The inept and corrupt federal government

Why?

As punishment for being poor?

Punishment....can you stop being stupid....just for a little while.

The poor absorb a disproportionate amount of taxes in the form of welfare and other public services. They also benefit from the protection of our armies.

The term "fair" was used. I simply applied it.

Unless you think it fair that someone get these benefits and not contribute.

You tax where the money is.

U.S._Distribution_of_Wealth,_2007.jpg

Where is that written ?

If you benefit, you can help.

Why do you advocate taxing those who only control two TENTHS of a percent of the wealth while offering those who have 34.6 of the wealth historically low tax rates

I don't recall saying anything about the wealthy. I am all for raising their taxes.

Shove your strawman.

But I don't advocate raising taxes unless there is an agreement that for every extra dollar of tax, there are three real dollars cut from the federal spending registers.
Again, why punish the poor for being poor

Why do you want a family struggling to feed, house and provide healthcare to do with less ?
 
Why do you advocate taxing those who only control two TENTHS of a percent of the wealth while offering those who have 34.6 of the wealth historically low tax rates

1. Because the American people are tired of people like you getting a free ride

2. The wealthy create jobs which are desperately needed

3. Communism/socialism/marxism/progressivism has been a spectacular failure world wide
I pay more in taxes than you earn in a year

Yet, I am still willing to pay my fair share
 
Punishment....can you stop being stupid....just for a little while.

The poor absorb a disproportionate amount of taxes in the form of welfare and other public services. They also benefit from the protection of our armies.

The term "fair" was used. I simply applied it.

Unless you think it fair that someone get these benefits and not contribute.

You tax where the money is.

U.S._Distribution_of_Wealth,_2007.jpg

Where is that written ?

If you benefit, you can help.

Why do you advocate taxing those who only control two TENTHS of a percent of the wealth while offering those who have 34.6 of the wealth historically low tax rates

I don't recall saying anything about the wealthy. I am all for raising their taxes.

Shove your strawman.

But I don't advocate raising taxes unless there is an agreement that for every extra dollar of tax, there are three real dollars cut from the federal spending registers.
Again, why punish the poor for being poor

Why do you want a family struggling to feed, house and provide healthcare to do with less ?

Funny how you think someone is being punished.

Tell me. When does it go from being a punishment to an obligation ?

Didn't your man Joe Biden say it was patriotic.

Why do you not support Joe Biden ?

I certainly don't.......

And asking the poor to pay taxes is not punishing them. It is allowing them to be a part of something.
 
You tax where the money is.

U.S._Distribution_of_Wealth,_2007.jpg

Where is that written ?

If you benefit, you can help.

Why do you advocate taxing those who only control two TENTHS of a percent of the wealth while offering those who have 34.6 of the wealth historically low tax rates

I don't recall saying anything about the wealthy. I am all for raising their taxes.

Shove your strawman.

But I don't advocate raising taxes unless there is an agreement that for every extra dollar of tax, there are three real dollars cut from the federal spending registers.
Again, why punish the poor for being poor

Why do you want a family struggling to feed, house and provide healthcare to do with less ?

Funny how you think someone is being punished.

Tell me. When does it go from being a punishment to an obligation ?

Didn't your man Joe Biden say it was patriotic.

Why do you not support Joe Biden ?

I certainly don't.......

And asking the poor to pay taxes is not punishing them. It is allowing them to be a part of something.
Provide me a Joe Biden quote about taxing people who can't afford it
 
Where is that written ?

If you benefit, you can help.

Why do you advocate taxing those who only control two TENTHS of a percent of the wealth while offering those who have 34.6 of the wealth historically low tax rates

I don't recall saying anything about the wealthy. I am all for raising their taxes.

Shove your strawman.

But I don't advocate raising taxes unless there is an agreement that for every extra dollar of tax, there are three real dollars cut from the federal spending registers.
Again, why punish the poor for being poor

Why do you want a family struggling to feed, house and provide healthcare to do with less ?

Funny how you think someone is being punished.

Tell me. When does it go from being a punishment to an obligation ?

Didn't your man Joe Biden say it was patriotic.

Why do you not support Joe Biden ?

I certainly don't.......

And asking the poor to pay taxes is not punishing them. It is allowing them to be a part of something.
Provide me a Joe Biden quote about taxing people who can't afford it

I don't recall saying he said that.

I do recall him saying it was patriotic.

Can you call your doctor and find out if they have another ADHD med you can try ?
 
Why do you advocate taxing those who only control two TENTHS of a percent of the wealth while offering those who have 34.6 of the wealth historically low tax rates

1. Because the American people are tired of people like you getting a free ride

2. The wealthy create jobs which are desperately needed

3. Communism/socialism/marxism/progressivism has been a spectacular failure world wide
I pay more in taxes than you earn in a year

Yet, I am still willing to pay my fair share
No you're not. If that were even remotely true, you'd simply write extra checks to the IRS (there is no limit on what you can pay in taxes voluntarily). You're a pathological liar wrongwinger. Just what we've come to express from progressives.
 
