The Democrat Party Should Be Dissolved

[JimBowie1958]

I have been in his Washington DC hotel, many times, and believe me it makes the gutter shit in San Fransicko , loot like a trailer park. One of the best thing about his property, is that it never gets infected with the liberal mental disorder, because idiots like you dont want to go there. That in itself is a blessing.

Hell, now I feel like going to rent a room while my liberal daughter is home, lol.

 

[playtime]

View attachment 350157

^^^

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

No

Dang Democrats!

This is pipe dream shit meant to feed the n-I-g-g-e-r-s and the s-p-I-c-s because they're stupid enough to believe that shit.

Today blacks act like animals because they are BARELY evolved past the Ape and need a strong central figure (the white man) to keep them in place and acting like normal people.

Sick of their shit and we should not hide it anymore. When they call me a fucking racist, and I say you damn right I am!!! Fuck those fucking people!

Why do Browns ("people of color") feel compelled to steal, assault, rape, murder Whites, their obvious superior beings? Browns should be worshiping Whites instead of being jealous douchebag criminals.'

Blacks... prone to violence, think they're still in the jungle, low IQ blacks.

How can you look at the world and not see that ALL ADVANCEMENTS came from Europe and America? Yeah, we're the superior race on the earth. All others developed because of whites

Look, he is actually intelligent and an actual person of color! How often does that happen?

“We swear muthafuckers, you take our beaners from us and we’ll come for your guns one day” Filthy fucks!

MAGA! This is great news! Everything is falling into place so we can build the Wall and thwart this invasion of brown diseease ridden third worlders who are a threat to our sovereignty, culture and American traditions.

Being the elected representative of a bunch of dumbass ghetto Jungle Monkeys doesn't take intelligence. It take a ghetto dialect and a promise to get them more welfare.

Valerie Jarrett.... Is she that light skinned negro who looks like that ape in Planet of the Apes (negroes?)

I thought she was an ape...Next you'll be telling me Mooch isn't really a shaved wookie.

The asians made fun of obama.....the asians refer to negroes as 'monkey people' and not in jest....they are serious....and why shouldn't they be?

Pay the pavement ape or he will get very angry and burn his house down.

Yawn, Kambala wants every African American crack addict to have their own home while White, Red, and Yellow Americans some disabled vets rot on the street.

Nigga's acting like a Nigga...must be part of the Thugery... most blacks don't act like that!

I believe the black race is inferior to both the white and yellow races....I can prove it by taking a look at the world map and income, innovation/scientific discoveries, and prison populations. Maybe you have some other mysterious way of defining the word but you never seem to say what it is.

Most intelligent people understand how stupid blacks are....average i.q. of 85.....being one you should know.

Come on people you blacks are better than this shit every fucking week....stand BEHIND your police, you do the crime you get locked up...you fuck with THE MAN, he has every right to beat the shit out of you, and your community standing behind you just shows what stupid, low life idiots you are!

Fuck off House Negro. Shine my boots bitch

Hasn't it been proven, in the last few days, that blacks are incapable of living in the environment of civilization? Send them back to Africa.

..just like Africa is the shithole of the world, the black US communities mirror that

You can take a negro out of the ghetto. But you can't take the ghetto out of the negro.

No quotes from me? Whats the matter Mac? You Leftist Loon.

Kind of a weird thing to feel jealous about?

Where do you get the feeling that I am "jealous"? You missed the meaning behind my post entirely.

Could be. I personally feel that using other people's posts in order to make a point is a good debating tactic, and providing you don't completely take it out of context an honest tactic.

His premise is that all who disagree with him are racist. So I asked him to point to one of my posts that is racist. I vehemently disagree with Macs views. Doesn’t make me a racist. It just makes me logical. This is why he dodges me. I do not fit his narrative.

His premise, how I see it at least, is that there are plenty of people who are racist on this board. And that all of them are supporting Trump. If he didn't include you that's a good thing. He didn't make the argument as far as I can see that being a Trump supporter means you're racist. Feel free to go through this OP and use Mac's words against him and prove me wrong?

Plenty of racists and antisemites here on the other side too.

Define those terms please and then back that up? Speaking for myself, for instance, I don't like what the State of Israel is doing. They are grabbing land in my opinion that they don't have a right to. I don't hate Jews at all, I have no prejudice against them whatsoever. I do have a strong opinion though on the legitimacy of some of the actions they take. Do you consider that being an anti-Semite and if so do you feel one can have an opinion on anyone else without being bigoted?

State of Israel? You mean the people as Israel is a Democracy. Your post is idiotic. 53+ mostly Islamic countries and the safest place for a Muslim woman is in Israel. Only reason Israel is vilified is because it is a Jewish State. No one gives a shit about Islamists exterminating the Kurds. Or those in Lebanon treating Palestinians worse than dirt. Israel is an easy target. Your opinion is based on ignorance so yes you’re an antisemite. Your statement is like me saying, I dont dislike blacks at all except for those inner city blacks. You’re either uneducated or you’re an antisemite. Pick one.

No, I mean the state of Israel as in the nation and it's leader who at this moment although only supported by a minority of the populace is moving to not just occupy but full annex the West Bank. By the way, Democratically elected governments are fully capable of doing immoral stuff if you want I'll give you a history lesson. You inferring from my statements that I don't like stuff what Israel is doing based on me having a problem with Jews is a leap, to say the least. I don't need to dislike the Jewish people in order to condemn the country they inhabit for annexing territory belonging to someone else. As a matter of fact, My mother-in-law was Jewish.

This brings me to this. It's fascinating to me to see the cognitive dissonance displayed here. You reply to a post in an effort to call someone on a perceived inability to distinguish between the actions of individuals and the group as a whole and at the same time are perfectly willing to condemn me as anti-Semitic because I distinguish between the actions of individuals and the group as whole.

Israel is a democracy. The people there have been under attack for decades. The land is theirs. Read about it. The fact that you side with terror regimes speaks volumes

You know for someone who doesn't like being painted a racist because they support the GOP ( a claim that was never made btw), you are very eager to paint other people in a certain way because they support other things. You are right this conversation speaks volumes about someone, just not convinced it's about me it speaks. "You don't support Israel's annexation of the West Bank therefor you support terrorist regimes." You are missing a few steps in your reasoning there don't you think?

It is the same reasoning that one bad cop does a dirty deed, so the radicals go and burn cities and hurt innocent people, then want all police banned. Seems that you are missing a few brain cells.

I'm missing a few brain cells? I see. Do you think these people are only protesting because of this one bad cop? I know to acknowledge reality is probably fatal for some people but let me enlighten you under the presumption that you are actually capable of understanding reality. These people are protesting LOTS of bad cops. You don't have to sit on somebody's neck for almost nine minutes to be a bad cop. You can be a bad cop when you stop black people for no apparent reason. Or you can have a bad justice system when it systematically pronounces harsher sentences for the same crimes when you're black. And yes you are a really bad cop when you kill unarmed people.

I already said how I feel about the protests (unwise) and made it absolutely clear that I don't condone looting or hurting people (arrest and prosecute them) as MOST of the people who actually did protest don't either.

If it wasn’t just the one bad cop then why weren’t they protesting before this? Why weren’t they protesting as 1000s were dying in Chicago? Do tell. You feel all whites are racist? Silence = Violence.

Lol NOT protesting before this? Civil rights movement - Wikipedia quite a few protests here.
protests here Shooting of Tamir Rice - Wikipedia ,here Shooting of Michael Brown - Wikipedia here, The Mysterious Death of Freddie Gray here, Shooting of Philando Castile - Wikipedia oh and who can forget here, Rodney King - Wikipedia

How many more protests do you need?

Nothing like this. Don’t be obtuse.

I'm being obtuse? Azog I'm not the one claiming that protests against racial discrimination or against police brutality against blacks are a new phenomenon. You are quite funny I give you that.

This is new. Not since Rodney King has it been like this. So do you believe that silence is violence?

New means it never happened before. This is NOT new, not even close. As to silence is violence I understand the sentiment not sure I agree. It's not a new concept either.
“The world suffers a lot. Not because the violence of bad people. But because of the silence of the good people.”
Napoleon
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Edmund Burke

Not sure? Yes or no? If I choose to live my life and not opine, is that “violence”?

Nope. It also won't solve anything when you ignore problems. Why is it even relevant? I don't mind you deflecting like this but it is a bit random.

It’s not a deflection. These rallies are about guilt and not about substance.

Just because you ignore the substance doesn't mean it's not present. That is has substance is apparent from the fact that politicians on both sides are arguing for in some cases substantive measures in response to these protests. Something that wouldn't have happened without these protests.

I disagree. The protests will backfire. My wife was very sympathetic and now she has shifted the other way. I doubt She is the only one.

It's certain she's not the only one. On the other hand, it's also certain that these protests have made more people aware there is actually a problem. By the way, the reason your wife is losing sympathy for the protests is likely because you and the people on the right are highlighting the riots and stuff like "silence is violence" in a bid to claim these protests are "without substance". It's also again you ignoring that your assertions are demonstrably false. If you say the protests have no substance and I reply by pointing out that the protest has motivated substantive measures at no point is what your wife thinks relevant. Just like asking about 'silence is violence" after claiming something is new while at the same acknowledging it isn't, is relevant.

I have a basic problem. My problem is that I hate when people dodge questions, so I tend to answer every point a person makes individually, this is often used by people as a way to never ever take responsibility for what they say no matter how asinine. They just change the subject and I let their stupidity stand. You have done this now to many times.

Aware that entitled white kids are looting and burning under the guise of BLM. Got it.

Sure I get it. You made it absolutely clear that as long as you can claim that that's what it's about you can pretend that there is no substance. As I said dishonesty will allow you to do that.

I see what I see. I dont buy the fake outrage. These same people go home and feel better about themselves while not accomplishing anything. Silence is violence. LOL

You see what you want to see. And that's perfectly fine with me. If you can't understand that somebody could be outraged by this event or by what's happened to black people in the US since it's inception there is nothing I or anybody else can say to convince you. Silence might not be violence, but silence will for sure allow violence to continue, by all means, stick your head in the sand and pretend that every time something happens that causes protests like this it's "new" and "without substance" or "fueled by fake outrage".

OK

So what action items will you be embracing to change this? Do tell. You cannot force someone not to be racist. I am Jew and I cannot force you to see how stupid your views on Israel are. So stick your own head in the sand. Your little digs are laughable.

did you call him an anti semite & holocaust denier yet, per your M.O.?

He tried, more than once lol.

Nope. Never said Holocaust denier. Another Leftist lie.

You did call me an anti-semist... at least twice so not a lie maybe an oversimplification. I apologize though.

If you believe that Israel is an apartheid state while the 50+ Islamist nations are victims then you're an antisemite.

Here you go putting words in my mouth again. I swear to god you have the worst case of cognitive dissonance I've ever see. First, you object to me saying that you called me a holocaust denier. Rightfully so by the way hence the apology. And in the very next post, you put words in my mouth. Azog do you ever stop to examine yourself?

Reiterate what you said then? I'll apologize if I am mistaken.

Ok, what I said is that I object to certain actions the state of Israel engages in. Which I then further specified as at the moment the annexation of the west-bank. Not once did I claim Israel is an apartheid state or for that matter all 50+ Islamist nations are victims.

My bad. If you were in their shoes and surrounded by enemies and vilified by most sans some in the US, what would you do? If Mexico did to the US what the Palestine territories have done to Israel, there would be no more Mexico. I believe Israel has been very tolerant. It is actually illegal for Jews to enter most Islamist countries.

 

[Flash]

No

Dang Democrats!

This is pipe dream shit meant to feed the n-I-g-g-e-r-s and the s-p-I-c-s because they're stupid enough to believe that shit.

Today blacks act like animals because they are BARELY evolved past the Ape and need a strong central figure (the white man) to keep them in place and acting like normal people.

Sick of their shit and we should not hide it anymore. When they call me a fucking racist, and I say you damn right I am!!! Fuck those fucking people!

Why do Browns ("people of color") feel compelled to steal, assault, rape, murder Whites, their obvious superior beings? Browns should be worshiping Whites instead of being jealous douchebag criminals.'

Blacks... prone to violence, think they're still in the jungle, low IQ blacks.

How can you look at the world and not see that ALL ADVANCEMENTS came from Europe and America? Yeah, we're the superior race on the earth. All others developed because of whites

Look, he is actually intelligent and an actual person of color! How often does that happen?

“We swear muthafuckers, you take our beaners from us and we’ll come for your guns one day” Filthy fucks!

MAGA! This is great news! Everything is falling into place so we can build the Wall and thwart this invasion of brown diseease ridden third worlders who are a threat to our sovereignty, culture and American traditions.

Being the elected representative of a bunch of dumbass ghetto Jungle Monkeys doesn't take intelligence. It take a ghetto dialect and a promise to get them more welfare.

Valerie Jarrett.... Is she that light skinned negro who looks like that ape in Planet of the Apes (negroes?)

I thought she was an ape...Next you'll be telling me Mooch isn't really a shaved wookie.

The asians made fun of obama.....the asians refer to negroes as 'monkey people' and not in jest....they are serious....and why shouldn't they be?

Pay the pavement ape or he will get very angry and burn his house down.

Yawn, Kambala wants every African American crack addict to have their own home while White, Red, and Yellow Americans some disabled vets rot on the street.

