🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

The Creation Of White Nationalism

Ku Klux Klan. Dixie Democrats. Slavery in America. Confederacy. Then in Europe it was Austria-Hungary in the First World War. Archduke (= Grand Dragon) Franz Ferdinand. Too much classical music and symphony orchestras and they did too much dope in the opium dens in those days. Then there was a Second World War when the Weimar Republic reneged on its war reparations. The Nazis were a national socialist workers' party.
 
Come on. The White Nationalist movement, or whichever term a group chooses to call itself, clearly has a guy in DC whom they favor. Right now. Today. And he's done little to change that. And we all know who he is.

This thread is a pretty feeble (if amusing) attempt to shift that somehow.
.
And I bet you were fine with black supremacists supporting Obama and even getting a page on his 2008 campaign website....
Enjoy whatever fantasies exist in your alternate reality.

Doesn't matter to me.
.
You are literally ignoring history now.

Priceless.
 
Come on. The White Nationalist movement, or whichever term a group chooses to call itself, clearly has a guy in DC whom they favor. Right now. Today. And he's done little to change that. And we all know who he is.

This thread is a pretty feeble (if amusing) attempt to shift that somehow.
.



What is your opinion on the point raised by the New York Times, that the dems have given up on appealing to the white working class, in favor of a coalition of upper middle class whites and minorities?
I agree with that, by and large.

But it has nothing to do with my point.
.
You don’t have a “point”.
Of course I do.

You just don't like it.

Too bad.
.
No, you don’t.

To say that white nationalists have their candidate in the White House when Democrats are now condoning blatant racism against white people every day in the form of supporting the ANC and the EFF and supporting the hiring of Sarah Jeong at the New York Times, on top of a long list of anti-white political statements within the party leadership over the years is absolutely asinine.

Any white person with a brain today not only doesn’t even think about voting Democrat, but actually votes specifically against Democrats. Not only that, but all of the white Republicans born after the 60s are far more sympathic to white nationalism because the fear of it is far less potent compared to their fear of being oppressed by Democrats.
Your first paragraph denies my point.

Your second paragraph illustrates it.

I love this place.
.
 
Can you be so blind that you don't recognize that every reader knows you'd refute my posts if you could...and you're simply a boring liar who is only here because no one who knows you wants to have anything to do with you,and you're lonesome.

If you need a shoulder to cry on.....pull over to the side of the road.

Honey, you just kind of post loads of number pointed crazy on these threads and wonder why we all laugh at you.
 
Any white person with a brain today not only doesn’t even think about voting Democrat, but actually votes specifically against Democrats. Not only that, but all of the white Republicans born after the 60s are far more sympathic to white nationalism because the fear of it is far less potent compared to their fear of being oppressed by Democrats.

uh, buddy... about 40- 45% of white folks vote Democratic.. and they are usually better educated than the ones that dont.
 
Who do we have to thank?




1.Somehow, when it comes to any narrative put forth by the Left, the Democrats/Liberals, the story is never what they say it is.
Every argument of theirs is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.



Remember this lie?

"Well, I say to them tonight, there's not a liberal America and a conservative America; there's the United States of America.”

"There's not a black America and white America and Latino America and Asian America; there's the United States of America.” Barack Obama, Democrat Ten years ago: Obama makes national debut

This, from the party that survives on identity politics, divide and conquer.

While they lie and suggest unity, the Democrats can never praise nationalism, as the term is the opposite of what they try to do….Balkanize the population.

The Democrats wanted to put Obama on Mt. Rushmore, but there wasn't enough room for two more faces.




2.That’s what they say out loud. Here’s what they said behind your back:

"The Future of the Obama Coalition
By THOMAS B. EDSALL NOVEMBER 27, 2011 11:34 PM November 27, 2011 11:34 pm
For decades, Democrats have suffered continuous and increasingly severe losses among white voters. But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class."
The Future of the Obama Coalition



“But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class.
All pretense of trying to win a majority of the white working class has been effectively jettisoned in favor of cementing a center-left coalition made up, on the one hand, of voters who have gotten ahead on the basis of educational attainment — professors, artists, designers, editors, human resources managers, lawyers, librarians, social workers, teachers and therapists — and a second, substantial constituency of lower-income voters who are disproportionately African-American and Hispanic."
The Future of the Obama Coalition





Somehow the interests of the majority white population of the nation didn’t, and don’t, align with the interests of the Democrat Party.



