Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOLSo a black Republican can't get elected without support from Democrats?Republicans struggle to elect blacks to Congress. Electing one as president won't happen in this century.
I don't know why this is an issue for Democrats in the first place since they don't like conservatives anyway. If you don't like conservatives or conservative values, you're not going to like a black Republican. And if a black Republican does get nominated, it's unlikely he/she would be elected and Democrats would be largely responsible for this. The reason being because a lot of black Democrats already consider conservative blacks as sellouts and Uncle Toms.
All of this nonsense about black Republican presidential nominees is just farting in a hurricane. Speaking for myself, I don't care how many blacks the Republican party has. A black person will either choose to be Republican or not, I don't give a shit and I don't want some kind of quota. If the Republican party doesn't have what a black person wants, shut the fuck up and become a Democrat. Same goes for white people.
I said black Democrats. The party of which most blacks in this country belong to.
Thanks for admitting that many Republicans and conservatives are racist. I already knew that but it's nice to see your side admit it.
Thanks for admitting your prejudice in assuming many Republicans and conservatives are racist.
You know, most Republicans are not racist and are completely baffled and angered by this trumped up hypocritical Democrat crusade against their imaginary racism and are quite frankly, sick and fucking tired of it.
YOU admitted many Republicans/conservatives are racist.
YOU said a black Republican struggles to get elected...
"And if a black Republican does get nominated, it's unlikely he/she would be elected and Democrats would be largely responsible for this."
... it wouldn't be a problem if there weren't so many racists on the right.
Idiots like ghost talk about quotas only when it pertains to black people.
Idiots like IM2 confuse "I don't want quotas" with "I don't want blacks".
IM2, I believe you may be suffering a form of comprehension dyslexia. The letters are all in the right place and facing the right way but you always seem to get the meaning backwards.
But he doesn't consider 100 percent white a quota.
100 per cent is not a quota dumbass. And the Republican party is not 100 per cent white anyway.
Quota - 1: A proportional part or share.
2: The number or amount constituting a proportional share.
Look it up.
Secondly there are black republicans who are not right wing. Conservatives have no place in todays republican party, the leadership are right wing extremists and the blacks they champion are right wing black stooges.
Opinion.
Why do you think that COlin Powell would not have won the 96 election?
Okay, are you on drugs? "clutching pearls" is an old feminist cliché.That sums up this topic neatly, and many others I've seen. Just trying to picture all these put upon "white people" clutching their pearls while pounding out this daily stream of insufferable dreck... Yuck!! Makes perfect sense to be a proud, surviving, marginalized minority. Hard finding much to celebrate about identifying as a member of a neck crushing majority.If white men can be angry about some shit they imagine, I can be pissed off about what really happens.
1. I'm not "clutching pearls". I'm a middle class man with real interests and/or grievances and that was you dismissing them, and using a racist stereotype to do it.
But of course! The same logic couldn't possibly apply to the Chinese vs the Uyghurs, the Nazis vs the Jews, the Russians vs the Ukrainians, Goliath vs David, the sole proprietor vs Walmart, the U.S. Air Force vs King Kong... No, by not specifying I was clearly picking on these victimized "white people" even though I'm one, and victimized by a minority of blacks in particular despite the countless other possible contenders. Yep, you be a veritable train wreck of illogic, sir.2. And the bit about "proud, surviving minority" vs " neck crushing majority"? That is you, once again, stating fairly clearly that you consider blacks morally superior to whites. THat is judging people by race, not their actual character. You are the racist here not me. You and IM2.
Idiots like ghost talk about quotas only when it pertains to black people.
Idiots like IM2 confuse "I don't want quotas" with "I don't want blacks".
IM2, I believe you may be suffering a form of comprehension dyslexia. The letters are all in the right place and facing the right way but you always seem to get the meaning backwards.
But he doesn't consider 100 percent white a quota.
100 per cent is not a quota dumbass. And the Republican party is not 100 per cent white anyway.
Quota - 1: A proportional part or share.
2: The number or amount constituting a proportional share.
Look it up.
Secondly there are black republicans who are not right wing. Conservatives have no place in todays republican party, the leadership are right wing extremists and the blacks they champion are right wing black stooges.