Nigga's acting like a Nigga...must be part of the Thugery... most blacks don't act like that!

I believe the black race is inferior to both the white and yellow races....I can prove it by taking a look at the world map and income, innovation/scientific discoveries, and prison populations. Maybe you have some other mysterious way of defining the word but you never seem to say what it is.

Most intelligent people understand how stupid blacks are....average i.q. of 85.....being one you should know.

Come on people you blacks are better than this shit every fucking week....stand BEHIND your police, you do the crime you get locked up...you fuck with THE MAN, he has every right to beat the shit out of you, and your community standing behind you just shows what stupid, low life idiots you are!

Fuck off House Negro. Shine my boots bitch

Hasn't it been proven, in the last few days, that blacks are incapable of living in the environment of civilization? Send them back to Africa.

..just like Africa is the shithole of the world, the black US communities mirror that

You can take a negro out of the ghetto. But you can't take the ghetto out of the negro.

No quotes from me? Whats the matter Mac? You Leftist Loon.

Kind of a weird thing to feel jealous about?

Where do you get the feeling that I am "jealous"? You missed the meaning behind my post entirely.

Could be. I personally feel that using other people's posts in order to make a point is a good debating tactic, and providing you don't completely take it out of context an honest tactic.

His premise is that all who disagree with him are racist. So I asked him to point to one of my posts that is racist. I vehemently disagree with Macs views. Doesn’t make me a racist. It just makes me logical. This is why he dodges me. I do not fit his narrative.

His premise, how I see it at least, is that there are plenty of people who are racist on this board. And that all of them are supporting Trump. If he didn't include you that's a good thing. He didn't make the argument as far as I can see that being a Trump supporter means you're racist. Feel free to go through this OP and use Mac's words against him and prove me wrong?

Plenty of racists and antisemites here on the other side too.

Define those terms please and then back that up? Speaking for myself, for instance, I don't like what the State of Israel is doing. They are grabbing land in my opinion that they don't have a right to. I don't hate Jews at all, I have no prejudice against them whatsoever. I do have a strong opinion though on the legitimacy of some of the actions they take. Do you consider that being an anti-Semite and if so do you feel one can have an opinion on anyone else without being bigoted?

State of Israel? You mean the people as Israel is a Democracy. Your post is idiotic. 53+ mostly Islamic countries and the safest place for a Muslim woman is in Israel. Only reason Israel is vilified is because it is a Jewish State. No one gives a shit about Islamists exterminating the Kurds. Or those in Lebanon treating Palestinians worse than dirt. Israel is an easy target. Your opinion is based on ignorance so yes you’re an antisemite. Your statement is like me saying, I dont dislike blacks at all except for those inner city blacks. You’re either uneducated or you’re an antisemite. Pick one.

No, I mean the state of Israel as in the nation and it's leader who at this moment although only supported by a minority of the populace is moving to not just occupy but full annex the West Bank. By the way, Democratically elected governments are fully capable of doing immoral stuff if you want I'll give you a history lesson. You inferring from my statements that I don't like stuff what Israel is doing based on me having a problem with Jews is a leap, to say the least. I don't need to dislike the Jewish people in order to condemn the country they inhabit for annexing territory belonging to someone else. As a matter of fact, My mother-in-law was Jewish.

This brings me to this. It's fascinating to me to see the cognitive dissonance displayed here. You reply to a post in an effort to call someone on a perceived inability to distinguish between the actions of individuals and the group as a whole and at the same time are perfectly willing to condemn me as anti-Semitic because I distinguish between the actions of individuals and the group as whole.

Israel is a democracy. The people there have been under attack for decades. The land is theirs. Read about it. The fact that you side with terror regimes speaks volumes

You know for someone who doesn't like being painted a racist because they support the GOP ( a claim that was never made btw), you are very eager to paint other people in a certain way because they support other things. You are right this conversation speaks volumes about someone, just not convinced it's about me it speaks. "You don't support Israel's annexation of the West Bank therefor you support terrorist regimes." You are missing a few steps in your reasoning there don't you think?

It is the same reasoning that one bad cop does a dirty deed, so the radicals go and burn cities and hurt innocent people, then want all police banned. Seems that you are missing a few brain cells.

I'm missing a few brain cells? I see. Do you think these people are only protesting because of this one bad cop? I know to acknowledge reality is probably fatal for some people but let me enlighten you under the presumption that you are actually capable of understanding reality. These people are protesting LOTS of bad cops. You don't have to sit on somebody's neck for almost nine minutes to be a bad cop. You can be a bad cop when you stop black people for no apparent reason. Or you can have a bad justice system when it systematically pronounces harsher sentences for the same crimes when you're black. And yes you are a really bad cop when you kill unarmed people.

I already said how I feel about the protests (unwise) and made it absolutely clear that I don't condone looting or hurting people (arrest and prosecute them) as MOST of the people who actually did protest don't either.

If it wasn’t just the one bad cop then why weren’t they protesting before this? Why weren’t they protesting as 1000s were dying in Chicago? Do tell. You feel all whites are racist? Silence = Violence.

Lol NOT protesting before this? Civil rights movement - Wikipedia quite a few protests here.
protests here Shooting of Tamir Rice - Wikipedia ,here Shooting of Michael Brown - Wikipedia here, The Mysterious Death of Freddie Gray here, Shooting of Philando Castile - Wikipedia oh and who can forget here, Rodney King - Wikipedia

How many more protests do you need?

Nothing like this. Don’t be obtuse.

I'm being obtuse? Azog I'm not the one claiming that protests against racial discrimination or against police brutality against blacks are a new phenomenon. You are quite funny I give you that.

This is new. Not since Rodney King has it been like this. So do you believe that silence is violence?

New means it never happened before. This is NOT new, not even close. As to silence is violence I understand the sentiment not sure I agree. It's not a new concept either.
“The world suffers a lot. Not because the violence of bad people. But because of the silence of the good people.”
Napoleon
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Edmund Burke

Not sure? Yes or no? If I choose to live my life and not opine, is that “violence”?

Nope. It also won't solve anything when you ignore problems. Why is it even relevant? I don't mind you deflecting like this but it is a bit random.

It’s not a deflection. These rallies are about guilt and not about substance.

Just because you ignore the substance doesn't mean it's not present. That is has substance is apparent from the fact that politicians on both sides are arguing for in some cases substantive measures in response to these protests. Something that wouldn't have happened without these protests.

I disagree. The protests will backfire. My wife was very sympathetic and now she has shifted the other way. I doubt She is the only one.

It's certain she's not the only one. On the other hand, it's also certain that these protests have made more people aware there is actually a problem. By the way, the reason your wife is losing sympathy for the protests is likely because you and the people on the right are highlighting the riots and stuff like "silence is violence" in a bid to claim these protests are "without substance". It's also again you ignoring that your assertions are demonstrably false. If you say the protests have no substance and I reply by pointing out that the protest has motivated substantive measures at no point is what your wife thinks relevant. Just like asking about 'silence is violence" after claiming something is new while at the same acknowledging it isn't, is relevant.

I have a basic problem. My problem is that I hate when people dodge questions, so I tend to answer every point a person makes individually, this is often used by people as a way to never ever take responsibility for what they say no matter how asinine. They just change the subject and I let their stupidity stand. You have done this now to many times.

Aware that entitled white kids are looting and burning under the guise of BLM. Got it.

Sure I get it. You made it absolutely clear that as long as you can claim that that's what it's about you can pretend that there is no substance. As I said dishonesty will allow you to do that.

I see what I see. I dont buy the fake outrage. These same people go home and feel better about themselves while not accomplishing anything. Silence is violence. LOL

You see what you want to see. And that's perfectly fine with me. If you can't understand that somebody could be outraged by this event or by what's happened to black people in the US since it's inception there is nothing I or anybody else can say to convince you. Silence might not be violence, but silence will for sure allow violence to continue, by all means, stick your head in the sand and pretend that every time something happens that causes protests like this it's "new" and "without substance" or "fueled by fake outrage".

OK

So what action items will you be embracing to change this? Do tell. You cannot force someone not to be racist. I am Jew and I cannot force you to see how stupid your views on Israel are. So stick your own head in the sand. Your little digs are laughable.

did you call him an anti semite & holocaust denier yet, per your M.O.?

He tried, more than once lol.

no doubt he did.

#pathetic #cowardly #can'tdebateworthadamn

I wouldn't go that far. The fact of the matter is that it's about par for the course of most people on this board, left or right. Setting up strawman arguments is something we all do sometimes either on purpose or inadvertently. In this case, it was on purpose of course but it is a debating tactic, not a very good one but still. I would and I have called Azog dishonest, that's about as far as I'd go.

Setting up straw men? So a black man resists arrest throws punches at the police, ends up getting shot, dies, then this gives the right to liberal/anarchists to riot and burn cities? Moderates are liberals too ashamed to admit they are liberals...just as stupid though.

Yes, that's a strawman because there are as far as I know exactly zero liberals that I know that have said anybody has the right to riot and burn cities. Feel free to give me an example of it but we both know you won't. That is in fact a strawman. See how that works?

See how this guy is defending the liberals. Show me liberals like Nan from San Fransicko condemning the actions of BLM and other racist liberal organizations?

Ah, since you can't support your strawman you are now trying to shift the burden of proof to me? That is in fact another fallacy. So is begging the question as you do in your second sentence by trying to prove one assertion by making another one. If you want to talk to me about fallacious arguments it would probably be helpful for you to look up the different ones and apply them to what you write.

So when ANTIFA, who didnt have a permit to protest, showed up in Charleston Va, and started a fight with the KKK, who had a legal permit to protest by Black Face Northam, all the Lame Stream Media was wanting the president to condemn the actions, while he President Trump said that both sides did have a few good people. Where is the Lame Stream Media not wanting Nancy and Chuck to condemn the actions of the rioters and looters? If you dont want to answer that is fine, i can put you with the other 100 stupid liberal posters on my ignore list..

This might come as a surprise to you, but I don't care if you put me on ignore. It's your prerogative to shut out everybody who doesn't agree with you. Quite frankly it says more about you than it does about me.

As it stands YOU decided to query me about a statement I made. That is fine. I answered the question and asked YOU to support your assertion. YOU choose instead of doing that, just ask me another question. I have absolutely no problem answering however many questions you like. If it's an intelligent question it even has the chance of me agreeing on a certain point with you. What I won't do is allow you to ignore my questions because YOU don't want to answer mine. So...

Question one. Give me evidence of ANY liberal condoning burning cities or looting. Then we'll continue.

Ilhan Bin Omar;

{

2. Reject any attempt to criminalize peaceful protest https://twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/1267247808194764800 … }

One would be hard-pressed to find instances of “peaceful protests” as violence and anarchy erupted in major cities across the U.S. over the weekend, with the chaotic scenes dominating news coverage. Video after video shows protesters embracing Antifa-like tactics, setting buildings and police vehicles on fire, pillaging businesses, and violently attacking authorities.

You're question is answered.

Next straw man argument?

What do you think you have answered? You showed me Ilhan Ben Omar's twitter account and then made some statement about supporting "peaceful protests". Do you realize someone can support a protest and not condone looting and violence?

Maybe this will illustrate it for you. I'm going to make an assumption that might be wrong about you but is for sure true for a lot of people on the right. Quite a few supported the Charleston protests. Yet most will not have supported that idiot driving his car into a mass of people.

" Quite a few supported the Charleston protests. Yet most will not have supported that idiot driving his car into a mass of people "

MOST?

I dunno....

judging by their own words and comments I think MOST WOULD support and approve of it.

I don't personally think this board is indicative of most Republicans. At least I hope not.

"I don't personally think this board is indicative of most Republicans."

ok

BUT

trump PACKS THEM IN at his rallies;

View attachment 350181View attachment 350182

and limbaugh claims to have 20 million of them

and fox news has the LARGEST audience.....

so....THAT is a LOT of people who are subjected to the nonstop approval of VIOLENCE directed at their "enemies"

limbaugh "leave only SOME liberals left alive"

coulter "we should SHOOT A FEW! to let the rest know it could happen to THEM"

Trump (retweeted) "the ONLY GOOD DEMOCRAT is a DEAD DEMOCRAT"

so....

I think I'll stick with answer number 1; MOST!

The board is indicative of Trumpsters, not Republicans.

"The board is indicative of Trumpsters, not Republicans."

ok

I certainly RESPECT the NEVER-TRUMPERS!

however, since trump still has the support of MOST of the republican party....

unless otherwise shown I will assume that MOST registered Republicans are STILL planning on voting for trump....

So I will agree that there are MILLIONS of GOOD and HONORABLE Republicans but I still think they are outnumbered by the trumpers......

However, there are no good Democrats that are tired of the Democrat's disastrous policy to turn this country into a Socialist shithole, are there?

Only assholes align themselves with the Democrat filth nowadays.

The Democrat Party is the scum of America. A coalition of all the filth; Negroes that vote their race and welfare check, Environmental Wackos, Anti Gun Nuts, Queers, Feminazis, Welfare Queens, Illegals, uneducated Moon Bats and confused college kids and their bat shit crazy Marxist professors.

 

[anynameyouwish]

No

Dang Democrats!

This is pipe dream shit meant to feed the n-I-g-g-e-r-s and the s-p-I-c-s because they're stupid enough to believe that shit.

