Zone1 The Problem Is Guns, And Easy Access To Guns

[candycorn]

That's not a large purchase. Heck, I know people who regularly bought ammo by the PALLET.

Are they 18 years old?

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Firearms are now the number one cause of death for children in the United States, but rank no higher than fifth in 11 other large and wealthy countries, a new KFF analysis finds.

Guns – including accidental deaths, suicides, and homicides – killed 4,357 children (ages 1-19 years old) in the United States in 2020, or roughly 5.6 per 100,000 children. The U.S. is the only country among its peers that has seen a substantial increase in the rate of child firearm deaths in the last two decades (42%).

Firearms are the Leading Cause of Death for Children in the United States But Rank No Higher Than Fifth in Other Industrialized Nations | KFF

Firearms are now the number one cause of death for children in the United States, but rank no higher than fifth in 11 other large and wealthy countries, a new KFF analysis finds. Guns – including accidental deaths, suicides, and homicides – killed 4,357 children (ages 1-19 years old) in the...

www.kff.org

Firearms are the leading cause of death for American children and teens.

everytownresearch.org

Preventing Gun Violence, the Leading Cause of Childhood Death

In 2020, firearm-related injuries surpassed motor vehicle crashes to become the leading cause of death among children and adolescents in the United States. Dr. Bianchi highlights NICHD-supported research to prevent firearm violence and reduce the related deaths, injuries, and trauma.

www.nichd.nih.gov

The problem is guns, and the easy access to guns

No!!! The real problem is people like you.

The next problem is the people that are violent and should be committed to Rikers Island or Sing-Sing.

*****SMILE*****

 

[Jarlaxle]

Are they 18 years old?

My uncle was doing it at 14.

 

[Stryder50]

No disregard of the Constitution. The majority ruled both when Prop. 8 was first implemented in CA and again when the SC expanded the definition of marriage nationwide. Democracy. Horrors!

The USA Constitution was written to balance the rule of majority with the respect for the rights of the minority. Hence, not "Democracy", but Representative Republic. Your view of "Democracy" is what produced the Jim Crow Laws and other unConstitutional legislations/laws.

 

[Stryder50]

No, dummy:


Yes, the majority ruled out same sex marriage..

Governor Newsom Statement on Constitutional Amendment to Repeal Prop. 8 | Governor of California

SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom issued the below statement today regarding the constitutional amendment introduced by Assemblymember Evan Low (D-Campbell) to rescind Proposition 8…

www.gov.ca.gov

Done yet? If not, I'll just keep rubbing the irrefutable evidence into your fat Frankenface.. Same goes for your idiotic buddies, 2aguy and Stryder50..

I don't recall weighing in on same sex marriage on this thread so your broad brush is once again highly inaccurate.
Your "evidence" is far from irrefutable, but you ignorance and bias definitely are.

 

[sartre play]

50 years ago, we had guns easier to get hold of and didn't have these problems. Again, what changed? Not the guns.

What changed was concept, people bought a gun/riffle for a reason, Most were educated on the safe storage & use. Hunting was part of life. Now we have suit wearing men posing with there wife and kids with military grade weapons'. See how cool I am, for some unexplainable political reason. Pro gun, anti gun nut.

 

[2aguy]

What changed was concept, people bought a gun/riffle for a reason, Most were educated on the safe storage & use. Hunting was part of life. Now we have suit wearing men posing with there wife and kids with military grade weapons'. See how cool I am, for some unexplainable political reason. Pro gun, anti gun nut.

Those are not military weapons....not even close....that you are ignorant about that probably means you should do some research before you post....

 

[M14 Shooter]

What changed was concept, people bought a gun/riffle for a reason, Most were educated on the safe storage & use. Hunting was part of life. Now we have suit wearing men posing with there wife and kids with military grade weapons'. See how cool I am, for some unexplainable political reason. Pro gun, anti gun nut.

Undoubtedly, part of the reason for that picture was to trigger the anti-gun left.
Mission accomplished.

 

[sartre play]

Undoubtedly, part of the reason for that picture was to trigger the anti-gun left.
Mission accomplished.

That is really sad,
Hate triggering more popular than efforts to work together towards solutions.

 

[M14 Shooter]

That is really sad,
Hate triggering more popular than efforts to work together towards solutions.

The anti-gun left, over and over and over, demonstrates it has no desire to "work together" or create "solutions".

Instead, it demands we accept unnecessary, ineffective, and unconstitutional restrictions on the exercise of the right to keep and bear arms by the law abiding.

Triggering it serves to further illustrate its ignorance and dishonesty.

 

[Curried Goats]

The USA Constitution was written to balance the rule of majority with the respect for the rights of the minority. Hence, not "Democracy", but Representative Republic. Your view of "Democracy" is what produced the Jim Crow Laws and other unConstitutional legislations/laws.

Really? Was Jim Crow worse than the slavery that came before it? Funny how the constitution never protected the rights of the slave minority. Its almost as if they had a particular minority in mind....