Opinion.
Why do you think that COlin Powell would not have won the 96 election?
Back then it would have been likely. Or at least, he would have made a good showing. But in today's racially divided political climate? I just don't know.
There's no doubt in my mind that most Republicans would vote for Powell today, provided he still held to the conservative values he held back then (some say he leans a little more left today than he did then. I don't know, myself). But, I'm no political science expert but it seems to me that most elections are not won or lost by party members strictly voting their party. A lot of elections swing on convincing the fence-sitters and in today's racially charged atmosphere, a lot of erstwhile black fence-sitters are leaning left because other blacks and many liberal whites are screaming racial dogma at them that if they don't vote Democrat, they are selling out and betraying their race.
Okay, are you on drugs? "clutching pearls" is an old feminist cliché.That sums up this topic neatly, and many others I've seen. Just trying to picture all these put upon "white people" clutching their pearls while pounding out this daily stream of insufferable dreck... Yuck!! Makes perfect sense to be a proud, surviving, marginalized minority. Hard finding much to celebrate about identifying as a member of a neck crushing majority.If white men can be angry about some shit they imagine, I can be pissed off about what really happens.
1. I'm not "clutching pearls". I'm a middle class man with real interests and/or grievances and that was you dismissing them, and using a racist stereotype to do it.
What racist stereotype? In your "middle class" world, what non-racist, alternative words or phrases do you allow others to use when discussing these matters?
But of course! The same logic couldn't possibly apply to the Chinese vs the Uyghurs, the Nazis vs the Jews, the Russians vs the Ukrainians, Goliath vs David, the sole proprietor vs Walmart, the U.S. Air Force vs King Kong... No, by not specifying I was clearly picking on these victimized "white people" even though I'm one, and victimized by a minority of blacks in particular despite the countless other possible contenders. Yep, you be a veritable train wreck of illogic, sir.2. And the bit about "proud, surviving minority" vs " neck crushing majority"? That is you, once again, stating fairly clearly that you consider blacks morally superior to whites. THat is judging people by race, not their actual character. You are the racist here not me. You and IM2.
Who's the racist?Any attempt to give favorable treatment to blacks, to make up for past disadvantages, by the math principle of simple subtraction, takes away those limited resources from whites. That this practice has grown from just blacks to fucking EVERYONE who is not a white, normal, healthy male, has just made the practice even more harmful to whites.
Idiots like ghost talk about quotas only when it pertains to black people.
Idiots like IM2 confuse "I don't want quotas" with "I don't want blacks".
IM2, I believe you may be suffering a form of comprehension dyslexia. The letters are all in the right place and facing the right way but you always seem to get the meaning backwards.
But he doesn't consider 100 percent white a quota.
100 per cent is not a quota dumbass. And the Republican party is not 100 per cent white anyway.
Quota - 1: A proportional part or share.
2: The number or amount constituting a proportional share.
Look it up.
Secondly there are black republicans who are not right wing. Conservatives have no place in todays republican party, the leadership are right wing extremists and the blacks they champion are right wing black stooges.
Opinion.
Why do you think that COlin Powell would not have won the 96 election?
Back then it would have been likely. Or at least, he would have made a good showing. But in today's racially divided political climate? I just don't know.
There's no doubt in my mind that most Republicans would vote for Powell today, provided he still held to the conservative values he held back then (some say he leans a little more left today than he did then. I don't know, myself). But, I'm no political science expert but it seems to me that most elections are not won or lost by party members strictly voting their party. A lot of elections swing on convincing the fence-sitters and in today's racially charged atmosphere, a lot of erstwhile black fence-sitters are leaning left because other blacks and many liberal whites are screaming racial dogma at them that if they don't vote Democrat, they are selling out and betraying their race.
We are not "racially divided" in that whites are angry at blacks. We are angry at Liberals who keep attacking us on various bullshit reasons.
All any black republican candidate would have to do, is demonstrate somehow that they are not part of that group, and they would not be judged as part of that group.
It would be easy. The most obvious way to do it, would be in the primaries to speak out in DEFENSE of one of his primary opponents, who were falsely accused of racism by some moron, for attacking him.