Today blacks act like animals because they are BARELY evolved past the Ape and need a strong central figure (the white man) to keep them in place and acting like normal people.

Sick of their shit and we should not hide it anymore. When they call me a fucking racist, and I say you damn right I am!!! Fuck those fucking people!

Why do Browns ("people of color") feel compelled to steal, assault, rape, murder Whites, their obvious superior beings? Browns should be worshiping Whites instead of being jealous douchebag criminals.'

Blacks... prone to violence, think they're still in the jungle, low IQ blacks.

How can you look at the world and not see that ALL ADVANCEMENTS came from Europe and America? Yeah, we're the superior race on the earth. All others developed because of whites

Look, he is actually intelligent and an actual person of color! How often does that happen?

“We swear muthafuckers, you take our beaners from us and we’ll come for your guns one day” Filthy fucks!

MAGA! This is great news! Everything is falling into place so we can build the Wall and thwart this invasion of brown diseease ridden third worlders who are a threat to our sovereignty, culture and American traditions.

Being the elected representative of a bunch of dumbass ghetto Jungle Monkeys doesn't take intelligence. It take a ghetto dialect and a promise to get them more welfare.

Valerie Jarrett.... Is she that light skinned negro who looks like that ape in Planet of the Apes (negroes?)

I thought she was an ape...Next you'll be telling me Mooch isn't really a shaved wookie.

The asians made fun of obama.....the asians refer to negroes as 'monkey people' and not in jest....they are serious....and why shouldn't they be?

Pay the pavement ape or he will get very angry and burn his house down.

Yawn, Kambala wants every African American crack addict to have their own home while White, Red, and Yellow Americans some disabled vets rot on the street.

Nigga's acting like a Nigga...must be part of the Thugery... most blacks don't act like that!

I believe the black race is inferior to both the white and yellow races....I can prove it by taking a look at the world map and income, innovation/scientific discoveries, and prison populations. Maybe you have some other mysterious way of defining the word but you never seem to say what it is.

Most intelligent people understand how stupid blacks are....average i.q. of 85.....being one you should know.

Come on people you blacks are better than this shit every fucking week....stand BEHIND your police, you do the crime you get locked up...you fuck with THE MAN, he has every right to beat the shit out of you, and your community standing behind you just shows what stupid, low life idiots you are!

Fuck off House Negro. Shine my boots bitch

Hasn't it been proven, in the last few days, that blacks are incapable of living in the environment of civilization? Send them back to Africa.

..just like Africa is the shithole of the world, the black US communities mirror that

You can take a negro out of the ghetto. But you can't take the ghetto out of the negro.

No quotes from me? Whats the matter Mac? You Leftist Loon.

Kind of a weird thing to feel jealous about?

Where do you get the feeling that I am "jealous"? You missed the meaning behind my post entirely.

Could be. I personally feel that using other people's posts in order to make a point is a good debating tactic, and providing you don't completely take it out of context an honest tactic.

His premise is that all who disagree with him are racist. So I asked him to point to one of my posts that is racist. I vehemently disagree with Macs views. Doesn’t make me a racist. It just makes me logical. This is why he dodges me. I do not fit his narrative.

His premise, how I see it at least, is that there are plenty of people who are racist on this board. And that all of them are supporting Trump. If he didn't include you that's a good thing. He didn't make the argument as far as I can see that being a Trump supporter means you're racist. Feel free to go through this OP and use Mac's words against him and prove me wrong?

Plenty of racists and antisemites here on the other side too.

Define those terms please and then back that up? Speaking for myself, for instance, I don't like what the State of Israel is doing. They are grabbing land in my opinion that they don't have a right to. I don't hate Jews at all, I have no prejudice against them whatsoever. I do have a strong opinion though on the legitimacy of some of the actions they take. Do you consider that being an anti-Semite and if so do you feel one can have an opinion on anyone else without being bigoted?

State of Israel? You mean the people as Israel is a Democracy. Your post is idiotic. 53+ mostly Islamic countries and the safest place for a Muslim woman is in Israel. Only reason Israel is vilified is because it is a Jewish State. No one gives a shit about Islamists exterminating the Kurds. Or those in Lebanon treating Palestinians worse than dirt. Israel is an easy target. Your opinion is based on ignorance so yes you’re an antisemite. Your statement is like me saying, I dont dislike blacks at all except for those inner city blacks. You’re either uneducated or you’re an antisemite. Pick one.

No, I mean the state of Israel as in the nation and it's leader who at this moment although only supported by a minority of the populace is moving to not just occupy but full annex the West Bank. By the way, Democratically elected governments are fully capable of doing immoral stuff if you want I'll give you a history lesson. You inferring from my statements that I don't like stuff what Israel is doing based on me having a problem with Jews is a leap, to say the least. I don't need to dislike the Jewish people in order to condemn the country they inhabit for annexing territory belonging to someone else. As a matter of fact, My mother-in-law was Jewish.

This brings me to this. It's fascinating to me to see the cognitive dissonance displayed here. You reply to a post in an effort to call someone on a perceived inability to distinguish between the actions of individuals and the group as a whole and at the same time are perfectly willing to condemn me as anti-Semitic because I distinguish between the actions of individuals and the group as whole.

Israel is a democracy. The people there have been under attack for decades. The land is theirs. Read about it. The fact that you side with terror regimes speaks volumes

You know for someone who doesn't like being painted a racist because they support the GOP ( a claim that was never made btw), you are very eager to paint other people in a certain way because they support other things. You are right this conversation speaks volumes about someone, just not convinced it's about me it speaks. "You don't support Israel's annexation of the West Bank therefor you support terrorist regimes." You are missing a few steps in your reasoning there don't you think?

It is the same reasoning that one bad cop does a dirty deed, so the radicals go and burn cities and hurt innocent people, then want all police banned. Seems that you are missing a few brain cells.

I'm missing a few brain cells? I see. Do you think these people are only protesting because of this one bad cop? I know to acknowledge reality is probably fatal for some people but let me enlighten you under the presumption that you are actually capable of understanding reality. These people are protesting LOTS of bad cops. You don't have to sit on somebody's neck for almost nine minutes to be a bad cop. You can be a bad cop when you stop black people for no apparent reason. Or you can have a bad justice system when it systematically pronounces harsher sentences for the same crimes when you're black. And yes you are a really bad cop when you kill unarmed people.

I already said how I feel about the protests (unwise) and made it absolutely clear that I don't condone looting or hurting people (arrest and prosecute them) as MOST of the people who actually did protest don't either.

If it wasn’t just the one bad cop then why weren’t they protesting before this? Why weren’t they protesting as 1000s were dying in Chicago? Do tell. You feel all whites are racist? Silence = Violence.

Lol NOT protesting before this? Civil rights movement - Wikipedia quite a few protests here.
protests here Shooting of Tamir Rice - Wikipedia ,here Shooting of Michael Brown - Wikipedia here, The Mysterious Death of Freddie Gray here, Shooting of Philando Castile - Wikipedia oh and who can forget here, Rodney King - Wikipedia

How many more protests do you need?

Nothing like this. Don’t be obtuse.

I'm being obtuse? Azog I'm not the one claiming that protests against racial discrimination or against police brutality against blacks are a new phenomenon. You are quite funny I give you that.

This is new. Not since Rodney King has it been like this. So do you believe that silence is violence?

New means it never happened before. This is NOT new, not even close. As to silence is violence I understand the sentiment not sure I agree. It's not a new concept either.
“The world suffers a lot. Not because the violence of bad people. But because of the silence of the good people.”
Napoleon
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Edmund Burke

Not sure? Yes or no? If I choose to live my life and not opine, is that “violence”?

Nope. It also won't solve anything when you ignore problems. Why is it even relevant? I don't mind you deflecting like this but it is a bit random.

It’s not a deflection. These rallies are about guilt and not about substance.

Just because you ignore the substance doesn't mean it's not present. That is has substance is apparent from the fact that politicians on both sides are arguing for in some cases substantive measures in response to these protests. Something that wouldn't have happened without these protests.

I disagree. The protests will backfire. My wife was very sympathetic and now she has shifted the other way. I doubt She is the only one.

It's certain she's not the only one. On the other hand, it's also certain that these protests have made more people aware there is actually a problem. By the way, the reason your wife is losing sympathy for the protests is likely because you and the people on the right are highlighting the riots and stuff like "silence is violence" in a bid to claim these protests are "without substance". It's also again you ignoring that your assertions are demonstrably false. If you say the protests have no substance and I reply by pointing out that the protest has motivated substantive measures at no point is what your wife thinks relevant. Just like asking about 'silence is violence" after claiming something is new while at the same acknowledging it isn't, is relevant.

I have a basic problem. My problem is that I hate when people dodge questions, so I tend to answer every point a person makes individually, this is often used by people as a way to never ever take responsibility for what they say no matter how asinine. They just change the subject and I let their stupidity stand. You have done this now to many times.

Aware that entitled white kids are looting and burning under the guise of BLM. Got it.

Sure I get it. You made it absolutely clear that as long as you can claim that that's what it's about you can pretend that there is no substance. As I said dishonesty will allow you to do that.

I see what I see. I dont buy the fake outrage. These same people go home and feel better about themselves while not accomplishing anything. Silence is violence. LOL

You see what you want to see. And that's perfectly fine with me. If you can't understand that somebody could be outraged by this event or by what's happened to black people in the US since it's inception there is nothing I or anybody else can say to convince you. Silence might not be violence, but silence will for sure allow violence to continue, by all means, stick your head in the sand and pretend that every time something happens that causes protests like this it's "new" and "without substance" or "fueled by fake outrage".

OK

So what action items will you be embracing to change this? Do tell. You cannot force someone not to be racist. I am Jew and I cannot force you to see how stupid your views on Israel are. So stick your own head in the sand. Your little digs are laughable.

did you call him an anti semite & holocaust denier yet, per your M.O.?

He tried, more than once lol.

no doubt he did.

#pathetic #cowardly #can'tdebateworthadamn

I wouldn't go that far. The fact of the matter is that it's about par for the course of most people on this board, left or right. Setting up strawman arguments is something we all do sometimes either on purpose or inadvertently. In this case, it was on purpose of course but it is a debating tactic, not a very good one but still. I would and I have called Azog dishonest, that's about as far as I'd go.

Setting up straw men? So a black man resists arrest throws punches at the police, ends up getting shot, dies, then this gives the right to liberal/anarchists to riot and burn cities? Moderates are liberals too ashamed to admit they are liberals...just as stupid though.

Yes, that's a strawman because there are as far as I know exactly zero liberals that I know that have said anybody has the right to riot and burn cities. Feel free to give me an example of it but we both know you won't. That is in fact a strawman. See how that works?

See how this guy is defending the liberals. Show me liberals like Nan from San Fransicko condemning the actions of BLM and other racist liberal organizations?

Ah, since you can't support your strawman you are now trying to shift the burden of proof to me? That is in fact another fallacy. So is begging the question as you do in your second sentence by trying to prove one assertion by making another one. If you want to talk to me about fallacious arguments it would probably be helpful for you to look up the different ones and apply them to what you write.

So when ANTIFA, who didnt have a permit to protest, showed up in Charleston Va, and started a fight with the KKK, who had a legal permit to protest by Black Face Northam, all the Lame Stream Media was wanting the president to condemn the actions, while he President Trump said that both sides did have a few good people. Where is the Lame Stream Media not wanting Nancy and Chuck to condemn the actions of the rioters and looters? If you dont want to answer that is fine, i can put you with the other 100 stupid liberal posters on my ignore list..

This might come as a surprise to you, but I don't care if you put me on ignore. It's your prerogative to shut out everybody who doesn't agree with you. Quite frankly it says more about you than it does about me.

As it stands YOU decided to query me about a statement I made. That is fine. I answered the question and asked YOU to support your assertion. YOU choose instead of doing that, just ask me another question. I have absolutely no problem answering however many questions you like. If it's an intelligent question it even has the chance of me agreeing on a certain point with you. What I won't do is allow you to ignore my questions because YOU don't want to answer mine. So...

Question one. Give me evidence of ANY liberal condoning burning cities or looting. Then we'll continue.

Ilhan Bin Omar;

{

2. Reject any attempt to criminalize peaceful protest https://twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/1267247808194764800 … }

One would be hard-pressed to find instances of “peaceful protests” as violence and anarchy erupted in major cities across the U.S. over the weekend, with the chaotic scenes dominating news coverage. Video after video shows protesters embracing Antifa-like tactics, setting buildings and police vehicles on fire, pillaging businesses, and violently attacking authorities.

You're question is answered.

Next straw man argument?

What do you think you have answered? You showed me Ilhan Ben Omar's twitter account and then made some statement about supporting "peaceful protests". Do you realize someone can support a protest and not condone looting and violence?

Maybe this will illustrate it for you. I'm going to make an assumption that might be wrong about you but is for sure true for a lot of people on the right. Quite a few supported the Charleston protests. Yet most will not have supported that idiot driving his car into a mass of people.

" Quite a few supported the Charleston protests. Yet most will not have supported that idiot driving his car into a mass of people "

MOST?

I dunno....

judging by their own words and comments I think MOST WOULD support and approve of it.

I don't personally think this board is indicative of most Republicans. At least I hope not.

