Today...Smashing The Lie That Nazis Were Rightwing.

[PoliticalChic]

Nazis were and still are rabid right wingers.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

Wrong.

As proven.....PROVEN...OVER AND OVER...in this thread, Nazis were as Leftwing as the Bolsheviks and the modern Liberals.

But....you are a dunce, so....you will still deny the obvious.


True?

The Nazis were Nationalists, not Conservatives, nor Liberals.

Liberals care mostly about equality, and rights for all.

Conservatives care mostly about freedom, and keeping their money.

Nationalists care mostly about their nation, and heritage.

Hogwash.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Over and over....the indoctrinated just can't overcome the propaganda...this: while Communists were Leftwing, the really, really doctrine, Nazism, was Rightwing.
No, it wasn't. It was brithed from the same sourece as communism...Karl Marx.
It authorized slaughter and genocide...as Leftism does.
And dreamed of the very same end stage for society as all six Leftwing views do.

They weren't: both are Leftwing....as is Liberalism, Progressivism, Socialism and Fascism.


1. Where did they learn to fear truth? Liberals, indoctrinated in government schools, hearing nothing but propaganda, raised to worship Franklin Roosevelt, look at the truth as though it were toxic.


2. But....to be a Liberal in good standing, this is the prescribed response when the facts run counter to their worldview: become irate, and attack, attack, attack

These were the retorts of the indoctrinated in a recent thread:

Fascists hate Liberals, and visa versa.

similarities between post 911 Evangelical/Tea Party Republicans and Fascists.

LW being communist (not capitalist), RW being fascist (allied with corporations, capitalist) like Naziism.

The Nazis may have had some quasi-socialist policies, but they were not socialists.

The Nazis simply didn't have a strong economic ideology, in some ways they weren't even true fascists

capitalism thrived under the Nazis.

Hitler and his gang took over a party with Socialist in its name. But when he took over Germany and turned it into a fascist dictatorship, it was anything but socialist.



Clearly Liberals all, and based on their comments, it is difficult to determine whether they are more incensed, or more ignorant.


3. Here's the bottom line...and then I'll prove it: Hitler and the Nazis were Leftwing.
Here's the reason for the propaganda assault by Liberals:
Pre-WWII, Progressives, Liberals, Democrats, were hot to embrace communism, fascism, and the Nazis. In fact, FDR was a pal of Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler. He used Mussolini as his model for the New Deal.


All six of these worldviews are based on the same, un-American view of individuals, individual rights and the final stage of social development.
All six are Leftwing...none are Rightwing.




4. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



When one 'sibling' attacked another, June 21, 1941, FDR had to choose one over the other.
"Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to the Soviet Union." Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48



As I promised.....I will prove the above in this thread.

Nazis were Right wing Socialists.

Unlike Conservatives, the Nazis correctly cracked down on Capitalism for promoting Liberalism.

Conservatives keep getting it wrong, over, and over again.

In other words the Nazis were social conservatives driven by populist hegemonic ideals. For some reason those characteristics seem eerily reminiscent of Trumpism....

Actually, they are directly similar to Liberals.


Watch:

Hitler's Socialist programs:

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.
LIES YOUR TEACHER TAUGHT YOU: Nazi Hitler Economic Social and Political Policies



Get it, you dope?

Your entire worldview is based on lies they've taught you.


Nazis and Communists, Socialists and Fascists, Liberals and Progressives.....all six are Leftwing......

Here is what they taught me.

According to The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics, in liberal democracies, the political Right opposes socialism and social democracy. Right-wing parties include conservatives, Christian democrats, classical liberals, nationalists and, on the far Right, racists and fascists.
Right-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Right-wing_politics

Left-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Left-wing_politics
Left-wing politics supports social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy and social inequality. ... The term left wing can also refer to "the radical, reforming, or socialist section of a political party or system".
‎Egalitarianism · ‎Social equality · ‎Prioritarianism

Looking at those two definitions I don't see how anyone,including you, would fit neatly into either political category.. Some of us, regardless of party affiliation, are fiscal conservatives on the one hand, and liberal on social issues..or vise versa. Just what " wing" do you place people like that on.
Left and right dichotomies don't really apply across the board anymore. Times have changed and so should those archaic terms.
Let's take an updated look at the heart of what was once the bastion of Soviet Communism: Putin, a former KGB agent, has become the darling of western rightwingers.
The reasons are as clear as Hitler's were when he too embraced socialism for Whites only. In a world where White males are becoming increasingly fearful over what they see as an encroachment on their turf, the term rightwing has become an unspoken euphemism for Whitness. The Republicans, under the leadership of Trump, have capitalzed on the same kind of hegemonic populism that spawed Hitler.