What is the majority racial group supposed to do when the Democrats throw them, white folks, under the bus????





Do you see who created the backlash of white nationalism?

The Democrats.




Next post….how the Democrats smear the group that is simply stating that they have rights in America, too.
One has to wonder why an Asian would think white supramacisrs think she’s anything but an interloper.

:cuckoo:
 
Haha...watching this chic school you Loons is fucking hilarious...Joe...you’re much better off to stand on the sidelines and save face bud...you’re in way over your head when you engage with this chic.

What till you find out she's not white.... but never mind.

Sorry, crazy people agreeing with each other doesn't impress.



That's gotta hurt....
 
Who do we have to thank?




1.Somehow, when it comes to any narrative put forth by the Left, the Democrats/Liberals, the story is never what they say it is.
Every argument of theirs is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.



Remember this lie?

"Well, I say to them tonight, there's not a liberal America and a conservative America; there's the United States of America.”

"There's not a black America and white America and Latino America and Asian America; there's the United States of America.” Barack Obama, Democrat Ten years ago: Obama makes national debut

This, from the party that survives on identity politics, divide and conquer.

While they lie and suggest unity, the Democrats can never praise nationalism, as the term is the opposite of what they try to do….Balkanize the population.

The Democrats wanted to put Obama on Mt. Rushmore, but there wasn't enough room for two more faces.




2.That’s what they say out loud. Here’s what they said behind your back:

"The Future of the Obama Coalition
By THOMAS B. EDSALL NOVEMBER 27, 2011 11:34 PM November 27, 2011 11:34 pm
For decades, Democrats have suffered continuous and increasingly severe losses among white voters. But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class."
The Future of the Obama Coalition



“But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class.
All pretense of trying to win a majority of the white working class has been effectively jettisoned in favor of cementing a center-left coalition made up, on the one hand, of voters who have gotten ahead on the basis of educational attainment — professors, artists, designers, editors, human resources managers, lawyers, librarians, social workers, teachers and therapists — and a second, substantial constituency of lower-income voters who are disproportionately African-American and Hispanic."
The Future of the Obama Coalition





Somehow the interests of the majority white population of the nation didn’t, and don’t, align with the interests of the Democrat Party.



What is the majority racial group supposed to do when the Democrats throw them, white folks, under the bus????





Do you see who created the backlash of white nationalism?

The Democrats.




Next post….how the Democrats smear the group that is simply stating that they have rights in America, too.
One has to wonder why an Asian would think white supramacisrs think she’s anything but an interloper.

:cuckoo:



".....white supramacisrs...."


Kinda early to be loaded, sis......


Now....just for edification....there are no such things as 'white supremacists (catch the spelling?).
The term is made up to fuel dunces like you.

Watch:
b. There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Fake news.




Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."
 
Who do we have to thank?




1.Somehow, when it comes to any narrative put forth by the Left, the Democrats/Liberals, the story is never what they say it is.
Every argument of theirs is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.



Remember this lie?

"Well, I say to them tonight, there's not a liberal America and a conservative America; there's the United States of America.”

"There's not a black America and white America and Latino America and Asian America; there's the United States of America.” Barack Obama, Democrat Ten years ago: Obama makes national debut

This, from the party that survives on identity politics, divide and conquer.

While they lie and suggest unity, the Democrats can never praise nationalism, as the term is the opposite of what they try to do….Balkanize the population.

The Democrats wanted to put Obama on Mt. Rushmore, but there wasn't enough room for two more faces.