"I don't personally think this board is indicative of most Republicans."

ok

BUT

trump PACKS THEM IN at his rallies;

View attachment 350181View attachment 350182

and limbaugh claims to have 20 million of them

and fox news has the LARGEST audience.....

so....THAT is a LOT of people who are subjected to the nonstop approval of VIOLENCE directed at their "enemies"

limbaugh "leave only SOME liberals left alive"

coulter "we should SHOOT A FEW! to let the rest know it could happen to THEM"

Trump (retweeted) "the ONLY GOOD DEMOCRAT is a DEAD DEMOCRAT"

so....

I think I'll stick with answer number 1; MOST!

The board is indicative of Trumpsters, not Republicans.

"The board is indicative of Trumpsters, not Republicans."

ok

I certainly RESPECT the NEVER-TRUMPERS!

however, since trump still has the support of MOST of the republican party....

unless otherwise shown I will assume that MOST registered Republicans are STILL planning on voting for trump....

So I will agree that there are MILLIONS of GOOD and HONORABLE Republicans but I still think they are outnumbered by the trumpers......

Do you think voting for a guy who though black men were super predators along with the Clinton's should be voted into office? Will you cast your vote for the groper of women and children Joe Biden?

there are only 2 choices


a POS, CRIMINAL, LIAR, who panders to dictators, mocks and ridicules DECENT people....

or a democrat

I will NOT vote for the POS, CRIMINAL, LIAR, who panders to dictators, mocks and ridicules DECENT people....

 

[playtime]

oh look - nothing i said was a lie.

whilst all you ever have is lies.

You are mistaken, I'm not a filthy, pathological democrat. I leaving the lying to you Marxist scum.

Let's look at the Stalinist lies for today..

MSNBC lies about Trump on Chokeholds;

Trump said;

{ "I don't like chokeholds," Trump began. "Now I will say this. You grow up, and you wrestle and you fight, or you see what happens. Sometimes if you're alone and you're fighting somebody, it's tough. And you get somebody in a chokehold, what are you gonna do, say 'Oh,' and it's a real bad person and you know that and they do exist…What are you going to do? Let them go, and say ‘let’s start all over again, I’m not allowed to have you in a chokehold’? ... If you have two people or in the case, we're talking about four people... it's a very, very tricky situation." }


BUT you commie bastards posted;

View attachment 350174

Hey, democrats are lying fucks, it's just what you do. The demagogue - sociopath party...

blah blah fucking blah on your part.... i don't care what MSNBC says - i don't watch 'em.

anyhoo...



not only fox - but i bet you watch OANN too. lol... amiright?

 

[Flash]

View attachment 350157

^^^View attachment 350206

I served in the Army of the United States in a war. Where did you serve?

 

[anynameyouwish]

No

Dang Democrats!

This is pipe dream shit meant to feed the n-I-g-g-e-r-s and the s-p-I-c-s because they're stupid enough to believe that shit.

Today blacks act like animals because they are BARELY evolved past the Ape and need a strong central figure (the white man) to keep them in place and acting like normal people.

Sick of their shit and we should not hide it anymore. When they call me a fucking racist, and I say you damn right I am!!! Fuck those fucking people!

Why do Browns ("people of color") feel compelled to steal, assault, rape, murder Whites, their obvious superior beings? Browns should be worshiping Whites instead of being jealous douchebag criminals.'

Blacks... prone to violence, think they're still in the jungle, low IQ blacks.

How can you look at the world and not see that ALL ADVANCEMENTS came from Europe and America? Yeah, we're the superior race on the earth. All others developed because of whites

Look, he is actually intelligent and an actual person of color! How often does that happen?

“We swear muthafuckers, you take our beaners from us and we’ll come for your guns one day” Filthy fucks!

MAGA! This is great news! Everything is falling into place so we can build the Wall and thwart this invasion of brown diseease ridden third worlders who are a threat to our sovereignty, culture and American traditions.

Being the elected representative of a bunch of dumbass ghetto Jungle Monkeys doesn't take intelligence. It take a ghetto dialect and a promise to get them more welfare.

Valerie Jarrett.... Is she that light skinned negro who looks like that ape in Planet of the Apes (negroes?)

I thought she was an ape...Next you'll be telling me Mooch isn't really a shaved wookie.

The asians made fun of obama.....the asians refer to negroes as 'monkey people' and not in jest....they are serious....and why shouldn't they be?

Pay the pavement ape or he will get very angry and burn his house down.

Yawn, Kambala wants every African American crack addict to have their own home while White, Red, and Yellow Americans some disabled vets rot on the street.

Nigga's acting like a Nigga...must be part of the Thugery... most blacks don't act like that!

I believe the black race is inferior to both the white and yellow races....I can prove it by taking a look at the world map and income, innovation/scientific discoveries, and prison populations. Maybe you have some other mysterious way of defining the word but you never seem to say what it is.

Most intelligent people understand how stupid blacks are....average i.q. of 85.....being one you should know.

Come on people you blacks are better than this shit every fucking week....stand BEHIND your police, you do the crime you get locked up...you fuck with THE MAN, he has every right to beat the shit out of you, and your community standing behind you just shows what stupid, low life idiots you are!

Fuck off House Negro. Shine my boots bitch

Hasn't it been proven, in the last few days, that blacks are incapable of living in the environment of civilization? Send them back to Africa.

..just like Africa is the shithole of the world, the black US communities mirror that

You can take a negro out of the ghetto. But you can't take the ghetto out of the negro.

No quotes from me? Whats the matter Mac? You Leftist Loon.

Kind of a weird thing to feel jealous about?

Where do you get the feeling that I am "jealous"? You missed the meaning behind my post entirely.

Could be. I personally feel that using other people's posts in order to make a point is a good debating tactic, and providing you don't completely take it out of context an honest tactic.

His premise is that all who disagree with him are racist. So I asked him to point to one of my posts that is racist. I vehemently disagree with Macs views. Doesn’t make me a racist. It just makes me logical. This is why he dodges me. I do not fit his narrative.

His premise, how I see it at least, is that there are plenty of people who are racist on this board. And that all of them are supporting Trump. If he didn't include you that's a good thing. He didn't make the argument as far as I can see that being a Trump supporter means you're racist. Feel free to go through this OP and use Mac's words against him and prove me wrong?

Plenty of racists and antisemites here on the other side too.

Define those terms please and then back that up? Speaking for myself, for instance, I don't like what the State of Israel is doing. They are grabbing land in my opinion that they don't have a right to. I don't hate Jews at all, I have no prejudice against them whatsoever. I do have a strong opinion though on the legitimacy of some of the actions they take. Do you consider that being an anti-Semite and if so do you feel one can have an opinion on anyone else without being bigoted?

State of Israel? You mean the people as Israel is a Democracy. Your post is idiotic. 53+ mostly Islamic countries and the safest place for a Muslim woman is in Israel. Only reason Israel is vilified is because it is a Jewish State. No one gives a shit about Islamists exterminating the Kurds. Or those in Lebanon treating Palestinians worse than dirt. Israel is an easy target. Your opinion is based on ignorance so yes you’re an antisemite. Your statement is like me saying, I dont dislike blacks at all except for those inner city blacks. You’re either uneducated or you’re an antisemite. Pick one.

No, I mean the state of Israel as in the nation and it's leader who at this moment although only supported by a minority of the populace is moving to not just occupy but full annex the West Bank. By the way, Democratically elected governments are fully capable of doing immoral stuff if you want I'll give you a history lesson. You inferring from my statements that I don't like stuff what Israel is doing based on me having a problem with Jews is a leap, to say the least. I don't need to dislike the Jewish people in order to condemn the country they inhabit for annexing territory belonging to someone else. As a matter of fact, My mother-in-law was Jewish.

This brings me to this. It's fascinating to me to see the cognitive dissonance displayed here. You reply to a post in an effort to call someone on a perceived inability to distinguish between the actions of individuals and the group as a whole and at the same time are perfectly willing to condemn me as anti-Semitic because I distinguish between the actions of individuals and the group as whole.

Israel is a democracy. The people there have been under attack for decades. The land is theirs. Read about it. The fact that you side with terror regimes speaks volumes

You know for someone who doesn't like being painted a racist because they support the GOP ( a claim that was never made btw), you are very eager to paint other people in a certain way because they support other things. You are right this conversation speaks volumes about someone, just not convinced it's about me it speaks. "You don't support Israel's annexation of the West Bank therefor you support terrorist regimes." You are missing a few steps in your reasoning there don't you think?

It is the same reasoning that one bad cop does a dirty deed, so the radicals go and burn cities and hurt innocent people, then want all police banned. Seems that you are missing a few brain cells.

I'm missing a few brain cells? I see. Do you think these people are only protesting because of this one bad cop? I know to acknowledge reality is probably fatal for some people but let me enlighten you under the presumption that you are actually capable of understanding reality. These people are protesting LOTS of bad cops. You don't have to sit on somebody's neck for almost nine minutes to be a bad cop. You can be a bad cop when you stop black people for no apparent reason. Or you can have a bad justice system when it systematically pronounces harsher sentences for the same crimes when you're black. And yes you are a really bad cop when you kill unarmed people.

I already said how I feel about the protests (unwise) and made it absolutely clear that I don't condone looting or hurting people (arrest and prosecute them) as MOST of the people who actually did protest don't either.

If it wasn’t just the one bad cop then why weren’t they protesting before this? Why weren’t they protesting as 1000s were dying in Chicago? Do tell. You feel all whites are racist? Silence = Violence.

Lol NOT protesting before this? Civil rights movement - Wikipedia quite a few protests here.
protests here Shooting of Tamir Rice - Wikipedia ,here Shooting of Michael Brown - Wikipedia here, The Mysterious Death of Freddie Gray here, Shooting of Philando Castile - Wikipedia oh and who can forget here, Rodney King - Wikipedia

How many more protests do you need?

Nothing like this. Don’t be obtuse.

I'm being obtuse? Azog I'm not the one claiming that protests against racial discrimination or against police brutality against blacks are a new phenomenon. You are quite funny I give you that.

This is new. Not since Rodney King has it been like this. So do you believe that silence is violence?

New means it never happened before. This is NOT new, not even close. As to silence is violence I understand the sentiment not sure I agree. It's not a new concept either.
“The world suffers a lot. Not because the violence of bad people. But because of the silence of the good people.”
Napoleon
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Edmund Burke

Not sure? Yes or no? If I choose to live my life and not opine, is that “violence”?

Nope. It also won't solve anything when you ignore problems. Why is it even relevant? I don't mind you deflecting like this but it is a bit random.

It’s not a deflection. These rallies are about guilt and not about substance.

Just because you ignore the substance doesn't mean it's not present. That is has substance is apparent from the fact that politicians on both sides are arguing for in some cases substantive measures in response to these protests. Something that wouldn't have happened without these protests.

I disagree. The protests will backfire. My wife was very sympathetic and now she has shifted the other way. I doubt She is the only one.

It's certain she's not the only one. On the other hand, it's also certain that these protests have made more people aware there is actually a problem. By the way, the reason your wife is losing sympathy for the protests is likely because you and the people on the right are highlighting the riots and stuff like "silence is violence" in a bid to claim these protests are "without substance". It's also again you ignoring that your assertions are demonstrably false. If you say the protests have no substance and I reply by pointing out that the protest has motivated substantive measures at no point is what your wife thinks relevant. Just like asking about 'silence is violence" after claiming something is new while at the same acknowledging it isn't, is relevant.

I have a basic problem. My problem is that I hate when people dodge questions, so I tend to answer every point a person makes individually, this is often used by people as a way to never ever take responsibility for what they say no matter how asinine. They just change the subject and I let their stupidity stand. You have done this now to many times.

Aware that entitled white kids are looting and burning under the guise of BLM. Got it.

Sure I get it. You made it absolutely clear that as long as you can claim that that's what it's about you can pretend that there is no substance. As I said dishonesty will allow you to do that.

I see what I see. I dont buy the fake outrage. These same people go home and feel better about themselves while not accomplishing anything. Silence is violence. LOL

You see what you want to see. And that's perfectly fine with me. If you can't understand that somebody could be outraged by this event or by what's happened to black people in the US since it's inception there is nothing I or anybody else can say to convince you. Silence might not be violence, but silence will for sure allow violence to continue, by all means, stick your head in the sand and pretend that every time something happens that causes protests like this it's "new" and "without substance" or "fueled by fake outrage".

OK

So what action items will you be embracing to change this? Do tell. You cannot force someone not to be racist. I am Jew and I cannot force you to see how stupid your views on Israel are. So stick your own head in the sand. Your little digs are laughable.

did you call him an anti semite & holocaust denier yet, per your M.O.?

He tried, more than once lol.

no doubt he did.

#pathetic #cowardly #can'tdebateworthadamn

I wouldn't go that far. The fact of the matter is that it's about par for the course of most people on this board, left or right. Setting up strawman arguments is something we all do sometimes either on purpose or inadvertently. In this case, it was on purpose of course but it is a debating tactic, not a very good one but still. I would and I have called Azog dishonest, that's about as far as I'd go.

Setting up straw men? So a black man resists arrest throws punches at the police, ends up getting shot, dies, then this gives the right to liberal/anarchists to riot and burn cities? Moderates are liberals too ashamed to admit they are liberals...just as stupid though.

Yes, that's a strawman because there are as far as I know exactly zero liberals that I know that have said anybody has the right to riot and burn cities. Feel free to give me an example of it but we both know you won't. That is in fact a strawman. See how that works?

