Today...Smashing The Lie That Nazis Were Rightwing.

[PoliticalChic]

I hope you're taking notes as well.....you dunce.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I don't judge inferiority by race, i judge that sort of thing on a case by case basis.....

Exactly. One particularly stupid, illogical, Polish Nazi making an ass of himself on the internet doesn't mean all people of Polish ancestry should be disgraced along with him.

I'm clearly way too intelligent for you... ...

I assure you, Adolphski, that every normal person reading this can see what an illogical buffoon you are.

Normal people are pretty dumb.

.....

And you'd have to increase your intelligence tenfold just to reach the level of "normal."

I'm well above normal intelligence, you obviously are not.

You never debate, because you are incapable, because your sub-Human brain lets you down.

 

[danielpalos]

Even if a superior race, erases an inferior race... It's wrong.

I think it's sad when a people can't showcase their unique customs, facial features, or tell their stories.

Which is obviously a natural reaction.... Only a heartless cold blooded monster would support anyone's heritage to be erased.

Who toppled the mighty Roman empire?
Was it a superior race or a consortium of barbaric tribes.

The Romans bought in Germanic tribes to do their dirty-work.... Those Germanic tribes resented Rome, and went onto sack Rome.... Sound familiar?

Sounds like what the U.S.A is doing with Hispanics.... Western Europe with Muslims.

The Romans needed an "economic gold mine" when their real gold mines exhausted. A market friendly visa program could have generated revenue for the Romans; and the Romans could have "commissioned" Peoples from anywhere, to establish colonia anywhere better aqueducts and better roads may have been of better service, to the Romans.

 

[Pogo]

Nazis were Right wing Socialists.

Unlike Conservatives, the Nazis correctly cracked down on Capitalism for promoting Liberalism.

Conservatives keep getting it wrong, over, and over again.

In other words the Nazis were social conservatives driven by populist hegemonic ideals. For some reason those characteristics seem eerily reminiscent of Trumpism....

Actually, they are directly similar to Liberals.


Watch:

Hitler's Socialist programs:

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.
LIES YOUR TEACHER TAUGHT YOU: Nazi Hitler Economic Social and Political Policies



Get it, you dope?

Your entire worldview is based on lies they've taught you.


Nazis and Communists, Socialists and Fascists, Liberals and Progressives.....all six are Leftwing......

Here is what they taught me.

According to The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics, in liberal democracies, the political Right opposes socialism and social democracy. Right-wing parties include conservatives, Christian democrats, classical liberals, nationalists and, on the far Right, racists and fascists.
Right-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Right-wing_politics

Left-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Left-wing_politics
Left-wing politics supports social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy and social inequality. ... The term left wing can also refer to "the radical, reforming, or socialist section of a political party or system".
‎Egalitarianism · ‎Social equality · ‎Prioritarianism

Looking at those two definitions I don't see how anyone,including you, would fit neatly into either political category.. Some of us, regardless of party affiliation, are fiscal conservatives on the one hand, and liberal on social issues..or vise versa. Just what " wing" do you place people like that on.
Left and right dichotomies don't really apply across the board anymore. Times have changed and so should those archaic terms.
Let's take an updated look at the heart of what was once the bastion of Soviet Communism: Putin, a former KGB agent, has become the darling of western rightwingers.
The reasons are as clear as Hitler's were when he too embraced socialism for Whites only. In a world where White males are becoming increasingly fearful over what they see as an encroachment on their turf, the term rightwing has become an unspoken euphemism for Whitness. The Republicans, under the leadership of Trump, have capitalzed on the same kind of hegemonic populism that spawed Hitler.

See if you can point out any errors in my posts.

Otherwise, the veracity of the thread title has been established.

I will put this question to you and answering it might be fruitful:

What crucial difference separated Nazism from Communism? Follow that up with a plausible explanation for Hitler's hatred and persecu of Communists.

Hitler in fact climbed over and assaulted, through the SA brownshirts (which he called the "Gymnastics and Sports Division" of the political party simultaneously called "socialist") the existing socialists and communists in order to get into power. And once there the first political prisoners, at Dachau ---- were the communists and socialists. And that's 1933, way before he got involved with Stalin.

