Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[DiveCon]

dipshit, there is no "truth" in the troofer movement
they lie all the time, just like YOU do
there is no concrete in any of your photos you post, and you dont understand the context of that piece from the Oxford Encyclopedia

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Why would anyone here be more informed than elsewhere in the truth movement? Why would they be immune to the misinformation and psyops?

They would have to put reason and evidence over social fears and use evidence, like Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology which identifies a concrete core in 1992.



Or they would have to realize that in the days after 9-11 the buiildings engineer of record identified a concrete core.

Why would they oppose the vast psyops of the infiltrated government and use evidence?

Material evidence from the scen of the crime shows a concrete core.



A remnant of concrete at ground zero shows the massive core base wall.

Just man up and admit it, no one believes you. And you know it, or you would have named people who do.

 

[Christophera]

You know, the response to Joe Penalty is a good way to show a sincere poster with an open mind, not the agents of the false social group trolling now.

According to these two images and my understanding of them, the Federal Emergency Management Agency's diagram and an actual photograph of the failure of the structure of the World Trade Center number two are somewhat contrasting. The Federal Emergency Management Agency's diagram depicts several columns in the core. While the actual photograph from the failure the structure of World Trade Center number two show what appears to be central core (one solid structure). Therefore one can conclude that the Federal Emergency Management Agency must redo their diagram or some other entity outside of this agency must do a diagram to more accurately represent the actual structure. Again, basing any further analysis on the findings of the Federal Emergency Management Agency is redundant.

Is this a correct analysis?

Absolutely correct. Any analysis of events utilizing FEMA's design data is a continued waste of time and can only produce completely inaccurate results.

This was very basic analysis.

Knowing all of this, there should be tons of journalists all over America inquiring about these same topics to government officials.

True, but that is evident since 9-11. They never engaged private, professionals to provide independant analysis. They were a conduit for "shock and awe" information in a ritualistic conditioning of the populations.

I still think some body ordered about a billion little American flags BEFORE 9-11 so that the populations primed to respond with warlike retaliation would have the standard patriotic sybol while joining and bonding with others.

Why American journalists do not seem to be doing their jobs?

The infiltration includes, potentialy, all corporate positions, but particuarly media, all media. Print, radio, music recording, film production.
A basic rule exists at the top. No one who will expose any critical secrets, or even test the fringes of them, will be given any power to share with a larger segment of the population.
Power in publishing and journalism is only given to those that will support the interests of the power, for the sake of the power. A dynamic of power corrupting absolutely. Fear based decision making as implimented since that dude was nailed up to the cross for speaking a truth that exposed secrete methods of power mongering in society.

So my question is, Who else out there is willing to confront this issue?

Man, ................ can't you ask another question?

No, ......... I can respond with a question and explanation.

"Do you mean says they are willing, or are actually willing" if they state generally they seek the truth?

Consider many seek this kind of truth. Then when they learn about it they decide they don't want to know. An aspect voiced simply here.

"Do you still want to know the truth after you learn it is something that you do not want to know?"

The situtation we address is a factor of the psyops, or "the big lie". We are near the crux where either people question the lie and expose it, or fearfully react in acceptence seeking what is presented as comfort and security. The fear in the psyops is social fear.
Social fear is something we are far more sensitive and reactive to than many can believe. Media for the last 40 years has been working to artificially escalate this to maximize corporate profits through advertising and tv for children.

A group of people using reason and common knowledge; and what ever resource of evidence supporting it, if needed, and it shouldn't be unless the social situation is artificially directed through infiltrations; upon forming in a face to face situation draw attention. If they are passionate and developed as leaders they speak in support of the common interests of the people who might listen and how the particular issue the initial group formed, then found concencus adequate for further sharing and concencus building.

After a certain amonut of that, another, larger group forms with what is well known as common knowledge replete with details and the facts begin to echo through the conscious state of the people of the society.

In this case the fears are unconscious and have nothing to do with 9-11. They are religious but societally assimilated unconsciously by social members as an invisible conditioning going back 2,000 years and more.

What can be done as a solution?

I've been doing it, know we are doing it. Others are reading, they may do it, yet others may hear them doing it and start up.

We can also remember something that is very justified because of the long record of many improprieties politically of the last 20 years that have compromised the US Constitution as the rule of law. Anyone that knows how title 42 §1988 is used has an idea.