2.That’s what they say out loud. Here’s what they said behind your back:

"The Future of the Obama Coalition
By THOMAS B. EDSALL NOVEMBER 27, 2011 11:34 PM November 27, 2011 11:34 pm
For decades, Democrats have suffered continuous and increasingly severe losses among white voters. But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class."
The Future of the Obama Coalition



“But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class.
All pretense of trying to win a majority of the white working class has been effectively jettisoned in favor of cementing a center-left coalition made up, on the one hand, of voters who have gotten ahead on the basis of educational attainment — professors, artists, designers, editors, human resources managers, lawyers, librarians, social workers, teachers and therapists — and a second, substantial constituency of lower-income voters who are disproportionately African-American and Hispanic."
The Future of the Obama Coalition





Somehow the interests of the majority white population of the nation didn’t, and don’t, align with the interests of the Democrat Party.



What is the majority racial group supposed to do when the Democrats throw them, white folks, under the bus????





Do you see who created the backlash of white nationalism?

The Democrats.




Next post….how the Democrats smear the group that is simply stating that they have rights in America, too.
One has to wonder why an Asian would think white supramacisrs think she’s anything but an interloper.

:cuckoo:



This is the part I get a kick out of....

"One has to wonder why an Asian would think white supramacisrs (sic) think she’s anything but an interloper."



....yet daily you trumpet your support for the anti-Semite party, the Democrats, who were Hitler's actual model for Nazis!!!




Check this out, here's what you vote for:

1. First, the Nazis copied the Progressives/Democrats Immigration Policies.

Only the ‘right races’ welcomed.

“Progressives opposed immigration and enacted several immigration restrictions during the 1920s. Progressives also tried to force immigrants to adopt Progressive moral beliefs.” Progressive Movement - Ohio History Central

And… Immigrant Restrictions During the Progressive Era | Synonym

Hitler lauded the Progressives’ immigration policies.

“By refusing immigration on principle to elements in poor health, by simply excluding certain racesfrom naturalization, it professes in slow beginnings a view which is peculiar to the folkish state concept.”
“Mein Kampf,” chapter three



“Hitler also appealed to the racially exclusionary provisions of U.S. immigration laws, specifically the 1924 Immigration Act that had been pushed by American progressives as a model of enlightened eugenic legislation. “There is today one state,” Hitler noted, “in which at least weak beginning toward a better conception are noticeable. Of course it is not our German Republic but the American union. By refusing immigration on principle to elements in poor health, by simply excluding certain races from naturalization, it professes in slow beginnings a view which is peculiar to the Volkish state concept.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats

How about Franklin Roosevelt's attitude toward other races....?
"This attitude dovetails with what is known about FDR's views regarding immigrants in general and Asian immigrants in particular.... He recommended that future immigration should be limited to those who had "blood of the right sort." FDR's troubling view of Jews

Sieg Heil, Franklin????




2. Know what else the Nazis learned from the Progressives/Democrats?

“…history of laws against miscegenation—interracial marriage or procreation—in the United States.

Under the influence of Darwinism, racial science and an associated eugenics movement emerged in the late nineteenth century, grew with the Progressive movement, peaked in the 1920s, and disappeared during World War II. (Its enthusiastic embrace by Hitler did not help it…” The Race Against Race

“The Germanic inhabitant of the American continent, who has remained racially pure and unmixed, rose to be master of the continent; he will remain the master as long as he does not fall a victim to defilement of the blood.”
Adolph Hitler
Untitled Document


“At Nuremberg, the Nazis sought to preserve Nordic racial purity by outlawing racial intermarriage with Jews in much the same manner that Democratic anti-miscegenation laws outlawed racial intermarriage with blacks.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats



3. Guess were Adolph got the idea for sterilization of ‘undesireables’???


“…Hitler learned from progressive sterilization laws that had been enacted in America through the influence of activists like Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. “I have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would in all probability be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.”

Hitler’s views—which closely parallel Sanger’s—provided the basis for the Nazi sterilization laws of 1933 which began by targeting “imbeciles” and the mentally retarded, and later expanded to cover Jews, gypsies, and other social undesirables.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




Hitler wrote to the president of the American Eugenics Society to ask for a copy of his “The Case for Sterilization.”
(Margaret Sanger and Sterilization)

German race science stood on American progressive’s shoulders.


4. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.

In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’


“Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats


From the LATimes:

“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes

5. although the Nazis used the Democrat doctrines, Jim Crow and segregation laws as their model…..


