The Quandary Christians Put Gays In

[Syriusly]

I've argued that in many social aspects of society, locker rooms, gym showers and excersize areas, SEPERATE but equal is the norm and has been embraced.

Man, that is so fucking stupid. Same sex marriage should be prohibited because men and women use different locker rooms. That post should go into the dictionary as an example of non-sequitor.

What's your problem? Hell, they give gays MORE rights than straights. Same sex partners are welcome in gender exclusive areas while a straight partner could be arrested in some.

Never has a public restroom been restricted based on relationship status. Never. Somehow, that makes for "special" rights for gay people. Man, you're really fucking deranged. This obsession of yours really is unhealthy, and is starting to break down your grasp on reality. Just let go, and you'll find peace and happiness once again.

God are you a simpleton.

Never has Being Gay been part of the public record.

We are talking MARRIED COUPLES.

Easily defined now, before simple speculation.

Gays have GREATER access to public accomodations than straights!

Christians have GREATER access to public accommodations than Gays.

 

[Syriusly]

Already did...and linked to the Christian website.

Can I now paint all Christians like you do all Muslims?

Sorry. I didn't click on your porn link but at least I have a better idea of how kinky your fantasy life is.

Not mine, straight Christian's kinky sex life. The Latest Trend In Christianity: Beating Your Wife For Jesus.

Kinky sex between opposite sex couples often result in offspring.

Can you name a single same sex coupling (kinky or not) that ever resulted in a child?

Can you name a state where it matters? Argument tried and failed...all the way to the SCOTUS.

Oh, I'm sorry...I'm supposed to be a gracious winner.

Now we know what image Flash thinks about when he fantasizes.

 

[Syriusly]

No- not really- I dislike aspects of more of Islam than I dislike aspects of Christianity. However, as long as Muslims or Christians are not trying to impose their faith on me, or trying to harm others, I am not too concerned with either faith.

Do you treat Muslims and Christians equally?

I treat everyone the same until they give me a reason not to. Islam is an evil hateful doctrine from the devil. Christianity is the Word of God. That's my belief.

Has a Christian forced you to read a bible or attend their church? You seem to have a case of Christophobia. It's quite common among the left.

Actually yes- I was forced to read the bible and yes I was forced to go to church. I continue to read the bible because I enjoy reading it, and I find it useful when dealing with faux Christians like yourself.

You seem to have a case of both homophobia and Muslim bigotry- which is quite common- but bizarre since homophobes and extremist Muslims share the same views on homosexuals.

Seeing Christians who disagree with the homosexual lifestyle in the same light as Muslims who hang them in the street is your own special version of bizarre.

Why are you comparing American Christians to Muslims in other countries? Here in America, it's the evangelical Christians that like gays the least. Oh...and Christians in other countries kill gays too, just like the Muslims in other countries.

"They Could Kill Me Anytime"

The 25 Most Shocking Anti Gay Stories from Russia

So why do you defend Islam?

She wasn't.

Why are you attacking all Muslims?

 

[Syriusly]

How many wives did Solomon have again?

I mean in your myths and fairy tales?

If it's all myths and fairy tales why does it bother you so that you spend time and energy attacking it?

If you weren't pushing your myths and fairy tales to attack Americans, I wouldn't bother.

So do you see yourself as the Savior of leftist ideology? Free speech is now "attacking"?

There is no 'leftist ideology,' facts, pragmatism, and critical thinking skills is not an 'ideology.'

And when you and other theists seek to codify your religious doctrine and dogma into secular law all must obey to disadvantage gay Americans or any other class of citizens whom you subjectively disapprove of, such efforts violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, and in no way constitute 'free speech.'

You do see how your argument leads to polygamous and incestuous marriage, right?

That is what you keep claiming- despite all evidence to the contrary.

 

[Flash Farley]

Who interprets the New Testament as supporting wife beating? Which passage do they cite?

Stop lying, Leftists!

Already did...and linked to the Christian website.

Can I now paint all Christians like you do all Muslims?

Sorry. I didn't click on your porn link but at least I have a better idea of how kinky your fantasy life is.