Fun inconvenient facts.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

If an Ethiopian collective, leads to an Ethiopia, then that's something that should be avoided.

You can't blame the sad state of Ethiopia on Colonization, because they weren't colonized.

Besides, while it's true that extremely gifted people who guide society the most are not even 0.1% of any society... However, about 90% are White, and Whitish, (Whitish includes Ashkenazi Jews, Armenians, Italians, and Greeks)
The other 10% are East Asian.
Virtually 0% comes from Africans, Hispanics, or Muslims.

Therefor there must be something about the White elite that's remarkable... To tamper with it by mixing, or replacing it... Could have catastrophic implicat

Japan's IQ, and PISA scores are higher than Whites... They remain a highly homogeneous society...

Who does the dirty work in Japan?

Besides, there's plenty of poor Whites in America..... The government should support those on welfare to be funneled into farming, restaurants, constructions, and so forth.... Keep them busy, keep the economy moving, and make them work for their wage.

Many poor Whites do work. Some have two or more jobs and still barely make ends meet.

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

Because of your distateful demeanor I was tempted to leave you to your own devices. You must have noticed that all the other posters have abandoned the thread. However, I do detect a sincere hunger for the truth in you. Let me help.

Between 1976 and 1986 I spent five of that ten year spread in the far east; three in Japan and two in South Korea. Speaking from experience, coupled with a historical review of the symbiotic relationships between Japan, Korea and China, I can tell you that
Chinese and Koreans were the"wetbacks" of Japan. They did the dirty work. That might have changed in recent times to some degree but when I was there that is the way it was.

Japan emerged as the economic power house in that part of the world after WW2.
Even the devastating effects of two nuclear blasts barely slowed them down.. So what social phenomena spurred their economic success far beyond the struggling economies of the other Asian countries?
Hint: it couldn't have been race. I see the rejection of Communism as a key to the origins of prosperity in Japanese. Nevertheless, socialized healthcare and
Institutions remained as tenets of the social fabric.

But a shift in the economic paradigm occured when workers swore loyalty to the corporations that employed them. Conversely, the corporations reciprocated. I was astonished to see a hundreds of employees standing in a parking lot saluting a corporate flag while singing a corporate anthem.

The Japanese homogeneity you speak of is an illusion since all Asians are really just extended genetic families of the
Chinese. Language cultural and physical differences aren't all that stark.

Koreans make up less than 1% of Japan, though.

They're still East Asian like Japanese.

That would be like the U.S.A bringing in Ukrainian refugees to do their dirty work at less than 1% of the population.

DID YOU SAY SOMPIN' ABOUT KOREANS??????

I have a much bigger problem with Western Europeans, than with East Asians.

The irony is that East Asians are probably more like to stand up against the influx of third-World riff-raff into Western European society, than Western Europeans are.

The further West in Europe the more stupid, anti-Racist, and obnoxious they tend to be.

Unkotare being Irish, is no surprise.... The people of the British Isles tend to be like him... dumb brutes, anti-Racists, and obnoxious big mouths.

 

[JQPublic1]

Because there are no superior races. There are a few superior individuals in every race but lets face it...most people of any race are just followers living off the reputations of the gifted. American progressives realized that a long time ago and sought to tap into human genius around the world. Making America a place where bright people from everywhere
come to realize their dreams is the essence of our success. Not Whiteness alone.

If an Ethiopian collective, leads to an Ethiopia, then that's something that should be avoided.

You can't blame the sad state of Ethiopia on Colonization, because they weren't colonized.

Besides, while it's true that extremely gifted people who guide society the most are not even 0.1% of any society... However, about 90% are White, and Whitish, (Whitish includes Ashkenazi Jews, Armenians, Italians, and Greeks)
The other 10% are East Asian.
Virtually 0% comes from Africans, Hispanics, or Muslims.

Therefor there must be something about the White elite that's remarkable... To tamper with it by mixing, or replacing it... Could have catastrophic implicat

So which of you "superior" Whites are willing to do the dirty work?

Japan's IQ, and PISA scores are higher than Whites... They remain a highly homogeneous society...

Who does the dirty work in Japan?

Besides, there's plenty of poor Whites in America..... The government should support those on welfare to be funneled into farming, restaurants, constructions, and so forth.... Keep them busy, keep the economy moving, and make them work for their wage.