See if you can point out any errors in my posts.

Otherwise, the veracity of the thread title has been established.

 

[PoliticalChic]

In other words the Nazis were social conservatives driven by populist hegemonic ideals. For some reason those characteristics seem eerily reminiscent of Trumpism....

Drivel. There was nothing 'populist' about Hitler in power.

You don't know your history. Besides..even the pope sees the populist similarities between Trump and Hitler.

Even the Leftist Pope?????


Brilliant choice of 'experts' to quote.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Even if a superior race, erases an inferior race... It's wrong.

I think it's sad when a people can't showcase their unique customs, facial features, or tell their stories.

Which is obviously a natural reaction.... Only a heartless cold blooded monster would support anyone's heritage to be erased.

I don't judge inferiority by race, i judge that sort of thing on a case by case basis.....

Exactly. One particularly stupid, illogical, Polish Nazi making an ass of himself on the internet doesn't mean all people of Polish ancestry should be disgraced along with him.

I'm clearly way too intelligent for you... ...

I assure you, Adolphski, that every normal person reading this can see what an illogical buffoon you are.

Normal people are pretty dumb.

They mostly just do as their told.

That's why we need eugenics to weed out dumb mistakes like you.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I'll attempt to debate you.... If all races aren't equal... Why should superior races be overrun by inferior races?

Because there are no superior races. There are a few superior individuals in every race but lets face it...most people of any race are just followers living off the reputations of the gifted. American progressives realized that a long time ago and sought to tap into human genius around the world. Making America a place where bright people from everywhere
come to realize their dreams is the essence of our success. Not Whiteness alone.

If an Ethiopian collective, leads to an Ethiopia, then that's something that should be avoided.

You can't blame the sad state of Ethiopia on Colonization, because they weren't colonized.

Besides, while it's true that extremely gifted people who guide society the most are not even 0.1% of any society... However, about 90% are White, and Whitish, (Whitish includes Ashkenazi Jews, Armenians, Italians, and Greeks)
The other 10% are East Asian.
Virtually 0% comes from Africans, Hispanics, or Muslims.

Therefor there must be something about the White elite that's remarkable... To tamper with it by mixing, or replacing it... Could have catastrophic implicat

The Romans bought in Germanic tribes to do their dirty-work.... Those Germanic tribes resented Rome, and went onto sack Rome.... Sound familiar?

Sounds like what the U.S.A is doing with Hispanics.... Western Europe with Muslims.

So which of you "superior" Whites are willing to do the dirty work?

Japan's IQ, and PISA scores are higher than Whites... They remain a highly homogeneous society...

Who does the dirty work in Japan?

Besides, there's plenty of poor Whites in America..... The government should support those on welfare to be funneled into farming, restaurants, constructions, and so forth.... Keep them busy, keep the economy moving, and make them work for their wage.

Many poor Whites do work. Some have two or more jobs and still barely make ends meet.

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

More ignorance.

So, says the guy who's too ignorant to debate, so they just mouth off.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

....

There's no logic behind your simpleton ideals, ........

AGAIN, you very obviously have NO idea what the word "logic" means.

So, it's logical to support your own to be overrun by inferior people?....

Can you read?

FALSE PREMISE, you utter moron.

You run every thread into the gutter, because you are incapable of putting forward a debate.

Moron isn't quite a big enough word for how stupid you are.

I actually wonder if you're a retard.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I'll attempt to debate you.... If all races aren't equal... Why should superior races be overrun by inferior races?