Not mine, straight Christian's kinky sex life. The Latest Trend In Christianity: Beating Your Wife For Jesus.

Kinky sex between opposite sex couples often result in offspring.

Can you name a single same sex coupling (kinky or not) that ever resulted in a child?

Can you name a state where it matters? Argument tried and failed...all the way to the SCOTUS.

Oh, I'm sorry...I'm supposed to be a gracious winner.

Sorry. I didn't click on your porn link but at least I have a better idea of how kinky your fantasy life is.

Not mine, straight Christian's kinky sex life. The Latest Trend In Christianity: Beating Your Wife For Jesus.

Kinky sex between opposite sex couples often result in offspring.

Can you name a single same sex coupling (kinky or not) that ever resulted in a child?

Can you name a state where it matters? Argument tried and failed...all the way to the SCOTUS.

Oh, I'm sorry...I'm supposed to be a gracious winner.

Now we know what image Flash thinks about when he fantasizes.

I'm not afraid to mock Mohammad. Anyone can mock Jesus. Mocking Mohammad takes a little more courage.

 

[Pop23]

I've argued that in many social aspects of society, locker rooms, gym showers and excersize areas, SEPERATE but equal is the norm and has been embraced.

Man, that is so fucking stupid. Same sex marriage should be prohibited because men and women use different locker rooms. That post should go into the dictionary as an example of non-sequitor.

What's your problem? Hell, they give gays MORE rights than straights. Same sex partners are welcome in gender exclusive areas while a straight partner could be arrested in some.

Never has a public restroom been restricted based on relationship status. Never. Somehow, that makes for "special" rights for gay people. Man, you're really fucking deranged. This obsession of yours really is unhealthy, and is starting to break down your grasp on reality. Just let go, and you'll find peace and happiness once again.

God are you a simpleton.

Never has Being Gay been part of the public record.

We are talking MARRIED COUPLES.

Easily defined now, before simple speculation.

Gays have GREATER access to public accomodations than straights!

Christians have GREATER access to public accommodations than Gays.

Perhaps, but you simply deflected, let's say my straight couple are devil worshoppers, that doesn't help the dude facing 3 to 5 for public exposure.

 

[Flash Farley]

I treat everyone the same until they give me a reason not to. Islam is an evil hateful doctrine from the devil. Christianity is the Word of God. That's my belief.

Has a Christian forced you to read a bible or attend their church? You seem to have a case of Christophobia. It's quite common among the left.

Actually yes- I was forced to read the bible and yes I was forced to go to church. I continue to read the bible because I enjoy reading it, and I find it useful when dealing with faux Christians like yourself.

You seem to have a case of both homophobia and Muslim bigotry- which is quite common- but bizarre since homophobes and extremist Muslims share the same views on homosexuals.

Seeing Christians who disagree with the homosexual lifestyle in the same light as Muslims who hang them in the street is your own special version of bizarre.

Why are you comparing American Christians to Muslims in other countries? Here in America, it's the evangelical Christians that like gays the least. Oh...and Christians in other countries kill gays too, just like the Muslims in other countries.

"They Could Kill Me Anytime"

The 25 Most Shocking Anti Gay Stories from Russia

So why do you defend Islam?

She wasn't.

Why are you attacking all Muslims?

Fair and balanced.

 

[Syriusly]

The bible DOES...and some interpret the New Testament to support it. Most don't. Most Muslims don't interpret the Koran as supporting wife beating.

Domestic violence in Islam The Quran on wife-beating

Who interprets the New Testament as supporting wife beating? Which passage do they cite?

Stop lying, Leftists!

Already did...and linked to the Christian website.

Can I now paint all Christians like you do all Muslims?

Sorry. I didn't click on your porn link but at least I have a better idea of how kinky your fantasy life is.

Not mine, straight Christian's kinky sex life. The Latest Trend In Christianity: Beating Your Wife For Jesus.

Kinky sex between opposite sex couples often result in offspring.

Can you name a single same sex coupling (kinky or not) that ever resulted in a child?

Can you name a single heterosexual blow job that ever resulted in a child?