Many poor Whites do work. Some have two or more jobs and still barely make ends meet.

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

Japan emerged as the economic power house in that part of the world after WW2.
Even the devastating effects of two nuclear blasts barely slowed them down.. So what social phenomena spurred their economic success far beyond the struggling economies of the other Asian countries?
Hint: it couldn't have been race. I see the rejection of Communism as a key to the origins of prosperity in Japanese. Nevertheless, socialized healthcare and
Institutions remained as tenets of the social fabric.

But a shift in the economic paradigm occured when workers swore loyalty to the corporations that employed them. Conversely, the corporations reciprocated. I was astonished to see a hundreds of employees standing in a parking lot saluting a corporate flag while singing a corporate anthem.

The Japanese homogeneity you speak of is an illusion since all Asians are really just extended genetic families of the
Chinese. Language cultural and physical differences aren't all that stark.

Japan industrialized early, as a result they were ahead of others in the region even before WW2, which is why Japan could cause so much damage to China, and Korea.

During that era, Japan was ruled by god-kings and feudal lords.Something in that social formula encouraged technological progression. But obviously race wasn't a factor. The Chinese and Koreans were /are basically the same racial stock as the Japanese and just as smart. Japan's advantage had to be related to the synergy
generated by the man gods and their adoring subjects, the latter of which would willingly die for them without hesitation.

 

[PoliticalChic]

In other words the Nazis were social conservatives driven by populist hegemonic ideals. For some reason those characteristics seem eerily reminiscent of Trumpism....

Actually, they are directly similar to Liberals.


Watch:

Hitler's Socialist programs:

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.
LIES YOUR TEACHER TAUGHT YOU: Nazi Hitler Economic Social and Political Policies



Get it, you dope?

Your entire worldview is based on lies they've taught you.


Nazis and Communists, Socialists and Fascists, Liberals and Progressives.....all six are Leftwing......

Here is what they taught me.

According to The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics, in liberal democracies, the political Right opposes socialism and social democracy. Right-wing parties include conservatives, Christian democrats, classical liberals, nationalists and, on the far Right, racists and fascists.
Right-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Right-wing_politics

Left-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Left-wing_politics
Left-wing politics supports social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy and social inequality. ... The term left wing can also refer to "the radical, reforming, or socialist section of a political party or system".
‎Egalitarianism · ‎Social equality · ‎Prioritarianism

Looking at those two definitions I don't see how anyone,including you, would fit neatly into either political category.. Some of us, regardless of party affiliation, are fiscal conservatives on the one hand, and liberal on social issues..or vise versa. Just what " wing" do you place people like that on.
Left and right dichotomies don't really apply across the board anymore. Times have changed and so should those archaic terms.
Let's take an updated look at the heart of what was once the bastion of Soviet Communism: Putin, a former KGB agent, has become the darling of western rightwingers.
The reasons are as clear as Hitler's were when he too embraced socialism for Whites only. In a world where White males are becoming increasingly fearful over what they see as an encroachment on their turf, the term rightwing has become an unspoken euphemism for Whitness. The Republicans, under the leadership of Trump, have capitalzed on the same kind of hegemonic populism that spawed Hitler.

See if you can point out any errors in my posts.

Otherwise, the veracity of the thread title has been established.

I will put this question to you and answering it might be fruitful:

What crucial difference separated Nazism from Communism? Follow that up with a plausible explanation for Hitler's hatred and persecu of Communists.

Hitler in fact climbed over and assaulted, through the SA brownshirts (which he called the "Gymnastics and Sports Division" of the political party simultaneously called "socialist") the existing socialists and communists in order to get into power. And once there the first political prisoners, at Dachau ---- were the communists and socialists. And that's 1933, way before he got involved with Stalin.

Fun inconvenient facts.

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks



You've been mislead your entire life, and were never brave enough or smart enough to investigate for yourself.


Hence....you're a moron.

 

[Pogo]

Actually, they are directly similar to Liberals.


Watch:

Hitler's Socialist programs:

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.
LIES YOUR TEACHER TAUGHT YOU: Nazi Hitler Economic Social and Political Policies



Get it, you dope?

