Today...Smashing The Lie That Nazis Were Rightwing.

[Pogo]

Hitler in fact climbed over and assaulted, through the SA brownshirts (which he called the "Gymnastics and Sports Division" of the political party simultaneously called "socialist") the existing socialists and communists in order to get into power. And once there the first political prisoners, at Dachau ---- were the communists and socialists. And that's 1933, way before he got involved with Stalin.

Fun inconvenient facts.

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo you have no response.

Exactly. That's why I call 'em "fun inconvenient facts". Inconvenient for you; fun for me.
Also known as a "win-win".

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Sooooooooooooooooooooo you're actually reposting the lack of response, in hope that even more readers will notice the rhetorical vacuum.

Good plan.

"Can't bare the truth" huh? Nice touch. Yep, it's what I do around here ---- bare the truth, when y'all Revisionistas try to dress it up all different.

Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, LF



Did I mention that you're a moron?

Did I mention that your cherrypicked "source" Jonah Goldberg is a duplicitous hack? You know, like yourself?

Just to pick my favorite out of that laundry list --- Liberalism, about which it's obvious Goldberg and you know as much about as I know about the geology of Tasmania.... has nothing to do with "all-encompassing states"; in fact it's the ideological reverse, holding that power derives from the consent of the governed and that aside from basic infrastructural and security givens the State should just get the hell out of the way.

Apparently basic knowledge of basic political science isn't a requirement for getting a book published, any more than it is for starting an internet message board history revision thread.

Jonah Goldberg --- concoctor of the Doublethink term "Liberal Fascism". Which is right up there on the lexicographical junkyard with "cold heat".

 

[whitehall]

The fact of the matter is that you can't use the same terminology to compare American and European political extremes either historically or currently. What seems right wing to Euros can be mainstream or even left wing to Americans. Political cliches can mean different things to Europeans and Americans. Lefties are fond of calling republicans "fascists" when they don't even have a freaking clue that fascism equals government control and that's the opposite of right wing thinking. How can you argue that the Nazis were right wing when the acronym Nazi stands for nationalist socialist?

 

[Unkotare]

Because there are no superior races. There are a few superior individuals in every race but lets face it...most people of any race are just followers living off the reputations of the gifted. American progressives realized that a long time ago and sought to tap into human genius around the world. Making America a place where bright people from everywhere
come to realize their dreams is the essence of our success. Not Whiteness alone.

If an Ethiopian collective, leads to an Ethiopia, then that's something that should be avoided.

You can't blame the sad state of Ethiopia on Colonization, because they weren't colonized.

Besides, while it's true that extremely gifted people who guide society the most are not even 0.1% of any society... However, about 90% are White, and Whitish, (Whitish includes Ashkenazi Jews, Armenians, Italians, and Greeks)
The other 10% are East Asian.
Virtually 0% comes from Africans, Hispanics, or Muslims.

Therefor there must be something about the White elite that's remarkable... To tamper with it by mixing, or replacing it... Could have catastrophic implicat

So which of you "superior" Whites are willing to do the dirty work?

Japan's IQ, and PISA scores are higher than Whites... They remain a highly homogeneous society...

Who does the dirty work in Japan?

Besides, there's plenty of poor Whites in America..... The government should support those on welfare to be funneled into farming, restaurants, constructions, and so forth.... Keep them busy, keep the economy moving, and make them work for their wage.

Many poor Whites do work. Some have two or more jobs and still barely make ends meet.

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

More ignorance.

So, says the guy who's too ignorant to debate, so they just mouth off.

Every mental case insists on being taken seriously, and can't understand why they're not.

 

[Pogo]

The fact of the matter is that you can't use the same terminology to compare American and European political extremes either historically or currently. What seems right wing to Euros can be mainstream or even left wing to Americans. Political cliches can mean different things to Europeans and Americans. Lefties are fond of calling republicans "fascists" when they don't even have a freaking clue that fascism equals government control and that's the opposite of right wing thinking. How can you argue that the Nazis were right wing when the acronym Nazi stands for nationalist socialist?

No, it stands for "National Socialist". Already part of the name when Hitler joined it, and didn't like but he went along with it for the marketing appeal, while proceeding to battle, assault, and eventually imprison the actual socialists.

Or are you actually asking the class that Adolf Hitler, who called his brownshirt thug brigade the "Gymnastics and Sports Division" --- was an honest guy who would never engage in disingenuous euphemism?

