequality but that doesnt mean he can do jack shit about it.
Ron Paul can introduce a bill to require a balanced budget and free bags of weed for everyone under 30 but that doesnt mean it has a ghost of a chance of passing. Like every bill he's pushed for 30 years.
And he can introduce a bill to repeal NDAA's indefinite detention, and when your heroes vote against it you'll pat them on he back.
The same thing Obama's supporters will do when their democrat heroes vote against it.
And of course since Paul couldn't force them to vote for something that's good for america, you'll blame him, like any good neocon would.
The OP is merely one of the drown it in the bathtub righties trying to get Dems to give up on this country.
The right wants it dead so they can hand it all to the corporations
Merely having good intentions isn't the same as actually being able to deliver a result. Obama can preach about eliminating income inequality but that doesnt mean he can do jack shit about it.
Ron Paul can introduce a bill to require a balanced budget and free bags of weed for everyone under 30 but that doesnt mean it has a ghost of a chance of passing. Like every bill he's pushed for 30 years.
And he can introduce a bill to repeal NDAA's indefinite detention, and when your heroes vote against it you'll pat them on he back.
The same thing Obama's supporters will do when their democrat heroes vote against it.
And of course since Paul couldn't force them to vote for something that's good for america, you'll blame him, like any good neocon would.
Paul is merely grandstanding for his idiot fan-bois. Introducing bill after bill with no attempt to round up support is simply wasting people's time.
You've been had.
he is merely a toadie of the right who wants us Not to vote.
Its helps republicans when people dont vote.