Because there are no superior races. There are a few superior individuals in every race but lets face it...most people of any race are just followers living off the reputations of the gifted. American progressives realized that a long time ago and sought to tap into human genius around the world. Making America a place where bright people from everywhere
come to realize their dreams is the essence of our success. Not Whiteness alone.

If an Ethiopian collective, leads to an Ethiopia, then that's something that should be avoided.

You can't blame the sad state of Ethiopia on Colonization, because they weren't colonized.

Besides, while it's true that extremely gifted people who guide society the most are not even 0.1% of any society... However, about 90% are White, and Whitish, (Whitish includes Ashkenazi Jews, Armenians, Italians, and Greeks)
The other 10% are East Asian.
Virtually 0% comes from Africans, Hispanics, or Muslims.

Therefor there must be something about the White elite that's remarkable... To tamper with it by mixing, or replacing it... Could have catastrophic implicat

The Romans bought in Germanic tribes to do their dirty-work.... Those Germanic tribes resented Rome, and went onto sack Rome.... Sound familiar?

Sounds like what the U.S.A is doing with Hispanics.... Western Europe with Muslims.

So which of you "superior" Whites are willing to do the dirty work?

Japan's IQ, and PISA scores are higher than Whites... They remain a highly homogeneous society...

Who does the dirty work in Japan?

Besides, there's plenty of poor Whites in America..... The government should support those on welfare to be funneled into farming, restaurants, constructions, and so forth.... Keep them busy, keep the economy moving, and make them work for their wage.

Many poor Whites do work. Some have two or more jobs and still barely make ends meet.

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

Because of your distateful demeanor I was tempted to leave you to your own devices. You must have noticed that all the other posters have abandoned the thread. However, I do detect a sincere hunger for the truth in you. Let me help.

Between 1976 and 1986 I spent five of that ten year spread in the far east; three in Japan and two in South Korea. Speaking from experience, coupled with a historical review of the symbiotic relationships between Japan, Korea and China, I can tell you that
Chinese and Koreans were the"wetbacks" of Japan. They did the dirty work. That might have changed in recent times to some degree but when I was there that is the way it was.

Japan emerged as the economic power house in that part of the world after WW2.
Even the devastating effects of two nuclear blasts barely slowed them down.. So what social phenomena spurred their economic success far beyond the struggling economies of the other Asian countries?
Hint: it couldn't have been race. I see the rejection of Communism as a key to the origins of prosperity in Japanese. Nevertheless, socialized healthcare and
Institutions remained as tenets of the social fabric.

But a shift in the economic paradigm occured when workers swore loyalty to the corporations that employed them. Conversely, the corporations reciprocated. I was astonished to see a hundreds of employees standing in a parking lot saluting a corporate flag while singing a corporate anthem.

The Japanese homogeneity you speak of is an illusion since all Asians are really just extended genetic families of the
Chinese. Language cultural and physical differences aren't all that stark.

Koreans make up less than 1% of Japan, though.

They're still East Asian like Japanese.

That would be like the U.S.A bringing in Ukrainian refugees to do their dirty work at less than 1% of the population.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I'll attempt to debate you.... If all races aren't equal... Why should superior races be overrun by inferior races?

Because there are no superior races. There are a few superior individuals in every race but lets face it...most people of any race are just followers living off the reputations of the gifted. American progressives realized that a long time ago and sought to tap into human genius around the world. Making America a place where bright people from everywhere
come to realize their dreams is the essence of our success. Not Whiteness alone.

If an Ethiopian collective, leads to an Ethiopia, then that's something that should be avoided.

You can't blame the sad state of Ethiopia on Colonization, because they weren't colonized.

Besides, while it's true that extremely gifted people who guide society the most are not even 0.1% of any society... However, about 90% are White, and Whitish, (Whitish includes Ashkenazi Jews, Armenians, Italians, and Greeks)
The other 10% are East Asian.
Virtually 0% comes from Africans, Hispanics, or Muslims.

Therefor there must be something about the White elite that's remarkable... To tamper with it by mixing, or replacing it... Could have catastrophic implicat

The Romans bought in Germanic tribes to do their dirty-work.... Those Germanic tribes resented Rome, and went onto sack Rome.... Sound familiar?