Hey --- your call.

It's actually hilarious the way y'all revisionistas insist that the name of the NSDAP absolutely must be taken literally, while at the same time insisting that the name of the US Democratic Party, absolutely must not.

Having it both ways --- Priceless.

 

[Unkotare]

Exactly. One particularly stupid, illogical, Polish Nazi making an ass of himself on the internet doesn't mean all people of Polish ancestry should be disgraced along with him.

I'm clearly way too intelligent for you... ...

I assure you, Adolphski, that every normal person reading this can see what an illogical buffoon you are.

Normal people are pretty dumb.

.....

And you'd have to increase your intelligence tenfold just to reach the level of "normal."

I'm well above normal intelligence...

 

[Unkotare]

If an Ethiopian collective, leads to an Ethiopia, then that's something that should be avoided.

You can't blame the sad state of Ethiopia on Colonization, because they weren't colonized.

Besides, while it's true that extremely gifted people who guide society the most are not even 0.1% of any society... However, about 90% are White, and Whitish, (Whitish includes Ashkenazi Jews, Armenians, Italians, and Greeks)
The other 10% are East Asian.
Virtually 0% comes from Africans, Hispanics, or Muslims.

Therefor there must be something about the White elite that's remarkable... To tamper with it by mixing, or replacing it... Could have catastrophic implicat

Japan's IQ, and PISA scores are higher than Whites... They remain a highly homogeneous society...

Who does the dirty work in Japan?

Besides, there's plenty of poor Whites in America..... The government should support those on welfare to be funneled into farming, restaurants, constructions, and so forth.... Keep them busy, keep the economy moving, and make them work for their wage.

Many poor Whites do work. Some have two or more jobs and still barely make ends meet.

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

Japan emerged as the economic power house in that part of the world after WW2.
Even the devastating effects of two nuclear blasts barely slowed them down.. So what social phenomena spurred their economic success far beyond the struggling economies of the other Asian countries?
Hint: it couldn't have been race. I see the rejection of Communism as a key to the origins of prosperity in Japanese. Nevertheless, socialized healthcare and
Institutions remained as tenets of the social fabric.

But a shift in the economic paradigm occured when workers swore loyalty to the corporations that employed them. Conversely, the corporations reciprocated. I was astonished to see a hundreds of employees standing in a parking lot saluting a corporate flag while singing a corporate anthem.

The Japanese homogeneity you speak of is an illusion since all Asians are really just extended genetic families of the
Chinese. Language cultural and physical differences aren't all that stark.

Japan industrialized early, as a result they were ahead of others in the region even before WW2, which is why Japan could cause so much damage to China, and Korea.

During that era, Japan was ruled by god-kings and feudal lords.Something in that social formula encouraged technological progression. But obviously race wasn't a factor. The Chinese and Koreans were /are basically the same racial stock as the Japanese and just as smart. Japan's advantage had to be related to the synergy
generated by the man gods and their adoring subjects, the latter of which would willingly die for them without hesitation.

You've got your History a little mixed up, and your sociology very mixed up.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Look who's back!

The lying windbag!!!

Hey, remember when you claimed to be a military electronics expert....and I punctured that balloon, you windbag??

.

.

PoliticalChic continues to pepper her posts with little tidbits of dishonest. A poster claimed to be former military and an electronics expert. PC has changed that to claiming the poster claimed to be a military electronics expert. It may seem like a small infraction, but when you start adding the small infractions up they accumulate into a pattern of dishonest.

Oooo.....stubbed your toe again?
That explains the concussion symptoms.

 

[PoliticalChic]

If you weren't such a moron you wouldn't keep putting your foot......FEET...in your mouth.

So glad you bring up the love of Roosevelt's life....Benito Mussolini


1. RexTugwell, FDR's guru, was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described."
Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew."
The NRA was copied wholesale from Mussolini's corporative system.

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48




2. " As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.....

.... Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.”

Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator."
Fascism: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty



3. Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:

"The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill." (p. 280)


QED....FDR & Mussolini, sittin' in a tree.....

Liberals and Fascists.....one and the same.

You....a moron.

As the boards resident fascist, you deny that you voted for President Trumpolini?

"As the boards resident fascist,..."

