The Unprecedented Law Giving Gun Makers And Dealers Immunity

[GuyPinestra]

[

Please Joe, be specific. Tell me what it is that I have posted that makes me a racist.

You're so absolutely convinced of it, give us all some PROOF of your accusation.

You mean other than spending two pages repeating stormfront bullshit about "minority gang-bangers"...

Hey, I'll give JstPeter credit, at least he admits he's a racist.

It's not "Stormfront bullshit", Joe, it's the FBI and the Justice Department.

Unless it's your assertion that they're racist, too...

 

[JoeB131]

[

Please Joe, be specific. Tell me what it is that I have posted that makes me a racist.

You're so absolutely convinced of it, give us all some PROOF of your accusation.

You mean other than spending two pages repeating stormfront bullshit about "minority gang-bangers"...

Hey, I'll give JstPeter credit, at least he admits he's a racist.

It's not "Stormfront bullshit", Joe, it's the FBI and the Justice Department.

Unless it's your assertion that they're racist, too...

Again, take your schtick to StormFront where they give a crap....

Although it sounds like you probably spend too much time there already....

Boy, they sawyou coming.

 

[GuyPinestra]

You mean other than spending two pages repeating stormfront bullshit about "minority gang-bangers"...

Hey, I'll give JstPeter credit, at least he admits he's a racist.

It's not "Stormfront bullshit", Joe, it's the FBI and the Justice Department.

Unless it's your assertion that they're racist, too...

Again, take your schtick to StormFront where they give a crap....

Although it sounds like you probably spend too much time there already....

Boy, they sawyou coming.

So it's your assertion that the FBI and Justice Dept. are racists for publishing these facts?

I know I said you were delusional Joe, but you didn't have to go THIS far to PROVE it!

 

[JoeB131]

I'm not accepting the FBI said anything of the sort because some Paulite Whack says so....

You just aren't credible... and about five minute from getting added to my ignore list.

 

[bripat9643]

I'm sensitive about race because I see you racist assholes destroying what used to be a great Republican Party. Obama has completely unhinged you guys by just being black in the White House, and it shows.

You, the guy who hates Mormons, is "sensitive about race?"

Who do you think you're fooling?

No one gives a fuck about Obama's race aside from the fact that because of it he has a chip on his shoulder and is seeking retribution against white people.

But gun control is coming, and I'll be happy the day it does, because, honestly, the best argument for gun control is talking to a racist, fuckwad gun nut talking about all the people he wants to shoot.

You're the kind that enthusiastically saluted the Fuhrer and volunteered to work in the concentration camps.

 

[JoeB131]

I'm sensitive about race because I see you racist assholes destroying what used to be a great Republican Party. Obama has completely unhinged you guys by just being black in the White House, and it shows.

You, the guy who hates Mormons, is "sensitive about race?"

.

Nobody should be discriminated against because of their race.

But how you worship your imaginary friend in the sky is a great indicator of what kind of person you are.

Now, I hope for that happy day when we all stop believing in Sky Fairies and just learn to deal with death as a part of life...

But honestly, Mormons are just kind of the dumbest of the dumb.

And unless you're signing up for yoru own set of Magic Underwear, you don't think Joe Smith was talking to God any more than I do.

 

[bripat9643]

Please Joe, be specific. Tell me what it is that I have posted that makes me a racist.

You're so absolutely convinced of it, give us all some PROOF of your accusation.

You didn't vote for Obama. Therefore you're a racist.

 

[bripat9643]

[

Please Joe, be specific. Tell me what it is that I have posted that makes me a racist.

You're so absolutely convinced of it, give us all some PROOF of your accusation.

You mean other than spending two pages repeating stormfront bullshit about "minority gang-bangers"...

Hey, I'll give JstPeter credit, at least he admits he's a racist.

It's not "Stormfront bullshit", Joe, it's the FBI and the Justice Department.

Unless it's your assertion that they're racist, too...

If it's critical of liberal propaganda, then it has to be Nazi propaganda from Stormfront. That's how the liberal mind perceives reality.

 

[bripat9643]

It's not "Stormfront bullshit", Joe, it's the FBI and the Justice Department.

Unless it's your assertion that they're racist, too...

Again, take your schtick to StormFront where they give a crap....

