Oddball
Unobtanium Member
Blind squirrel, meet acorn.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whatever you want to tell yourself to make yourself feel good, I'm not the one that's vomiting out fallacies, suggestions and conjecture as fact.That's the long and short of it, they simply CANNOT accept what's NOT already pre-programmed into their minute brains.And there you have it folks, even when given exactly what they ask for, the Right refuse to accept the facts. How can anyone have an honest discussion with people like that????
Iths thimple.
Says the guy who has to invent racism because he doesn't like a verdict.
Whatever you want to tell yourself to make yourself feel good, I'm not the one that's vomiting out fallacies, suggestions and conjecture as fact.That's the long and short of it, they simply CANNOT accept what's NOT already pre-programmed into their minute brains.
Iths thimple.
Says the guy who has to invent racism because he doesn't like a verdict.
This issue has turned from justice to politics. It's what this administration does.
Angela Corey is probably not the only one that displayed some sort of racism in the handling of GZ case. She had to be removed from the case because she took GZ's word without so much as investigating him but, she didn't waste any time convicting the black woman.I am not pretending to suddenly trust Angela Corey without question. But what she says at least gives reason for closer inspection into what the investigators found.
Marissa Alexander case in spotlight after Zimmerman trial - The Washington Post
From your link:
A judge rejected her bid to mount a defense under Floridas controversial stand your ground law, which allows people to use deadly force if they or their homes are in danger. After she rejected a three-year plea deal, Alexander was convicted and sentenced to 20 years, as required by Floridas strict sentencing guidelines on crimes involving a gun.
Kevin Cobbin, Alexanders attorney, said his client was justified in firing her gun because Gray had put his hands on her and there was a fight in the bathroom.
The judge decided not to make the call to grant stand your ground,  Cobbin said. If it had been a white female, I believe she would have.
It is quite obvious that racism played a part in both of these cases, considering the black woman was not even allowed to file a charge of "self defense" considering it was in her house, and her husband had a record of abuse, yet Zimmerman was not in his house, TM had no record of abusing GZ and GZ actually shot and killed him.. Seems like in both these cases the black person ends up on the losing end. Perhaps this whole GZ/TM situation will shine the light on some of the injustices going on in this country and we can make more headway.
Corey doesn't indicate that she went to her husband/boyfriend's house, just that she was involved in an altercation that left him with a swollen eye. How do you know that he wasn't beating on her again, and where? And 3 years (in light of GZ going free) is not a walk in the park. How come GZ didn't get 3 years?And yes, after you shoot at a man and children, and then violate a court order and go over and physically attack the guy, 3 years is at least reasonable if not generous. It's really dumb to go beat a guy up when you're out on bond for shooting at him.
And it is also reasonable to just believe everything a defendant says in light of many opportunities he had to circumvent the consequences, and let him go free after killing an innocent 17 year old walking home from the store? 3 years is a heck of a lot of time for someone that didn't kill anyone in contrast to someone going free for killing another in basically similar situations. I would probably have turned it down, too, now that I know that all you have to do is claim "you feared for your life" before shooting and killing someone.
Well, Piers Morgan is not a cracker. We can only give Snookie half credit for that one.
Are there crackahs across the pond?
The derogatory term "crackers" originates across the pond and was even employed by Shakespeare. Shakespeares King John: What cracker is this that deafes our ears/ With this abundance of superfluous breath?"
It is derived from the Gaelic word craic, and refers to a conversationalist. It soon was employed as an insult to the Scot-Irish as braggards. The term was thereafter transported across the pond with the immigration of the Scotch Irish to the Americas, where they settled primarily in the southern colonies and on the edges os of civilization. The Scotch Irish are also the source of the term "hillbilly" and "redneck" and are the original "April Fool"
Legal Eagle ---> of Scotch Irish descent who likes Ritz Crackers
Youth are the biggest target in Chicago. Black youth, she pointed out. In 2012, Chicago had 100 more murders than New York City, 215 more than Los Angeles, and according to the Chicago Reporter and other statistics, from 2008 to 2012 half of Chicagos nearly 2,500 homicide victims were killed before they reached their 25th birthdays.
