The Right Wing had better be right about this "Deep State" stuff.

[Crixus]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

Gotta ask, do you think all this Russia stuff is on the up and up? Do you think Comey, Brennen, McCabe, clapper and all them did their jobs and fulfilled their oaths of Office? Hannity is a RNC water boy who can tell you the exact flavor of Trumps cock no doubt, and Lavine is an angry little man, but what exactly did they say that hasn't been true or accurate?

 

[Ambivalent1]

Why do partisan zealots feel they have to lie to make a "point"?

Being for a side doesn't automatically make one a liar.
Having principles is a good thing.
Not having principles is exactly what communists need to manipulate the masses.

Trump salutes communists -

Barry bows to Islamic Kings, what's your point?

 

[B. Kidd]

Why do partisan zealots feel they have to lie to make a "point"?

Being for a side doesn't automatically make one a liar.
Having principles is a good thing.
Not having principles is exactly what communists need to manipulate the masses.

Trump salutes communists -

That is so post Mueller report yesterday.
No critical thinker can take you seriously.

 

[Ambivalent1]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

Gotta ask, do you think all this Russia stuff is on the up and up? Do you think Comey, Brennen, McCabe, clapper and all them did their jobs and fulfilled their oaths of Office? Hannity is a RNC water boy who can tell you the exact flavor of Trumps cock no doubt, and Lavine is an angry little man, but what exactly did they say that hasn't been true or accurate?

Levin is the ONLY Constitutional scholar in the group.

 

[Tehon]

...as long as they stir up shit they could care less about right/wrong or honesty/dishonesty.

I dunno. They're absolutely sold on this, as much as they've been sold on anything.
.

inscurity needs a boogie man

Who would know that better than you?

 

[Crixus]

Why do partisan zealots feel they have to lie to make a "point"?

Being for a side doesn't automatically make one a liar.
Having principles is a good thing.
Not having principles is exactly what communists need to manipulate the masses.

Trump salutes communists -

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.

Oh, Vichy Mac, this is how this is going to play out.

Trump will leave office either by impeachment or being voted out, and all these Right Wingers will deny they ever supported him.

He'll talk smack about the deep state all day... but nothing will come of it because at the end of the day, if they came to the FBI with the same information about Hillary, that would have been investigated.

The mistake that was made was that Obama was so keen on getting Putin's cooperation on the Iran deal, that he kept this under wraps, figuring Trump wasn't going to win anyway.

Yup, and you drove tanks at the battle of the bulge.

 

[Mac1958]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

Gotta ask, do you think all this Russia stuff is on the up and up? Do you think Comey, Brennen, McCabe, clapper and all them did their jobs and fulfilled their oaths of Office? Hannity is a RNC water boy who can tell you the exact flavor of Trumps cock no doubt, and Lavine is an angry little man, but what exactly did they say that hasn't been true or accurate?

From what I'm told here, some of their accusations are correct. Great. Let's bring them up and shine the light on them, full scrutiny.

I don't believe anything that any partisan zombie from either side says, out of hand. Why not? Because even if they ARE providing an actual "fact", it's highly likely that they are avoiding all facts and information and details that don't support their point. Therefore, we're only getting a part of the story. It's also possible that they are distorting facts and information with which they disagree. It's just who they are.

Whether it's Hannity or Levin or Maddow or Matthews or a winger here, none of them can be depended on for full intellectual honesty.

So, let's lay all this stuff out on the table with both sides present and go through it.
.

 

[Crixus]

Why do partisan zealots feel they have to lie to make a "point"?

Being for a side doesn't automatically make one a liar.
Having principles is a good thing.
Not having principles is exactly what communists need to manipulate the masses.

Trump salutes communists -

What does Vlads house half negro do?

 

[Siete]

...as long as they stir up shit they could care less about right/wrong or honesty/dishonesty.

I dunno. They're absolutely sold on this, as much as they've been sold on anything.
.

inscurity needs a boogie man

Who would know that better than you?

everyone who can see his picture saluting a communist ????

 

[Siete]

Why do partisan zealots feel they have to lie to make a "point"?

Being for a side doesn't automatically make one a liar.
Having principles is a good thing.
Not having principles is exactly what communists need to manipulate the masses.

Trump salutes communists -

What does Vlads house half negro do?

live in the minds of RW traitors.

 

[B. Kidd]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

Gotta ask, do you think all this Russia stuff is on the up and up? Do you think Comey, Brennen, McCabe, clapper and all them did their jobs and fulfilled their oaths of Office? Hannity is a RNC water boy who can tell you the exact flavor of Trumps cock no doubt, and Lavine is an angry little man, but what exactly did they say that hasn't been true or accurate?

From what I'm told here, some of their accusations are correct. Great. Let's bring them up and shine the light on them, full scrutiny.

I don't believe anything that any partisan zombie from either side says, out of hand. Why not? Because even if they ARE providing an actual "fact", it's highly likely that they are avoiding all facts and information and details that don't support their point. Therefore, we're only getting a part of the story. It's also possible that they are distorting facts and information with which they disagree. It's just who they are.

Whether it's Hannity or Levin or Maddow or Matthews or a winger here, none of them can be depended on for full intellectual honesty.

So, let's lay all this stuff out on the table with both sides present and go through it.
.

Maybe in a perfect world.
But you know damn well that the FBI and CIA will hide behind the phrase 'sources and methods' and maintain their untouchable posture.
Some Muppets will buy it and other Muppets won't.

