Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's where we differ: You say "Without George Bush there would be no Afghanistan and Iraq" and I say "Without al Qaeda, the Taliban, and radical Islam there would be no Afghanistan and Iraq."
You say "Without Donald Trump there would be no coronavirus" and I say "Without China there would be no cvoronavirus."
See the difference? I'm glad we had this little discussion. It's always a good thing to set you youngsters straight about how things work in this world.
And Iraq had 'what?' to do with the Taliban and al Qaeda again?
Without the US propping up dictatorships like SA there might not be any al Qaeda
I already posted the total.
From 2008-2016, 2,499 U.S. soldiers were killed in Afghanistan and Iraq under President Obama.
—2,499 U.S. soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan and Iraq so far under President Obama, according to the independent Iraq Coalition Casualty Count.
—Of those, 1,906 have been killed in and around Afghanistan, and 593 in Iraq.
—Under Obama, the United States has been at war for 2,687 days. That’s longer than under George W. Bush — or any other U.S. president, for that matter.
—Obama has conducted airstrikes on seven countries: Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Libya and Syria. (That’s three more countries than George W. Bush bombed.)
—U.S. combat forces are deployed on the ground in three countries: Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria. That’s one more war than Obama inherited, and which his successor will likely have to contend with.
Obama Is Longest Wartime President In History
Meh. That's just politics. Without George Bush there would be no Afghanistan and Iraq. Wanna put up Bush's numbers in terms of deaths?
And for the past four years of Obama's presidency, he seriously downgraded the number of troops in both countries, thus the massive decline in deaths in those four years.
You see, this is why political discourse is so sour in the US. Total dishonesty - and yes, both parties do it. The link from your piece is from a self-affirming conservative site. They are more interested in the win (HEY! OBAMA HAS BEEN IN IRAQ LONGER THAN BUSH!!!). To which I say "So the fuck what? Give us the minutiae. Give use the bigger picture., not just a sound bite."
I equate it to something like this:
What I said: George Washington wanted to make sure all little boys and girls got a good education
How the right wing media would report it: George Washington is a pedo...
Wow, you're really, really gone now.holy shitSome have the capacity to communicate, collaborate, innovate and get America back on track.
Those who lack that capacity are best left out of the conversation. They are the problem.
That's exactly what Trump did: Communicate, innovate, and got America back on track again.
Unfortunately, your side refused to participate in it.
Yeah, that non-stop shit storm of name-calling, personal insults, comical hyperbole and transparent lies really should have been appreciated more.
You started it. He is our answer to you. And the next answer will be worse.
Some have the capacity to communicate, collaborate, innovate and get America back on track.
Those who lack that capacity are best left out of the conversation. They are the problem.
Not sure Israel is willing to share.Some have the capacity to communicate, collaborate, innovate and get America back on track.
Those who lack that capacity are best left out of the conversation. They are the problem.
Back on track ....to becoming a vassal state of China
That's where we differ: You say "Without George Bush there would be no Afghanistan and Iraq" and I say "Without al Qaeda, the Taliban, and radical Islam there would be no Afghanistan and Iraq."
You say "Without Donald Trump there would be no coronavirus" and I say "Without China there would be no cvoronavirus."
See the difference? I'm glad we had this little discussion. It's always a good thing to set you youngsters straight about how things work in this world.
And Iraq had 'what?' to do with the Taliban and al Qaeda again?
Without the US propping up dictatorships like SA there might not be any al Qaeda
That's where we differ: You say "Without George Bush there would be no Afghanistan and Iraq" and I say "Without al Qaeda, the Taliban, and radical Islam there would be no Afghanistan and Iraq."
You say "Without Donald Trump there would be no coronavirus" and I say "Without China there would be no cvoronavirus."
See the difference? I'm glad we had this little discussion. It's always a good thing to set you youngsters straight about how things work in this world.
And Iraq had 'what?' to do with the Taliban and al Qaeda again?
Without the US propping up dictatorships like SA there might not be any al Qaeda
These Democrats like Clinton, Kerry, Pelosi, Biden, etc that supported the invasion of Iraq were reall dumbasse, weren't they?
You didn't vote for any of those dumbasses for President, did you?
I honestly believe that had the Chinese attacked the US with Trump in power they would have fought for themConsidered a 2nd Pearl Harbor, wished for by Neocons-We were unified on 911
But we were unified for awhile, right? Why didn't the same thing happen during the pandemic?