Remember this is about exposing a simple deception about the design of a building that was supposed to have collapsed killing a lot of people. Those telling the "big lie" and supporting it would like us to always add to the fear they have created by us alleging very scary things that can only relate to the 2,000 year old conditioning we struggle with.

Remember, this is about the Constitution and as citizens doing our duty and forbidding any official governmental lapses regarding the highest point of Constitutional due process as it is associated with "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness". Remember this is about reason and evidence not social acceptence which is easily steeped in the psychological elements of the "big lie" that extend back in time to an uncomfortable degree. No need to talk about demolition nor question anything except the cause of death based on the fact FEMA misrepresented the structures to NIST who produced the official cause of death seen on nearly all 3,000 death certificates.

The goal is 20 affidavits addressing the evidence by persons who have worked for 15 years in construction who affirm what they see and what they do not see that are served with a petition signed by as many NY state voters as can be found integrating the affidavits and evidence into a demand upon the attorney general of that state.

Whatever the solution may be, who is responsible for implementing the said solution?

Americans.

 

[stannrodd]

Stop talking to yourself Chris .. no one reads your shit anyway except your fans at Namasteezy guru forum .. and they are all you anyway .. dick head.. or don't you know what your alter egos do ...

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Why would anyone here be more informed than elsewhere in the truth movement? Why would they be immune to the misinformation and psyops?

They would have to put reason and evidence over social fears and use evidence, like Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology which identifies a concrete core in 1992.

Or they would have to realize that in the days after 9-11 the buiildings engineer of record identified a concrete core.

Why would they oppose the vast psyops of the infiltrated government and use evidence?

Material evidence from the scen of the crime shows a concrete core.

A remnant of concrete at ground zero shows the massive core base wall.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xv5PrXj00g&feature=related[/ame]

 

[Christophera]

agents have no evidence and no reason, only a false social group working to make social fears more important than justice in 3,000 murders, or the US Consitution, or right and freedoms.

agents cannot even post an image of steel core columns in the core area of the Twins. I have no problem posting an image showing only a concrete core.

 

[DiveCon]

YOU have no evidence
your paranoid delusions are NOT evidence

 

[Liability]

Actual Photo of Miss Prison 2010 Winner!

Congrats CriscoFEARa!

 

[Christophera]

Actual Photo of Miss Prison 2010 Winner!

Congrats CriscoFEARa!

YOU have no evidence
your paranoid delusions are NOT evidence

You cannot be more wrong. I quote lilybilly to show the pretend delusion the agents present. And I post the info of the lead engineer of the Twin Towers, Leslie E. Robertson in the days after 9-11

Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.

http://web.archive.org/web/20040807085840/http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3069641/

Then I post an image of the concrete core.

 

[DiveCon]

except he NEVER SAID THAT you lying PoS

 

[Christophera]

Da po agent has no evidence and hates the truth.

Robertson provided the concrete core information to Newsweek just like August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. did in his safety report in November of 2001. See chapter 2.1.

This is true because ONLY images on 9-11 showing the concrete core can be found. The east concrete core wall of WTC 1 toppling into the empty core.

 

[Liability]

Da po agent has no evidence and hates the truth.

Yes, agent CriscoFEARa, you do seem to detest truth.

Robertson provided the concrete core information to Newsweek just like August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. did in his safety report in November of 2001. * * * *

Previously refuted. Repeating your disproved bullshit will not bring it back to life.

 

[Liability]

except he NEVER SAID THAT you lying PoS

AND CriscoFEARa's delusions do not constitute evidence. In reality, the Null Poster bastard has never posted an image of the concrete core for the same reason that he has never posted a picture of an actual living unicorn.

 

[Christophera]

You cannot reasonably refute evidence with text.

This is Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 stating the twins have a concrete core.

This is an image of the west core wall of WTC 1 after the north wall has fallen showing the empty core area.

Do you know how crowded your cell is going to be?

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Section 4 states “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States” such language is clear in that a citizen is allowed and required under law to disclose if such disclosure is “cognizable by a court of the United States”

TITLE 18, PART I , CHAPTER 115, §2382 U.S. Code as of: 01/19/04
Section 2382. Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

 

[Liability]

You cannot reasonably refute evidence with text.

This is Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 stating the twins have a concrete core.