It would demonstrate that he was disagreeing with his opponents on policy, but not calling him "racists" for disagreeing with a black man.
Obama never said that. Or if he did, he did not mean it. Right there, any fence sitters would know, that the black republican was NOT one of the assholes.
Idiots like ghost talk about quotas only when it pertains to black people.
Idiots like IM2 confuse "I don't want quotas" with "I don't want blacks".
IM2, I believe you may be suffering a form of comprehension dyslexia. The letters are all in the right place and facing the right way but you always seem to get the meaning backwards.
But he doesn't consider 100 percent white a quota.
100 per cent is not a quota dumbass. And the Republican party is not 100 per cent white anyway.
Quota - 1: A proportional part or share.
2: The number or amount constituting a proportional share.
Look it up.
Secondly there are black republicans who are not right wing. Conservatives have no place in todays republican party, the leadership are right wing extremists and the blacks they champion are right wing black stooges.
Opinion.
Why do you think that COlin Powell would not have won the 96 election?
Back then it would have been likely. Or at least, he would have made a good showing. But in today's racially divided political climate? I just don't know.
There's no doubt in my mind that most Republicans would vote for Powell today, provided he still held to the conservative values he held back then (some say he leans a little more left today than he did then. I don't know, myself). But, I'm no political science expert but it seems to me that most elections are not won or lost by party members strictly voting their party. A lot of elections swing on convincing the fence-sitters and in today's racially charged atmosphere, a lot of erstwhile black fence-sitters are leaning left because other blacks and many liberal whites are screaming racial dogma at them that if they don't vote Democrat, they are selling out and betraying their race.
We are not "racially divided" in that whites are angry at blacks. We are angry at Liberals who keep attacking us on various bullshit reasons.
All any black republican candidate would have to do, is demonstrate somehow that they are not part of that group, and they would not be judged as part of that group.
It would be easy. The most obvious way to do it, would be in the primaries to speak out in DEFENSE of one of his primary opponents, who were falsely accused of racism by some moron, for attacking him.
It would demonstrate that he was disagreeing with his opponents on policy, but not calling him "racists" for disagreeing with a black man.
Obama never said that. Or if he did, he did not mean it. Right there, any fence sitters would know, that the black republican was NOT one of the assholes.
You may be absolutely right. Question is: would it happen this way? Would a black Republican be able to sway the black fence-sitter? I don't know. But I do know it would be more of a challenge today than say, twenty years ago.
Who's the racist?Any attempt to give favorable treatment to blacks, to make up for past disadvantages, by the math principle of simple subtraction, takes away those limited resources from whites. That this practice has grown from just blacks to fucking EVERYONE who is not a white, normal, healthy male, has just made the practice even more harmful to whites.
You just make shit up. I'm white. I have "interests." I speak for me. I don't try to to speak for you because I'm not an asshole. You don't get to speak for me. You inferring "implications" to argue with yourself about is as pathetic as pathetic gets.1. And you are using it to dismiss whites and white interests, with an implication that we are wealthy and white and thus our concerns are not to be taken seriously.
That's all you just making shit up again. I never said anything of the sort. Asshole.2. That the justification for your assumption of blacks being morally superior
There ya go girl! Clutch them pearls, you shameless pansy! You've clearly got nothing else.3. And that you would Godwin your fellow American whites
You just make shit up. I'm white. I have "interests." I speak for me. I don't try to to speak for you because I'm not an asshole. You don't get to speak for me. You inferring "implications" to argue with yourself about is as pathetic as pathetic gets.1. And you are using it to dismiss whites and white interests, with an implication that we are wealthy and white and thus our concerns are not to be taken seriously.
That's all you just making shit up again. I never said anything of the sort. Asshole.2. That the justification for your assumption of blacks being morally superior
There ya go girl! Clutch them pearls, you shameless pansy!3. And that you would Godwin your fellow American whites
Idiots like ghost talk about quotas only when it pertains to black people.
Idiots like IM2 confuse "I don't want quotas" with "I don't want blacks".
IM2, I believe you may be suffering a form of comprehension dyslexia. The letters are all in the right place and facing the right way but you always seem to get the meaning backwards.