Although it sounds like you probably spend too much time there already....

Boy, they sawyou coming.

So it's your assertion that the FBI and Justice Dept. are racists for publishing these facts?

I know I said you were delusional Joe, but you didn't have to go THIS far to PROVE it!

Liberal Dictionary
========================================
racism - truth about any democrat constituency

 

[bripat9643]

I'm sensitive about race because I see you racist assholes destroying what used to be a great Republican Party. Obama has completely unhinged you guys by just being black in the White House, and it shows.

You, the guy who hates Mormons, is "sensitive about race?"

.

Nobody should be discriminated against because of their race.

But how you worship your imaginary friend in the sky is a great indicator of what kind of person you are.

Now, I hope for that happy day when we all stop believing in Sky Fairies and just learn to deal with death as a part of life...

But honestly, Mormons are just kind of the dumbest of the dumb.

And unless you're signing up for yoru own set of Magic Underwear, you don't think Joe Smith was talking to God any more than I do.

But if anyone questions the beliefs of Muslims, you and your ilk call them a "racist."

Who do you think you're fooling?

 

[GuyPinestra]

I'm not accepting the FBI said anything of the sort because some Paulite Whack says so....

You just aren't credible... and about five minute from getting added to my ignore list.

In 2005, offending rates for blacks were more than 7 times higher than the rates for whites.

Bureau of Justice Statistics Homicide trends in the U.S.: Trends by race

 

[JoeB131]

You, the guy who hates Mormons, is "sensitive about race?"

.

Nobody should be discriminated against because of their race.

But how you worship your imaginary friend in the sky is a great indicator of what kind of person you are.

Now, I hope for that happy day when we all stop believing in Sky Fairies and just learn to deal with death as a part of life...

But honestly, Mormons are just kind of the dumbest of the dumb.

And unless you're signing up for yoru own set of Magic Underwear, you don't think Joe Smith was talking to God any more than I do.

But if anyone questions the beliefs of Muslims, you and your ilk call them a "racist."

Who do you think you're fooling?

I think Muslims believe in as much silly shit as the rest of you pixie-worshipers do.

But I don't think we need to be fooling around in their shit or takign sides in their fights...

But you do because the Oil Companies told you it was really important. Yeah. As long as one of those not-white kids Guy is on about is going over there to do the fighting, because I don't see you enlisting.

 

[JoeB131]

I'm not accepting the FBI said anything of the sort because some Paulite Whack says so....

You just aren't credible... and about five minute from getting added to my ignore list.

In 2005, offending rates for blacks were more than 7 times higher than the rates for whites.

Bureau of Justice Statistics Homicide trends in the U.S.: Trends by race

BUt that isn't the claim you made.

You made the claim that most gun murders are "Black and hispanic gangbangers"...

Quit trying to move the goal posts.

 

[jtpr312]

Again, why should gun makers be liable for the wrongful, illegal use of guns when we don't apply that bizarre logic to any other product, even though more people are killed by hammers and clubs than are killed by rifles each year?

Using liberal logic, we should allow companies that make hammers and clubs to be sued by the families of people who are killed by hammers and clubs.

For that matter, if gun makers should be sued even for accidental, unintentional shootings, then auto makers should be sued for car accidents in which people are killed or injured.

Do you actually have proof that there are 30,000+ hammer deaths every year. 11,000 dead from drunk driving accidents, over 3,000 killed in accidents while texting, almost 34,000speeding related deaths in 2011. How many times must you be told the fact that to sue gun makers for scumbags using thier products in an unsafe or unlawful way would be the same as suing the car companies for all the deaths realted to their products being used in a reckless or illegal way, not to mention suing AT&T, Sprint, whatever for those deaths caused by texting while driving. You're an idiot. The responsibility lies with the person who pulled the trigger, steered the car or punched the buttons on the phone.

