- Jan 19, 2010
- 67,793
- 62,179
- 3,605
Every judicial norm that could benefit the accused has been discarded so they can find some way... any way to prosecute Trump... and I don't care how much you hate him this is wrong....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
every judge is. Like Kohberger, the prosecution spoiled the jury pool for their benefit and they do not want the defense to impede on that progress by stating facts that prove them wrong and take the bias away. it is our judicial system I've now learned we really are. Prosecutor and judges are tied together. Defense never stands a chance especially after they get their public misinformation out. Go look up the prosecuter Bill from Idaho 4 and what he claimed Kohberger as a stalker, and now say in a hearing about survey that the defense is spreading false information for asking the question if they heard that!! and then state in the hearing that it was knowingly false!!!! holy shit, they lied to really bias the jury pool there. This trump piece is exactly the same.What is that fascist judge afraid of?... the truth?....
ahhh snowflake, I'm honored. See i don't cheat to get my way like your side.^^^ More highbrow humor from the MAGA elitists.
Like every other criminal defendant he cannot threaten the court, jurors, witnesses, or persecution.Ummmmm, if everyone else has a first amendment right to speak then why shouldn't Trump?
That is not what the criminal justice system is based upon.LOL. Go back and read the article. Even CNN says that if Trump is jailed it would hurt Biden.
The judge isn't threatening TrumpThey are inherently unfair. You let everyone else say what they want except for the accused.
It is established in the law that a CRIMINAL DEFENDANT may not threaten directly or indirectly any party to the case.The question is fairness. If others have the right to say bad things about Trump then he should have that very same right.
Can you argue why the gag order is illegal?Can you violate an illegal gag order?
Don't feed the sealions.Ummmmm, if everyone else has a first amendment right to speak then why shouldn't Trump?
Why? Saying she works for the DEMs and could bias her father's judgement is perfectly legal. If he were lying, that would be different, but he is not!Blasting family members of presiding judges on social media specifically to attack/intimidate is pretty fucking cut and dry, dummy.
The supreme court has ruled gag orders are unconstitutional, it's called "prior restraint" and a big constitutional no no.
.
Pointing out the family member is making $$$$$$$$$$$$ from the trial is not attacking or intimidating, twatwaffle. Except to TDS snowflakes.Blasting family members of presiding judges on social media specifically to attack/intimidate is pretty fucking cut and dry, dummy.
Signed an NDA or paid someone off to keep them quiet? John Edwards ring any bells?
If you want to deny that the criminal prosecutions of Trump are not political, feel free. But you look pretty silly doing so.
Maybe you should climb down off the roof and retype that.every judge is. Like Kohberger, the prosecution spoiled the jury pool for their benefit and they do not want the defense to impede on that progress by stating facts that prove them wrong and take the bias away. it is our judicial system I've now learned we really are. Prosecutor and judges are tied together. Defense never stands a chance especially after they get their public misinformation out. Go look up the prosecuter Bill from Idaho 4 and what he claimed Kohberger as a stalker, and now say in a hearing about survey that the defense is spreading false information for asking the question if they heard that!! and then state in the hearing that it was knowingly false!!!! holy shit, they lied to really bias the jury pool there. This trump piece is exactly the same.
dude, if you have the judicial in your pocket, everything is fair play. It's how good cheaters cheat.Every judicial norm that could benefit the accused has been discarded so they can find some way... any way to prosecute Trump... and I don't care how much you hate him this is wrong....
no evidence, yet you keep saying he did. So you don't need evidence, that's all I need to knowThe question is did Trump do the thing he is accused of doing. That is the only question.
LOL. Go back and read the article. Even CNN says that if Trump is jailed it would hurt Biden.
The judge thinks it is, magafuck, and that's what matters.Pointing out the family member is making $$$$$$$$$$$$ from the trial is not attacking or intimidating, twatwaffle. Except to TDS snowflakes.
The judge says differently.Why? Saying she works for the DEMs and could bias her father's judgement is perfectly legal. If he were lying, that would be different, but he is not!