Thread to Talk Shit about Global Warming

[Crick]

That EMH is not a PARROT. Got it...

A unique voice. One unfettered by the laws of science or its methods.

 

[EMH]

A unique voice. One unfettered by the laws of science or its methods.

"laws of science"

LOL!!!

The laws of Earth climate change:

1. Earth climate change is all about how much ICE is on Earth
2. Earth ice is all about continent specific ice ages, of which the planet has 2 now - Antarctica and Greenland
3. The LAW of current Earth climate change is that a CONTINENT goes into ICE AGE when it gets approximately 600 miles from a pole. That Law holds 100% true today.


Other laws of science


FUDGING is not SCIENCE
FRAUD is not SCIENCE
PARROTING is not SCIENCE


Class dismissed....

 

[Crick]

The laws of Earth climate change:

1. Earth climate change is all about how much ICE is on Earth
2. Earth ice is all about continent specific ice ages, of which the planet has 2 now - Antarctica and Greenland
3. The LAW of current Earth climate change is that a CONTINENT goes into ICE AGE when it gets approximately 600 miles from a pole. That Law holds 100% true today.

If these are "laws" CERTAINLY they must be mentioned by climate scientists far and wide. Show us some quotes from actual scientists. Doesn't have to be a study. Just a real climate scientist making some sort of statement that supports any of these three "LAWS"

Other laws of science

FUDGING is not SCIENCE
FRAUD is not SCIENCE
PARROTING is not SCIENCE

Show us some evidence that such things are taking place.

Class dismissed....

You'd have to be in one first.

 

[EMH]

CERTAINLY they must be mentioned by climate scientists

The PARROT insists, if it cannot be PARROTED from a taxpayer funded conflicted liar who fudged the atmospheric temp data showing NO WARMING despite rising Co2, then

IT DOES NOT EXIST

LMFAO!!!

 

[jc456]

Do you have the name of an active, published, PhD climate scientist who agrees that your highly correlated balloon and satellite data were correct and should not have been adjusted and that there has been NO warming? Just ONE.

Do you have a name of an active, published PhD climate scientist who is not tax payer funded saying it's warming?

 

[jc456]

A unique voice. One unfettered by the laws of science or its methods.

Laws of Science? Son, you would hardly be one to be stating such a thing. You can't even post a site on the planet that has sea level rise because of the nonsense of warming.

 

[jc456]

The PARROT insists, if it cannot be PARROTED from a taxpayer funded conflicted liar who fudged the atmospheric temp data showing NO WARMING despite rising Co2, then

IT DOES NOT EXIST

LMFAO!!!

Exactly, the now argument has to be that someone must have a tax funded background to comment!!!!! hahahaahahhahahahaahah, thank you

 

[EMH]

Do you have a name of an active, published PhD climate scientist who is not funded saying it's warming?

not TAXPAYER funded

 

[Crick]

If these are "laws" CERTAINLY they must be mentioned by climate scientists far and wide. Show us some quotes from actual scientists. Doesn't have to be a study. Just a real climate scientist making some sort of statement that supports any of these three "LAWS"

Show us some evidence that such things are taking place.

You'd have to be in one first.

Still waiting.

 

[Ame®icano]

Mountains of empirical data gathered by professional, published climate scientists tells us that the world is getting warmer rapidly when it had been cooling off for the last 5,000 years. It tells us that the cause of that warming is the greenhouse effect acting on the CO2 and other greenhouse gases that humans have put into the atmosphere since the Industrial Revolution. That increased temperature has caused sea level to rise both from thermal expansion and melting land-borne ice The warming is going to fuck with us six ways from Sunday but there are still a small collection of idiots (roughly 10% of the US population) who reject all that science and think its some sort of hoax by people trying to get rich or to destroy our country or the world cause, you know, that motivates a lot of people these days. In fact, from the PoV of these particular individuals, an unquenchable desire to destroy everything is an identifying characteristic of democrats.

So, based on the conclusions of more than 10,000 PhD, published, actively researching climate scientists, I'm convinced that the conclusions of the IPCC are the best idea we have right now as to what's going to happen. Some of you disagree. Bring your evidence cause I'm gonna bring mine.

The year Al Gore was born, there were 130,000 glaciers in the world.

Today, only 130,000 glaciers remain.

 

[Crick]

The year Al Gore was born, there were 130,000 glaciers in the world.
AND
Today, only 130,000 glaciers remain.

US Glacier national park losing its glaciers with just 26 of 150 left

Warming climate makes it ‘inevitable’ that contiguous US will lose all of its glaciers within decades, according to scientists

www.theguardian.com

124 glaciers just within Glacier National Park no longer exist.

AND

Estimated glacial losses​

Melting of mountain glaciers from 1994 to 2017 (6.1 trillion tonnes) constituted about 22% of Earth's ice loss during that period.
Excluding peripheral glaciers of ice sheets, the total cumulated global glacial losses over the 26 year period from 1993–2018 were likely 5500 gigatons, or 210 gigatons per yr.