Let's review...
1. I just proved that FDR and Mussolini were blood brothers.
2. I regularly provide well deserved contumely (better look that up) for both FDR and Mussollini
3. Sooo....your lie is diaphanous (better, you know...look that up).


Why are you Leftists almost always low-life liars?
Is it a requirement?

How do you tell the difference between a Conservative and a Fascist?
.

.

.
You can't


<you can tell that one at your next Bund meeting>

Ooooo.....ooo...I have one: what's the dif between a Liberal and a low-life, dirt-eating, liar???


There is none!

Get it?????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo you have no response.

Exactly. That's why I call 'em "fun inconvenient facts". Inconvenient for you; fun for me.
Also known as a "win-win".

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Sooooooooooooooooooooo you're actually reposting the lack of response, in hope that even more readers will notice the rhetorical vacuum.

Good plan.

"Can't bare the truth" huh? Nice touch. Yep, it's what I do around here ---- bare the truth, when y'all Revisionistas try to dress it up all different.

Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, LF



Did I mention that you're a moron?

Did I mention that your cherrypicked "source" Jonah Goldberg is a duplicitous hack? You know, like yourself?

Just to pick my favorite out of that laundry list --- Liberalism, about which it's obvious Goldberg and you know as much about as I know about the geology of Tasmania.... has nothing to do with "all-encompassing states"; in fact it's the ideological reverse, holding that power derives from the consent of the governed and that aside from basic infrastructural and security givens the State should just get the hell out of the way.

Apparently basic knowledge of basic political science isn't a requirement for getting a book published, any more than it is for starting an internet message board history revision thread.

Jonah Goldberg --- concoctor of the Doublethink term "Liberal Fascism". Which is right up there on the lexicographical junkyard with "cold heat".

Liberals and Nazis....very same programs:

"The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the régime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.


The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.”[4]


The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5]One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible “for travellers’ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; ‘support’ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.”


These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans “the highest possible standard of living.” National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia




Know why?

Very same origins and doctrines.



Did I mention that you're a moron?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The fact of the matter is that you can't use the same terminology to compare American and European political extremes either historically or currently. What seems right wing to Euros can be mainstream or even left wing to Americans. Political cliches can mean different things to Europeans and Americans. Lefties are fond of calling republicans "fascists" when they don't even have a freaking clue that fascism equals government control and that's the opposite of right wing thinking. How can you argue that the Nazis were right wing when the acronym Nazi stands for nationalist socialist?

No, it stands for "National Socialist". Already part of the name when Hitler joined it, and didn't like but he went along with it for the marketing appeal, while proceeding to battle, assault, and eventually imprison the actual socialists.

Or are you actually asking the class that Adolf Hitler, who called his brownshirt thug brigade the "Gymnastics and Sports Division" --- was an honest guy who would never engage in disingenuous euphemism?

Hey --- your call.

It's actually hilarious the way y'all revisionistas insist that the name of the NSDAP absolutely must be taken literally, while at the same time insisting that the name of the US Democratic Party, absolutely must not.

Having it both ways --- Priceless.

Nazism and Liberalism.....two totalitarian doctrines.


"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian


1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.


2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?


3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.


4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners."




Oh....I forgot to mention: You're a moron.

 

[Unkotare]

Many poor Whites do work. Some have two or more jobs and still barely make ends meet.

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

Japan emerged as the economic power house in that part of the world after WW2.
Even the devastating effects of two nuclear blasts barely slowed them down.. So what social phenomena spurred their economic success far beyond the struggling economies of the other Asian countries?
Hint: it couldn't have been race. I see the rejection of Communism as a key to the origins of prosperity in Japanese. Nevertheless, socialized healthcare and
Institutions remained as tenets of the social fabric.

But a shift in the economic paradigm occured when workers swore loyalty to the corporations that employed them. Conversely, the corporations reciprocated. I was astonished to see a hundreds of employees standing in a parking lot saluting a corporate flag while singing a corporate anthem.

The Japanese homogeneity you speak of is an illusion since all Asians are really just extended genetic families of the
Chinese. Language cultural and physical differences aren't all that stark.

Japan industrialized early, as a result they were ahead of others in the region even before WW2, which is why Japan could cause so much damage to China, and Korea.

During that era, Japan was ruled by god-kings and feudal lords.Something in that social formula encouraged technological progression. But obviously race wasn't a factor. The Chinese and Koreans were /are basically the same racial stock as the Japanese and just as smart. Japan's advantage had to be related to the synergy
generated by the man gods and their adoring subjects, the latter of which would willingly die for them without hesitation.