 

[Pop23]

If it's all myths and fairy tales why does it bother you so that you spend time and energy attacking it?

If you weren't pushing your myths and fairy tales to attack Americans, I wouldn't bother.

So do you see yourself as the Savior of leftist ideology? Free speech is now "attacking"?

There is no 'leftist ideology,' facts, pragmatism, and critical thinking skills is not an 'ideology.'

And when you and other theists seek to codify your religious doctrine and dogma into secular law all must obey to disadvantage gay Americans or any other class of citizens whom you subjectively disapprove of, such efforts violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, and in no way constitute 'free speech.'

You do see how your argument leads to polygamous and incestuous marriage, right?

That is what you keep claiming- despite all evidence to the contrary.

Hmmmm, you've yet to defeat one?

You created them, remember?

 

[Syriusly]

I've argued that in many social aspects of society, locker rooms, gym showers and excersize areas, SEPERATE but equal is the norm and has been embraced.

Man, that is so fucking stupid. Same sex marriage should be prohibited because men and women use different locker rooms. That post should go into the dictionary as an example of non-sequitor.

What's your problem? Hell, they give gays MORE rights than straights. Same sex partners are welcome in gender exclusive areas while a straight partner could be arrested in some.

Never has a public restroom been restricted based on relationship status. Never. Somehow, that makes for "special" rights for gay people. Man, you're really fucking deranged. This obsession of yours really is unhealthy, and is starting to break down your grasp on reality. Just let go, and you'll find peace and happiness once again.

God are you a simpleton.

Never has Being Gay been part of the public record.

We are talking MARRIED COUPLES.

Easily defined now, before simple speculation.

Gays have GREATER access to public accomodations than straights!

Christians have GREATER access to public accommodations than Gays.

Perhaps, but you simply deflected, let's say my straight couple are devil worshoppers, that doesn't help the dude facing 3 to 5 for public exposure.

And you simply deflected.

If you want to claim that Gays have greater 'access' to public accommodations than straights, then I will point out that Christians have greater access than Gays.

 

[Syriusly]

If you weren't pushing your myths and fairy tales to attack Americans, I wouldn't bother.

So do you see yourself as the Savior of leftist ideology? Free speech is now "attacking"?

There is no 'leftist ideology,' facts, pragmatism, and critical thinking skills is not an 'ideology.'

And when you and other theists seek to codify your religious doctrine and dogma into secular law all must obey to disadvantage gay Americans or any other class of citizens whom you subjectively disapprove of, such efforts violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, and in no way constitute 'free speech.'

You do see how your argument leads to polygamous and incestuous marriage, right?

That is what you keep claiming- despite all evidence to the contrary.

Hmmmm, you've yet to defeat one?

You created them, remember?

Like I said- you keep making those claims- and have yet to provide any evidence to support your claim.

 

[Pop23]

Who interprets the New Testament as supporting wife beating? Which passage do they cite?

Stop lying, Leftists!

Already did...and linked to the Christian website.

Can I now paint all Christians like you do all Muslims?

Sorry. I didn't click on your porn link but at least I have a better idea of how kinky your fantasy life is.

Not mine, straight Christian's kinky sex life. The Latest Trend In Christianity: Beating Your Wife For Jesus.

Kinky sex between opposite sex couples often result in offspring.

Can you name a single same sex coupling (kinky or not) that ever resulted in a child?

Can you name a single heterosexual blow job that ever resulted in a child?

You realize to a straight couple those can be for play. For gays, the lifestyle.

 

[Pop23]

So do you see yourself as the Savior of leftist ideology? Free speech is now "attacking"?

There is no 'leftist ideology,' facts, pragmatism, and critical thinking skills is not an 'ideology.'

And when you and other theists seek to codify your religious doctrine and dogma into secular law all must obey to disadvantage gay Americans or any other class of citizens whom you subjectively disapprove of, such efforts violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, and in no way constitute 'free speech.'

You do see how your argument leads to polygamous and incestuous marriage, right?

That is what you keep claiming- despite all evidence to the contrary.

