The left and the right can't get along, so what if we just split up?

[skookerasbil]

The problem is that the left divides this country into groups, and then decides which side they want to favor and which side they wish to chastise.

Ray... you are accusing left for what the right has been doing for years...chastising the gays, the poor, women.

Nope, that's only MSM and liberal blogs telling you that. If you disagree with one policy the left has on any of those subjects, they call you the stereotypical racist, sexist, homophobe....

This is how the left believes they can get their way all the time; try to make Republicans feel guilty about having a different opinion than theirs. They've been doing it for decades.

But as we both know, when it comes to liberalism, nobody is allowed to have a different opinion. You either agree with everything they say or you are the enemy. This is why they are trying like hell to shut down Trump rallies. They don't want him to speak. It doesn't fit their version of what America should be like. In the liberal version of America, only those who march in lockstep are allowed to have their message heard.

Spot on......the definition of "intolerance". LOL....these people are fascists and they don't even know it. They call those rallies "peaceful protests". Real mental case stuff. These people.......they hate their own country.........progressives..........every single one.

Ray....was reading yesterday about Europe "NO GO ZONES"..........

Swedish police: 55 official no-go zones

Hadnt heard about them........Musilm people who have just taken over communities and the police don't go in there. Sharia Law is established. To the modern progressive, this is fine........let every swinging dick into our country and they will assimilate. European culture is dying...........the American progressive WANTS this!! What you have in Trump is a candidate that plays to American nationalism, thus we have seen such great popularity. People are done with their country slipping away and turning into Cuba thanks to progressives.........we saw it begin with the Tea Parties in 2010......this is like that on steroids and thank God!!

 

[Votto]

Just thought I would throw this out there to break away from the hundreds of posts about the election and candidates:

As time progresses, it seems the left and right drift more and more apart. So my question is, if we just decided to divide the country in half (conservative on one side, liberals on the other, and anybody in between would have to choose a side) would you approve of it and if so, what would be the advantage to your side over the other?

As a conservative, on our side, I would like to see much less government regulation so as to attract more businesses. On our side, everybody would pay income tax regardless of income. Our social programs would be only for those who could absolutely not work, and prison would be a hellhole where most of the time prisoners spent would be in solitary confinement as to deter crime. People who use deadly force would not be held liable to the subject or family, and illegal immigrants would be immediately deported or jailed. Our death penalty would be carried out within six months after conviction (all appeals exhausted) and would be made public for all of society to witness.

So to the liberals, what would your side be like with huge taxation against the rich, an unarmed society, drugs run freely, and so many environmental regulations that nobody could possibly open up a business for profit?

What you fail to understand is that the left are tyrants. They wish to impose their will, not only on conservative America, but the rest of the world as well.

They have the power, why would they relinquish it?

Dear Votto
1. by empowering their CONSTITUENT base to take back the party and get what they want by investing and building it themselves
2. by organizing a mass LAWSUIT or PETITION or LEGISLATION
ordering the party leaders to pay restitution OWED to constituents
by making them pay back either donations and/or monies abused by govt that DIDN'T go into the promised programs. And MAKE them pay that money into those programs or else it's FRAUD if they don't deliver what they accepts MONEY and VOTES to do.
3. or at least LOBBYING for #2, and even if it doesn't work legally or legislatively the PUBLICITY and PRESSURE would make the party leaders have to build the programs they have been promising their party

Basically it can be compelled by lobbying, suing or writing/pushing legislation
by which the leftwing party leaders are petitioned/ordered to invest in and build
these "social programs" themselves, directly or indirectly throught PARTY structures
organized democratically from the local precinct levels all the way to the national/federal levels.
And keep those programs OUT of govt, but controlled and funded by locally
elected party leaders and party principles written, enforced and endorse by FREE CHOICE
of the party members and leaders who AGREE WITH THOSE BELIEFS and principles.