Your entire worldview is based on lies they've taught you.


Nazis and Communists, Socialists and Fascists, Liberals and Progressives.....all six are Leftwing......

Here is what they taught me.

According to The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics, in liberal democracies, the political Right opposes socialism and social democracy. Right-wing parties include conservatives, Christian democrats, classical liberals, nationalists and, on the far Right, racists and fascists.
Right-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Right-wing_politics

Left-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Left-wing_politics
Left-wing politics supports social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy and social inequality. ... The term left wing can also refer to "the radical, reforming, or socialist section of a political party or system".
‎Egalitarianism · ‎Social equality · ‎Prioritarianism

Looking at those two definitions I don't see how anyone,including you, would fit neatly into either political category.. Some of us, regardless of party affiliation, are fiscal conservatives on the one hand, and liberal on social issues..or vise versa. Just what " wing" do you place people like that on.
Left and right dichotomies don't really apply across the board anymore. Times have changed and so should those archaic terms.
Let's take an updated look at the heart of what was once the bastion of Soviet Communism: Putin, a former KGB agent, has become the darling of western rightwingers.
The reasons are as clear as Hitler's were when he too embraced socialism for Whites only. In a world where White males are becoming increasingly fearful over what they see as an encroachment on their turf, the term rightwing has become an unspoken euphemism for Whitness. The Republicans, under the leadership of Trump, have capitalzed on the same kind of hegemonic populism that spawed Hitler.

See if you can point out any errors in my posts.

Otherwise, the veracity of the thread title has been established.

I will put this question to you and answering it might be fruitful:

What crucial difference separated Nazism from Communism? Follow that up with a plausible explanation for Hitler's hatred and persecu of Communists.

Hitler in fact climbed over and assaulted, through the SA brownshirts (which he called the "Gymnastics and Sports Division" of the political party simultaneously called "socialist") the existing socialists and communists in order to get into power. And once there the first political prisoners, at Dachau ---- were the communists and socialists. And that's 1933, way before he got involved with Stalin.

Fun inconvenient facts.

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo you have no response.

Exactly. That's why I call 'em "fun inconvenient facts". Inconvenient for you; fun for me.
Also known as a "win-win".

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here is what they taught me.

According to The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics, in liberal democracies, the political Right opposes socialism and social democracy. Right-wing parties include conservatives, Christian democrats, classical liberals, nationalists and, on the far Right, racists and fascists.
Right-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Right-wing_politics

Left-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Left-wing_politics
Left-wing politics supports social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy and social inequality. ... The term left wing can also refer to "the radical, reforming, or socialist section of a political party or system".
‎Egalitarianism · ‎Social equality · ‎Prioritarianism

Looking at those two definitions I don't see how anyone,including you, would fit neatly into either political category.. Some of us, regardless of party affiliation, are fiscal conservatives on the one hand, and liberal on social issues..or vise versa. Just what " wing" do you place people like that on.
Left and right dichotomies don't really apply across the board anymore. Times have changed and so should those archaic terms.
Let's take an updated look at the heart of what was once the bastion of Soviet Communism: Putin, a former KGB agent, has become the darling of western rightwingers.
The reasons are as clear as Hitler's were when he too embraced socialism for Whites only. In a world where White males are becoming increasingly fearful over what they see as an encroachment on their turf, the term rightwing has become an unspoken euphemism for Whitness. The Republicans, under the leadership of Trump, have capitalzed on the same kind of hegemonic populism that spawed Hitler.

See if you can point out any errors in my posts.

Otherwise, the veracity of the thread title has been established.

I will put this question to you and answering it might be fruitful:

What crucial difference separated Nazism from Communism? Follow that up with a plausible explanation for Hitler's hatred and persecu of Communists.

Hitler in fact climbed over and assaulted, through the SA brownshirts (which he called the "Gymnastics and Sports Division" of the political party simultaneously called "socialist") the existing socialists and communists in order to get into power. And once there the first political prisoners, at Dachau ---- were the communists and socialists. And that's 1933, way before he got involved with Stalin.

Fun inconvenient facts.

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo you have no response.

Exactly. That's why I call 'em "fun inconvenient facts". Inconvenient for you; fun for me.