But he doesn't consider 100 percent white a quota.
100 per cent is not a quota dumbass. And the Republican party is not 100 per cent white anyway.
Quota - 1: A proportional part or share.
2: The number or amount constituting a proportional share.
Look it up.
Secondly there are black republicans who are not right wing. Conservatives have no place in todays republican party, the leadership are right wing extremists and the blacks they champion are right wing black stooges.
Opinion.
Why do you think that COlin Powell would not have won the 96 election?
Back then it would have been likely. Or at least, he would have made a good showing. But in today's racially divided political climate? I just don't know.
There's no doubt in my mind that most Republicans would vote for Powell today, provided he still held to the conservative values he held back then (some say he leans a little more left today than he did then. I don't know, myself). But, I'm no political science expert but it seems to me that most elections are not won or lost by party members strictly voting their party. A lot of elections swing on convincing the fence-sitters and in today's racially charged atmosphere, a lot of erstwhile black fence-sitters are leaning left because other blacks and many liberal whites are screaming racial dogma at them that if they don't vote Democrat, they are selling out and betraying their race.
We are not "racially divided" in that whites are angry at blacks. We are angry at Liberals who keep attacking us on various bullshit reasons.
All any black republican candidate would have to do, is demonstrate somehow that they are not part of that group, and they would not be judged as part of that group.
It would be easy. The most obvious way to do it, would be in the primaries to speak out in DEFENSE of one of his primary opponents, who were falsely accused of racism by some moron, for attacking him.
It would demonstrate that he was disagreeing with his opponents on policy, but not calling him "racists" for disagreeing with a black man.
Obama never said that. Or if he did, he did not mean it. Right there, any fence sitters would know, that the black republican was NOT one of the assholes.
You may be absolutely right. Question is: would it happen this way? Would a black Republican be able to sway the black fence-sitter? I don't know. But I do know it would be more of a challenge today than say, twenty years ago.
IMO, that fact that Powell would NOT be swaying the BLACK fence sitters so much as WHITE fence sitters, or more commonly referred to Reagan Democrats, would have been a GOOD thing.
It would have made the milestone of the "First Black President" STRONGER, for him to have been elected primarily by whites instead of by high black turnout.
Indeed, the idea that a BLACK republican's job, would be to appeal to BLACK voters, is buying into the identity politics of the Left.
Powell's big assets were his connection to Reagan and his military background, especially the win he got some credit for, in The Persian Gulf War.
Not his skin color.
I'm white (for census purposes) and I have interests. I don't have "white interests." Only asshole racists like you think you have "white interests."You just make shit up. I'm white. I have "interests." I speak for me. I don't try to to speak for you because I'm not an asshole. You don't get to speak for me. You inferring "implications" to argue with yourself about is as pathetic as pathetic gets.1. And you are using it to dismiss whites and white interests, with an implication that we are wealthy and white and thus our concerns are not to be taken seriously.
That's all you just making shit up again. I never said anything of the sort. Asshole.2. That the justification for your assumption of blacks being morally superior
There ya go girl! Clutch them pearls, you shameless pansy!3. And that you would Godwin your fellow American whites
1. What "white" interests do you speak out for? Pick one for discussion purposes. ONE, your freaking moron. No gish gallop bullshit.
2. You "defer" to them, on certain, very large and important issues, because you believe their experiences and minority perspective, give them a better understanding that you, a white man operating from a position of "privilege" can have. That is a form of Moral Superiority. For one Race to be superior to your own race. You are an anti-white racist.
3. There is nothing "pansy" about calling you out for insulting US, by comparing and to some extent even equating our treatment of blacks to the Nazis treatment of Jews. You are being an asshole.
Idiots like ghost talk about quotas only when it pertains to black people.
Idiots like IM2 confuse "I don't want quotas" with "I don't want blacks".
IM2, I believe you may be suffering a form of comprehension dyslexia. The letters are all in the right place and facing the right way but you always seem to get the meaning backwards.
But he doesn't consider 100 percent white a quota.
100 per cent is not a quota dumbass. And the Republican party is not 100 per cent white anyway.
Quota - 1: A proportional part or share.
2: The number or amount constituting a proportional share.