Sounds like what the U.S.A is doing with Hispanics.... Western Europe with Muslims.

So which of you "superior" Whites are willing to do the dirty work?

Japan's IQ, and PISA scores are higher than Whites... They remain a highly homogeneous society...

Who does the dirty work in Japan?

Besides, there's plenty of poor Whites in America..... The government should support those on welfare to be funneled into farming, restaurants, constructions, and so forth.... Keep them busy, keep the economy moving, and make them work for their wage.

Many poor Whites do work. Some have two or more jobs and still barely make ends meet.

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

Japan emerged as the economic power house in that part of the world after WW2.
Even the devastating effects of two nuclear blasts barely slowed them down.. So what social phenomena spurred their economic success far beyond the struggling economies of the other Asian countries?
Hint: it couldn't have been race. I see the rejection of Communism as a key to the origins of prosperity in Japanese. Nevertheless, socialized healthcare and
Institutions remained as tenets of the social fabric.

But a shift in the economic paradigm occured when workers swore loyalty to the corporations that employed them. Conversely, the corporations reciprocated. I was astonished to see a hundreds of employees standing in a parking lot saluting a corporate flag while singing a corporate anthem.

The Japanese homogeneity you speak of is an illusion since all Asians are really just extended genetic families of the
Chinese. Language cultural and physical differences aren't all that stark.

Japan industrialized early, as a result they were ahead of others in the region even before WW2, which is why Japan could cause so much damage to China, and Korea.

 

[rightwinger]

 

[PoliticalChic]

....

There's no logic behind your simpleton ideals, ........

AGAIN, you very obviously have NO idea what the word "logic" means.

So, it's logical to support your own to be overrun by inferior people?

You are what's illogical, you seem to be completely hollow, both emotionally, and mentally.

Most of today's immigrants and refugees are not inferior people. Those from Asia. Africa and the middle east own their own businesses and
Usually are well educated. They certainly aren't inferior.

You tell him, Q......Tell him about those superior Asian folks!!!!!!!!!

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

In the U.S.A Corporate power runs the state, in Fascism the state runs Corporate power.

Besides, I don't know why you think Mussolini was so bad?

The U.S.A has killed way more than Mussolini did.

 

[PoliticalChic]

If you weren't such a moron you wouldn't keep putting your foot......FEET...in your mouth.

So glad you bring up the love of Roosevelt's life....Benito Mussolini


1. RexTugwell, FDR's guru, was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described."
Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew."
The NRA was copied wholesale from Mussolini's corporative system.

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48




2. " As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.....

.... Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.”

Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator."
Fascism: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty



3. Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:

"The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill." (p. 280)


QED....FDR & Mussolini, sittin' in a tree.....

Liberals and Fascists.....one and the same.

You....a moron.

 

[JQPublic1]

Over and over....the indoctrinated just can't overcome the propaganda...this: while Communists were Leftwing, the really, really doctrine, Nazism, was Rightwing.
No, it wasn't. It was brithed from the same sourece as communism...Karl Marx.
It authorized slaughter and genocide...as Leftism does.
And dreamed of the very same end stage for society as all six Leftwing views do.

They weren't: both are Leftwing....as is Liberalism, Progressivism, Socialism and Fascism.


1. Where did they learn to fear truth? Liberals, indoctrinated in government schools, hearing nothing but propaganda, raised to worship Franklin Roosevelt, look at the truth as though it were toxic.


2. But....to be a Liberal in good standing, this is the prescribed response when the facts run counter to their worldview: become irate, and attack, attack, attack

These were the retorts of the indoctrinated in a recent thread:

Fascists hate Liberals, and visa versa.

similarities between post 911 Evangelical/Tea Party Republicans and Fascists.

LW being communist (not capitalist), RW being fascist (allied with corporations, capitalist) like Naziism.

The Nazis may have had some quasi-socialist policies, but they were not socialists.

The Nazis simply didn't have a strong economic ideology, in some ways they weren't even true fascists

capitalism thrived under the Nazis.