….wait for it…..


….the Nazis found them TOO HARSH!!!!!



“And the ugly irony is that when the Nazis rejected American law, it was often because they found it too harsh. For example, Nazi observers shuddered at the "human hardness" of the "one drop" rule, which classified people "of predominantly white appearance" as blacks. To them, American racism was sometimes simply too inhumane.


That may sound implausible — too awful to believe — but in their early years in power, the Nazis were not yet contemplating the "final solution." At first, they had a different fate in mind for the German Jewry: Jews were to be reduced to second-class citizenship and punished criminally if they sought to marry or engage in sexual contact with "Aryans." The ultimate goal was to terrify Germany's Jews into emigrating.”

When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes


If it weren’t so tragic, it’d be funny: the Progressives/Democrat’s programs were too rigid for the Nazis.


Amazing.



“…the Nazis balked at defining Jews as anyone possessing “one drop” of Jewish blood in line with the Democratic “one drop rule.” Incredibly the Nazis rejected the one-drop precedent of their American counterparts as too harsh. They defined a Jew as one who has predominant Jewish ancestry—usually characterized by three Jewish grandparents.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




6. The three considered the most Progressive Presidents….all had racist political views.

Woodrow Wilson segregated the federal government.

FDR chose as his first Supreme Court nominee, a KKKer.

LBJ led the fight against anti-lynching laws.




7. And….the Nazis praised FDR’s policies as nearly identical to theirs.

The National Socialists hailed FDR’s ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:

a. May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”

b. And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’

c. And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”

d. The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”

In 1938, American ambassador Hugh R. Wilson reported to FDR his conversations with Hitler: “Hitler then said that he had watched with interest the methods which you, Mr. President, have been attempting to adopt for the United States…. I added that you were very much interested in certain phases of the sociological effort, notably for the youth and workmen, which is being made in Germany…” cited in “Franklin D. Roosevelt and Foreign Affairs,” vol.2, p. 27.




8. The Nazis love the Democrat policies of ‘enslave and colonize.’

Many know that Andrew Jackson is considered to be the father of the modern Democrat Party.

Will…..in that case, he should also be remembered as at least a step-father of "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei,” Hitler’s bunch.


You see, another thing the Nazis learned from the Democrats was use to push the ‘Untermenschen’ out of the way to gain ‘lebensraum.’


“….what did Hitler learn from the Democratic Party and from his fellow leftists in America? First, he credited his plan of lebensraum or “living space”—specifically, his plan to forcibly seize the land in Russia, Poland and Eastern Europe, and enslave the native inhabitants—to the Jacksonian Democrats. In a 1928 speech, Hitler noted that Americans in the Jacksonian Era had “gunned down the millions of Redskins to a few hundred thousand, and now keep the modest remnant under observation in a cage.”


Historian Timothy Snyder makes the same point in Bloodlands, “As Hitler imagined the future, Germany would deal with the Slavs much as the North Americans had dealt with the Indians.” Using a formula developed by the Democrats, Hitler sought to drive the Poles, Russians and Slavs from their land; dispatch Germans to take it over; and enslave the conquered peoples that refused to leave.


Notice that Rich and Snyder, who are both progressives, never mentioned the term “Democrat.” They are content to say that Hitler got his ideas from the white man, or from the North Americans. Yet it was the Democratic Party under its founder, Andrew Jackson, and then under Jackson’s Democratic successors, that massacred the Indians and drove them west and presided over the ignominious Trail of Tears. This is the actual precedent that Hitler appealed to in formulating his plans of conquest, dispossession and enslavement.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




9. Hitler “…. did, however, learn how to frame his policies of racial discrimination and Nordic supremacy, his lebensraum strategy of mass displacement and subjugation, and his genocidal mechanisms for exterminating the “unfit,” from his fellow leftists and progressives in the United States.

This is the disgraceful legacy of the Democratic left. Scholars and media pundits who know this history are deeply frightened by it. They realize that if young people discover it, if it comes to become widely known, then the whole progressive Democratic project will be discredited. No longer will progressives be able to pose as the part of the good, the true and the beautiful; on the contrary, they will be exposed as a partly complicit in racism, mass murder and genocide.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




Vote Democrat, Jill????
Congrats......or do you prefer Sieg Heil?????
 