I suspect it has mostly to do with war, war disproportionately targets the elite, as a result the elite start to vanish.

In the case of Japan, and also Britain in Europe, they simply avoided much war, by being protected on islands.

In dealing with Japanese, and Brits online they tend to be quite more stupid than their neighbors, but their elite obviously isn't.

More ignorance from the Polish Nazi.

 

[Unkotare]

I will put this question to you and answering it might be fruitful:

What crucial difference separated Nazism from Communism? Follow that up with a plausible explanation for Hitler's hatred and persecu of Communists.

Hitler in fact climbed over and assaulted, through the SA brownshirts (which he called the "Gymnastics and Sports Division" of the political party simultaneously called "socialist") the existing socialists and communists in order to get into power. And once there the first political prisoners, at Dachau ---- were the communists and socialists. And that's 1933, way before he got involved with Stalin.

Fun inconvenient facts.

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo you have no response.

Exactly. That's why I call 'em "fun inconvenient facts". Inconvenient for you; fun for me.
Also known as a "win-win".

Here's a fact: you're a moron.

You can't bare the truth: this ->

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.

After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.”

This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

.....Yep, it's what I do around here ---- bare the truth, ...

YOU?!

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

Japan emerged as the economic power house in that part of the world after WW2.
Even the devastating effects of two nuclear blasts barely slowed them down.. So what social phenomena spurred their economic success far beyond the struggling economies of the other Asian countries?
Hint: it couldn't have been race. I see the rejection of Communism as a key to the origins of prosperity in Japanese. Nevertheless, socialized healthcare and
Institutions remained as tenets of the social fabric.

But a shift in the economic paradigm occured when workers swore loyalty to the corporations that employed them. Conversely, the corporations reciprocated. I was astonished to see a hundreds of employees standing in a parking lot saluting a corporate flag while singing a corporate anthem.

The Japanese homogeneity you speak of is an illusion since all Asians are really just extended genetic families of the
Chinese. Language cultural and physical differences aren't all that stark.

Japan industrialized early, as a result they were ahead of others in the region even before WW2, which is why Japan could cause so much damage to China, and Korea.

During that era, Japan was ruled by god-kings and feudal lords.Something in that social formula encouraged technological progression. But obviously race wasn't a factor. The Chinese and Koreans were /are basically the same racial stock as the Japanese and just as smart. Japan's advantage had to be related to the synergy
generated by the man gods and their adoring subjects, the latter of which would willingly die for them without hesitation.

I suspect it has mostly to do with war, war disproportionately targets the elite, as a result the elite start to vanish.

In the case of Japan, and also Britain in Europe, they simply avoided much war, by being protected on islands.

In dealing with Japanese, and Brits online they tend to be quite more stupid than their neighbors, but their elite obviously isn't.

I see you have abandoned the false hypothesis that race is a factor in the economic status of a homogeneous nation.
Africa had it's kings and great civilizations;
and, the hieroglyphs depict that the earliest
Kings and Pharaohs were Black Africans.
Osiris, chief of the nilotic pantheon, is frequently found painted in acient black pigment.

1.) What has Egypt done lately?

2.) Why is Egypt behind some nations which gained their independence later such as Estonia, or Israel, or some nations that were much more abused in the 20th century like China, or Poland?

3.) Egyptians aren't, and weren't Black, or White, but more like Arabs, even DNA analysis proves it, and the depictions clearly don't show a Black people, when you look at how Egyptians depicted themselves as Reddish, and long nosed, as opposed to Nubians as Black, and puggy nosed.

4.) Egyptians have cranial capacities similar to Northern Europeans according to the work from Beals.

5.) Egyptians had a huge head start in their population size, while Ancient Egypt had over 1 million at it's start roughly 4,000 - 5,000 years ago, Britain didn't gain over 1 million until almost 1,000 AD/

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

Japan emerged as the economic power house in that part of the world after WW2.
Even the devastating effects of two nuclear blasts barely slowed them down.. So what social phenomena spurred their economic success far beyond the struggling economies of the other Asian countries?
Hint: it couldn't have been race. I see the rejection of Communism as a key to the origins of prosperity in Japanese. Nevertheless, socialized healthcare and
Institutions remained as tenets of the social fabric.