Why do you advocate taxing those who only control two TENTHS of a percent of the wealth while offering those who have 34.6 of the wealth historically low tax rates

1. Because the American people are tired of people like you getting a free ride

2. The wealthy create jobs which are desperately needed

3. Communism/socialism/marxism/progressivism has been a spectacular failure world wide
I pay more in taxes than you earn in a year

Yet, I am still willing to pay my fair share


It is a truth universally acknowledged that an anonymous person on the interwebs who brags about his income is in reality a loser who either does menial work for low wages or is unemployed and lives in his parents' basement.
 
Why do you advocate taxing those who only control two TENTHS of a percent of the wealth while offering those who have 34.6 of the wealth historically low tax rates

1. Because the American people are tired of people like you getting a free ride

2. The wealthy create jobs which are desperately needed

3. Communism/socialism/marxism/progressivism has been a spectacular failure world wide
I pay more in taxes than you earn in a year

Yet, I am still willing to pay my fair share


It is a truth universally acknowledged that an anonymous person on the interwebs who brags about his income is in reality a loser who either does menial work for low wages or is unemployed and lives in his parents' basement.
And don't forget that wrongwinger is literally on this board 24x7. I guarantee you he doesn't have a job at all. That's why government handouts are so important to him.
 
Why do you advocate taxing those who only control two TENTHS of a percent of the wealth while offering those who have 34.6 of the wealth historically low tax rates

1. Because the American people are tired of people like you getting a free ride

2. The wealthy create jobs which are desperately needed

3. Communism/socialism/marxism/progressivism has been a spectacular failure world wide
I pay more in taxes than you earn in a year

Yet, I am still willing to pay my fair share


It is a truth universally acknowledged that an anonymous person on the interwebs who brags about his income is in reality a loser who either does menial work for low wages or is unemployed and lives in his parents' basement.
And don't forget that wrongwinger is literally on this board 24x7. I guarantee you he doesn't have a job at all. That's why government handouts are so important to him.
I am a world renowned, highly compensated messageboard poster
 
Again, why punish the poor for being poor
Again Wrongwinger, why punish the wealthy for being successful?

How do you equate someone with a private jet sacrificing to someone struggling to feed their kids sacrificing?
By that "logic" you should beat a child who comes home with straight A's, take half of their A's and swap them with the child with straight F's. After all, that child with straight F's is "struggling" in school. We should reward him for that and punish that child for excelling with straight A's. :eusa_doh:

The person struggling to feed their children shouldn't have had children. That is irresponsible and part of the reason they are in the financial circumstances they find themselves.
 
Again, why punish the poor for being poor
Again Wrongwinger, why punish the wealthy for being successful?

How do you equate someone with a private jet sacrificing to someone struggling to feed their kids sacrificing?
By that "logic" you should beat a child who comes home with straight A's, take half of their A's and swap them with the child with straight F's. After all, that child with straight F's is "struggling" in school. We should reward him for that and punish that child for excelling with straight A's. :eusa_doh:

The person struggling to feed their children shouldn't have had children. That is irresponsible and part of the reason they are in the financial circumstances they find themselves.
Damn.....you really suck at analogies
 
Again, why punish the poor for being poor
Again Wrongwinger, why punish the wealthy for being successful?

How do you equate someone with a private jet sacrificing to someone struggling to feed their kids sacrificing?
By that "logic" you should beat a child who comes home with straight A's, take half of their A's and swap them with the child with straight F's. After all, that child with straight F's is "struggling" in school. We should reward him for that and punish that child for excelling with straight A's. :eusa_doh:

The person struggling to feed their children shouldn't have had children. That is irresponsible and part of the reason they are in the financial circumstances they find themselves.
Damn.....you really suck at analogies
LOL! Kind of just proved how dumb your views are on punishing the wealthy, didn't I?
 
The federal government has reached levels of ineptitude and corruption the likes of which have never been seen before by man. They are nearly $20 trillion in debt, have far exceeded the 18 enumerated powers they were authorized to oversee, and are now oppressing the very people they are supposed to answer to and represent.
It's what one does when one is trying to destroy the country
 
Last edited:
Less than 3% of GDP ??? And that is small ?

I don't know about today's armies, but I do know that poor people did when being in the army was not a good thing. Regardless, the army then benefits the poor in many ways.

Food stamps are promoted by the food corporations. I'd have no problem with them if I didn't see it as another corporate program that made the rich richer.

To my mind 3% is too large, but the real problem is that we have 400 people in this country who have more money than 40% of the population combined.
 
Again, why punish the poor for being poor
Again Wrongwinger, why punish the wealthy for being successful?

How do you equate someone with a private jet sacrificing to someone struggling to feed their kids sacrificing?
By that "logic" you should beat a child who comes home with straight A's, take half of their A's and swap them with the child with straight F's. After all, that child with straight F's is "struggling" in school. We should reward him for that and punish that child for excelling with straight A's. :eusa_doh:

The person struggling to feed their children shouldn't have had children. That is irresponsible and part of the reason they are in the financial circumstances they find themselves.
Damn.....you really suck at analogies
LOL! Kind of just proved how dumb your views are on punishing the wealthy, didn't I?
No.....you really do suck at analogies

Try again
 

Forum List

Back
Top