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks



You've been mislead your entire life, and were never brave enough or smart enough to investigate for yourself.


Hence....you're a moron.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

If an Ethiopian collective, leads to an Ethiopia, then that's something that should be avoided.

You can't blame the sad state of Ethiopia on Colonization, because they weren't colonized.

Besides, while it's true that extremely gifted people who guide society the most are not even 0.1% of any society... However, about 90% are White, and Whitish, (Whitish includes Ashkenazi Jews, Armenians, Italians, and Greeks)
The other 10% are East Asian.
Virtually 0% comes from Africans, Hispanics, or Muslims.

Therefor there must be something about the White elite that's remarkable... To tamper with it by mixing, or replacing it... Could have catastrophic implicat

Japan's IQ, and PISA scores are higher than Whites... They remain a highly homogeneous society...

Who does the dirty work in Japan?

Besides, there's plenty of poor Whites in America..... The government should support those on welfare to be funneled into farming, restaurants, constructions, and so forth.... Keep them busy, keep the economy moving, and make them work for their wage.

Many poor Whites do work. Some have two or more jobs and still barely make ends meet.

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

Japan emerged as the economic power house in that part of the world after WW2.
Even the devastating effects of two nuclear blasts barely slowed them down.. So what social phenomena spurred their economic success far beyond the struggling economies of the other Asian countries?
Hint: it couldn't have been race. I see the rejection of Communism as a key to the origins of prosperity in Japanese. Nevertheless, socialized healthcare and
Institutions remained as tenets of the social fabric.

But a shift in the economic paradigm occured when workers swore loyalty to the corporations that employed them. Conversely, the corporations reciprocated. I was astonished to see a hundreds of employees standing in a parking lot saluting a corporate flag while singing a corporate anthem.

The Japanese homogeneity you speak of is an illusion since all Asians are really just extended genetic families of the
Chinese. Language cultural and physical differences aren't all that stark.

Japan industrialized early, as a result they were ahead of others in the region even before WW2, which is why Japan could cause so much damage to China, and Korea.

During that era, Japan was ruled by god-kings and feudal lords.Something in that social formula encouraged technological progression. But obviously race wasn't a factor. The Chinese and Koreans were /are basically the same racial stock as the Japanese and just as smart. Japan's advantage had to be related to the synergy
generated by the man gods and their adoring subjects, the latter of which would willingly die for them without hesitation.

I suspect it has mostly to do with war, war disproportionately targets the elite, as a result the elite start to vanish.

In the case of Japan, and also Britain in Europe, they simply avoided much war, by being protected on islands.

In dealing with Japanese, and Brits online they tend to be quite more stupid than their neighbors, but their elite obviously isn't.

 

[Pogo]

See if you can point out any errors in my posts.

Otherwise, the veracity of the thread title has been established.

I will put this question to you and answering it might be fruitful:

What crucial difference separated Nazism from Communism? Follow that up with a plausible explanation for Hitler's hatred and persecu of Communists.

Hitler in fact climbed over and assaulted, through the SA brownshirts (which he called the "Gymnastics and Sports Division" of the political party simultaneously called "socialist") the existing socialists and communists in order to get into power. And once there the first political prisoners, at Dachau ---- were the communists and socialists. And that's 1933, way before he got involved with Stalin.

Fun inconvenient facts.

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo you have no response.

Exactly. That's why I call 'em "fun inconvenient facts". Inconvenient for you; fun for me.
Also known as a "win-win".

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Sooooooooooooooooooooo you're actually reposting the lack of response, in hope that even more readers will notice the rhetorical vacuum.

Good plan.

"Can't bare the truth" huh? Nice touch. Yep, it's what I do around here ---- bare the truth, when y'all Revisionistas try to dress it up all different.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I will put this question to you and answering it might be fruitful:

What crucial difference separated Nazism from Communism? Follow that up with a plausible explanation for Hitler's hatred and persecu of Communists.

Hitler in fact climbed over and assaulted, through the SA brownshirts (which he called the "Gymnastics and Sports Division" of the political party simultaneously called "socialist") the existing socialists and communists in order to get into power. And once there the first political prisoners, at Dachau ---- were the communists and socialists. And that's 1933, way before he got involved with Stalin.