See how this guy is defending the liberals. Show me liberals like Nan from San Fransicko condemning the actions of BLM and other racist liberal organizations?

Ah, since you can't support your strawman you are now trying to shift the burden of proof to me? That is in fact another fallacy. So is begging the question as you do in your second sentence by trying to prove one assertion by making another one. If you want to talk to me about fallacious arguments it would probably be helpful for you to look up the different ones and apply them to what you write.

So when ANTIFA, who didnt have a permit to protest, showed up in Charleston Va, and started a fight with the KKK, who had a legal permit to protest by Black Face Northam, all the Lame Stream Media was wanting the president to condemn the actions, while he President Trump said that both sides did have a few good people. Where is the Lame Stream Media not wanting Nancy and Chuck to condemn the actions of the rioters and looters? If you dont want to answer that is fine, i can put you with the other 100 stupid liberal posters on my ignore list..

This might come as a surprise to you, but I don't care if you put me on ignore. It's your prerogative to shut out everybody who doesn't agree with you. Quite frankly it says more about you than it does about me.

As it stands YOU decided to query me about a statement I made. That is fine. I answered the question and asked YOU to support your assertion. YOU choose instead of doing that, just ask me another question. I have absolutely no problem answering however many questions you like. If it's an intelligent question it even has the chance of me agreeing on a certain point with you. What I won't do is allow you to ignore my questions because YOU don't want to answer mine. So...

Question one. Give me evidence of ANY liberal condoning burning cities or looting. Then we'll continue.

Ilhan Bin Omar;

{

2. Reject any attempt to criminalize peaceful protest https://twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/1267247808194764800 … }

One would be hard-pressed to find instances of “peaceful protests” as violence and anarchy erupted in major cities across the U.S. over the weekend, with the chaotic scenes dominating news coverage. Video after video shows protesters embracing Antifa-like tactics, setting buildings and police vehicles on fire, pillaging businesses, and violently attacking authorities.

You're question is answered.

Next straw man argument?

What do you think you have answered? You showed me Ilhan Ben Omar's twitter account and then made some statement about supporting "peaceful protests". Do you realize someone can support a protest and not condone looting and violence?

Maybe this will illustrate it for you. I'm going to make an assumption that might be wrong about you but is for sure true for a lot of people on the right. Quite a few supported the Charleston protests. Yet most will not have supported that idiot driving his car into a mass of people.

" Quite a few supported the Charleston protests. Yet most will not have supported that idiot driving his car into a mass of people "

MOST?

I dunno....

judging by their own words and comments I think MOST WOULD support and approve of it.

I don't personally think this board is indicative of most Republicans. At least I hope not.

"I don't personally think this board is indicative of most Republicans."

ok

BUT

trump PACKS THEM IN at his rallies;

View attachment 350181View attachment 350182

and limbaugh claims to have 20 million of them

and fox news has the LARGEST audience.....

so....THAT is a LOT of people who are subjected to the nonstop approval of VIOLENCE directed at their "enemies"

limbaugh "leave only SOME liberals left alive"

coulter "we should SHOOT A FEW! to let the rest know it could happen to THEM"

Trump (retweeted) "the ONLY GOOD DEMOCRAT is a DEAD DEMOCRAT"

so....

I think I'll stick with answer number 1; MOST!

The board is indicative of Trumpsters, not Republicans.

"The board is indicative of Trumpsters, not Republicans."

ok

I certainly RESPECT the NEVER-TRUMPERS!

however, since trump still has the support of MOST of the republican party....

unless otherwise shown I will assume that MOST registered Republicans are STILL planning on voting for trump....

So I will agree that there are MILLIONS of GOOD and HONORABLE Republicans but I still think they are outnumbered by the trumpers......

However, there are no good Democrats that are tired of the Democrat;s disastrous policy to turn this country into a Socialist shithole, are there?

Only assholes align themselves with the Democrat filth nowadays.

The Democrat Party is the scum of America. A coalition of all the filth; Negroes that vote their race and welfare check, Environmental Wackos, Anti Gun Nuts, Queers, Feminazis, Welfare Queens, Illegals, uneducated Moon Bats and confused college kids and their bat shit crazy Marxist professors.

anyone displaying the confederate flag is a traitor to the USA.

 

[playtime]

Democrats are the scum of this country.

Siding with the looters, rioters, ANTIFA and BLM filth and having their nominee this corrupt Biden clown just shows how morally bankrupted they are.

Trump will win by a landslide and there ain't a damn thing these stupid hate filled Moon Bats can do about it. They had better get out their pink pussy hats and red flannel pajamas and practice howling at the sky .

anyone displaying the confedeRAT flag is a traitor.

and human garbage.

& looooosers.... they need to get over it. they lost.

bigley, 'cause the south ain't rising again.

You mean like 2016, when despite you buying the dirty dossier from the Kremlin to rig the election, you still lost?

Yet you traitor fucks never seem to get over it.

more pablum from a basket dwelling deplorable.

yer dismissed.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

No

Dang Democrats!

This is pipe dream shit meant to feed the n-I-g-g-e-r-s and the s-p-I-c-s because they're stupid enough to believe that shit.

Today blacks act like animals because they are BARELY evolved past the Ape and need a strong central figure (the white man) to keep them in place and acting like normal people.

Sick of their shit and we should not hide it anymore. When they call me a fucking racist, and I say you damn right I am!!! Fuck those fucking people!

Why do Browns ("people of color") feel compelled to steal, assault, rape, murder Whites, their obvious superior beings? Browns should be worshiping Whites instead of being jealous douchebag criminals.'

Blacks... prone to violence, think they're still in the jungle, low IQ blacks.

How can you look at the world and not see that ALL ADVANCEMENTS came from Europe and America? Yeah, we're the superior race on the earth. All others developed because of whites

Look, he is actually intelligent and an actual person of color! How often does that happen?

“We swear muthafuckers, you take our beaners from us and we’ll come for your guns one day” Filthy fucks!

MAGA! This is great news! Everything is falling into place so we can build the Wall and thwart this invasion of brown diseease ridden third worlders who are a threat to our sovereignty, culture and American traditions.

Being the elected representative of a bunch of dumbass ghetto Jungle Monkeys doesn't take intelligence. It take a ghetto dialect and a promise to get them more welfare.

Valerie Jarrett.... Is she that light skinned negro who looks like that ape in Planet of the Apes (negroes?)

I thought she was an ape...Next you'll be telling me Mooch isn't really a shaved wookie.

The asians made fun of obama.....the asians refer to negroes as 'monkey people' and not in jest....they are serious....and why shouldn't they be?

Pay the pavement ape or he will get very angry and burn his house down.

Yawn, Kambala wants every African American crack addict to have their own home while White, Red, and Yellow Americans some disabled vets rot on the street.

Nigga's acting like a Nigga...must be part of the Thugery... most blacks don't act like that!

I believe the black race is inferior to both the white and yellow races....I can prove it by taking a look at the world map and income, innovation/scientific discoveries, and prison populations. Maybe you have some other mysterious way of defining the word but you never seem to say what it is.

Most intelligent people understand how stupid blacks are....average i.q. of 85.....being one you should know.

Come on people you blacks are better than this shit every fucking week....stand BEHIND your police, you do the crime you get locked up...you fuck with THE MAN, he has every right to beat the shit out of you, and your community standing behind you just shows what stupid, low life idiots you are!

Fuck off House Negro. Shine my boots bitch

Hasn't it been proven, in the last few days, that blacks are incapable of living in the environment of civilization? Send them back to Africa.

..just like Africa is the shithole of the world, the black US communities mirror that

You can take a negro out of the ghetto. But you can't take the ghetto out of the negro.

No quotes from me? Whats the matter Mac? You Leftist Loon.

Kind of a weird thing to feel jealous about?

Where do you get the feeling that I am "jealous"? You missed the meaning behind my post entirely.

Could be. I personally feel that using other people's posts in order to make a point is a good debating tactic, and providing you don't completely take it out of context an honest tactic.

His premise is that all who disagree with him are racist. So I asked him to point to one of my posts that is racist. I vehemently disagree with Macs views. Doesn’t make me a racist. It just makes me logical. This is why he dodges me. I do not fit his narrative.

His premise, how I see it at least, is that there are plenty of people who are racist on this board. And that all of them are supporting Trump. If he didn't include you that's a good thing. He didn't make the argument as far as I can see that being a Trump supporter means you're racist. Feel free to go through this OP and use Mac's words against him and prove me wrong?

Plenty of racists and antisemites here on the other side too.

Define those terms please and then back that up? Speaking for myself, for instance, I don't like what the State of Israel is doing. They are grabbing land in my opinion that they don't have a right to. I don't hate Jews at all, I have no prejudice against them whatsoever. I do have a strong opinion though on the legitimacy of some of the actions they take. Do you consider that being an anti-Semite and if so do you feel one can have an opinion on anyone else without being bigoted?

State of Israel? You mean the people as Israel is a Democracy. Your post is idiotic. 53+ mostly Islamic countries and the safest place for a Muslim woman is in Israel. Only reason Israel is vilified is because it is a Jewish State. No one gives a shit about Islamists exterminating the Kurds. Or those in Lebanon treating Palestinians worse than dirt. Israel is an easy target. Your opinion is based on ignorance so yes you’re an antisemite. Your statement is like me saying, I dont dislike blacks at all except for those inner city blacks. You’re either uneducated or you’re an antisemite. Pick one.

No, I mean the state of Israel as in the nation and it's leader who at this moment although only supported by a minority of the populace is moving to not just occupy but full annex the West Bank. By the way, Democratically elected governments are fully capable of doing immoral stuff if you want I'll give you a history lesson. You inferring from my statements that I don't like stuff what Israel is doing based on me having a problem with Jews is a leap, to say the least. I don't need to dislike the Jewish people in order to condemn the country they inhabit for annexing territory belonging to someone else. As a matter of fact, My mother-in-law was Jewish.

This brings me to this. It's fascinating to me to see the cognitive dissonance displayed here. You reply to a post in an effort to call someone on a perceived inability to distinguish between the actions of individuals and the group as a whole and at the same time are perfectly willing to condemn me as anti-Semitic because I distinguish between the actions of individuals and the group as whole.

Israel is a democracy. The people there have been under attack for decades. The land is theirs. Read about it. The fact that you side with terror regimes speaks volumes

You know for someone who doesn't like being painted a racist because they support the GOP ( a claim that was never made btw), you are very eager to paint other people in a certain way because they support other things. You are right this conversation speaks volumes about someone, just not convinced it's about me it speaks. "You don't support Israel's annexation of the West Bank therefor you support terrorist regimes." You are missing a few steps in your reasoning there don't you think?

It is the same reasoning that one bad cop does a dirty deed, so the radicals go and burn cities and hurt innocent people, then want all police banned. Seems that you are missing a few brain cells.

I'm missing a few brain cells? I see. Do you think these people are only protesting because of this one bad cop? I know to acknowledge reality is probably fatal for some people but let me enlighten you under the presumption that you are actually capable of understanding reality. These people are protesting LOTS of bad cops. You don't have to sit on somebody's neck for almost nine minutes to be a bad cop. You can be a bad cop when you stop black people for no apparent reason. Or you can have a bad justice system when it systematically pronounces harsher sentences for the same crimes when you're black. And yes you are a really bad cop when you kill unarmed people.

I already said how I feel about the protests (unwise) and made it absolutely clear that I don't condone looting or hurting people (arrest and prosecute them) as MOST of the people who actually did protest don't either.

If it wasn’t just the one bad cop then why weren’t they protesting before this? Why weren’t they protesting as 1000s were dying in Chicago? Do tell. You feel all whites are racist? Silence = Violence.

Lol NOT protesting before this? Civil rights movement - Wikipedia quite a few protests here.
protests here Shooting of Tamir Rice - Wikipedia ,here Shooting of Michael Brown - Wikipedia here, The Mysterious Death of Freddie Gray here, Shooting of Philando Castile - Wikipedia oh and who can forget here, Rodney King - Wikipedia

How many more protests do you need?

Nothing like this. Don’t be obtuse.

I'm being obtuse? Azog I'm not the one claiming that protests against racial discrimination or against police brutality against blacks are a new phenomenon. You are quite funny I give you that.

This is new. Not since Rodney King has it been like this. So do you believe that silence is violence?

New means it never happened before. This is NOT new, not even close. As to silence is violence I understand the sentiment not sure I agree. It's not a new concept either.
“The world suffers a lot. Not because the violence of bad people. But because of the silence of the good people.”
Napoleon
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Edmund Burke

Not sure? Yes or no? If I choose to live my life and not opine, is that “violence”?

Nope. It also won't solve anything when you ignore problems. Why is it even relevant? I don't mind you deflecting like this but it is a bit random.

It’s not a deflection. These rallies are about guilt and not about substance.

Just because you ignore the substance doesn't mean it's not present. That is has substance is apparent from the fact that politicians on both sides are arguing for in some cases substantive measures in response to these protests. Something that wouldn't have happened without these protests.

I disagree. The protests will backfire. My wife was very sympathetic and now she has shifted the other way. I doubt She is the only one.