The OP is like the person who blames short dresses for rape.

Hey dumbass.....you have to first imagine a crime to commit a crime. You supported a radical communist fag parading around as a Christian after years in Jerry Wright's racist church...but he never heard about the "chickens coming home to roost" or us "white devils"...no sir, never heard any of it. Or about Bill Ayers or Barry's mob pal who sold him a house and the lot next to it, for a fraction of it's value. Or his visits to Chicago bathhouses where he supposedly preferred "older white men". Where's the birth records of his supposed daughters? Legacy.com can't find them. Where's his birth certificate? nobody can find that. Where's the paperwork on the loan he got at Oxynard as a "foreign exchange student"...from guess where....Kenya. Where's his grades transcripts from Harvard? You've got to imagine a crime to commit a crime and you're thinking about short dresses? Yeah, they start the rape process but you'd have to be a hetero to understand why that is and a brain-dead doper to have ever believed Barry gave a shit about you.
 
7. As seen with metronomic regularity, the Left’s rule #1 is to destroy any opposition. Sooo….white nationalism must be conflated with white supremacy, just as control of the media allows the Left to pretend that illegal immigration is the same as immigration.


The salient point is that the creation of white nationalism is the collateral damage to the Democrats’ successful use of identity politics…They play on grievances of each constituent group…..but complain when white folks pick up their model.


Dr. Carol Swain, in “The New White Nationalism in America,” makes clear that white nationalism is not white supremacy.
“They insist that they are simply advocates of white identity and white power in the same mode as advocates of black identity and black power….a kind of civil rights movement fighting for equal treatment for white people.” “Death Of A Nation,” Dinesh D’Souza, p. 263





8. Jared Taylor is called both a white supremacist, and a white nationalist, in his Wikipedia article….most of said articles are edited by Leftists. I read his book “Paved With Good Intentions,” years ago, and found it cogent.

For Liberals/Democrats, it is ‘racist’ to have any opinion other than theirs.

“If a white person says, ‘I like being white, and I prefer my associates to be white’, that’s hate? Why?” he said. “It should not be taboo to talk about these things.”
'The races are not equal': meet the alt-right leader in Clinton's campaign ad





“According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, Taylor’s career has involved lending a “pseudo-academic polish” to racial thought.”

That’s what it is…..’thought.’


Real Americans don’t believe there are ‘thought crimes.’ Liberals and Progressives do.

Here's air-head Mika saying "It's our job to control what people think"


 
Last edited:
9. Dr. Swain interviewed this guy…

“Michael H. Hart (born April 27, 1932) is an American astrophysicist and author, most notably of The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History. He has described himself as a white separatist[1] and is active in white separatist causes.”
Michael H. Hart - Wikipedia



Hart said “I have no desire to rule over blacks….or to have someone else rule over blacks on my behalf….I do not what to rule, enslave, or exterminate anyone.”


The guy wants an exclusively white society somewhere in the Pacific Northwest.

White supremacist or white nationalist?
Answer: separatist or white nationalist.....but, so what???
Rich folks like to live in gated communities.

What’s the prob?

Let him go and live where he wishes.


Where’s that Liberal demand for diversity now????

Liberals either want to mandate.....or ban. There's no room for individualism or liberty in their purview.





Soooo.....we've seen that it is the Democrats/Liberals whose agenda has led to the creation of white nationalism.

10. “It is all very well to tell them that politics ideally should not be structured along the lines of race or ethnicity. Their point is: It is.
And as long as the Democratic Party mobilizes groups along ethnic lines, they are going to feel justified in doing as whites what every other group does in the name of its own ethnicity. Multiculturalism has come home to roost, and white nationalists are its newest advocates.” Who are the white nationalists? - WND - WND
 
Oh, look, she's puking out more of her number-pointed crazy.

Let's get real here. If there is a racial divide in politics, Republicans put it there.