But a shift in the economic paradigm occured when workers swore loyalty to the corporations that employed them. Conversely, the corporations reciprocated. I was astonished to see a hundreds of employees standing in a parking lot saluting a corporate flag while singing a corporate anthem.

The Japanese homogeneity you speak of is an illusion since all Asians are really just extended genetic families of the
Chinese. Language cultural and physical differences aren't all that stark.

Japan industrialized early, as a result they were ahead of others in the region even before WW2, which is why Japan could cause so much damage to China, and Korea.

During that era, Japan was ruled by god-kings and feudal lords.Something in that social formula encouraged technological progression. But obviously race wasn't a factor. The Chinese and Koreans were /are basically the same racial stock as the Japanese and just as smart. Japan's advantage had to be related to the synergy
generated by the man gods and their adoring subjects, the latter of which would willingly die for them without hesitation.

I suspect it has mostly to do with war, war disproportionately targets the elite, as a result the elite start to vanish.

In the case of Japan, and also Britain in Europe, they simply avoided much war, by being protected on islands.

In dealing with Japanese, and Brits online they tend to be quite more stupid than their neighbors, but their elite obviously isn't.

More ignorance from the Polish Nazi.

Do you leave any comments without insults?
All you do is mouth off, and you think you're so smart, and tough for supporting the demise of your own people.

I think you're a projecting clown, who insults people to make up for their sub-Human demeanor, and who just uses anti-Racism as a pretext to think they're so sophisticated, which is a load of crock, you're a sub-Human through, and through.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

If you weren't such a moron you wouldn't keep putting your foot......FEET...in your mouth.

So glad you bring up the love of Roosevelt's life....Benito Mussolini


1. RexTugwell, FDR's guru, was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described."
Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew."
The NRA was copied wholesale from Mussolini's corporative system.

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48




2. " As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.....

.... Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.”

Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator."
Fascism: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty



3. Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:

"The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill." (p. 280)


QED....FDR & Mussolini, sittin' in a tree.....

Liberals and Fascists.....one and the same.

You....a moron.

As the boards resident fascist, you deny that you voted for President Trumpolini?

"As the boards resident fascist,..."

Let's review...
1. I just proved that FDR and Mussolini were blood brothers.
2. I regularly provide well deserved contumely (better look that up) for both FDR and Mussollini
3. Sooo....your lie is diaphanous (better, you know...look that up).


Why are you Leftists almost always low-life liars?
Is it a requirement?

How do you tell the difference between a Conservative and a Fascist?
.

.

.
You can't


<you can tell that one at your next Bund meeting>

Neo-Fascists are typically way more Nationalistic, Racist, and Socialist than Conservatives.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

If an Ethiopian collective, leads to an Ethiopia, then that's something that should be avoided.

You can't blame the sad state of Ethiopia on Colonization, because they weren't colonized.

Besides, while it's true that extremely gifted people who guide society the most are not even 0.1% of any society... However, about 90% are White, and Whitish, (Whitish includes Ashkenazi Jews, Armenians, Italians, and Greeks)
The other 10% are East Asian.
Virtually 0% comes from Africans, Hispanics, or Muslims.

Therefor there must be something about the White elite that's remarkable... To tamper with it by mixing, or replacing it... Could have catastrophic implicat

Japan's IQ, and PISA scores are higher than Whites... They remain a highly homogeneous society...

Who does the dirty work in Japan?

Besides, there's plenty of poor Whites in America..... The government should support those on welfare to be funneled into farming, restaurants, constructions, and so forth.... Keep them busy, keep the economy moving, and make them work for their wage.

Many poor Whites do work. Some have two or more jobs and still barely make ends meet.

There's millions of unemployed Whites, though.

But, why not answer why smarter Japan doesn't have to import riff-raff to do their dirty-work?

More ignorance.

So, says the guy who's too ignorant to debate, so they just mouth off.

Every mental case insists on being taken seriously, and can't understand why they're not.

No one takes you seriously, because you're a sub-Human troll, who just insults people, while refusing to debate because you're too dull witted.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I'm clearly way too intelligent for you... ...

I assure you, Adolphski, that every normal person reading this can see what an illogical buffoon you are.

Normal people are pretty dumb.

.....

And you'd have to increase your intelligence tenfold just to reach the level of "normal."

I'm well above normal intelligence...

I think you stand against racism, because you know many racists don't like the mentally challenged like yourself.