Same way CHURCH leaders, programs and members create manage
and fund their own programs. The benefit is that nobody is opposed.
they have full control of getting what they want because they already agree to those goals!

I would say that your notion of the power to effect change in such a corrupt power hungry system is a pipe dream, but whatever floats your boat.

Good luck with that!

 

[Seawytch]

Dear Red States...

We've decided we're leaving. We intend to form our own country, and
we're taking the other Blue States with us.

In case you aren't aware, that includes Hawaii, Oregon,Washington,
Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois and all the Northeast. We
believe this split will be beneficial to the nation, and especially
to the people of the new country of New California.

To sum up briefly: You get Texas, Oklahoma and all the slave states.
We get stem cell research and the best beaches. We get Elliot
Spitzer. You get Ken Lay.

We get the Statue of Liberty. You get Dollywood.
We get Intel and Microsoft. You get WorldCom.
We get Harvard. You get Ole' Miss.
We get 85 percent of America's venture capital and entrepreneurs. You
get Alabama.
We get two-thirds of the tax revenue, you get to make the red states
pay their fair share.

Since our aggregate divorce rate is 22 percent lower than the
Christian Coalition's, we get a bunch of happy families. You get a
bunch of single moms.

Please be aware that Nuevo California will be pro-choice and
anti-war, and we're going to want all our citizens back from Iraq at
once. If you need people to fight, ask your evangelicals. They have
kids they're apparently willing to send to their deaths for no
purpose, and they don't care if you don't show pictures of their
children's caskets coming home. We do wish you success in Iraq, and
hope that the WMDs turn up, but we're not willing to spend our
resources in Bush's Quagmire.

With the Blue States in hand, we will have firm control of 80 percent
of the country's fresh water, more than 90 percent of the pineapple
and lettuce, 92 percent of the nation's fresh fruit, 95 percent of
America's quality wines (you can serve French wines at state dinners)
90 percent of all cheese, 90 percent of the high tech industry, most
of the U.S. low-sulfur coal, all living redwoods, sequoias and
condors, all the Ivy and Seven Sister schools, plus Harvard, Yale,
Stanford, Cal Tech and MIT.

With the Red States, on the other hand, you will have to cope with 88
percent of all obese Americans (and their projected health care
costs), 92 percent of all U.S. mosquitoes, nearly 100 percent of the
tornadoes, 90 percent of the hurricanes, 99 percent of all Southern
Baptists, virtually 100 percent of all televangelists, Rush Limbaugh,
Bob Jones University, Clemson and the University of Georgia.

We get Hollywood and Yosemite, thank you.

Additionally, 38 percent of those in the Red states believe Jonah was
actually swallowed by a whale, 62 percent believe life is sacred
unless we're discussing the death penalty or gun laws, 44 percent say
that evolution is only a theory, 53 percent that Saddam was involved
in 9/11 and 61 percent of you crazy b*****ds believe you are people
with higher morals then we lefties.

By the way, we're taking the good pot, too. You can have that dirt
weed they grow in Mexico.

Peace out,
Blue States

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Just thought I would throw this out there to break away from the hundreds of posts about the election and candidates:

As time progresses, it seems the left and right drift more and more apart. So my question is, if we just decided to divide the country in half (conservative on one side, liberals on the other, and anybody in between would have to choose a side) would you approve of it and if so, what would be the advantage to your side over the other?

As a conservative, on our side, I would like to see much less government regulation so as to attract more businesses. On our side, everybody would pay income tax regardless of income. Our social programs would be only for those who could absolutely not work, and prison would be a hellhole where most of the time prisoners spent would be in solitary confinement as to deter crime. People who use deadly force would not be held liable to the subject or family, and illegal immigrants would be immediately deported or jailed. Our death penalty would be carried out within six months after conviction (all appeals exhausted) and would be made public for all of society to witness.

So to the liberals, what would your side be like with huge taxation against the rich, an unarmed society, drugs run freely, and so many environmental regulations that nobody could possibly open up a business for profit?