This is an image of the west core wall of WTC 1 after the north wall has fallen showing the empty core area.

Do you know how crowded your cell is going to be?

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Section 4 states “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States” such language is clear in that a citizen is allowed and required under law to disclose if such disclosure is “cognizable by a court of the United States”

TITLE 18, PART I , CHAPTER 115, §2382 U.S. Code as of: 01/19/04
Section 2382. Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

Even an uber-moron like you, despite all of your efforts to be deceptive and dishonest, knows full well that there was no concrete core. That has been proved by contemporaneous records, images, etc.

Robertson's mis-quote even got subsequently corrected. The Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia article was mistaken. Shit happens. But a mistake is hardly a sound basis to stake your claim on, imbecile.

You have exactly zero credibility, bitch. And you deserve it entirely.

 

[The T]

You cannot reasonably refute evidence with text.

This is Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 stating the twins have a concrete core.

This is an image of the west core wall of WTC 1 after the north wall has fallen showing the empty core area.

Do you know how crowded your cell is going to be?

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Section 4 states “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States” such language is clear in that a citizen is allowed and required under law to disclose if such disclosure is “cognizable by a court of the United States”

TITLE 18, PART I , CHAPTER 115, §2382 U.S. Code as of: 01/19/04
Section 2382. Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

How on Earth could the towers have a concrete core when the stairwells [All of them] were in the center of the structures? The CORE was HOLLOW.

 

[DiveCon]

You cannot reasonably refute evidence with text.

This is Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 stating the twins have a concrete core.

This is an image of the west core wall of WTC 1 after the north wall has fallen showing the empty core area.

Even an uber-moron like you, despite all of your efforts to be deceptive and dishonest, knows full well that there was no concrete core. That has been proved by contemporaneous records, images, etc.

Robertson's mis-quote even got subsequently corrected. The Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia article was mistaken. Shit happens. But a mistake is hardly a sound basis to stake your claim on, imbecile.

You have exactly zero credibility, bitch. And you deserve it entirely.

actually, Oxford wasnt mistaken, when read in proper context
they used the WTC as an example of a skyscraper, then went on to describe general skyscrapers
he just takes it out of context to say the WTC had a concrete core
it didnt

 

[Liability]

You cannot reasonably refute evidence with text.

This is Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 stating the twins have a concrete core.

This is an image of the west core wall of WTC 1 after the north wall has fallen showing the empty core area.

Even an uber-moron like you, despite all of your efforts to be deceptive and dishonest, knows full well that there was no concrete core. That has been proved by contemporaneous records, images, etc.

Robertson's mis-quote even got subsequently corrected. The Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia article was mistaken. Shit happens. But a mistake is hardly a sound basis to stake your claim on, imbecile.

You have exactly zero credibility, bitch. And you deserve it entirely.

actually, Oxford wasnt mistaken, when read in proper context
they used the WTC as an example of a skyscraper, then went on to describe general skyscrapers
he just takes it out of context to say the WTC had a concrete core
it didnt

I thought it said that the WTC had a concrete and steel core. It is very poorly written if that's not what they meant to convey.

 

[DiveCon]

Even an uber-moron like you, despite all of your efforts to be deceptive and dishonest, knows full well that there was no concrete core. That has been proved by contemporaneous records, images, etc.

Robertson's mis-quote even got subsequently corrected. The Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia article was mistaken. Shit happens. But a mistake is hardly a sound basis to stake your claim on, imbecile.

You have exactly zero credibility, bitch. And you deserve it entirely.

actually, Oxford wasnt mistaken, when read in proper context
they used the WTC as an example of a skyscraper, then went on to describe general skyscrapers
he just takes it out of context to say the WTC had a concrete core
it didnt

I thought it said that the WTC had a concrete and steel core. It is very poorly written if that's not what they meant to convey.

no, it states that "skyscrapers, like the WTC, have steel and concrete"
the steel and concrete were referencing skyscrapers in general, and the WTC was used as an example of skyscrapers
Oxford has since edited their entry substantially to be more accurate than it was in the version dipshit goof-o-phera uses

 

[Christophera]

You are distorting and misrepresenting. Proof was posted.

Hull = steel, core = concrete. Still no independently verifications of the steel core columns. Just your usual spam misrepresentations and errors. Especially this one. It does not look into the core, just at the largest columns surrounding the core.