Hmmmm, you've yet to defeat one?

You created them, remember?

Like I said- you keep making those claims- and have yet to provide any evidence to support your claim.

Yes, until a case is won, I cant. But until then I can simply argue merit, and you've yet to find any argument of mine you can defeat, therefore showing mine have merit.

 

[Pop23]

I've argued that in many social aspects of society, locker rooms, gym showers and excersize areas, SEPERATE but equal is the norm and has been embraced.

Man, that is so fucking stupid. Same sex marriage should be prohibited because men and women use different locker rooms. That post should go into the dictionary as an example of non-sequitor.

What's your problem? Hell, they give gays MORE rights than straights. Same sex partners are welcome in gender exclusive areas while a straight partner could be arrested in some.

Never has a public restroom been restricted based on relationship status. Never. Somehow, that makes for "special" rights for gay people. Man, you're really fucking deranged. This obsession of yours really is unhealthy, and is starting to break down your grasp on reality. Just let go, and you'll find peace and happiness once again.

God are you a simpleton.

Never has Being Gay been part of the public record.

We are talking MARRIED COUPLES.

Easily defined now, before simple speculation.

Gays have GREATER access to public accomodations than straights!

Christians have GREATER access to public accommodations than Gays.

Perhaps, but you simply deflected, let's say my straight couple are devil worshoppers, that doesn't help the dude facing 3 to 5 for public exposure.

And you simply deflected.

If you want to claim that Gays have greater 'access' to public accommodations than straights, then I will point out that Christians have greater access than Gays.

I see, assumptions have merit?

DO NOT APPLY FOR THE BENCH.

Oh, dummy,the gay couple won the case. Proving your access charge bogus and you an idiot.

 

[Syriusly]

FLASH FARLEY SAID:

“Marriage is a male and female and has been since the dawn of civilization.”

Religious marriage rituals are perceived by some as being between a male and female, but that has nothing to do with the right of same-sex couples to enter into marriage contracts.

As a fact of law marriage is the union of two equal, adult partners not related to each other in a committed relationship recognized by the state – same- or opposite-sex. (Obergefell v. Hodges)

That something is believed to be 'historic' or 'traditional' is legally and Constitutionally irrelevant, and in no way 'justifies' denying gay Americans their civil rights. (Lawrence v. Texas)

Funny, the number of participants are only valid as a traditional number. It is now simply arbitrary unless you can name another type of contract that is legally limited to two participants..

So once again- you are admitting that the only argument you have- apparently the only objection you have to polygamous marriage is 'Tradition'?

If that is the case- you had lost that argument once Loving v. Virginia shot down 'Tradition' as a valid argument.

I really wonder why you and your sort even are against sibling marriage and polygamous marriage since you can't seem to articulate a reason why you are against it.

Your objection to sibling marriage is 'procreation'- but when I ask you whether sterile a sterile brother should be able to marry his sister, you act like a speed skater being chased by a bear in avoiding the answer.

And you can't seem to come up with any argument about why you are against polygamous marriage other than 'tradition'.

The sad thing is- if you ever read any of the court cases- you might learn some other reason.

But you refuse to 'pollute' your mind with actual legal arguments, and prefer just to keep making your specious claims as you whine about 'gay marriage'.

 

[Flash Farley]

So do you see yourself as the Savior of leftist ideology? Free speech is now "attacking"?

There is no 'leftist ideology,' facts, pragmatism, and critical thinking skills is not an 'ideology.'

And when you and other theists seek to codify your religious doctrine and dogma into secular law all must obey to disadvantage gay Americans or any other class of citizens whom you subjectively disapprove of, such efforts violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, and in no way constitute 'free speech.'

You do see how your argument leads to polygamous and incestuous marriage, right?

That is what you keep claiming- despite all evidence to the contrary.

Hmmmm, you've yet to defeat one?

You created them, remember?

Like I said- you keep making those claims- and have yet to provide any evidence to support your claim.

And when evidence is there you will refuse to acknowledge it. That's what I've experienced after dealing with lefties.