Gun makers should be sued because they market their product to people like Nancy Lanza, a crazy Prepper who was stocking up with guns like the Zombie Apocolypse was coming. Too bad she didn't keep an eye on the Zombie she was living with.Once again I ask you to show me where all these commercials or marketing ads for guns are? I have NEVER seen a gun commercial on ANY of the major networks or channels and the ONLY cable channels I see them on are the hunting related channels. Cars and alcohol, which are directly responsible for more deaths and injuries every year than firearms, on the other hand, are marketed on the main broadcast channels EVERY Freaking DAY, not to mention them being marketed in almost EVERY newpaper and magazine in the nation. I know it's hard and all, you being such a head up your ass liberal, but please try to stop bing a hypocritical jackass and admit that under your stupid assed logic we should be suing the motor vehichle companies, the liquor companies, and every liquor store owner and car dealer that sells their product when their product ends up being responsible for the death or injury of another. If you wish to blame the gun makers and sellers but not the liquor makers/sellers car makers/sellers, than you're just a hypocritical bastard that doesn't care about justice, but just cares about the socialists anti-gun agenda.

.

 

[JoeB131]

Again, why should gun makers be liable for the wrongful, illegal use of guns when we don't apply that bizarre logic to any other product, even though more people are killed by hammers and clubs than are killed by rifles each year?

Using liberal logic, we should allow companies that make hammers and clubs to be sued by the families of people who are killed by hammers and clubs.

For that matter, if gun makers should be sued even for accidental, unintentional shootings, then auto makers should be sued for car accidents in which people are killed or injured.

Do you actually have proof that there are 30,000+ hammer deaths every year. 11,000 dead from drunk driving accidents, over 3,000 killed in accidents while texting, almost 34,000speeding related deaths in 2011. How many times must you be told the fact that to sue gun makers for scumbags using thier products in an unsafe or unlawful way would be the same as suing the car companies for all the deaths realted to their products being used in a reckless or illegal way, not to mention suing AT&T, Sprint, whatever for those deaths caused by texting while driving. You're an idiot. The responsibility lies with the person who pulled the trigger, steered the car or punched the buttons on the phone.

Gun makers should be sued because they market their product to people like Nancy Lanza, a crazy Prepper who was stocking up with guns like the Zombie Apocolypse was coming. Too bad she didn't keep an eye on the Zombie she was living with.Once again I ask you to show me where all these commercials or marketing ads for guns are? I have NEVER seen a gun commercial on ANY of the major networks or channels and the ONLY cable channels I see them on are the hunting related channels. Cars and alcohol, which are directly responsible for more deaths and injuries every year than firearms, on the other hand, are marketed on the main broadcast channels EVERY Freaking DAY, not to mention them being marketed in almost EVERY newpaper and magazine in the nation. I know it's hard and all, you being such a head up your ass liberal, but please try to stop bing a hypocritical jackass and admit that under your stupid assed logic we should be suing the motor vehichle companies, the liquor companies, and every liquor store owner and car dealer that sells their product when their product ends up being responsible for the death or injury of another. If you wish to blame the gun makers and sellers but not the liquor makers/sellers car makers/sellers, than you're just a hypocritical bastard that doesn't care about justice, but just cares about the socialists anti-gun agenda.

.

Can you please learn how to use the quote fuction properly?

Cars are not being marketted to reckless drivers. Guns are marketted to the Nancy Lanzas of the world...

 

[jtpr312]

Again, why should gun makers be liable for the wrongful, illegal use of guns when we don't apply that bizarre logic to any other product, even though more people are killed by hammers and clubs than are killed by rifles each year?

Using liberal logic, we should allow companies that make hammers and clubs to be sued by the families of people who are killed by hammers and clubs.

For that matter, if gun makers should be sued even for accidental, unintentional shootings, then auto makers should be sued for car accidents in which people are killed or injured.

Do you actually have proof that there are 30,000+ hammer deaths every year.

Gun makers should be sued because they market their product to people like Nancy Lanza, a crazy Prepper who was stocking up with guns like the Zombie Apocolypse was coming. Too bad she didn't keep an eye on the Zombie she was living with.

According to the FBI, more people are killed each year with hammers and clubs than with rifles. See:

FBI: More People Killed with Hammers, Clubs Each Year Than Rifles

Gun makers do not market their product to anyone who is unstable or evil, no more than auto makers market their product to people who intentionally run into other cars, who leave the scenes of accidents, etc., etc. That is erroneous logic.

Using your logic, beer producers should be sued because "they market their product" to people who intentionally drink and drive and who then go out and kill or injure other people.

Your argument requires the illogical assumption that if a company advertises its product and a few crazies misuse that product to harm others, then the company "marketed its product to crazy people who then used that product to harm others."