Hitler and his gang took over a party with Socialist in its name. But when he took over Germany and turned it into a fascist dictatorship, it was anything but socialist.



Clearly Liberals all, and based on their comments, it is difficult to determine whether they are more incensed, or more ignorant.


3. Here's the bottom line...and then I'll prove it: Hitler and the Nazis were Leftwing.
Here's the reason for the propaganda assault by Liberals:
Pre-WWII, Progressives, Liberals, Democrats, were hot to embrace communism, fascism, and the Nazis. In fact, FDR was a pal of Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler. He used Mussolini as his model for the New Deal.


All six of these worldviews are based on the same, un-American view of individuals, individual rights and the final stage of social development.
All six are Leftwing...none are Rightwing.




4. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



When one 'sibling' attacked another, June 21, 1941, FDR had to choose one over the other.
"Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to the Soviet Union." Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48



As I promised.....I will prove the above in this thread.

Nazis were Right wing Socialists.

Unlike Conservatives, the Nazis correctly cracked down on Capitalism for promoting Liberalism.

Conservatives keep getting it wrong, over, and over again.

In other words the Nazis were social conservatives driven by populist hegemonic ideals. For some reason those characteristics seem eerily reminiscent of Trumpism....

Actually, they are directly similar to Liberals.


Watch:

Hitler's Socialist programs:

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.
LIES YOUR TEACHER TAUGHT YOU: Nazi Hitler Economic Social and Political Policies



Get it, you dope?

Your entire worldview is based on lies they've taught you.


Nazis and Communists, Socialists and Fascists, Liberals and Progressives.....all six are Leftwing......

Here is what they taught me.

According to The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics, in liberal democracies, the political Right opposes socialism and social democracy. Right-wing parties include conservatives, Christian democrats, classical liberals, nationalists and, on the far Right, racists and fascists.
Right-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Right-wing_politics

Left-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Left-wing_politics
Left-wing politics supports social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy and social inequality. ... The term left wing can also refer to "the radical, reforming, or socialist section of a political party or system".
‎Egalitarianism · ‎Social equality · ‎Prioritarianism

Looking at those two definitions I don't see how anyone,including you, would fit neatly into either political category.. Some of us, regardless of party affiliation, are fiscal conservatives on the one hand, and liberal on social issues..or vise versa. Just what " wing" do you place people like that on.
Left and right dichotomies don't really apply across the board anymore. Times have changed and so should those archaic terms.
Let's take an updated look at the heart of what was once the bastion of Soviet Communism: Putin, a former KGB agent, has become the darling of western rightwingers.
The reasons are as clear as Hitler's were when he too embraced socialism for Whites only. In a world where White males are becoming increasingly fearful over what they see as an encroachment on their turf, the term rightwing has become an unspoken euphemism for Whitness. The Republicans, under the leadership of Trump, have capitalzed on the same kind of hegemonic populism that spawed Hitler.

See if you can point out any errors in my posts.

Otherwise, the veracity of the thread title has been established.

I will put this question to you and answering it might be fruitful:

What crucial difference separated Nazism from Communism? Follow that up with a plausible explanation for Hitler's hatred and persecu of Communists.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Nazis were Right wing Socialists.

Unlike Conservatives, the Nazis correctly cracked down on Capitalism for promoting Liberalism.

Conservatives keep getting it wrong, over, and over again.

In other words the Nazis were social conservatives driven by populist hegemonic ideals. For some reason those characteristics seem eerily reminiscent of Trumpism....

Actually, they are directly similar to Liberals.


Watch:

Hitler's Socialist programs:

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.
LIES YOUR TEACHER TAUGHT YOU: Nazi Hitler Economic Social and Political Policies



Get it, you dope?

Your entire worldview is based on lies they've taught you.


Nazis and Communists, Socialists and Fascists, Liberals and Progressives.....all six are Leftwing......

Here is what they taught me.