What you fail to understand is that the left are tyrants. They wish to impose their will, not only on conservative America, but the rest of the world as well.

They have the power, why would they relinquish it?

That would be a problem, but our President would be Donald Trump, and he would build a huge wall to keep liberals from infecting ur side. After all, when there is no work on the left side, they would need to find work where work is at.

the left work ? LOL

 

[Eaglewings]

The problem is that the left divides this country into groups, and then decides which side they want to favor and which side they wish to chastise.

Ray... you are accusing left for what the right has been doing for years...chastising the gays, the poor, women.

Nope, that's only MSM and liberal blogs telling you that. If you disagree with one policy the left has on any of those subjects, they call you the stereotypical racist, sexist, homophobe....

This is how the left believes they can get their way all the time; try to make Republicans feel guilty about having a different opinion than theirs. They've been doing it for decades.

But as we both know, when it comes to liberalism, nobody is allowed to have a different opinion. You either agree with everything they say or you are the enemy. This is why they are trying like hell to shut down Trump rallies. They don't want him to speak. It doesn't fit their version of what America should be like. In the liberal version of America, only those who march in lockstep are allowed to have their message heard.

Don't you recall in the last election why Romney lost...? Because of him and Ryan trying to control women's birth control and such. Why isn't that considered over government.? Especially when they themselves get drugs without questions to keep their own libido going at a old age.

Also perhaps its just the tea party but they are still affiliated with the republicans...how they make it ugly about gays, and people different like that.. its all over the place news, here..not blogs.

.

.

 

[Eaglewings]

The problem is that the left divides this country into groups, and then decides which side they want to favor and which side they wish to chastise.

Ray... you are accusing left for what the right has been doing for years...chastising the gays, the poor, women.

Nope, that's only MSM and liberal blogs telling you that. If you disagree with one policy the left has on any of those subjects, they call you the stereotypical racist, sexist, homophobe....

This is how the left believes they can get their way all the time; try to make Republicans feel guilty about having a different opinion than theirs. They've been doing it for decades.

But as we both know, when it comes to liberalism, nobody is allowed to have a different opinion. You either agree with everything they say or you are the enemy. This is why they are trying like hell to shut down Trump rallies. They don't want him to speak. It doesn't fit their version of what America should be like. In the liberal version of America, only those who march in lockstep are allowed to have their message heard.

Spot on......the definition of "intolerance". LOL....these people are fascists and they don't even know it. They call those rallies "peaceful protests". Real mental case stuff. These people.......they hate their own country.........progressives..........every single one.

Ray....was reading yesterday about Europe "NO GO ZONES"..........

Swedish police: 55 official no-go zones

Hadnt heard about them........Musilm people who have just taken over communities and the police don't go in there. Sharia Law is established. To the modern progressive, this is fine........let every swinging dick into our country and they will assimilate. European culture is dying...........the American progressive WANTS this!! What you have in Trump is a candidate that plays to American nationalism, thus we have seen such great popularity. People are done with their country slipping away and turning into Cuba thanks to progressives.........we saw it begin with the Tea Parties in 2010......this is like that on steroids and thank God!!

Wrong...lol first the start of the Tea Party was founded by the Koch brothers pulling wool over the members eyes, like the Koch brothers give a shit about regular people...They used the people .

2nd...No body wants no go zones..I find that really stupid and unfair to have the people make their own rules in America.

.

.

 

[bripat9643]

Just thought I would throw this out there to break away from the hundreds of posts about the election and candidates:

As time progresses, it seems the left and right drift more and more apart. So my question is, if we just decided to divide the country in half (conservative on one side, liberals on the other, and anybody in between would have to choose a side) would you approve of it and if so, what would be the advantage to your side over the other?