It's certain she's not the only one. On the other hand, it's also certain that these protests have made more people aware there is actually a problem. By the way, the reason your wife is losing sympathy for the protests is likely because you and the people on the right are highlighting the riots and stuff like "silence is violence" in a bid to claim these protests are "without substance". It's also again you ignoring that your assertions are demonstrably false. If you say the protests have no substance and I reply by pointing out that the protest has motivated substantive measures at no point is what your wife thinks relevant. Just like asking about 'silence is violence" after claiming something is new while at the same acknowledging it isn't, is relevant.

I have a basic problem. My problem is that I hate when people dodge questions, so I tend to answer every point a person makes individually, this is often used by people as a way to never ever take responsibility for what they say no matter how asinine. They just change the subject and I let their stupidity stand. You have done this now to many times.

Aware that entitled white kids are looting and burning under the guise of BLM. Got it.

Sure I get it. You made it absolutely clear that as long as you can claim that that's what it's about you can pretend that there is no substance. As I said dishonesty will allow you to do that.

I see what I see. I dont buy the fake outrage. These same people go home and feel better about themselves while not accomplishing anything. Silence is violence. LOL

You see what you want to see. And that's perfectly fine with me. If you can't understand that somebody could be outraged by this event or by what's happened to black people in the US since it's inception there is nothing I or anybody else can say to convince you. Silence might not be violence, but silence will for sure allow violence to continue, by all means, stick your head in the sand and pretend that every time something happens that causes protests like this it's "new" and "without substance" or "fueled by fake outrage".

OK

So what action items will you be embracing to change this? Do tell. You cannot force someone not to be racist. I am Jew and I cannot force you to see how stupid your views on Israel are. So stick your own head in the sand. Your little digs are laughable.

did you call him an anti semite & holocaust denier yet, per your M.O.?

He tried, more than once lol.

no doubt he did.

#pathetic #cowardly #can'tdebateworthadamn

I wouldn't go that far. The fact of the matter is that it's about par for the course of most people on this board, left or right. Setting up strawman arguments is something we all do sometimes either on purpose or inadvertently. In this case, it was on purpose of course but it is a debating tactic, not a very good one but still. I would and I have called Azog dishonest, that's about as far as I'd go.

Setting up straw men? So a black man resists arrest throws punches at the police, ends up getting shot, dies, then this gives the right to liberal/anarchists to riot and burn cities? Moderates are liberals too ashamed to admit they are liberals...just as stupid though.

Yes, that's a strawman because there are as far as I know exactly zero liberals that I know that have said anybody has the right to riot and burn cities. Feel free to give me an example of it but we both know you won't. That is in fact a strawman. See how that works?

See how this guy is defending the liberals. Show me liberals like Nan from San Fransicko condemning the actions of BLM and other racist liberal organizations?

Ah, since you can't support your strawman you are now trying to shift the burden of proof to me? That is in fact another fallacy. So is begging the question as you do in your second sentence by trying to prove one assertion by making another one. If you want to talk to me about fallacious arguments it would probably be helpful for you to look up the different ones and apply them to what you write.

So when ANTIFA, who didnt have a permit to protest, showed up in Charleston Va, and started a fight with the KKK, who had a legal permit to protest by Black Face Northam, all the Lame Stream Media was wanting the president to condemn the actions, while he President Trump said that both sides did have a few good people. Where is the Lame Stream Media not wanting Nancy and Chuck to condemn the actions of the rioters and looters? If you dont want to answer that is fine, i can put you with the other 100 stupid liberal posters on my ignore list..

This might come as a surprise to you, but I don't care if you put me on ignore. It's your prerogative to shut out everybody who doesn't agree with you. Quite frankly it says more about you than it does about me.

As it stands YOU decided to query me about a statement I made. That is fine. I answered the question and asked YOU to support your assertion. YOU choose instead of doing that, just ask me another question. I have absolutely no problem answering however many questions you like. If it's an intelligent question it even has the chance of me agreeing on a certain point with you. What I won't do is allow you to ignore my questions because YOU don't want to answer mine. So...

Question one. Give me evidence of ANY liberal condoning burning cities or looting. Then we'll continue.

Ilhan Bin Omar;

{

2. Reject any attempt to criminalize peaceful protest https://twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/1267247808194764800 … }

One would be hard-pressed to find instances of “peaceful protests” as violence and anarchy erupted in major cities across the U.S. over the weekend, with the chaotic scenes dominating news coverage. Video after video shows protesters embracing Antifa-like tactics, setting buildings and police vehicles on fire, pillaging businesses, and violently attacking authorities.

You're question is answered.

Next straw man argument?

What do you think you have answered? You showed me Ilhan Ben Omar's twitter account and then made some statement about supporting "peaceful protests". Do you realize someone can support a protest and not condone looting and violence?

Maybe this will illustrate it for you. I'm going to make an assumption that might be wrong about you but is for sure true for a lot of people on the right. Quite a few supported the Charleston protests. Yet most will not have supported that idiot driving his car into a mass of people.

" Quite a few supported the Charleston protests. Yet most will not have supported that idiot driving his car into a mass of people "

MOST?

I dunno....

judging by their own words and comments I think MOST WOULD support and approve of it.

I don't personally think this board is indicative of most Republicans. At least I hope not.

"I don't personally think this board is indicative of most Republicans."

ok

BUT

trump PACKS THEM IN at his rallies;

View attachment 350181View attachment 350182

and limbaugh claims to have 20 million of them

and fox news has the LARGEST audience.....

so....THAT is a LOT of people who are subjected to the nonstop approval of VIOLENCE directed at their "enemies"

limbaugh "leave only SOME liberals left alive"

coulter "we should SHOOT A FEW! to let the rest know it could happen to THEM"

Trump (retweeted) "the ONLY GOOD DEMOCRAT is a DEAD DEMOCRAT"

so....

I think I'll stick with answer number 1; MOST!

The board is indicative of Trumpsters, not Republicans.

"The board is indicative of Trumpsters, not Republicans."

ok

I certainly RESPECT the NEVER-TRUMPERS!

however, since trump still has the support of MOST of the republican party....

unless otherwise shown I will assume that MOST registered Republicans are STILL planning on voting for trump....

So I will agree that there are MILLIONS of GOOD and HONORABLE Republicans but I still think they are outnumbered by the trumpers......

Do you think voting for a guy who though black men were super predators along with the Clinton's should be voted into office? Will you cast your vote for the groper of women and children Joe Biden?

there are only 2 choices


a POS, CRIMINAL, LIAR, who panders to dictators, mocks and ridicules DECENT people....

or a democrat

I will NOTE vote for the POS, CRIMINAL, LIAR, who panders to dictators, mocks and ridicules DECENT people....

What if someone doesn't care about politics and just wants to live their life? What then?

You said there are only TWO choices.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

No

Dang Democrats!

This is pipe dream shit meant to feed the n-I-g-g-e-r-s and the s-p-I-c-s because they're stupid enough to believe that shit.

Today blacks act like animals because they are BARELY evolved past the Ape and need a strong central figure (the white man) to keep them in place and acting like normal people.

Sick of their shit and we should not hide it anymore. When they call me a fucking racist, and I say you damn right I am!!! Fuck those fucking people!

Why do Browns ("people of color") feel compelled to steal, assault, rape, murder Whites, their obvious superior beings? Browns should be worshiping Whites instead of being jealous douchebag criminals.'

Blacks... prone to violence, think they're still in the jungle, low IQ blacks.

How can you look at the world and not see that ALL ADVANCEMENTS came from Europe and America? Yeah, we're the superior race on the earth. All others developed because of whites

Look, he is actually intelligent and an actual person of color! How often does that happen?

“We swear muthafuckers, you take our beaners from us and we’ll come for your guns one day” Filthy fucks!

MAGA! This is great news! Everything is falling into place so we can build the Wall and thwart this invasion of brown diseease ridden third worlders who are a threat to our sovereignty, culture and American traditions.

Being the elected representative of a bunch of dumbass ghetto Jungle Monkeys doesn't take intelligence. It take a ghetto dialect and a promise to get them more welfare.

Valerie Jarrett.... Is she that light skinned negro who looks like that ape in Planet of the Apes (negroes?)

I thought she was an ape...Next you'll be telling me Mooch isn't really a shaved wookie.

The asians made fun of obama.....the asians refer to negroes as 'monkey people' and not in jest....they are serious....and why shouldn't they be?

Pay the pavement ape or he will get very angry and burn his house down.

Yawn, Kambala wants every African American crack addict to have their own home while White, Red, and Yellow Americans some disabled vets rot on the street.

Nigga's acting like a Nigga...must be part of the Thugery... most blacks don't act like that!

I believe the black race is inferior to both the white and yellow races....I can prove it by taking a look at the world map and income, innovation/scientific discoveries, and prison populations. Maybe you have some other mysterious way of defining the word but you never seem to say what it is.

Most intelligent people understand how stupid blacks are....average i.q. of 85.....being one you should know.

Come on people you blacks are better than this shit every fucking week....stand BEHIND your police, you do the crime you get locked up...you fuck with THE MAN, he has every right to beat the shit out of you, and your community standing behind you just shows what stupid, low life idiots you are!

Fuck off House Negro. Shine my boots bitch

Hasn't it been proven, in the last few days, that blacks are incapable of living in the environment of civilization? Send them back to Africa.

..just like Africa is the shithole of the world, the black US communities mirror that

You can take a negro out of the ghetto. But you can't take the ghetto out of the negro.

No quotes from me? Whats the matter Mac? You Leftist Loon.

Kind of a weird thing to feel jealous about?

Where do you get the feeling that I am "jealous"? You missed the meaning behind my post entirely.

Could be. I personally feel that using other people's posts in order to make a point is a good debating tactic, and providing you don't completely take it out of context an honest tactic.

His premise is that all who disagree with him are racist. So I asked him to point to one of my posts that is racist. I vehemently disagree with Macs views. Doesn’t make me a racist. It just makes me logical. This is why he dodges me. I do not fit his narrative.

His premise, how I see it at least, is that there are plenty of people who are racist on this board. And that all of them are supporting Trump. If he didn't include you that's a good thing. He didn't make the argument as far as I can see that being a Trump supporter means you're racist. Feel free to go through this OP and use Mac's words against him and prove me wrong?

Plenty of racists and antisemites here on the other side too.

Define those terms please and then back that up? Speaking for myself, for instance, I don't like what the State of Israel is doing. They are grabbing land in my opinion that they don't have a right to. I don't hate Jews at all, I have no prejudice against them whatsoever. I do have a strong opinion though on the legitimacy of some of the actions they take. Do you consider that being an anti-Semite and if so do you feel one can have an opinion on anyone else without being bigoted?

State of Israel? You mean the people as Israel is a Democracy. Your post is idiotic. 53+ mostly Islamic countries and the safest place for a Muslim woman is in Israel. Only reason Israel is vilified is because it is a Jewish State. No one gives a shit about Islamists exterminating the Kurds. Or those in Lebanon treating Palestinians worse than dirt. Israel is an easy target. Your opinion is based on ignorance so yes you’re an antisemite. Your statement is like me saying, I dont dislike blacks at all except for those inner city blacks. You’re either uneducated or you’re an antisemite. Pick one.

No, I mean the state of Israel as in the nation and it's leader who at this moment although only supported by a minority of the populace is moving to not just occupy but full annex the West Bank. By the way, Democratically elected governments are fully capable of doing immoral stuff if you want I'll give you a history lesson. You inferring from my statements that I don't like stuff what Israel is doing based on me having a problem with Jews is a leap, to say the least. I don't need to dislike the Jewish people in order to condemn the country they inhabit for annexing territory belonging to someone else. As a matter of fact, My mother-in-law was Jewish.

This brings me to this. It's fascinating to me to see the cognitive dissonance displayed here. You reply to a post in an effort to call someone on a perceived inability to distinguish between the actions of individuals and the group as a whole and at the same time are perfectly willing to condemn me as anti-Semitic because I distinguish between the actions of individuals and the group as whole.

Israel is a democracy. The people there have been under attack for decades. The land is theirs. Read about it. The fact that you side with terror regimes speaks volumes

You know for someone who doesn't like being painted a racist because they support the GOP ( a claim that was never made btw), you are very eager to paint other people in a certain way because they support other things. You are right this conversation speaks volumes about someone, just not convinced it's about me it speaks. "You don't support Israel's annexation of the West Bank therefor you support terrorist regimes." You are missing a few steps in your reasoning there don't you think?

It is the same reasoning that one bad cop does a dirty deed, so the radicals go and burn cities and hurt innocent people, then want all police banned. Seems that you are missing a few brain cells.

I'm missing a few brain cells? I see. Do you think these people are only protesting because of this one bad cop? I know to acknowledge reality is probably fatal for some people but let me enlighten you under the presumption that you are actually capable of understanding reality. These people are protesting LOTS of bad cops. You don't have to sit on somebody's neck for almost nine minutes to be a bad cop. You can be a bad cop when you stop black people for no apparent reason. Or you can have a bad justice system when it systematically pronounces harsher sentences for the same crimes when you're black. And yes you are a really bad cop when you kill unarmed people.

I already said how I feel about the protests (unwise) and made it absolutely clear that I don't condone looting or hurting people (arrest and prosecute them) as MOST of the people who actually did protest don't either.

If it wasn’t just the one bad cop then why weren’t they protesting before this? Why weren’t they protesting as 1000s were dying in Chicago? Do tell. You feel all whites are racist? Silence = Violence.