You're wasting your time trying to convince him usuing facts. He's a brain dead, head up his ass, liberal moron, he isn't interestes in facts, just pushing the socialist's anti-gun agenda.

 

[jtpr312]

Do you actually have proof that there are 30,000+ hammer deaths every year.

Gun makers should be sued because they market their product to people like Nancy Lanza, a crazy Prepper who was stocking up with guns like the Zombie Apocolypse was coming. Too bad she didn't keep an eye on the Zombie she was living with.

According to the FBI, more people are killed each year with hammers and clubs than with rifles. See:

FBI: More People Killed with Hammers, Clubs Each Year Than Rifles

Gun makers do not market their product to anyone who is unstable or evil, no more than auto makers market their product to people who intentionally run into other cars, who leave the scenes of accidents, etc., etc. That is erroneous logic.

Using your logic, beer producers should be sued because "they market their product" to people who intentionally drink and drive and who then go out and kill or injure other people.

Your argument requires the illogical assumption that if a company advertises its product and a few crazies misuse that product to harm others, then the company "marketed its product to crazy people who then used that product to harm others."

I do like how you changed the goal post, there, bud... If you artificially take out the handgun deaths and just leave the "rifle" deaths, you get some bizarre Fox News logic that hammers are more dangerous... I mean, that was actually kind of clever, I guess.

Totally dishonest and silly, but "clever".

No, it's neither when you consider the scumbag Socialist Democrats in this nation are specifically targeting rifles in their gun ban bs. Or is that just one more of the thousands of facts on this topic that you're ignorant of?

 

[jtpr312]

My my my, such a childish little man you are. The picture is coming clear as to what kind of race-baiting propagandist you really are, Joe.

You refuse to deal in facts if they are inconvenient to your narrative, and you happily misrepresent facts if they can be twisted to support your inane positions.

You really have some serious control issues, Joe. You are constantly going on about what you and your ilk should 'allow' free citizens to do, when you have absolutely NO SAYSO over anyone but yourself, and that's only if your caregiver lets you choose what they'll feed you for lunch.

You're hypersensitive to ANYTHING touching on race because the FACTS make you look bad, and God knows we're not ALLOWED to hurt poor old Joe's feelings.

You're pitiful, Joe, and that's another FACT.

I'm sensitive about race because I see you racist assholes destroying what used to be a great Republican Party. Obama has completely unhinged you guys by just being black in the White House, and it shows.

But gun control is coming, and I'll be happy the day it does, because, honestly, the best argument for gun control is talking to a racist, fuckwad gun nut talking about all the people he wants to shoot.

Too funny. I love seeing a racist a-hole who denies being racist then complains about another's racism. YOU are the racist a-hole dude. You totally 100% deny and ignore obama's white half, much like he does. He ain't a black in the white house, he's a mulatto in the white house. I know you liberal a-holes and most negroes hate to admit that, thinking if you aknowledge his white half you may have to ackowledge that it's due to that white half's culture and the influences of his white upbringing that made him even remotely qualified to be where he's at today, lol. Freaking hypocrite on too many levels to count.

 

[thereisnospoon]

2050, according to the Census Bureau...

You evaded the second question.

Because I never said I wished it to happen... just stated that it would. Racial divisions are artificallly created by the plutocrats so we don't see the REAL division, the haves and the have-nots.

Kind of like when a waiter brings out 12 cookies, a Koch brother wolfs down 11 and says to the White Teabagger "That welfare person wants half your cookie!"

And you fall for it, you dweeb!

Racial division is created by liberals.

 

[JoeB131]

[

Too funny. I love seeing a racist a-hole who denies being racist then complains about another's racism. YOU are the racist a-hole dude. You totally 100% deny and ignore obama's white half, much like he does. He ain't a black in the white house, he's a mulatto in the white house. I know you liberal a-holes and most negroes hate to admit that, thinking if you aknowledge his white half you may have to ackowledge that it's due to that white half's culture and the influences of his white upbringing that made him even remotely qualified to be where he's at today, lol. Freaking hypocrite on too many levels to count.

Mulatto? Is that word even still in the language?

What made him qualified to be where he is at is that he's a bright guy who worked really hard to accomplish a lot of things you never will.

Which probably explains a lot of your bitterness...