 

[Syriusly]

There is no 'leftist ideology,' facts, pragmatism, and critical thinking skills is not an 'ideology.'

And when you and other theists seek to codify your religious doctrine and dogma into secular law all must obey to disadvantage gay Americans or any other class of citizens whom you subjectively disapprove of, such efforts violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, and in no way constitute 'free speech.'

You do see how your argument leads to polygamous and incestuous marriage, right?

That is what you keep claiming- despite all evidence to the contrary.

Hmmmm, you've yet to defeat one?

You created them, remember?

Like I said- you keep making those claims- and have yet to provide any evidence to support your claim.

Yes, until a case is won, I cant. But until then I can simply argue merit, and you've yet to find any argument of mine you can defeat, therefore showing mine have merit.

You haven't argued merit at all. You have presented no more cogent argument than:

"Gay marriage is legal so therefore sibling marriage and polygamous marriage must be made legal also."

That is the extent of your argument.

 

[Syriusly]

There is no 'leftist ideology,' facts, pragmatism, and critical thinking skills is not an 'ideology.'

And when you and other theists seek to codify your religious doctrine and dogma into secular law all must obey to disadvantage gay Americans or any other class of citizens whom you subjectively disapprove of, such efforts violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, and in no way constitute 'free speech.'

You do see how your argument leads to polygamous and incestuous marriage, right?

That is what you keep claiming- despite all evidence to the contrary.

Hmmmm, you've yet to defeat one?

You created them, remember?

Like I said- you keep making those claims- and have yet to provide any evidence to support your claim.

And when evidence is there you will refuse to acknowledge it. That's what I've experienced after dealing with lefties.

Flash, if you ever offer evidence regarding anything let us all know, so we can cheer you on for that new breakthrough for you.

 

[Flash Farley]

You do see how your argument leads to polygamous and incestuous marriage, right?

That is what you keep claiming- despite all evidence to the contrary.

Hmmmm, you've yet to defeat one?

You created them, remember?

Like I said- you keep making those claims- and have yet to provide any evidence to support your claim.

Yes, until a case is won, I cant. But until then I can simply argue merit, and you've yet to find any argument of mine you can defeat, therefore showing mine have merit.

You haven't argued merit at all. You have presented no more cogent argument than:

"Gay marriage is legal so therefore sibling marriage and polygamous marriage must be made legal also."

That is the extent of your argument.

Why not? Five lawyers just redefined marriage. Why stop with same sex marriage?

 

[Pop23]

FLASH FARLEY SAID:

“Marriage is a male and female and has been since the dawn of civilization.”

Religious marriage rituals are perceived by some as being between a male and female, but that has nothing to do with the right of same-sex couples to enter into marriage contracts.

As a fact of law marriage is the union of two equal, adult partners not related to each other in a committed relationship recognized by the state – same- or opposite-sex. (Obergefell v. Hodges)

That something is believed to be 'historic' or 'traditional' is legally and Constitutionally irrelevant, and in no way 'justifies' denying gay Americans their civil rights. (Lawrence v. Texas)

Funny, the number of participants are only valid as a traditional number. It is now simply arbitrary unless you can name another type of contract that is legally limited to two participants..

So once again- you are admitting that the only argument you have- apparently the only objection you have to polygamous marriage is 'Tradition'?

If that is the case- you had lost that argument once Loving v. Virginia shot down 'Tradition' as a valid argument.

I really wonder why you and your sort even are against sibling marriage and polygamous marriage since you can't seem to articulate a reason why you are against it.

Your objection to sibling marriage is 'procreation'- but when I ask you whether sterile a sterile brother should be able to marry his sister, you act like a speed skater being chased by a bear in avoiding the answer.

And you can't seem to come up with any argument about why you are against polygamous marriage other than 'tradition'.

The sad thing is- if you ever read any of the court cases- you might learn some other reason.

But you refuse to 'pollute' your mind with actual legal arguments, and prefer just to keep making your specious claims as you whine about 'gay marriage'.

Dear poor idiot, I have never claimed to be in favor of incest, I've always claimed that since the courts recent ruling I can see no legal argument denying them access.

You?