Fun inconvenient facts.

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo you have no response.

Exactly. That's why I call 'em "fun inconvenient facts". Inconvenient for you; fun for me.
Also known as a "win-win".

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Sooooooooooooooooooooo you're actually reposting the lack of response, in hope that even more readers will notice the rhetorical vacuum.

Good plan.

"Can't bare the truth" huh? Nice touch. Yep, it's what I do around here ---- bare the truth, when y'all Revisionistas try to dress it up all different.

Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, LF



Did I mention that you're a moron?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Hitler in fact climbed over and assaulted, through the SA brownshirts (which he called the "Gymnastics and Sports Division" of the political party simultaneously called "socialist") the existing socialists and communists in order to get into power. And once there the first political prisoners, at Dachau ---- were the communists and socialists. And that's 1933, way before he got involved with Stalin.

Fun inconvenient facts.

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo you have no response.

Exactly. That's why I call 'em "fun inconvenient facts". Inconvenient for you; fun for me.
Also known as a "win-win".

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Sooooooooooooooooooooo you're actually reposting the lack of response, in hope that even more readers will notice the rhetorical vacuum.

Good plan.

"Can't bare the truth" huh? Nice touch. Yep, it's what I do around here ---- bare the truth, when y'all Revisionistas try to dress it up all different.

Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, LF



Did I mention that you're a moron?

To tell you the truth, Capitalism leads to social Liberalism more than Communism even does.

Communist era Poland had no immigrants, no Gay pride marches, now these do exist in modern Capitalist Poland.

 

[g5000]

Many of Germany's right wing movements were ridiculed by the Left. Hitler felt the reason for this was a weakness he perceived in the existing right wing parties. He felt they were not hardcore enough. He felt that even the racialists didn't have any spine. And so to avoid ridicule from the Left for his own party, Hitler felt it would be dangerous to allow the weak sisters of the Right to be too heavy an influence in his own party. Out of this came the reasoning for the name of his party, and the brutality he advocated.

Piss drinking retards like PoliticalChic have never even read Mein Kampf. Instead, they parrot their propaganda outlets claim that Nazis are left wing, without having the slightest bit of knowledge about Hitler or the Nazis. This claim comes from willful and profound ignorance.

Here is Hitler in his own words on the other German right wing parties compared to his own:

The value of these people is clearly illustrated in the way they are treated by the Left-Wing parties. They find them ridiculous so they let these people rant and rave and just laugh at them. Anyone in this world who is not hated by his enemies is worthless as a friend to me. Therefore the friendship of these people for our young movement was not only worthless but downright dangerous. In fact, that was the main reason we chose the name “Party” in the first place. We hoped that this would scare off a whole swarm of racialist sleepwalkers. This is why we also described ourselves as the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. The word Party scared off the fanatics who live in the past, as well as the big talkers who spout meaningless phrases about the “racial idea”. The other part, National Socialist German Workers, freed us from a whole parade of knights of the “intellectual” sword and all the ragged misfits that carry “intellectual weapons” as a shield to cover their cowardice. Naturally the most violent “attacks” on our new movement came from these racialists. Of course the attacks were not physical, but only with their favorite weapon of pen and ink, just as you would expect from such racialist pen heads. To them, there was something revolting about our principle which stated, “If a man offers us violence, we will defend ourselves by violence”. They criticized us profusely claiming we possessed a rude type of worship for the rubber club and that our ranks lack any form of intellect. These quacks fail to realize that in a meeting of racialists, a Demosthenes can be silenced by just fifty idiots who rely on nothing but their lungs and their fists if those idiots do not want to let him speak.The inborn cowardice of the racialist always keeps him out of any such danger. He does not make noise when he works and he never steps out of the crowd--he is always careful to stay silent.


Only a complete, total, willfully stupid retard would ever think Hitler was left wing.

You don't want me to have to reveal.....again.....what a lying windbag you are......


....do you, 'expert'?????

You can't do shit. You are a retard. It pleases me to show what a retard you are. It pleases me even more to provoke you into showing everyone just how retarded you are.

 

[JQPublic1]

Many poor Whites do work. Some have two or more jobs and still barely make ends meet.