As a conservative, on our side, I would like to see much less government regulation so as to attract more businesses. On our side, everybody would pay income tax regardless of income. Our social programs would be only for those who could absolutely not work, and prison would be a hellhole where most of the time prisoners spent would be in solitary confinement as to deter crime. People who use deadly force would not be held liable to the subject or family, and illegal immigrants would be immediately deported or jailed. Our death penalty would be carried out within six months after conviction (all appeals exhausted) and would be made public for all of society to witness.

So to the liberals, what would your side be like with huge taxation against the rich, an unarmed society, drugs run freely, and so many environmental regulations that nobody could possibly open up a business for profit?

The left will never go for it because their schemes depend on using the rest of us as "resources." They view conservatives the same a rancher views his cattle.

 

[hangover]

Just thought I would throw this out there to break away from the hundreds of posts about the election and candidates:

As time progresses, it seems the left and right drift more and more apart. So my question is, if we just decided to divide the country in half (conservative on one side, liberals on the other, and anybody in between would have to choose a side) would you approve of it and if so, what would be the advantage to your side over the other?

As a conservative, on our side, I would like to see much less government regulation so as to attract more businesses. On our side, everybody would pay income tax regardless of income. Our social programs would be only for those who could absolutely not work, and prison would be a hellhole where most of the time prisoners spent would be in solitary confinement as to deter crime. People who use deadly force would not be held liable to the subject or family, and illegal immigrants would be immediately deported or jailed. Our death penalty would be carried out within six months after conviction (all appeals exhausted) and would be made public for all of society to witness.

So to the liberals, what would your side be like with huge taxation against the rich, an unarmed society, drugs run freely, and so many environmental regulations that nobody could possibly open up a business for profit?

Your proposal is not realistic. Every state is half left and half right....for the most part. There are some states that have more left or more right, but you aren't going to get any of them to relocate.

But the right can't even get along with each other. Right now Trump is splitting the GOP in half....Thanks trump.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Just thought I would throw this out there to break away from the hundreds of posts about the election and candidates:

As time progresses, it seems the left and right drift more and more apart. So my question is, if we just decided to divide the country in half (conservative on one side, liberals on the other, and anybody in between would have to choose a side) would you approve of it and if so, what would be the advantage to your side over the other?

As a conservative, on our side, I would like to see much less government regulation so as to attract more businesses. On our side, everybody would pay income tax regardless of income. Our social programs would be only for those who could absolutely not work, and prison would be a hellhole where most of the time prisoners spent would be in solitary confinement as to deter crime. People who use deadly force would not be held liable to the subject or family, and illegal immigrants would be immediately deported or jailed. Our death penalty would be carried out within six months after conviction (all appeals exhausted) and would be made public for all of society to witness.

So to the liberals, what would your side be like with huge taxation against the rich, an unarmed society, drugs run freely, and so many environmental regulations that nobody could possibly open up a business for profit?

The left will never go for it because their schemes depend on using the rest of us as "resources." They view conservatives the same a rancher views his cattle.

We would wall your kind off in a heartbeat. Walls keep things in, and out. Goodbye, little piss freak.

 

[bripat9643]

Just thought I would throw this out there to break away from the hundreds of posts about the election and candidates:

As time progresses, it seems the left and right drift more and more apart. So my question is, if we just decided to divide the country in half (conservative on one side, liberals on the other, and anybody in between would have to choose a side) would you approve of it and if so, what would be the advantage to your side over the other?

As a conservative, on our side, I would like to see much less government regulation so as to attract more businesses. On our side, everybody would pay income tax regardless of income. Our social programs would be only for those who could absolutely not work, and prison would be a hellhole where most of the time prisoners spent would be in solitary confinement as to deter crime. People who use deadly force would not be held liable to the subject or family, and illegal immigrants would be immediately deported or jailed. Our death penalty would be carried out within six months after conviction (all appeals exhausted) and would be made public for all of society to witness.

So to the liberals, what would your side be like with huge taxation against the rich, an unarmed society, drugs run freely, and so many environmental regulations that nobody could possibly open up a business for profit?