According to The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics, in liberal democracies, the political Right opposes socialism and social democracy. Right-wing parties include conservatives, Christian democrats, classical liberals, nationalists and, on the far Right, racists and fascists.
Right-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Right-wing_politics

Left-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Left-wing_politics
Left-wing politics supports social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy and social inequality. ... The term left wing can also refer to "the radical, reforming, or socialist section of a political party or system".
‎Egalitarianism · ‎Social equality · ‎Prioritarianism

Looking at those two definitions I don't see how anyone,including you, would fit neatly into either political category.. Some of us, regardless of party affiliation, are fiscal conservatives on the one hand, and liberal on social issues..or vise versa. Just what " wing" do you place people like that on.
Left and right dichotomies don't really apply across the board anymore. Times have changed and so should those archaic terms.
Let's take an updated look at the heart of what was once the bastion of Soviet Communism: Putin, a former KGB agent, has become the darling of western rightwingers.
The reasons are as clear as Hitler's were when he too embraced socialism for Whites only. In a world where White males are becoming increasingly fearful over what they see as an encroachment on their turf, the term rightwing has become an unspoken euphemism for Whitness. The Republicans, under the leadership of Trump, have capitalzed on the same kind of hegemonic populism that spawed Hitler.

See if you can point out any errors in my posts.

Otherwise, the veracity of the thread title has been established.

I will put this question to you and answering it might be fruitful:

What crucial difference separated Nazism from Communism? Follow that up with a plausible explanation for Hitler's hatred and persecu of Communists.

Because Nazis were anti-Egalitarian moderate Socialists, while Soviets were pro-Egalitarian extreme Socialists.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Because there are no superior races. There are a few superior individuals in every race but lets face it...most people of any race are just followers living off the reputations of the gifted. American progressives realized that a long time ago and sought to tap into human genius around the world. Making America a place where bright people from everywhere
come to realize their dreams is the essence of our success. Not Whiteness alone.

If an Ethiopian collective, leads to an Ethiopia, then that's something that should be avoided.

You can't blame the sad state of Ethiopia on Colonization, because they weren't colonized.

Besides, while it's true that extremely gifted people who guide society the most are not even 0.1% of any society... However, about 90% are White, and Whitish, (Whitish includes Ashkenazi Jews, Armenians, Italians, and Greeks)
The other 10% are East Asian.
Virtually 0% comes from Africans, Hispanics, or Muslims.

Therefor there must be something about the White elite that's remarkable... To tamper with it by mixing, or replacing it... Could have catastrophic implicat

So which of you "superior" Whites are willing to do the dirty work?

Japan's IQ, and PISA scores are higher than Whites... They remain a highly homogeneous society...

Who does the dirty work in Japan?

Besides, there's plenty of poor Whites in America..... The government should support those on welfare to be funneled into farming, restaurants, constructions, and so forth.... Keep them busy, keep the economy moving, and make them work for their wage.

Many poor Whites do work. Some have two or more jobs and still barely make ends meet.

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

Because of your distateful demeanor I was tempted to leave you to your own devices. You must have noticed that all the other posters have abandoned the thread. However, I do detect a sincere hunger for the truth in you. Let me help.

Between 1976 and 1986 I spent five of that ten year spread in the far east; three in Japan and two in South Korea. Speaking from experience, coupled with a historical review of the symbiotic relationships between Japan, Korea and China, I can tell you that
Chinese and Koreans were the"wetbacks" of Japan. They did the dirty work. That might have changed in recent times to some degree but when I was there that is the way it was.

Japan emerged as the economic power house in that part of the world after WW2.
Even the devastating effects of two nuclear blasts barely slowed them down.. So what social phenomena spurred their economic success far beyond the struggling economies of the other Asian countries?
Hint: it couldn't have been race. I see the rejection of Communism as a key to the origins of prosperity in Japanese. Nevertheless, socialized healthcare and
Institutions remained as tenets of the social fabric.

But a shift in the economic paradigm occured when workers swore loyalty to the corporations that employed them. Conversely, the corporations reciprocated. I was astonished to see a hundreds of employees standing in a parking lot saluting a corporate flag while singing a corporate anthem.

The Japanese homogeneity you speak of is an illusion since all Asians are really just extended genetic families of the
Chinese. Language cultural and physical differences aren't all that stark.

Koreans make up less than 1% of Japan, though.

They're still East Asian like Japanese.