Look it up.
Secondly there are black republicans who are not right wing. Conservatives have no place in todays republican party, the leadership are right wing extremists and the blacks they champion are right wing black stooges.
Opinion.
Why do you think that COlin Powell would not have won the 96 election?
Back then it would have been likely. Or at least, he would have made a good showing. But in today's racially divided political climate? I just don't know.
There's no doubt in my mind that most Republicans would vote for Powell today, provided he still held to the conservative values he held back then (some say he leans a little more left today than he did then. I don't know, myself). But, I'm no political science expert but it seems to me that most elections are not won or lost by party members strictly voting their party. A lot of elections swing on convincing the fence-sitters and in today's racially charged atmosphere, a lot of erstwhile black fence-sitters are leaning left because other blacks and many liberal whites are screaming racial dogma at them that if they don't vote Democrat, they are selling out and betraying their race.
We are not "racially divided" in that whites are angry at blacks. We are angry at Liberals who keep attacking us on various bullshit reasons.
All any black republican candidate would have to do, is demonstrate somehow that they are not part of that group, and they would not be judged as part of that group.
It would be easy. The most obvious way to do it, would be in the primaries to speak out in DEFENSE of one of his primary opponents, who were falsely accused of racism by some moron, for attacking him.
It would demonstrate that he was disagreeing with his opponents on policy, but not calling him "racists" for disagreeing with a black man.
Obama never said that. Or if he did, he did not mean it. Right there, any fence sitters would know, that the black republican was NOT one of the assholes.
You may be absolutely right. Question is: would it happen this way? Would a black Republican be able to sway the black fence-sitter? I don't know. But I do know it would be more of a challenge today than say, twenty years ago.
IMO, that fact that Powell would NOT be swaying the BLACK fence sitters so much as WHITE fence sitters, or more commonly referred to Reagan Democrats, would have been a GOOD thing.
It would have made the milestone of the "First Black President" STRONGER, for him to have been elected primarily by whites instead of by high black turnout.
Indeed, the idea that a BLACK republican's job, would be to appeal to BLACK voters, is buying into the identity politics of the Left.
Powell's big assets were his connection to Reagan and his military background, especially the win he got some credit for, in The Persian Gulf War.
Not his skin color.
I think you may be misunderstanding where I'm coming from (or maybe I'm misunderstanding where you are coming from). I don't buy into identity politics any more than you. I don't think skin color should be a factor in anything. But unfortunately, this is the political climate we find ourselves in and the left is largely responsible for this.
I think a black nominee should campaign solely on a political platform and not make race an issue. I don't think he should try to win black fence-sitters on anything but that. However, race is very much an issue for a lot of blacks and I'm afraid they would assess a black nominee based on what he says along those lines.
It's not a reality I agree with or care for but it is reality nonetheless.
I'm white (for census purposes) and I have interests. I don't have "white interests." Only asshole racists like you think you have "white interests."You just make shit up. I'm white. I have "interests." I speak for me. I don't try to to speak for you because I'm not an asshole. You don't get to speak for me. You inferring "implications" to argue with yourself about is as pathetic as pathetic gets.1. And you are using it to dismiss whites and white interests, with an implication that we are wealthy and white and thus our concerns are not to be taken seriously.
That's all you just making shit up again. I never said anything of the sort. Asshole.2. That the justification for your assumption of blacks being morally superior
There ya go girl! Clutch them pearls, you shameless pansy!3. And that you would Godwin your fellow American whites
1. What "white" interests do you speak out for? Pick one for discussion purposes. ONE, your freaking moron. No gish gallop bullshit.
2. You "defer" to them, on certain, very large and important issues, because you believe their experiences and minority perspective, give them a better understanding that you, a white man operating from a position of "privilege" can have. That is a form of Moral Superiority. For one Race to be superior to your own race. You are an anti-white racist.
3. There is nothing "pansy" about calling you out for insulting US, by comparing and to some extent even equating our treatment of blacks to the Nazis treatment of Jews. You are being an asshole.
I defer to some minority members to best describe their own situation just as I defer to my dentist to best describe the condition of my teeth. Their viewing angle is clearly better. It has nothing to do with superior morals.