Lol NOT protesting before this? Civil rights movement - Wikipedia quite a few protests here.
protests here Shooting of Tamir Rice - Wikipedia ,here Shooting of Michael Brown - Wikipedia here, The Mysterious Death of Freddie Gray here, Shooting of Philando Castile - Wikipedia oh and who can forget here, Rodney King - Wikipedia

How many more protests do you need?

Nothing like this. Don’t be obtuse.

I'm being obtuse? Azog I'm not the one claiming that protests against racial discrimination or against police brutality against blacks are a new phenomenon. You are quite funny I give you that.

This is new. Not since Rodney King has it been like this. So do you believe that silence is violence?

New means it never happened before. This is NOT new, not even close. As to silence is violence I understand the sentiment not sure I agree. It's not a new concept either.
“The world suffers a lot. Not because the violence of bad people. But because of the silence of the good people.”
Napoleon
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Edmund Burke

Not sure? Yes or no? If I choose to live my life and not opine, is that “violence”?

Nope. It also won't solve anything when you ignore problems. Why is it even relevant? I don't mind you deflecting like this but it is a bit random.

It’s not a deflection. These rallies are about guilt and not about substance.

Just because you ignore the substance doesn't mean it's not present. That is has substance is apparent from the fact that politicians on both sides are arguing for in some cases substantive measures in response to these protests. Something that wouldn't have happened without these protests.

I disagree. The protests will backfire. My wife was very sympathetic and now she has shifted the other way. I doubt She is the only one.

It's certain she's not the only one. On the other hand, it's also certain that these protests have made more people aware there is actually a problem. By the way, the reason your wife is losing sympathy for the protests is likely because you and the people on the right are highlighting the riots and stuff like "silence is violence" in a bid to claim these protests are "without substance". It's also again you ignoring that your assertions are demonstrably false. If you say the protests have no substance and I reply by pointing out that the protest has motivated substantive measures at no point is what your wife thinks relevant. Just like asking about 'silence is violence" after claiming something is new while at the same acknowledging it isn't, is relevant.

I have a basic problem. My problem is that I hate when people dodge questions, so I tend to answer every point a person makes individually, this is often used by people as a way to never ever take responsibility for what they say no matter how asinine. They just change the subject and I let their stupidity stand. You have done this now to many times.

Aware that entitled white kids are looting and burning under the guise of BLM. Got it.

Sure I get it. You made it absolutely clear that as long as you can claim that that's what it's about you can pretend that there is no substance. As I said dishonesty will allow you to do that.

I see what I see. I dont buy the fake outrage. These same people go home and feel better about themselves while not accomplishing anything. Silence is violence. LOL

You see what you want to see. And that's perfectly fine with me. If you can't understand that somebody could be outraged by this event or by what's happened to black people in the US since it's inception there is nothing I or anybody else can say to convince you. Silence might not be violence, but silence will for sure allow violence to continue, by all means, stick your head in the sand and pretend that every time something happens that causes protests like this it's "new" and "without substance" or "fueled by fake outrage".

OK

So what action items will you be embracing to change this? Do tell. You cannot force someone not to be racist. I am Jew and I cannot force you to see how stupid your views on Israel are. So stick your own head in the sand. Your little digs are laughable.

did you call him an anti semite & holocaust denier yet, per your M.O.?

He tried, more than once lol.

no doubt he did.

#pathetic #cowardly #can'tdebateworthadamn

I wouldn't go that far. The fact of the matter is that it's about par for the course of most people on this board, left or right. Setting up strawman arguments is something we all do sometimes either on purpose or inadvertently. In this case, it was on purpose of course but it is a debating tactic, not a very good one but still. I would and I have called Azog dishonest, that's about as far as I'd go.

Setting up straw men? So a black man resists arrest throws punches at the police, ends up getting shot, dies, then this gives the right to liberal/anarchists to riot and burn cities? Moderates are liberals too ashamed to admit they are liberals...just as stupid though.

Yes, that's a strawman because there are as far as I know exactly zero liberals that I know that have said anybody has the right to riot and burn cities. Feel free to give me an example of it but we both know you won't. That is in fact a strawman. See how that works?

See how this guy is defending the liberals. Show me liberals like Nan from San Fransicko condemning the actions of BLM and other racist liberal organizations?

Ah, since you can't support your strawman you are now trying to shift the burden of proof to me? That is in fact another fallacy. So is begging the question as you do in your second sentence by trying to prove one assertion by making another one. If you want to talk to me about fallacious arguments it would probably be helpful for you to look up the different ones and apply them to what you write.

So when ANTIFA, who didnt have a permit to protest, showed up in Charleston Va, and started a fight with the KKK, who had a legal permit to protest by Black Face Northam, all the Lame Stream Media was wanting the president to condemn the actions, while he President Trump said that both sides did have a few good people. Where is the Lame Stream Media not wanting Nancy and Chuck to condemn the actions of the rioters and looters? If you dont want to answer that is fine, i can put you with the other 100 stupid liberal posters on my ignore list..

This might come as a surprise to you, but I don't care if you put me on ignore. It's your prerogative to shut out everybody who doesn't agree with you. Quite frankly it says more about you than it does about me.

As it stands YOU decided to query me about a statement I made. That is fine. I answered the question and asked YOU to support your assertion. YOU choose instead of doing that, just ask me another question. I have absolutely no problem answering however many questions you like. If it's an intelligent question it even has the chance of me agreeing on a certain point with you. What I won't do is allow you to ignore my questions because YOU don't want to answer mine. So...

Question one. Give me evidence of ANY liberal condoning burning cities or looting. Then we'll continue.

Ilhan Bin Omar;

{

2. Reject any attempt to criminalize peaceful protest https://twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/1267247808194764800 … }

One would be hard-pressed to find instances of “peaceful protests” as violence and anarchy erupted in major cities across the U.S. over the weekend, with the chaotic scenes dominating news coverage. Video after video shows protesters embracing Antifa-like tactics, setting buildings and police vehicles on fire, pillaging businesses, and violently attacking authorities.

You're question is answered.

Next straw man argument?

What do you think you have answered? You showed me Ilhan Ben Omar's twitter account and then made some statement about supporting "peaceful protests". Do you realize someone can support a protest and not condone looting and violence?

Maybe this will illustrate it for you. I'm going to make an assumption that might be wrong about you but is for sure true for a lot of people on the right. Quite a few supported the Charleston protests. Yet most will not have supported that idiot driving his car into a mass of people.

" Quite a few supported the Charleston protests. Yet most will not have supported that idiot driving his car into a mass of people "

MOST?

I dunno....

judging by their own words and comments I think MOST WOULD support and approve of it.

I don't personally think this board is indicative of most Republicans. At least I hope not.

"I don't personally think this board is indicative of most Republicans."

ok

BUT

trump PACKS THEM IN at his rallies;

View attachment 350181View attachment 350182

and limbaugh claims to have 20 million of them

and fox news has the LARGEST audience.....

so....THAT is a LOT of people who are subjected to the nonstop approval of VIOLENCE directed at their "enemies"

limbaugh "leave only SOME liberals left alive"

coulter "we should SHOOT A FEW! to let the rest know it could happen to THEM"

Trump (retweeted) "the ONLY GOOD DEMOCRAT is a DEAD DEMOCRAT"

so....

I think I'll stick with answer number 1; MOST!

The board is indicative of Trumpsters, not Republicans.

"The board is indicative of Trumpsters, not Republicans."

ok

I certainly RESPECT the NEVER-TRUMPERS!

however, since trump still has the support of MOST of the republican party....

unless otherwise shown I will assume that MOST registered Republicans are STILL planning on voting for trump....

So I will agree that there are MILLIONS of GOOD and HONORABLE Republicans but I still think they are outnumbered by the trumpers......

However, there are no good Democrats that are tired of the Democrat;s disastrous policy to turn this country into a Socialist shithole, are there?

Only assholes align themselves with the Democrat filth nowadays.

The Democrat Party is the scum of America. A coalition of all the filth; Negroes that vote their race and welfare check, Environmental Wackos, Anti Gun Nuts, Queers, Feminazis, Welfare Queens, Illegals, uneducated Moon Bats and confused college kids and their bat shit crazy Marxist professors.

anyone displaying the confederate flag is a traitor to the USA.

Anyone who supports the Democrat party is an antisemite. If we're going to throw out generalizations lets just go full blast.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

View attachment 350157

^^^View attachment 350206

I served in the Army of the United States in a war. Where did you serve?

She served meals to her family as she is a lifetime housewife. She is also a Leftist Loon.

 

[playtime]

View attachment 350157

^^^View attachment 350206

I served in the Army of the United States in a war. Where did you serve?

so what. you honor a flag based on secession. not to mention the right to own people.

my father fought in WW2 & i'm married to a Marine. HE certainly honors the right flag.

 

[playtime]

View attachment 350157

^^^View attachment 350206

I served in the Army of the United States in a war. Where did you serve?

She served meals to her family as she is a lifetime housewife. She is also a Leftist Loon.

i also served meals to seniors & the disabled & school kids.

#BEBEST@KILLINGGRAMMAFORTHEECONOMY

 

[Uncensored2008]

No

Dang Democrats!

This is pipe dream shit meant to feed the n-I-g-g-e-r-s and the s-p-I-c-s because they're stupid enough to believe that shit.

Today blacks act like animals because they are BARELY evolved past the Ape and need a strong central figure (the white man) to keep them in place and acting like normal people.

Sick of their shit and we should not hide it anymore. When they call me a fucking racist, and I say you damn right I am!!! Fuck those fucking people!

Why do Browns ("people of color") feel compelled to steal, assault, rape, murder Whites, their obvious superior beings? Browns should be worshiping Whites instead of being jealous douchebag criminals.'

Blacks... prone to violence, think they're still in the jungle, low IQ blacks.

How can you look at the world and not see that ALL ADVANCEMENTS came from Europe and America? Yeah, we're the superior race on the earth. All others developed because of whites

Look, he is actually intelligent and an actual person of color! How often does that happen?

“We swear muthafuckers, you take our beaners from us and we’ll come for your guns one day” Filthy fucks!

MAGA! This is great news! Everything is falling into place so we can build the Wall and thwart this invasion of brown diseease ridden third worlders who are a threat to our sovereignty, culture and American traditions.

Being the elected representative of a bunch of dumbass ghetto Jungle Monkeys doesn't take intelligence. It take a ghetto dialect and a promise to get them more welfare.

Valerie Jarrett.... Is she that light skinned negro who looks like that ape in Planet of the Apes (negroes?)

I thought she was an ape...Next you'll be telling me Mooch isn't really a shaved wookie.

The asians made fun of obama.....the asians refer to negroes as 'monkey people' and not in jest....they are serious....and why shouldn't they be?

Pay the pavement ape or he will get very angry and burn his house down.

Yawn, Kambala wants every African American crack addict to have their own home while White, Red, and Yellow Americans some disabled vets rot on the street.

Nigga's acting like a Nigga...must be part of the Thugery... most blacks don't act like that!

I believe the black race is inferior to both the white and yellow races....I can prove it by taking a look at the world map and income, innovation/scientific discoveries, and prison populations. Maybe you have some other mysterious way of defining the word but you never seem to say what it is.

Most intelligent people understand how stupid blacks are....average i.q. of 85.....being one you should know.

Come on people you blacks are better than this shit every fucking week....stand BEHIND your police, you do the crime you get locked up...you fuck with THE MAN, he has every right to beat the shit out of you, and your community standing behind you just shows what stupid, low life idiots you are!

Fuck off House Negro. Shine my boots bitch

Hasn't it been proven, in the last few days, that blacks are incapable of living in the environment of civilization? Send them back to Africa.

..just like Africa is the shithole of the world, the black US communities mirror that

You can take a negro out of the ghetto. But you can't take the ghetto out of the negro.

No quotes from me? Whats the matter Mac? You Leftist Loon.

Kind of a weird thing to feel jealous about?

Where do you get the feeling that I am "jealous"? You missed the meaning behind my post entirely.

Could be. I personally feel that using other people's posts in order to make a point is a good debating tactic, and providing you don't completely take it out of context an honest tactic.

His premise is that all who disagree with him are racist. So I asked him to point to one of my posts that is racist. I vehemently disagree with Macs views. Doesn’t make me a racist. It just makes me logical. This is why he dodges me. I do not fit his narrative.

His premise, how I see it at least, is that there are plenty of people who are racist on this board. And that all of them are supporting Trump. If he didn't include you that's a good thing. He didn't make the argument as far as I can see that being a Trump supporter means you're racist. Feel free to go through this OP and use Mac's words against him and prove me wrong?

Plenty of racists and antisemites here on the other side too.

Define those terms please and then back that up? Speaking for myself, for instance, I don't like what the State of Israel is doing. They are grabbing land in my opinion that they don't have a right to. I don't hate Jews at all, I have no prejudice against them whatsoever. I do have a strong opinion though on the legitimacy of some of the actions they take. Do you consider that being an anti-Semite and if so do you feel one can have an opinion on anyone else without being bigoted?

State of Israel? You mean the people as Israel is a Democracy. Your post is idiotic. 53+ mostly Islamic countries and the safest place for a Muslim woman is in Israel. Only reason Israel is vilified is because it is a Jewish State. No one gives a shit about Islamists exterminating the Kurds. Or those in Lebanon treating Palestinians worse than dirt. Israel is an easy target. Your opinion is based on ignorance so yes you’re an antisemite. Your statement is like me saying, I dont dislike blacks at all except for those inner city blacks. You’re either uneducated or you’re an antisemite. Pick one.