Retreat of glaciers since 1850 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[psikeyhackr]

The year Al Gore was born, there were 130,000 glaciers in the world.

Today, only 130,000 glaciers remain.

So you can pull numbers out of your ass!

That is very impressive.

Provide a couple of links to support your assertion.

 

[Ame®icano]

So you can pull numbers out of your ass!

That is very impressive.

Provide a couple of links to support your assertion.

It looks I was mistaken. There are no 130,000 glaciers left...

Wikipedia

 

[Ame®icano]

US Glacier national park losing its glaciers with just 26 of 150 left

Warming climate makes it ‘inevitable’ that contiguous US will lose all of its glaciers within decades, according to scientists

www.theguardian.com

124 glaciers just within Glacier National Park no longer exist.

AND

Estimated glacial losses​

Melting of mountain glaciers from 1994 to 2017 (6.1 trillion tonnes) constituted about 22% of Earth's ice loss during that period.
Excluding peripheral glaciers of ice sheets, the total cumulated global glacial losses over the 26 year period from 1993–2018 were likely 5500 gigatons, or 210 gigatons per yr.

Retreat of glaciers since 1850 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

This is map presented to us back in 2007 by climate experts, including Nobel Peace Prize winner Al Gore, how map of the United States will look in 10 years if we don’t stop manmade global warming.

 

[psikeyhackr]

It looks I was mistaken. There are no 130,000 glaciers left...

View attachment 783657​

Wikipedia

In your original post you specified 2 points in time. One was when Al Gore was born. What if there were 300,000 back then? You have not addressed the question. How many satellites were there in orbit to check such things back then?

ZERO!

Your claim was stupid from the beginning.

This is from 2006:

Norwegian glaciers could melt completely

Climate researchers predict that the approximately 1,600 Norwegian glaciers could melt completely away in course of the next 100 years. This would mean that only 28 glaciers would remain in the country.

phys.org

 

[Crick]

In your original post you specified 2 points in time. One was when Al Gore was born. What if there were 300,000 back then? You have not addressed the question. How many satellites were there in orbit to check such things back then?

ZERO!

Your claim was stupid from the beginning .

This is map presented to us back in 2007 by climate experts, including Nobel Peace Prize winner Al Gore, how map of the United States will look in 10 years if we don’t stop manmade global warming.

View attachment 783659​

That is simply not true.

Are you just making this stuff up or do you actually have a source feeding you bum dope like this?

Here is the actual source of that map: The Shocking Doomsday Maps Of The World And The Billionaire Escape Plans

 

[Ame®icano]

OMG, we're all gonna die from rising sea level, said every scientist on government payroll.

Just look at the photos below... unprecedented climate change caused sea level at Sydney Harbor to rise approximately 0.0 cm over past 140 years.

Brought to you by these guys...

This is what catastrophic sea level rise actually looks like.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

In your original post you specified 2 points in time. One was when Al Gore was born. What if there were 300,000 back then? You have not addressed the question. How many satellites were there in orbit to check such things back then?

ZERO!

Your claim was stupid from the beginning.

This is from 2006:

Norwegian glaciers could melt completely

Climate researchers predict that the approximately 1,600 Norwegian glaciers could melt completely away in course of the next 100 years. This would mean that only 28 glaciers would remain in the country.

phys.org

How many new nuclear reactors should we build to save the glaciers?

 

[Crick]

OMG, we're all gonna die from rising sea level, said every scientist on government payroll.

Just look at the photos below... unprecedented climate change caused sea level at Sydney Harbor to rise approximately 0.0 cm over past 140 years.

View attachment 783661​

Brought to you by these guys...

View attachment 783662​

This is what catastrophic sea level rise actually looks like.

View attachment 783666​

Maybe you haven't noticed it, but all three of these posts have done nothing but identify you as ignorant. Feel free to carry on if you wish.

Regarding sea level rise, please look at the numbers on this graph:

Sea level has risen 240mm in 140 years. 240 mm is about 9.5 inches. Given that you have no idea what the state of the tides might have been at any of your photo's locations, nor any uplift or subsidence that might have taken place at those locations, what are the odds that you could see the few inches of sea level change in any of those shots? Allow me to answer: ZERO.

Have you finished embarrassing yourself? Cause, I'd like to go to bed.

 

[Ame®icano]

In your original post you specified 2 points in time. One was when Al Gore was born. What if there were 300,000 back then? You have not addressed the question. How many satellites were there in orbit to check such things back then?

ZERO!

Your claim was stupid from the beginning.

This is from 2006:

Norwegian glaciers could melt completely

Climate researchers predict that the approximately 1,600 Norwegian glaciers could melt completely away in course of the next 100 years. This would mean that only 28 glaciers would remain in the country.

phys.org

What's funny, you link to an article from 2006, that says "1,600 Norwegian glaciers could melt completely away".

Could. You know what that word means, right?

What's even funnier is that Norway has 2534 registered glaciers on mainland, plus 2100 glaciers on Svalbard.

They could all melt. We both know that's unlikely.