You're just pissed since I caught you Godwinning something last week. Ignore the point then. I write for the benefit of others anyway, not for hopelessly self-deluded wackos like you.
Go right ahead then, Einstein. Grab your nuts and list all these lovely "white interests" of yours..I'm white (for census purposes) and I have interests. I don't have "white interests." Only asshole racists like you think you have "white interests."You just make shit up. I'm white. I have "interests." I speak for me. I don't try to to speak for you because I'm not an asshole. You don't get to speak for me. You inferring "implications" to argue with yourself about is as pathetic as pathetic gets.1. And you are using it to dismiss whites and white interests, with an implication that we are wealthy and white and thus our concerns are not to be taken seriously.
That's all you just making shit up again. I never said anything of the sort. Asshole.2. That the justification for your assumption of blacks being morally superior
There ya go girl! Clutch them pearls, you shameless pansy!3. And that you would Godwin your fellow American whites
1. What "white" interests do you speak out for? Pick one for discussion purposes. ONE, your freaking moron. No gish gallop bullshit.
2. You "defer" to them, on certain, very large and important issues, because you believe their experiences and minority perspective, give them a better understanding that you, a white man operating from a position of "privilege" can have. That is a form of Moral Superiority. For one Race to be superior to your own race. You are an anti-white racist.
3. There is nothing "pansy" about calling you out for insulting US, by comparing and to some extent even equating our treatment of blacks to the Nazis treatment of Jews. You are being an asshole.
I defer to some minority members to best describe their own situation just as I defer to my dentist to best describe the condition of my teeth. Their viewing angle is clearly better. It has nothing to do with superior morals.
You're just pissed since I caught you Godwinning something last week. Ignore the point then. I write for the benefit of others anyway, not for hopelessly self-deluded wackos like you.
1. Got it. So, not only do you dismiss white interests, but you consider any belief in white interest to be "Racist". So, all you push back when I said you "dismissed white interests", why did you instead not just honestly say that, instead of denying it?
2. It is not racist to discuss white interests, nor to even advocate for them. All groups have moral and legal right to have their interests and to pursue them in the political realm. That you think that whites are special and for some reason DON'T have that right, is just another facet of your belief that whites are morally inferior to other racial groups. IE, your anti-white racism.
3. Race relations in this country are two way streets. It is not just "their situation". You defer to blacks and you dismiss whites. Based on race. That is racism from you.
Fuck you. The ones tearing this nation apart are the racists, not the ones calling out the racists.It's not false.So a black Republican can't get elected without support from Democrats?Republicans struggle to elect blacks to Congress. Electing one as president won't happen in this century.
I don't know why this is an issue for Democrats in the first place since they don't like conservatives anyway. If you don't like conservatives or conservative values, you're not going to like a black Republican. And if a black Republican does get nominated, it's unlikely he/she would be elected and Democrats would be largely responsible for this. The reason being because a lot of black Democrats already consider conservative blacks as sellouts and Uncle Toms.
All of this nonsense about black Republican presidential nominees is just farting in a hurricane. Speaking for myself, I don't care how many blacks the Republican party has. A black person will either choose to be Republican or not, I don't give a shit and I don't want some kind of quota. If the Republican party doesn't have what a black person wants, shut the fuck up and become a Democrat. Same goes for white people.
I said black Democrats. The party of which most blacks in this country belong to.
Thanks for admitting that many Republicans and conservatives are racist. I already knew that but it's nice to see your side admit it.
Thanks for admitting your prejudice in assuming many Republicans and conservatives are racist.
You know, most Republicans are not racist and are completely baffled and angered by this trumped up hypocritical Democrat crusade against their imaginary racism and are quite frankly, sick and fucking tired of it.
Yep. They complain about divisive politics, but don't realize how divisive it is, to accuse large numbers of people, falsely.
They are pissing off EVERYONE. AT EVERYONE ELSE.
Every time you do that, you are tearing this nation apart. You piss off the majority of whites, who are getting more and more pissed off at being treated like dirt.
And you get minorities pissed off at whites, because you are filling their heads with fear of the supposedly evul racist whites.