 

[Crixus]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

Gotta ask, do you think all this Russia stuff is on the up and up? Do you think Comey, Brennen, McCabe, clapper and all them did their jobs and fulfilled their oaths of Office? Hannity is a RNC water boy who can tell you the exact flavor of Trumps cock no doubt, and Lavine is an angry little man, but what exactly did they say that hasn't been true or accurate?

From what I'm told here, some of their accusations are correct. Great. Let's bring them up and shine the light on them, full scrutiny.

I don't believe anything that any partisan zombie from either side says, out of hand. Why not? Because even if they ARE providing an actual "fact", it's highly likely that they are avoiding all facts and information and details that don't support their point. Therefore, we're only getting a part of the story. It's also possible that they are distorting facts and information with which they disagree. It's just who they are.

Whether it's Hannity or Levin or Maddow or Matthews or a winger here, none of them can be depended on for full intellectual honesty.

So, let's lay all this stuff out on the table with both sides present and go through it.
.

Well, he declassified all the stuff. I look forward to that.

 

[Mac1958]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

Gotta ask, do you think all this Russia stuff is on the up and up? Do you think Comey, Brennen, McCabe, clapper and all them did their jobs and fulfilled their oaths of Office? Hannity is a RNC water boy who can tell you the exact flavor of Trumps cock no doubt, and Lavine is an angry little man, but what exactly did they say that hasn't been true or accurate?

From what I'm told here, some of their accusations are correct. Great. Let's bring them up and shine the light on them, full scrutiny.

I don't believe anything that any partisan zombie from either side says, out of hand. Why not? Because even if they ARE providing an actual "fact", it's highly likely that they are avoiding all facts and information and details that don't support their point. Therefore, we're only getting a part of the story. It's also possible that they are distorting facts and information with which they disagree. It's just who they are.

Whether it's Hannity or Levin or Maddow or Matthews or a winger here, none of them can be depended on for full intellectual honesty.

So, let's lay all this stuff out on the table with both sides present and go through it.
.

Maybe in a perfect world.
But you know damn well that the FBI and CIA will hide behind the phrase 'sources and methods' and maintain their untouchable posture.
Some Muppets will buy it and other Muppets won't.

That would certainly look bad. We need real stuff, though.
.

 

[Crixus]

Why do partisan zealots feel they have to lie to make a "point"?

Being for a side doesn't automatically make one a liar.
Having principles is a good thing.
Not having principles is exactly what communists need to manipulate the masses.

Trump salutes communists -

What does Vlads house half negro do?

live in the minds of RW traitors.

Yup. I figured you would be to cowardly to admit Bammer was Putins house negro.

 

[Mac1958]

Why do partisan zealots feel they have to lie to make a "point"?

Being for a side doesn't automatically make one a liar.
Having principles is a good thing.
Not having principles is exactly what communists need to manipulate the masses.

Were you going to provide that list of issues on which I agree with Ted Cruz, or even anything positive I have ever said about him?
.

Okay, bar-b-que time.

I'll check back tomorrow for this!

Looking forward to it!
.

 

[B. Kidd]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

Gotta ask, do you think all this Russia stuff is on the up and up? Do you think Comey, Brennen, McCabe, clapper and all them did their jobs and fulfilled their oaths of Office? Hannity is a RNC water boy who can tell you the exact flavor of Trumps cock no doubt, and Lavine is an angry little man, but what exactly did they say that hasn't been true or accurate?

From what I'm told here, some of their accusations are correct. Great. Let's bring them up and shine the light on them, full scrutiny.

I don't believe anything that any partisan zombie from either side says, out of hand. Why not? Because even if they ARE providing an actual "fact", it's highly likely that they are avoiding all facts and information and details that don't support their point. Therefore, we're only getting a part of the story. It's also possible that they are distorting facts and information with which they disagree. It's just who they are.

Whether it's Hannity or Levin or Maddow or Matthews or a winger here, none of them can be depended on for full intellectual honesty.

So, let's lay all this stuff out on the table with both sides present and go through it.
.

Maybe in a perfect world.
But you know damn well that the FBI and CIA will hide behind the phrase 'sources and methods' and maintain their untouchable posture.
Some Muppets will buy it and other Muppets won't.

That would certainly look bad. We need real stuff, though.
.

Color me skeptical. Don't think we'll get it.

Too late. Our Republic is corrupted beyond repair.

 

[Ambivalent1]

The swamp is not simply populated by one "party"

 

[Crixus]

...as long as they stir up shit they could care less about right/wrong or honesty/dishonesty.

I dunno. They're absolutely sold on this, as much as they've been sold on anything.
.

inscurity needs a boogie man

Who would know that better than you?

everyone who can see his picture saluting a communist ????

Everyone can hear Putins pet negro selling out Europe?

 

[B. Kidd]

The swamp is not simply populated by one "party"

Trump is the last Populist to be elected. No one from the private sector will ever run and win again.
After Trump, it will be nothing but professional politicians who run, and fucked up our Republic to begin with.
No matter what anyone thinks of Trump, he loves the Country and has illuminated just how far we have strayed from our Founders vision.

 

[Ambivalent1]

The swamp is not simply populated by one "party"

Trump is the last Populist to be elected. No one from the private sector will ever run and win again.
After Trump, it will be nothing but professional politicians who run, and fucked up our Republic to begin with.
No matter what anyone thinks of Trump, he loves the Country and has illuminated just how far we have strayed from our Founders vision.

No, he isn't. He is the shiny distraction.