The 911 Operator went from being a witness for the prosecution to a witness for the defense.
What did the 911 Operator do for the defense?
He confirmed:
1. Martin ran
2. Zimmerman followed
3. Zimmerman was asked to stop following
4. Zimmerman did stop following
5. Martin was gone
1. Martin ran
No he didn't, he had no knowledge that Martin ran, he confirmed that Zimmerman said he ran. Two different things.
2. Zimmerman followed
No he didn't, he had no knowledge that Martin ran, he confirmed that Zimmerman said he ran. Two different things.
3. Zimmerman was asked to stop following
True, however it was coached as a request. Due to liability they attempt to not issue direct orders.
4. Zimmerman did stop following
No he didn't, he had no knowledge whether Zimmerman did or did not continue to follow. He confirmed that Zimmerman acknolwedge the "we don't need you to do that", he did not testify at all on whether Zimmerman actually stopped.
5. Martin was gone
No he didn't, he had no knowledge whether Martin was actually gone. He confirmed that Zimmerman said he was gone.
What does this tell me?
That Martin came back to confront Zimmerman, that Martin turned into the aggressor, so far anyway. We still have to hear testimony and evidence.
Or that you are applying a preconceived belief into testimony that doesn't do what you think it does.
>>>>
Hairsplitter grand master quote flash