So where are the riots? Where are the protests? Loesch asked. I mean yes, apparently they are just killing black teenagers out there but who is they? According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, anywhere from 8,000 to 9,000 black Americans are killed every year 93% of these murders are committed by other black Americans.
The fact that you, others, nor myself KNOWS nor CAN KNOW, means we cannot nor should not SPECULATE.You don't know WHO threw the first punch, yet you and others spew this BS out there as if it's Gospel Truth.
Why?!?!?!??
None of us were there, therefore we only have the physical evidence to go by, so what did the evidence suggest? Come on now, this is an easy lay up. According to the physical evidence, which person was more likely to have thrown the first punch?
Case closed.
Stop saying the victim, Trayvon Martin, threw the first punch.
It's simply not true.
If you say so...post one.Whatever you want to tell yourself to make yourself feel good, I'm not the one that's vomiting out fallacies, suggestions and conjecture as fact.Says the guy who has to invent racism because he doesn't like a verdict.
Surprise !! Yes you are.
When they notice and/or observe some creepy man following them?
Obviously they shouldn't exist, because no matter what, ***** like Zimmerman will insist on murdering them.
Don't worry, Noomi, I have a feeling Zimmerman is going to get what's coming to him. Call it Karma, call it justice, call it whatever you want to call it. He's going to get his.
If this had been a white kid walking down the street with Skittles and iced tea, would Zimmerman had thought him suspicious? I have Black friends who were scared to death of going through White neighborhoods as kids because of the possible consequences.
Come on now, enough with the "kid walking down the street with skittles and ice tea" crap. Martin would have been the first to tell you he wasn't a "kid" by any stretch, in fact, he probably would have whooped your ass to prove that point. He wasn't just "walking down the street," according to the testimony. Wandering through back yards and lurking around houses, is not "walking down the street." It is very suspicious behavior, especially in a community with a lot of burglary and break ins. So let's stop it with the Skittles crap, like he was some innocent little child, it's totally dishonest, and irrelevant to the case.
I find it interesting that Kruidbos' lawyer, Wesley White, is a former Prosecutor in Corey's office who resigned over ethics disagreements with Corey in December.
They should not assault anyone.
That's where it all went wrong, if you believe Zimmerman's account.
Unfortunately, he has been shown to lie....pretty straight faced at it too.
And the information I posted, which was presented to the jury, is evidence. Because it is pertinent to Zimmerman's motivation to pursue Martin.What Influenced The Zimmerman Jury?
The evidence (and lack thereof), common sense, logic, fairness, their oaths and the law.
I read the title of this thread and immediately said THE EVIDENCE influenced the jury. Anyone that thinks otherwise isn't thinking clearly.
Here's what influenced the jury. They were five white woman and a hispanic woman. Blacks had been moving into that neighborhood and ruining it. We've all seen how that happens, right? The article MikeK posted talks about just that. Come on, you know what I mean! I grew up with a racist father, I know all about how those blacks ruin property values and all.
So anyway, those white women on that jury probably think a lot like my father did. Zimmerman was just trying to save the damn neighborhood, and here's this suspicious black kid...the root of all the problems, these fucking coons!!! They're going to convict Zimmerman? I think not. And the hispanic woman...of course not, he's one of her own. She's especially not going to fight against all the white women, who want to acquit him!
That's what influenced the jury.
NAILED IT!!!!
Yep.
Whatever you want to tell yourself to make yourself feel good, I'm not the one that's vomiting out fallacies, suggestions and conjecture as fact.That's the long and short of it, they simply CANNOT accept what's NOT already pre-programmed into their minute brains.
Iths thimple.
Says the guy who has to invent racism because he doesn't like a verdict.