If your plan was to ruin this nation and inflame racial tension to the point of permanently damaging this nation, one would be hard pressed to come up with a better plan of action, than what you have already done.
I mean, I just always assumed that you lefties knew that and just considered it the cost of doing business.
Are you claiming that that is not true? That you did NOT know that?
Oh, wait, is this just more lying from you?
Whatever. FUck off and die.
Republicans struggle to elect blacks to Congress. Electing one as president won't happen in this century.
Who's the racist?Any attempt to give favorable treatment to blacks, to make up for past disadvantages, by the math principle of simple subtraction, takes away those limited resources from whites. That this practice has grown from just blacks to fucking EVERYONE who is not a white, normal, healthy male, has just made the practice even more harmful to whites.
Take the log out of your eye, you rightards are also nightmares.LOLSo a black Republican can't get elected without support from Democrats?Republicans struggle to elect blacks to Congress. Electing one as president won't happen in this century.
I don't know why this is an issue for Democrats in the first place since they don't like conservatives anyway. If you don't like conservatives or conservative values, you're not going to like a black Republican. And if a black Republican does get nominated, it's unlikely he/she would be elected and Democrats would be largely responsible for this. The reason being because a lot of black Democrats already consider conservative blacks as sellouts and Uncle Toms.
All of this nonsense about black Republican presidential nominees is just farting in a hurricane. Speaking for myself, I don't care how many blacks the Republican party has. A black person will either choose to be Republican or not, I don't give a shit and I don't want some kind of quota. If the Republican party doesn't have what a black person wants, shut the fuck up and become a Democrat. Same goes for white people.
Thanks for admitting that many Republicans and conservatives are racist. I already knew that but it's nice to see your side admit it.
Colin Powell would have easily defeated Bill Clinton according to exit polls in 1996. I would have happily voted for him against Bill Clinton. Some of my republican friends were really big fans of his.
That not many blacks would likely have crossed party lines, would not have mattered, and actually, imo, would have been a good thing.
I don't know why Ghost thinks that a black republican candidate would not win, or could not win without black dem voters. But he is incorrect.
If he's incorrect, where is the black Republican president? ...
Colin Powell did not run because he did not have a "passion for politics". That is where the most recent chance of a black republican President went.
Can you blame him? You libs are fucking nightmares to deal with.
"No, I did not. "LOLSo a black Republican can't get elected without support from Democrats?Republicans struggle to elect blacks to Congress. Electing one as president won't happen in this century.
I don't know why this is an issue for Democrats in the first place since they don't like conservatives anyway. If you don't like conservatives or conservative values, you're not going to like a black Republican. And if a black Republican does get nominated, it's unlikely he/she would be elected and Democrats would be largely responsible for this. The reason being because a lot of black Democrats already consider conservative blacks as sellouts and Uncle Toms.
All of this nonsense about black Republican presidential nominees is just farting in a hurricane. Speaking for myself, I don't care how many blacks the Republican party has. A black person will either choose to be Republican or not, I don't give a shit and I don't want some kind of quota. If the Republican party doesn't have what a black person wants, shut the fuck up and become a Democrat. Same goes for white people.
I said black Democrats. The party of which most blacks in this country belong to.
Thanks for admitting that many Republicans and conservatives are racist. I already knew that but it's nice to see your side admit it.
Thanks for admitting your prejudice in assuming many Republicans and conservatives are racist.
You know, most Republicans are not racist and are completely baffled and angered by this trumped up hypocritical Democrat crusade against their imaginary racism and are quite frankly, sick and fucking tired of it.
YOU admitted many Republicans/conservatives are racist.
*LOL*
No, I did not.
YOU said a black Republican struggles to get elected...
No, I did not.
"And if a black Republican does get nominated, it's unlikely he/she would be elected and Democrats would be largely responsible for this."... it wouldn't be a problem if there weren't so many racists on the right.
It wouldn't be a problem if you didn't think there were so many racists on the right.
As for whether or not a black Republican nominee could get elected, I can't say that he would not get elected and I didn't say that in the first place. However, one thing I know for sure: many blacks would see him/her as a sellout and an Uncle Tom for deserting or not joining the party they think he should have. You know this as well as I do.