No, I mean the state of Israel as in the nation and it's leader who at this moment although only supported by a minority of the populace is moving to not just occupy but full annex the West Bank. By the way, Democratically elected governments are fully capable of doing immoral stuff if you want I'll give you a history lesson. You inferring from my statements that I don't like stuff what Israel is doing based on me having a problem with Jews is a leap, to say the least. I don't need to dislike the Jewish people in order to condemn the country they inhabit for annexing territory belonging to someone else. As a matter of fact, My mother-in-law was Jewish.

This brings me to this. It's fascinating to me to see the cognitive dissonance displayed here. You reply to a post in an effort to call someone on a perceived inability to distinguish between the actions of individuals and the group as a whole and at the same time are perfectly willing to condemn me as anti-Semitic because I distinguish between the actions of individuals and the group as whole.

Israel is a democracy. The people there have been under attack for decades. The land is theirs. Read about it. The fact that you side with terror regimes speaks volumes

You know for someone who doesn't like being painted a racist because they support the GOP ( a claim that was never made btw), you are very eager to paint other people in a certain way because they support other things. You are right this conversation speaks volumes about someone, just not convinced it's about me it speaks. "You don't support Israel's annexation of the West Bank therefor you support terrorist regimes." You are missing a few steps in your reasoning there don't you think?

It is the same reasoning that one bad cop does a dirty deed, so the radicals go and burn cities and hurt innocent people, then want all police banned. Seems that you are missing a few brain cells.

I'm missing a few brain cells? I see. Do you think these people are only protesting because of this one bad cop? I know to acknowledge reality is probably fatal for some people but let me enlighten you under the presumption that you are actually capable of understanding reality. These people are protesting LOTS of bad cops. You don't have to sit on somebody's neck for almost nine minutes to be a bad cop. You can be a bad cop when you stop black people for no apparent reason. Or you can have a bad justice system when it systematically pronounces harsher sentences for the same crimes when you're black. And yes you are a really bad cop when you kill unarmed people.

I already said how I feel about the protests (unwise) and made it absolutely clear that I don't condone looting or hurting people (arrest and prosecute them) as MOST of the people who actually did protest don't either.

If it wasn’t just the one bad cop then why weren’t they protesting before this? Why weren’t they protesting as 1000s were dying in Chicago? Do tell. You feel all whites are racist? Silence = Violence.

Lol NOT protesting before this? Civil rights movement - Wikipedia quite a few protests here.
protests here Shooting of Tamir Rice - Wikipedia ,here Shooting of Michael Brown - Wikipedia here, The Mysterious Death of Freddie Gray here, Shooting of Philando Castile - Wikipedia oh and who can forget here, Rodney King - Wikipedia

How many more protests do you need?

Nothing like this. Don’t be obtuse.

I'm being obtuse? Azog I'm not the one claiming that protests against racial discrimination or against police brutality against blacks are a new phenomenon. You are quite funny I give you that.

This is new. Not since Rodney King has it been like this. So do you believe that silence is violence?

New means it never happened before. This is NOT new, not even close. As to silence is violence I understand the sentiment not sure I agree. It's not a new concept either.
“The world suffers a lot. Not because the violence of bad people. But because of the silence of the good people.”
Napoleon
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Edmund Burke

Not sure? Yes or no? If I choose to live my life and not opine, is that “violence”?

Nope. It also won't solve anything when you ignore problems. Why is it even relevant? I don't mind you deflecting like this but it is a bit random.

It’s not a deflection. These rallies are about guilt and not about substance.

Just because you ignore the substance doesn't mean it's not present. That is has substance is apparent from the fact that politicians on both sides are arguing for in some cases substantive measures in response to these protests. Something that wouldn't have happened without these protests.

I disagree. The protests will backfire. My wife was very sympathetic and now she has shifted the other way. I doubt She is the only one.

It's certain she's not the only one. On the other hand, it's also certain that these protests have made more people aware there is actually a problem. By the way, the reason your wife is losing sympathy for the protests is likely because you and the people on the right are highlighting the riots and stuff like "silence is violence" in a bid to claim these protests are "without substance". It's also again you ignoring that your assertions are demonstrably false. If you say the protests have no substance and I reply by pointing out that the protest has motivated substantive measures at no point is what your wife thinks relevant. Just like asking about 'silence is violence" after claiming something is new while at the same acknowledging it isn't, is relevant.

I have a basic problem. My problem is that I hate when people dodge questions, so I tend to answer every point a person makes individually, this is often used by people as a way to never ever take responsibility for what they say no matter how asinine. They just change the subject and I let their stupidity stand. You have done this now to many times.

Aware that entitled white kids are looting and burning under the guise of BLM. Got it.

Sure I get it. You made it absolutely clear that as long as you can claim that that's what it's about you can pretend that there is no substance. As I said dishonesty will allow you to do that.

I see what I see. I dont buy the fake outrage. These same people go home and feel better about themselves while not accomplishing anything. Silence is violence. LOL

You see what you want to see. And that's perfectly fine with me. If you can't understand that somebody could be outraged by this event or by what's happened to black people in the US since it's inception there is nothing I or anybody else can say to convince you. Silence might not be violence, but silence will for sure allow violence to continue, by all means, stick your head in the sand and pretend that every time something happens that causes protests like this it's "new" and "without substance" or "fueled by fake outrage".

OK

So what action items will you be embracing to change this? Do tell. You cannot force someone not to be racist. I am Jew and I cannot force you to see how stupid your views on Israel are. So stick your own head in the sand. Your little digs are laughable.

did you call him an anti semite & holocaust denier yet, per your M.O.?

He tried, more than once lol.

no doubt he did.

#pathetic #cowardly #can'tdebateworthadamn

I wouldn't go that far. The fact of the matter is that it's about par for the course of most people on this board, left or right. Setting up strawman arguments is something we all do sometimes either on purpose or inadvertently. In this case, it was on purpose of course but it is a debating tactic, not a very good one but still. I would and I have called Azog dishonest, that's about as far as I'd go.

Setting up straw men? So a black man resists arrest throws punches at the police, ends up getting shot, dies, then this gives the right to liberal/anarchists to riot and burn cities? Moderates are liberals too ashamed to admit they are liberals...just as stupid though.

Yes, that's a strawman because there are as far as I know exactly zero liberals that I know that have said anybody has the right to riot and burn cities. Feel free to give me an example of it but we both know you won't. That is in fact a strawman. See how that works?

See how this guy is defending the liberals. Show me liberals like Nan from San Fransicko condemning the actions of BLM and other racist liberal organizations?

Ah, since you can't support your strawman you are now trying to shift the burden of proof to me? That is in fact another fallacy. So is begging the question as you do in your second sentence by trying to prove one assertion by making another one. If you want to talk to me about fallacious arguments it would probably be helpful for you to look up the different ones and apply them to what you write.

So when ANTIFA, who didnt have a permit to protest, showed up in Charleston Va, and started a fight with the KKK, who had a legal permit to protest by Black Face Northam, all the Lame Stream Media was wanting the president to condemn the actions, while he President Trump said that both sides did have a few good people. Where is the Lame Stream Media not wanting Nancy and Chuck to condemn the actions of the rioters and looters? If you dont want to answer that is fine, i can put you with the other 100 stupid liberal posters on my ignore list..

This might come as a surprise to you, but I don't care if you put me on ignore. It's your prerogative to shut out everybody who doesn't agree with you. Quite frankly it says more about you than it does about me.

As it stands YOU decided to query me about a statement I made. That is fine. I answered the question and asked YOU to support your assertion. YOU choose instead of doing that, just ask me another question. I have absolutely no problem answering however many questions you like. If it's an intelligent question it even has the chance of me agreeing on a certain point with you. What I won't do is allow you to ignore my questions because YOU don't want to answer mine. So...

Question one. Give me evidence of ANY liberal condoning burning cities or looting. Then we'll continue.

Ilhan Bin Omar;

{

2. Reject any attempt to criminalize peaceful protest https://twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/1267247808194764800 … }

One would be hard-pressed to find instances of “peaceful protests” as violence and anarchy erupted in major cities across the U.S. over the weekend, with the chaotic scenes dominating news coverage. Video after video shows protesters embracing Antifa-like tactics, setting buildings and police vehicles on fire, pillaging businesses, and violently attacking authorities.

You're question is answered.

Next straw man argument?

What do you think you have answered? You showed me Ilhan Ben Omar's twitter account and then made some statement about supporting "peaceful protests". Do you realize someone can support a protest and not condone looting and violence?

Maybe this will illustrate it for you. I'm going to make an assumption that might be wrong about you but is for sure true for a lot of people on the right. Quite a few supported the Charleston protests. Yet most will not have supported that idiot driving his car into a mass of people.

" Quite a few supported the Charleston protests. Yet most will not have supported that idiot driving his car into a mass of people "

MOST?

I dunno....

judging by their own words and comments I think MOST WOULD support and approve of it.

I don't personally think this board is indicative of most Republicans. At least I hope not.

"I don't personally think this board is indicative of most Republicans."

ok

BUT

trump PACKS THEM IN at his rallies;

View attachment 350181View attachment 350182

and limbaugh claims to have 20 million of them

and fox news has the LARGEST audience.....

so....THAT is a LOT of people who are subjected to the nonstop approval of VIOLENCE directed at their "enemies"

limbaugh "leave only SOME liberals left alive"

coulter "we should SHOOT A FEW! to let the rest know it could happen to THEM"

Trump (retweeted) "the ONLY GOOD DEMOCRAT is a DEAD DEMOCRAT"

so....

I think I'll stick with answer number 1; MOST!

The board is indicative of Trumpsters, not Republicans.

"The board is indicative of Trumpsters, not Republicans."

ok

I certainly RESPECT the NEVER-TRUMPERS!

however, since trump still has the support of MOST of the republican party....

unless otherwise shown I will assume that MOST registered Republicans are STILL planning on voting for trump....

So I will agree that there are MILLIONS of GOOD and HONORABLE Republicans but I still think they are outnumbered by the trumpers......

Do you think voting for a guy who though black men were super predators along with the Clinton's should be voted into office? Will you cast your vote for the groper of women and children Joe Biden?

there are only 2 choices


a POS, CRIMINAL, LIAR, who panders to dictators, mocks and ridicules DECENT people....

or a democrat

I will NOTE vote for the POS, CRIMINAL, LIAR, who panders to dictators, mocks and ridicules DECENT people....

ANYONE who votes for ANY democrat is a pile of shit and an enemy of America.

The vile and traitorous democrat party is engaged in an open civil war to overthrow and destroy the Constitution of the United States.

No get back to trying to figure out which of 57 genders you are.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

View attachment 350157

^^^View attachment 350206

I served in the Army of the United States in a war. Where did you serve?

so what. you honor a flag based on secession. not to mention the right to own people.

my father fought in WW2 & i'm married to a Marine. HE certainly honors the right flag.

More lies. Amazing. So you were offended by the Dukes of Hazzard?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

The Democrat Party has racist roots. They supported slavery, they created Jim Crow laws, they ran the KKK.....thier statues are being torn down all over the South, so why not tear apart the primary cause of racism in America?

CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS have racist roots

CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS supported slavery

CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS opposed Civil Rights

CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS started the KKK

CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS are WHITE SUPREMACISTS

CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS started the American NAZI party....

time to ban, banish, round up, arrest, deport and punish CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS for CONTINUOUSLY trying to destroy the USA

They are ALL traitors and deserve the proper punishment.

What about Black Conservative Christians?

Whataboutem.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

View attachment 350157

^^^View attachment 350206

I served in the Army of the United States in a war. Where did you serve?

She served meals to her family as she is a lifetime housewife. She is also a Leftist Loon.

i also served meals to seniors & the disabled & school kids.

#BEBEST@KILLINGGRAMMAFORTHEECONOMY

Aha and then you flew home on your unicorn. Your lies are amazing.

 

[Flash]

View attachment 350157

^^^View attachment 350206

I served in the Army of the United States in a war. Where did you serve?

so what. you honor a flag based on secession. not to mention the right to own people.

my father fought in WW2 & i'm married to a Marine. HE certainly honors the right flag.

LOL!

So you never served but yet you call an American that did serve honorably, in a war, a traitor?

That pretty much makes you an asshole, doesn't it?

How come you Moon Bats always have to prove that you are assholes? Can't you shitheads ever learn to keep your fucking mouths shut? You embarrassed yourself every time you post your ignorant hate.

 

[playtime]

Democrats are the scum of this country.

Siding with the looters, rioters, ANTIFA and BLM filth and having their nominee this corrupt Biden clown just shows how morally bankrupted they are.

Trump will win by a landslide and there ain't a damn thing these stupid hate filled Moon Bats can do about it. They had better get out their pink pussy hats and red flannel pajamas and practice howling at the sky .

anyone displaying the confedeRAT flag is a traitor.

and human garbage.

I served in the US Army in combat. My father was in the Normandy landing and the Battle of the Bulge. My grandfather served in WWI. My son is an Iraq War veteran. You can take your traitor hate and stupidity and cram it up your Moon Bat ass.

And what of your flag, fuckwad?

View attachment 350176

You claim it's NOT a symbol of oppression?