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

Japan emerged as the economic power house in that part of the world after WW2.
Even the devastating effects of two nuclear blasts barely slowed them down.. So what social phenomena spurred their economic success far beyond the struggling economies of the other Asian countries?
Hint: it couldn't have been race. I see the rejection of Communism as a key to the origins of prosperity in Japanese. Nevertheless, socialized healthcare and
Institutions remained as tenets of the social fabric.

But a shift in the economic paradigm occured when workers swore loyalty to the corporations that employed them. Conversely, the corporations reciprocated. I was astonished to see a hundreds of employees standing in a parking lot saluting a corporate flag while singing a corporate anthem.

The Japanese homogeneity you speak of is an illusion since all Asians are really just extended genetic families of the
Chinese. Language cultural and physical differences aren't all that stark.

Japan industrialized early, as a result they were ahead of others in the region even before WW2, which is why Japan could cause so much damage to China, and Korea.

During that era, Japan was ruled by god-kings and feudal lords.Something in that social formula encouraged technological progression. But obviously race wasn't a factor. The Chinese and Koreans were /are basically the same racial stock as the Japanese and just as smart. Japan's advantage had to be related to the synergy
generated by the man gods and their adoring subjects, the latter of which would willingly die for them without hesitation.

I suspect it has mostly to do with war, war disproportionately targets the elite, as a result the elite start to vanish.

In the case of Japan, and also Britain in Europe, they simply avoided much war, by being protected on islands.

In dealing with Japanese, and Brits online they tend to be quite more stupid than their neighbors, but their elite obviously isn't.

I see you have abandoned the false hypothesis that race is a factor in the economic status of a homogeneous nation.
Africa had it's kings and great civilizations;
and, the hieroglyphs depict that the earliest
Kings and Pharaohs were Black Africans.
Osiris, chief of the nilotic pantheon, is frequently found painted in acient black pigment.

 

[rightwinger]

If you weren't such a moron you wouldn't keep putting your foot......FEET...in your mouth.

So glad you bring up the love of Roosevelt's life....Benito Mussolini


1. RexTugwell, FDR's guru, was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described."
Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew."
The NRA was copied wholesale from Mussolini's corporative system.

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48




2. " As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.....

.... Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.”

Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator."
Fascism: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty



3. Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:

"The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill." (p. 280)


QED....FDR & Mussolini, sittin' in a tree.....

Liberals and Fascists.....one and the same.

You....a moron.

As the boards resident fascist, you deny that you voted for President Trumpolini?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Many of Germany's right wing movements were ridiculed by the Left. Hitler felt the reason for this was a weakness he perceived in the existing right wing parties. He felt they were not hardcore enough. He felt that even the racialists didn't have any spine. And so to avoid ridicule from the Left for his own party, Hitler felt it would be dangerous to allow the weak sisters of the Right to be too heavy an influence in his own party. Out of this came the reasoning for the name of his party, and the brutality he advocated.

Piss drinking retards like PoliticalChic have never even read Mein Kampf. Instead, they parrot their propaganda outlets claim that Nazis are left wing, without having the slightest bit of knowledge about Hitler or the Nazis. This claim comes from willful and profound ignorance.

Here is Hitler in his own words on the other German right wing parties compared to his own:

The value of these people is clearly illustrated in the way they are treated by the Left-Wing parties. They find them ridiculous so they let these people rant and rave and just laugh at them. Anyone in this world who is not hated by his enemies is worthless as a friend to me. Therefore the friendship of these people for our young movement was not only worthless but downright dangerous. In fact, that was the main reason we chose the name “Party” in the first place. We hoped that this would scare off a whole swarm of racialist sleepwalkers. This is why we also described ourselves as the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. The word Party scared off the fanatics who live in the past, as well as the big talkers who spout meaningless phrases about the “racial idea”. The other part, National Socialist German Workers, freed us from a whole parade of knights of the “intellectual” sword and all the ragged misfits that carry “intellectual weapons” as a shield to cover their cowardice. Naturally the most violent “attacks” on our new movement came from these racialists. Of course the attacks were not physical, but only with their favorite weapon of pen and ink, just as you would expect from such racialist pen heads. To them, there was something revolting about our principle which stated, “If a man offers us violence, we will defend ourselves by violence”. They criticized us profusely claiming we possessed a rude type of worship for the rubber club and that our ranks lack any form of intellect. These quacks fail to realize that in a meeting of racialists, a Demosthenes can be silenced by just fifty idiots who rely on nothing but their lungs and their fists if those idiots do not want to let him speak.The inborn cowardice of the racialist always keeps him out of any such danger. He does not make noise when he works and he never steps out of the crowd--he is always careful to stay silent.