The left will never go for it because their schemes depend on using the rest of us as "resources." They view conservatives the same a rancher views his cattle.

We would wall your kind off in a heartbeat. Walls keep things in, and out. Goodbye, little piss freak.

Thanks for your input, Nazi douche bag.

 

[elektra]

The growing division is healthy for the country. It ensures survival. If a country is run by only one political spectrum, it is guaranteed to fail. So to counter your premise, since the left side would be a mess imagine
1) water and air that compare to linfen China. And you know that companies would be eager to pollute as much as possible because it saves them a mrasely Buck. I don't trust them to follow rules.
2). Everyone is working...for $2 an hour and no benefits.
3). Nobody can afford houses or apartments or a place to live....so a new ghetto is created.
4). Businesses can't find an educated worker. They have to recruit northerners.


See. This is fat right utopia. Great.

1. Republicans began the clean up, the epa, not Democrats
2. Democrat policies have caused the cost of things to rise, resulting in the need for more money, like refusing to let us drill in
Anwar or build the Keystone pipeline. Democrat energy policies cripple the people.
3. Yes, Democrats created ghettos and destroyed cities, like Detroit and Flint.
4. Democrats have driven the cost of education to an extreme level and the largest cost to private business is the government.

I am adding some info to your post. So, imagine more Detroits, more Flints, imagine more Third World the longer Democrats control the USA.

 

[initforme]

A one sided set of conservative or one sided set of liberal policies ensures the failure of a country. That is my point. I hope to see the division grow exponentially. It is entertaining. We Americans think we are so exceptional. Time for some humble pie.

 

[eddiew]

Just thought I would throw this out there to break away from the hundreds of posts about the election and candidates:

As time progresses, it seems the left and right drift more and more apart. So my question is, if we just decided to divide the country in half (conservative on one side, liberals on the other, and anybody in between would have to choose a side) would you approve of it and if so, what would be the advantage to your side over the other?

As a conservative, on our side, I would like to see much less government regulation so as to attract more businesses. On our side, everybody would pay income tax regardless of income. Our social programs would be only for those who could absolutely not work, and prison would be a hellhole where most of the time prisoners spent would be in solitary confinement as to deter crime. People who use deadly force would not be held liable to the subject or family, and illegal immigrants would be immediately deported or jailed. Our death penalty would be carried out within six months after conviction (all appeals exhausted) and would be made public for all of society to witness.

So to the liberals, what would your side be like with huge taxation against the rich, an unarmed society, drugs run freely, and so many environmental regulations that nobody could possibly open up a business for profit?

^ That post will forever serve as evidence that you're an embarrassing low-info voter.

A reply I expected from the left.

Okay... and that's a reply I'd expect from some idiot who thinks the country should split in two

So are you a Trump or establishment voter?

Pay attention, the country is already spit in two. Thus far, I fail to see anybody from the left chime in with the advantages they would have over the right side. That's pretty much reflective of the cities run by Democrats and liberals.

we did something like you suggest many years ago We call it the civil war and imo it should have lasted another year or 2 to get rid of those who brought red necks and trailer trash into our world today

 

[regent]

The nation would begin immediately begin breaking up with a new left and right.

 

[bripat9643]

A one sided set of conservative or one sided set of liberal policies ensures the failure of a country. That is my point. I hope to see the division grow exponentially. It is entertaining. We Americans think we are so exceptional. Time for some humble pie.

Your point is obvious bullshit. Where's the evidence for it? This is a leftwing shibboleth that lefties used to justify their interventionist policies.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Just thought I would throw this out there to break away from the hundreds of posts about the election and candidates:

As time progresses, it seems the left and right drift more and more apart. So my question is, if we just decided to divide the country in half (conservative on one side, liberals on the other, and anybody in between would have to choose a side) would you approve of it and if so, what would be the advantage to your side over the other?