That would be like the U.S.A bringing in Ukrainian refugees to do their dirty work at less than 1% of the population.

DID YOU SAY SOMPIN' ABOUT KOREANS??????

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

If an Ethiopian collective, leads to an Ethiopia, then that's something that should be avoided.

You can't blame the sad state of Ethiopia on Colonization, because they weren't colonized.

Besides, while it's true that extremely gifted people who guide society the most are not even 0.1% of any society... However, about 90% are White, and Whitish, (Whitish includes Ashkenazi Jews, Armenians, Italians, and Greeks)
The other 10% are East Asian.
Virtually 0% comes from Africans, Hispanics, or Muslims.

Therefor there must be something about the White elite that's remarkable... To tamper with it by mixing, or replacing it... Could have catastrophic implicat

Japan's IQ, and PISA scores are higher than Whites... They remain a highly homogeneous society...

Who does the dirty work in Japan?

Besides, there's plenty of poor Whites in America..... The government should support those on welfare to be funneled into farming, restaurants, constructions, and so forth.... Keep them busy, keep the economy moving, and make them work for their wage.

Many poor Whites do work. Some have two or more jobs and still barely make ends meet.

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

Because of your distateful demeanor I was tempted to leave you to your own devices. You must have noticed that all the other posters have abandoned the thread. However, I do detect a sincere hunger for the truth in you. Let me help.

Between 1976 and 1986 I spent five of that ten year spread in the far east; three in Japan and two in South Korea. Speaking from experience, coupled with a historical review of the symbiotic relationships between Japan, Korea and China, I can tell you that
Chinese and Koreans were the"wetbacks" of Japan. They did the dirty work. That might have changed in recent times to some degree but when I was there that is the way it was.

Japan emerged as the economic power house in that part of the world after WW2.
Even the devastating effects of two nuclear blasts barely slowed them down.. So what social phenomena spurred their economic success far beyond the struggling economies of the other Asian countries?
Hint: it couldn't have been race. I see the rejection of Communism as a key to the origins of prosperity in Japanese. Nevertheless, socialized healthcare and
Institutions remained as tenets of the social fabric.

But a shift in the economic paradigm occured when workers swore loyalty to the corporations that employed them. Conversely, the corporations reciprocated. I was astonished to see a hundreds of employees standing in a parking lot saluting a corporate flag while singing a corporate anthem.

The Japanese homogeneity you speak of is an illusion since all Asians are really just extended genetic families of the
Chinese. Language cultural and physical differences aren't all that stark.

Koreans make up less than 1% of Japan, though.

They're still East Asian like Japanese.

That would be like the U.S.A bringing in Ukrainian refugees to do their dirty work at less than 1% of the population.

DID YOU SAY SOMPIN' ABOUT KOREANS??????

Are you Korean? LOL

 

[Pogo]

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nazis were Right wing Socialists.

Unlike Conservatives, the Nazis correctly cracked down on Capitalism for promoting Liberalism.

Conservatives keep getting it wrong, over, and over again.

In other words the Nazis were social conservatives driven by populist hegemonic ideals. For some reason those characteristics seem eerily reminiscent of Trumpism....

Actually, they are directly similar to Liberals.


Watch:

Hitler's Socialist programs:

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.
LIES YOUR TEACHER TAUGHT YOU: Nazi Hitler Economic Social and Political Policies



Get it, you dope?

Your entire worldview is based on lies they've taught you.


Nazis and Communists, Socialists and Fascists, Liberals and Progressives.....all six are Leftwing......

Here is what they taught me.

