To all you calling BS on the Trump indictment…

[BS Filter]

Yes, that's no surprise at all. Trump can always count on the Manson Girls.

If Trump is re-elected will you kill yourself?

 

[Mac1958]

If Trump is re-elected will you kill yourself?

Very doubtful. Sorry.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

They will do it because they can. Who is going to call them on it? Those that do will be subject to the same abuse. You assholes watch and say nothing. Scumbags.

 

[Father O'Blivion]

\

Have you ever considered the fact that sleazy lying Democrats are corrupt to the bone?

Before you see the charges?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Bullshit.

It's secret because the prosecutor has more control over it that way.

Why does a prosecutor need the opinion of people who know nothing of the laws of evidence to decide if charges can be filed?

It’s secret because that’s how grand juries operate, dope.
It’s called due process.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

There is no need to protect evidence as it will all have to be turned over to the defense for the trial anyway.

The GJ basically guarantees an indictment because there are no rules of evidence for the prosecutor

And how is anyone going to "destroy evidence" if it is in the hands of the police under lock and key?

And tell me where you came up with the moronic conclusion that I want to destroy evidence

You’re attempting to diminish the validity of the GJ proceedings as we speak, dope. Imagine what you’d do with the actual evidence.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

This neither a capital nor an infamous crime.

In an actual trial not a kangaroo court the defense has the opportunity to provide rebuttal evidence and the rules of evidence are much stricter. Why does a prosecutor get to present evidence that will never see the light of day to a GJ ?

Anyone can win a one sided argument

^Simply retarded.

 

[BS Filter]

You’re attempting to diminish the validity of the GJ proceedings as we speak, dope. Imagine what you’d do with the actual evidence.

The Feds saw the same evidence and declined to indict. This isn't going anywhere.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Link?

What could they possibly have added to what I listed as the facts of the case?

The problem is you have to prove that Trump wouldn’t have made the payment outside him running for office.

Stormy Daniels has already done an interview in the past talking the affair.

And John Edwards had already been charged in the past for using campaign fund to do this type of thing.

It’s not illegal to pay someone to sign an NDA. It’s done all the time. It can’t be illegal to do so with campaign funds as well as with not campaign funds.

There’s 30 different criminal counts listed in the indictment.
Don’t forget that Weisselberg testified before the GJ recently and lost his legal representation provided by Trump because of it.
There is more to this than you care to admit.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The Feds saw the same evidence and declined to indict. This isn't going anywhere.

You mean Trump’s Justice dept declined to indict a sitting president?

That’s not news.

 

[Rogue AI]

grow up. That's all propagandist bs straight out of America's PRAVDA

The costs are real. DA offices have actual budgets, and wasting an extraordinary amount on a political case while there is a crime wave is utterly wasteful and dangerous for the community. Morons like you don't care, as long as you 'get Trump'. Pathetic.

 

[Blaster]

Bragg Confirms Federal Funds Used in Trump Probe, Bolstering GOP Investigation

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg revealed to the House GOP that roughly $5,000 in federal funds has gone toward the Trump probe.

www.breitbart.com

 

[BS Filter]

You mean Trump’s Justice dept declined to indict a sitting president?

That’s not news.

Biden has been President for two years. Idiot.

 

[Lastamender]

That is a go to answer when you cannot handle what you have been told. Now try racist and traitor.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Rules and decorum is out the window now…what is good for the goose, is good for your gander pal…strap in, you guys went there.

Huh?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

A literal jury is vetting the evidence and testimony. What is cleaner and more comprehensive than that?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You don’t know anybody on the grand jury yet you claim to know what they are thinking?! Wow, what a pompous ass you are.

More like an abject moron

 

[Lastamender]

A literal jury is vetting the evidence and testimony. What is cleaner and more comprehensive than that?

A tainted jury like in DC. There is no justice in a jury picked by a prosecutor.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Biden has been President for two years. Idiot.

When did the AG decline to indict Trump?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

That is a go to answer when you cannot handle what you have been told. Now try racist and traitor.

It’s the go to when addressing lunatic morons.