Starting with Nixon's Southern Strategy, when he gave a home to all those inbred racists from the South who the Democrats rejected after passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, continuing on with Reagan's "Welfare Queens" and "Young Bucks", Bush Sr.'s Willie Horton ad and just about everything that comes out of Trump's mouth.

anything to distract uneducated white people from the real people screwing them- the wealthy.
 
Hey dumbass.....you have to first imagine a crime to commit a crime. You supported a radical communist fag parading around as a Christian after years in Jerry Wright's racist church...but he never heard about the "chickens coming home to roost" or us "white devils"...no sir, never heard any of it

Or it just wasn't that important.

Frankly, what Wright said was kind of crazy, but no crazier than Pat Robertson claiming that abortions and gays caused 9/11.

Or about Bill Ayers or Barry's mob pal who sold him a house and the lot next to it, for a fraction of it's value.

Okay, so why is any of this important, exactly?

Or his visits to Chicago bathhouses where he supposedly preferred "older white men". Where's the birth records of his supposed daughters? Legacy.com can't find them. Where's his birth certificate? nobody can find that.

And the Train just went to Crazy Town. When do we get to the Lizard People? A crazy conspiracy theory is never complete with a visit from the Lizard People.
 
Somehow the interests of the majority white population of the nation didn’t, and don’t, align with the interests of the Democrat Party.

What is the majority racial group supposed to do when the Democrats throw them, white folks, under the bus????

Or you just realize that there's only so much time you waste trying to get the votes of people who are never going to support you.

The real problem with the white working class is that by and large, it votes against it's own economic interests. None of these guys will say, "I want to vote for lower wages so the queers don't get married and the darkies don't move into my neighborhood", but that's kind of the choice they make.

The GOP has gotten very adept at playing on their racial, religious and sexual fears over economic pragmatism. It's why nine of the last ten recessions started when the GOP was in charge, and they've never paid a political price for that. If anything, the White Working Class males get more intransigent.



Was there anything in the OP that you could actually refute...."is not, Isssssss nooottttttt!!!!" is hardly acceptable outside of government school.



So...everything I posted is true, correct, and accurate.

Excellent.


Now, back to your blanket fort.

1/2 of white people are democrats . It’s rediculous to say they jettison white people.

That 1/2 have been beaten into self hating helpless slobs.
 
Somehow the interests of the majority white population of the nation didn’t, and don’t, align with the interests of the Democrat Party.

What is the majority racial group supposed to do when the Democrats throw them, white folks, under the bus????

Or you just realize that there's only so much time you waste trying to get the votes of people who are never going to support you.

The real problem with the white working class is that by and large, it votes against it's own economic interests. None of these guys will say, "I want to vote for lower wages so the queers don't get married and the darkies don't move into my neighborhood", but that's kind of the choice they make.

The GOP has gotten very adept at playing on their racial, religious and sexual fears over economic pragmatism. It's why nine of the last ten recessions started when the GOP was in charge, and they've never paid a political price for that. If anything, the White Working Class males get more intransigent.



Was there anything in the OP that you could actually refute...."is not, Isssssss nooottttttt!!!!" is hardly acceptable outside of government school.



So...everything I posted is true, correct, and accurate.

Excellent.


Now, back to your blanket fort.

1/2 of white people are democrats . It’s rediculous to say they jettison white people.

That 1/2 have been beaten into self hating helpless slobs.


I tend to chalk it up to the facts that not many pay as much attention to the political milieu as those of us who post here.

With all of the media, schools, and pop culture telling them lies, no wonder so many are fooled.
 
I tend to chalk it up to the facts that not many pay as much attention to the political milieu as those of us who post here.

With all of the media, schools, and pop culture telling them lies, no wonder so many are fooled.

Fooled into what?

Here's the thing I realized. If you aren't part of the one percent, you are in the same boat as the Hispanic Lesbian.
 
I tend to chalk it up to the facts that not many pay as much attention to the political milieu as those of us who post here.

With all of the media, schools, and pop culture telling them lies, no wonder so many are fooled.

Fooled into what?

Here's the thing I realized. If you aren't part of the one percent, you are in the same boat as the Hispanic Lesbian.

Then why do the 1% support Democrats while the middle class votes Trump?
 

Forum List

Back
Top