 

[Curried Goats]

The anti-gun left, over and over and over, demonstrates it has no desire to "work together" or create "solutions".

Instead, it demands we accept unnecessary, ineffective, and unconstitutional restrictions on the exercise of the right to keep and bear arms by the law abiding.

Triggering it serves to further illustrate its ignorance and dishonesty.

The vast majority of this country supports gun reform.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

The vast majority of this country supports gun reform.

If that were really true, then were is thee movement to ratify a new amendment to the Constitution, in order to override the Second Amendment.

As long as the Second Amendment stands, all efforts to restrict he people's right to keep and bear are are illegal, unconstitutional,, and acts of corruption on the part of every public servant who has any part in enacting or enforcing any such restrictions.

By wise design, amending the Constitution is no trivial task, but of there was anywhere near the level of support that you criminal-loving anti-American filth claim there is for stripping us of this right, that would be enough support to get such an amendment passed.

There is no effort to get such an amendment passed, because no body in any position to initiate such an effort believes it would have any chance at all of succeeding, which puts the lie to all those claims about there being so much public support for removing this right.

 

[Curried Goats]

If that were really true, then were is thee movement to ratify a new amendment to the Constitution, in order to override the Second Amendment.

That's shitty logic. Who says stricter gun laws require a constitutional amendment?

As long as the Second Amendment stands, all efforts to restrict he people's right to keep and bear are are illegal, unconstitutional,, and acts of corruption on the part of every public servant who has any part in enacting or enforcing any such restrictions.

As I told another poster the 2nd Amendment isn't a magical forcefield. Feel how you want about them, your feelings don't mean much to me.

By wise design, amending the Constitution is no trivial task, but of there was anywhere near the level of support that you criminal-loving anti-American filth claim there is for stripping us of this right, that would be enough support to get such an amendment passed.

Somewhere around 56% to 60% of Americans support stricter gun laws.

There is no effort to get such an amendment passed, because no body in any position to initiate such an effort believes it would have any chance at all of succeeding, which puts the lie to all those claims about there being so much public support for removing this right.

You keep waiting in the bushes for the attack on the 2nd and don't mind us as we go around you.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

That's shitty logic. Who says stricter gun laws require a constitutional amendment?

That would be the Constitution—this nation's highest law. The Second Amendment affirms the right to keep and bear arms, identifies this right as belonging to the people, and forbids it from being infringed.

ALL gun control laws infringe this right, thetefore, ALL gun control laws are in violation of the Constitution.

The only way that any gun control law can ever legitimately exist in this nation would be to first ratify a new amendment to the Constitution that overturns the Second Amendment. Until this is done, every public servant—every legislator, every executive, every judge, every police officer—who takes any part in enacting, enforcing, or upholding any gun control law is a criminal.

 

[Curried Goats]

That would be the Constitution—this nation's highest law. The Second Amendment affirms the right to keep and bear arms, identifies this right as belonging to the people, and forbids it from being infringed.

Sure it does. Like a magical forcefield.

ALL gun control laws infringe this right, thetefore, ALL gun control laws are in violation of the Constitution.

The only way that any gun control law can ever legitimately exist in this nation would be to first ratify a new amendment to the Constitution that overturns the Second Amendment. Until this is done, every public servant—every legislator, every executive, every judge, every police officer—who takes any part in enacting, enforcing, or upholding any gun control law is a criminal.

Well see there's your problem right there. We don't care if you feel its legitmate or not so long as you feel the boot of the government on your neck if you violate it.

 

[2aguy]

Really? Was Jim Crow worse than the slavery that came before it? Funny how the constitution never protected the rights of the slave minority.

Interesting that the slave owners became the democrat party and that blacks vote for that party at an over 95% rate………while the democrat party cities and states refuse to educate their children and create generational poverty and crime………

 

[2aguy]

That's shitty logic. Who says stricter gun laws require a constitutional amendment?

As I told another poster the 2nd Amendment isn't a magical forcefield. Feel how you want about them, your feelings don't mean much to me.

Somewhere around 56% to 60% of Americans support stricter gun laws.

You keep waiting in the bushes for the attack on the 2nd and don't mind us as we go around you.

The Americans who support gun control don’t know what the issues are….which intentional on the part of fascists like you……..

You hide your goal of disarming people, until you get the votes to ban and confiscate….

 

[Curried Goats]

Interesting that the slave owners became the democrat party and that blacks vote for that party at an over 95% rate………while the democrat party cities and states refuse to educate their children and create generational poverty and crime………

Who's falling for this moronic narrative? Who has ever fallen it?

 

[Curried Goats]

The Americans who support gun control don’t know what the issues are….which intentional on the part of fascists like you……..

You hide your goal of disarming people, until you get the votes to ban and confiscate….

Sure sounds like you know what the issues are with the non specific way you discuss these topics....