As a conservative, on our side, I would like to see much less government regulation so as to attract more businesses. On our side, everybody would pay income tax regardless of income. Our social programs would be only for those who could absolutely not work, and prison would be a hellhole where most of the time prisoners spent would be in solitary confinement as to deter crime. People who use deadly force would not be held liable to the subject or family, and illegal immigrants would be immediately deported or jailed. Our death penalty would be carried out within six months after conviction (all appeals exhausted) and would be made public for all of society to witness.

So to the liberals, what would your side be like with huge taxation against the rich, an unarmed society, drugs run freely, and so many environmental regulations that nobody could possibly open up a business for profit?

Your proposal is not realistic. Every state is half left and half right....for the most part. There are some states that have more left or more right, but you aren't going to get any of them to relocate.

But the right can't even get along with each other. Right now Trump is splitting the GOP in half....Thanks trump.

I didn't say it was realistic. I would certainly like to know how many (especially on the left) would approve of such a plan. Doesn't seem like many so far. Who can blame them?

The left will never admit it, but if all their policies were put in place on their side only, it would be a disaster in less than ten years.

Their side would be so far in debt they could never dig out. Taxes would be so high nobody would want to live there or open up a business. But even if a business did open up, the left would have so many people on social programs that nobody would want the jobs anyway.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Just thought I would throw this out there to break away from the hundreds of posts about the election and candidates:

As time progresses, it seems the left and right drift more and more apart. So my question is, if we just decided to divide the country in half (conservative on one side, liberals on the other, and anybody in between would have to choose a side) would you approve of it and if so, what would be the advantage to your side over the other?

As a conservative, on our side, I would like to see much less government regulation so as to attract more businesses. On our side, everybody would pay income tax regardless of income. Our social programs would be only for those who could absolutely not work, and prison would be a hellhole where most of the time prisoners spent would be in solitary confinement as to deter crime. People who use deadly force would not be held liable to the subject or family, and illegal immigrants would be immediately deported or jailed. Our death penalty would be carried out within six months after conviction (all appeals exhausted) and would be made public for all of society to witness.

So to the liberals, what would your side be like with huge taxation against the rich, an unarmed society, drugs run freely, and so many environmental regulations that nobody could possibly open up a business for profit?

The left will never go for it because their schemes depend on using the rest of us as "resources." They view conservatives the same a rancher views his cattle.

That's the point I was hoping all would realize. Democrats could never survive on all Democrat policies. In fact, they couldn't survive with half of their polices they have or would like to have. Think of the crime alone!!!

 

[eddiew]

is that why blue states pay the freight for the red ones??

 

[NYcarbineer]

On our side, everybody would pay income tax regardless of income.

What would the tax be on zero income?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The problem is that the left divides this country into groups, and then decides which side they want to favor and which side they wish to chastise.

Ray... you are accusing left for what the right has been doing for years...chastising the gays, the poor, women.

Nope, that's only MSM and liberal blogs telling you that. If you disagree with one policy the left has on any of those subjects, they call you the stereotypical racist, sexist, homophobe....

This is how the left believes they can get their way all the time; try to make Republicans feel guilty about having a different opinion than theirs. They've been doing it for decades.

But as we both know, when it comes to liberalism, nobody is allowed to have a different opinion. You either agree with everything they say or you are the enemy. This is why they are trying like hell to shut down Trump rallies. They don't want him to speak. It doesn't fit their version of what America should be like. In the liberal version of America, only those who march in lockstep are allowed to have their message heard.

Don't you recall in the last election why Romney lost...? Because of him and Ryan trying to control women's birth control and such. Why isn't that considered over government.? Especially when they themselves get drugs without questions to keep their own libido going at a old age.

Also perhaps its just the tea party but they are still affiliated with the republicans...how they make it ugly about gays, and people different like that.. its all over the place news, here..not blogs.

.

.

Romney and Ryan tried to control women's birth control? How could Romney have anything to do with something like that when he wasn't even in the federal government?

So do tell: what were these two people out of the hundreds of Republican legislatures going to do about controlling women's birth control and how?