Only a complete, total, willfully stupid retard would ever think Hitler was left wing.

You don't want me to have to reveal.....again.....what a lying windbag you are......


....do you, 'expert'?????

You can't do shit. You are a retard. It pleases me to show what a retard you are. It pleases me even more to provoke you into showing everyone just how retarded you are.

Look who's back!

The lying windbag!!!

Hey, remember when you claimed to be a military electronics expert....and I punctured that balloon, you windbag??


You forgot?

1. You made bogus claims....like this:

"I'm retired military and an electronics expert. I know what bombs look like, and I know what clocks look like."
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum


And this:


2. "I am also an electronics expert. I worked at the top of the field for decades.... All these FACTS destroy your stupid FANTASY it looks like a bomb. Even an English teacher could tell it wasn't."
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

You still a military and electronics expert....or have you moved up to brain surgeon and NASA expert???

C'mon.....everyone needs a good laugh.



3. As an "expert" you pontificated about 'clock-boy' and his attempt to freak out the school with his bomb-lookalike.
Couldn't fool you....'cause you're a military electronics expert (snicker snicker....)




4. I "blew up" your expertise with a few pictures....

"I'm retired military and an electronics expert. I know what bombs look like, and I know what clocks look like."

Nice job, 'expert'!!!!!



What an imbecile.

 

[PoliticalChic]

If you weren't such a moron you wouldn't keep putting your foot......FEET...in your mouth.

So glad you bring up the love of Roosevelt's life....Benito Mussolini


1. RexTugwell, FDR's guru, was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described."
Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew."
The NRA was copied wholesale from Mussolini's corporative system.

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48




2. " As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.....

.... Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.”

Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator."
Fascism: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty



3. Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:

"The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill." (p. 280)


QED....FDR & Mussolini, sittin' in a tree.....

Liberals and Fascists.....one and the same.

You....a moron.

As the boards resident fascist, you deny that you voted for President Trumpolini?

"As the boards resident fascist,..."

Let's review...
1. I just proved that FDR and Mussolini were blood brothers.
2. I regularly provide well deserved contumely (better look that up) for both FDR and Mussollini
3. Sooo....your lie is diaphanous (better, you know...look that up).


Why are you Leftists almost always low-life liars?
Is it a requirement?

 

[Camp]

Look who's back!

The lying windbag!!!

Hey, remember when you claimed to be a military electronics expert....and I punctured that balloon, you windbag??

.

.

PoliticalChic continues to pepper her posts with little tidbits of dishonest. A poster claimed to be former military and an electronics expert. PC has changed that to claiming the poster claimed to be a military electronics expert. It may seem like a small infraction, but when you start adding the small infractions up they accumulate into a pattern of dishonest.

 

[rightwinger]

If you weren't such a moron you wouldn't keep putting your foot......FEET...in your mouth.

So glad you bring up the love of Roosevelt's life....Benito Mussolini


1. RexTugwell, FDR's guru, was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described."
Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew."
The NRA was copied wholesale from Mussolini's corporative system.

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48




2. " As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.....

.... Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.”

Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator."
Fascism: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty



3. Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:

"The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill." (p. 280)


QED....FDR & Mussolini, sittin' in a tree.....

Liberals and Fascists.....one and the same.

You....a moron.

As the boards resident fascist, you deny that you voted for President Trumpolini?

"As the boards resident fascist,..."

Let's review...
1. I just proved that FDR and Mussolini were blood brothers.
2. I regularly provide well deserved contumely (better look that up) for both FDR and Mussollini
3. Sooo....your lie is diaphanous (better, you know...look that up).


Why are you Leftists almost always low-life liars?
Is it a requirement?

How do you tell the difference between a Conservative and a Fascist?
.

.

.
You can't


<you can tell that one at your next Bund meeting>