 

[Dragonlady]

The fact of the matter is that you can't use the same terminology to compare American and European political extremes either historically or currently. What seems right wing to Euros can be mainstream or even left wing to Americans. Political cliches can mean different things to Europeans and Americans. Lefties are fond of calling republicans "fascists" when they don't even have a freaking clue that fascism equals government control and that's the opposite of right wing thinking. How can you argue that the Nazis were right wing when the acronym Nazi stands for nationalist socialist?

No, it stands for "National Socialist". Already part of the name when Hitler joined it, and didn't like but he went along with it for the marketing appeal, while proceeding to battle, assault, and eventually imprison the actual socialists.

Or are you actually asking the class that Adolf Hitler, who called his brownshirt thug brigade the "Gymnastics and Sports Division" --- was an honest guy who would never engage in disingenuous euphemism?

Hey --- your call.

It's actually hilarious the way y'all revisionistas insist that the name of the NSDAP absolutely must be taken literally, while at the same time insisting that the name of the US Democratic Party, absolutely must not.

Having it both ways --- Priceless.

Nazism and Liberalism.....two totalitarian doctrines.


"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian


1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.


2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?


3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.


4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners."




Oh....I forgot to mention: You're a moron.

Your moronic repetition of the same lies, over and over will NEVER make it true.

Nazis are extreme right-wing conservatives. You OWN the Nazi Party, the KKK, and the white supremacists.

All of the nasty things that live under rocks are all out in the light of day, invited by Trump.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

The fact of the matter is that you can't use the same terminology to compare American and European political extremes either historically or currently. What seems right wing to Euros can be mainstream or even left wing to Americans. Political cliches can mean different things to Europeans and Americans. Lefties are fond of calling republicans "fascists" when they don't even have a freaking clue that fascism equals government control and that's the opposite of right wing thinking. How can you argue that the Nazis were right wing when the acronym Nazi stands for nationalist socialist?

No, it stands for "National Socialist". Already part of the name when Hitler joined it, and didn't like but he went along with it for the marketing appeal, while proceeding to battle, assault, and eventually imprison the actual socialists.

Or are you actually asking the class that Adolf Hitler, who called his brownshirt thug brigade the "Gymnastics and Sports Division" --- was an honest guy who would never engage in disingenuous euphemism?

Hey --- your call.

It's actually hilarious the way y'all revisionistas insist that the name of the NSDAP absolutely must be taken literally, while at the same time insisting that the name of the US Democratic Party, absolutely must not.

Having it both ways --- Priceless.

Nazism and Liberalism.....two totalitarian doctrines.


"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian


1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.


2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?


3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.


4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners."




Oh....I forgot to mention: You're a moron.

Your moronic repetition of the same lies, over and over will NEVER make it true.

Nazis are extreme right-wing conservatives. You OWN the Nazi Party, the KKK, and the white supremacists.

All of the nasty things that live under rocks are all out in the light of day, invited by Trump.

But, the most nasty thing on this forum isn't a Racist, but rather an anti-Racist named Unkotare.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

The fact of the matter is that you can't use the same terminology to compare American and European political extremes either historically or currently. What seems right wing to Euros can be mainstream or even left wing to Americans. Political cliches can mean different things to Europeans and Americans. Lefties are fond of calling republicans "fascists" when they don't even have a freaking clue that fascism equals government control and that's the opposite of right wing thinking. How can you argue that the Nazis were right wing when the acronym Nazi stands for nationalist socialist?

No, it stands for "National Socialist". Already part of the name when Hitler joined it, and didn't like but he went along with it for the marketing appeal, while proceeding to battle, assault, and eventually imprison the actual socialists.

Or are you actually asking the class that Adolf Hitler, who called his brownshirt thug brigade the "Gymnastics and Sports Division" --- was an honest guy who would never engage in disingenuous euphemism?

Hey --- your call.

It's actually hilarious the way y'all revisionistas insist that the name of the NSDAP absolutely must be taken literally, while at the same time insisting that the name of the US Democratic Party, absolutely must not.

Having it both ways --- Priceless.

Nazism and Liberalism.....two totalitarian doctrines.


"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian


1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.


2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?


3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.


4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners."




Oh....I forgot to mention: You're a moron.

Many Capitalist Wall street financiers funded both the Soviets, and the Nazis, anyways.