According to The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics, in liberal democracies, the political Right opposes socialism and social democracy. Right-wing parties include conservatives, Christian democrats, classical liberals, nationalists and, on the far Right, racists and fascists.
Right-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Right-wing_politics

Left-wing politics - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Left-wing_politics
Left-wing politics supports social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy and social inequality. ... The term left wing can also refer to "the radical, reforming, or socialist section of a political party or system".
‎Egalitarianism · ‎Social equality · ‎Prioritarianism

Looking at those two definitions I don't see how anyone,including you, would fit neatly into either political category.. Some of us, regardless of party affiliation, are fiscal conservatives on the one hand, and liberal on social issues..or vise versa. Just what " wing" do you place people like that on.
Left and right dichotomies don't really apply across the board anymore. Times have changed and so should those archaic terms.
Let's take an updated look at the heart of what was once the bastion of Soviet Communism: Putin, a former KGB agent, has become the darling of western rightwingers.
The reasons are as clear as Hitler's were when he too embraced socialism for Whites only. In a world where White males are becoming increasingly fearful over what they see as an encroachment on their turf, the term rightwing has become an unspoken euphemism for Whitness. The Republicans, under the leadership of Trump, have capitalzed on the same kind of hegemonic populism that spawed Hitler.

See if you can point out any errors in my posts.

Otherwise, the veracity of the thread title has been established.

I will put this question to you and answering it might be fruitful:

What crucial difference separated Nazism from Communism? Follow that up with a plausible explanation for Hitler's hatred and persecu of Communists.

Don't be absurd.

Nazism and Communism were siblings.

The contention was about who controlled the nation.


Both Stalin's Bolsheviks.........and Hitler's NationalSocialists..... sprang from Karl Marx.


1. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.



2. Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika.

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.



3. Only after the horrors of Nazism were revealed did Leftists intellectuals pretend that Nazism was not Leftist, and try to dissociate it from their first love, Soviet Communism.....
The new mantra is that communism is Leftwing, Nazism is Rightwing.


4. Although aligned with Fascists and Nazis throughout the pre-war period, Liberals/Progressives/Democrats were suddenly shocked by revelations about their erstwhile allies post-war.

 

[Unkotare]

Even if a superior race, erases an inferior race... It's wrong.

I think it's sad when a people can't showcase their unique customs, facial features, or tell their stories.

Which is obviously a natural reaction.... Only a heartless cold blooded monster would support anyone's heritage to be erased.

I don't judge inferiority by race, i judge that sort of thing on a case by case basis.....

Exactly. One particularly stupid, illogical, Polish Nazi making an ass of himself on the internet doesn't mean all people of Polish ancestry should be disgraced along with him.

I'm clearly way too intelligent for you... ...

I assure you, Adolphski, that every normal person reading this can see what an illogical buffoon you are.

Normal people are pretty dumb.

.....

And you'd have to increase your intelligence tenfold just to reach the level of "normal."

 

[PoliticalChic]

Many poor Whites do work. Some have two or more jobs and still barely make ends meet.

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

Because of your distateful demeanor I was tempted to leave you to your own devices. You must have noticed that all the other posters have abandoned the thread. However, I do detect a sincere hunger for the truth in you. Let me help.

Between 1976 and 1986 I spent five of that ten year spread in the far east; three in Japan and two in South Korea. Speaking from experience, coupled with a historical review of the symbiotic relationships between Japan, Korea and China, I can tell you that
Chinese and Koreans were the"wetbacks" of Japan. They did the dirty work. That might have changed in recent times to some degree but when I was there that is the way it was.

Japan emerged as the economic power house in that part of the world after WW2.
Even the devastating effects of two nuclear blasts barely slowed them down.. So what social phenomena spurred their economic success far beyond the struggling economies of the other Asian countries?
Hint: it couldn't have been race. I see the rejection of Communism as a key to the origins of prosperity in Japanese. Nevertheless, socialized healthcare and
Institutions remained as tenets of the social fabric.

But a shift in the economic paradigm occured when workers swore loyalty to the corporations that employed them. Conversely, the corporations reciprocated. I was astonished to see a hundreds of employees standing in a parking lot saluting a corporate flag while singing a corporate anthem.

The Japanese homogeneity you speak of is an illusion since all Asians are really just extended genetic families of the
Chinese. Language cultural and physical differences aren't all that stark.

Koreans make up less than 1% of Japan, though.

They're still East Asian like Japanese.

That would be like the U.S.A bringing in Ukrainian refugees to do their dirty work at less than 1% of the population.

DID YOU SAY SOMPIN' ABOUT KOREANS??????

Are you Korean? LOL

왜 묻는거야?