... created by Public Education impressing the importance of conformity over individual rights-
....
No such impressment is taking place.
Their parts of the nation will be like France in WW 2 if the Chinese invaded. .I honestly believe that had the Chinese attacked the US with Trump in power they would have fought for themConsidered a 2nd Pearl Harbor, wished for by Neocons-We were unified on 911
But we were unified for awhile, right? Why didn't the same thing happen during the pandemic?
I think the Orange Turd tried that with Me-heekoBlood and Iron (speech) - Wikipedia
The term coined by Bismarck often used to refer to the militarism and nationalism that helped create modern Germany. There are few things better to unite a people and a nation than a (perceived) external threat or a crusade to eliminate that threat and consolidate the power of a nation.
Personally, I've very tired of hearing about how divided the United States is and some repeatedly suggesting the U.S. needs to break up.
Wouldn't it be worth it to unite our country and give us renewed national purpose for at least a couple of decades or more?
Wouldn't it be worth it to save our nation?
Why would the Chinese try to invade?
Some have the capacity to communicate, collaborate, innovate and get America back on track.
Those who lack that capacity are best left out of the conversation. They are the problem.
That's exactly what Trump did: Communicate, innovate, and got America back on track again.
Unfortunately, your side refused to participate in it.
Why would the Chinese try to invade?
Definitely. That would be incredibly stupid.
Why on earth attack a country that is your bread and butter?
Why would the Chinese try to invade?
Definitely. That would be incredibly stupid.
Why on earth attack a country that is your bread and butter?
Some have the capacity to communicate, collaborate, innovate and get America back on track.
Those who lack that capacity are best left out of the conversation. They are the problem.
That's exactly what Trump did: Communicate, innovate, and got America back on track again.
Unfortunately, your side refused to participate in it.
You call more than 300,000 American deaths being 'Back on Track"?!?!?!?
Yes, we liberals refused to participate in that!
CNN...The biggest Ass Kissers when it comes to learning how important it is to bribe nations into loving you.Fuck diplomacy; hasn't worked since post WWI.
Your knowledge of current events amongst nations sucks.
You're joking...you never read about NK firing nukes towards Japan?
You're so ignorant of anything outside of your Liberal bubble, you're not worth my time.
It works all the time. There have been regional and minor conflicts since WWII but there has also been plenty of times when we have come back from the brink. Cuban Missile Crisis, anyone? So diplomacy has worked many times. I guess warmongers like you just love conflict.
They fired missiles, not Nukes. Christ, I even spelt it out for you.
I'd put my knowledge of current world affairs above yours any day of the week.
So?View attachment 430015you have so many nukes you don't even need a regular military. Just threaten to unlock the codes and that tends to shut the like of N Korea up pretty quickly.Isn't that what one of the things this President has accomplished? Not to mention peace in the ME, energy independence, the strongest military in the world, no more American soldiers dying, and the destruction of ISIS and al Qaeda?
No, no, no, no, no and no.....he is responsible for very little or none of it.
Peace in the ME? With UAE??? Are you serious.
ISIS and al Qaeda were well on their way to being dismantled before he came along. Well under way.
Strongest military in the world? Interesting point. However, has there been a time since WWII when the US hasn't been the strongest military in the world under any president? Christ, you have so many nukes you don't even need a regular military. Just threaten to unlock the codes and that tends to shut the like of N Korea up pretty quickly.
Dunno about energy independence.
From 2012 to 2016, 34 US service men and women died in Iraq (not sure of the cause)
From 2017-2020, 59 US service men and women died in Iraq (not sure of the cause)
Iraq war - American soldiers killed in Iraq 2020 | Statista
As of March 2021, 11 U.S.www.statista.com
Which is exactly what Trump did.
But since Trump did it, it's not good.
If a D does it, it will be good..
I’m waiting for you to cry about Chicago.Some have the capacity to communicate, collaborate, innovate and get America back on track.
Those who lack that capacity are best left out of the conversation. They are the problem.
That's exactly what Trump did: Communicate, innovate, and got America back on track again.
Unfortunately, your side refused to participate in it.
You call more than 300,000 American deaths being 'Back on Track"?!?!?!?
Yes, we liberals refused to participate in that!
