Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol, Says "todays gop" but the liar posts his "proof" from an article from 1989! lmao.
[
You do have historians by the hundreds.
Yet, when I call you to support what those "hundreds of historians" claim,
the best you have is "goldwater voted against a bill that passed" and some rhetoric.
You do not flip a region from one party to the next with weak shit like that.
The Dems were a split party, comprised on liberal elites in the north buying the votes of poor immigrants with social spending and a machine in the south, based on the declining power of white racism.
When it gave up that unnatural alliance, the racists has no where to go. They were left without a voice.
BUT, teh South, without the alliance between the part machine and the racists, really had nothing to hold it to the liberal north eastern dems who dominated the national party.
Especially with the way the south has been changing, becoming more urban and less poor, relatively speaking.
YOu can't support the claims of those hundreds of historians because the claims are false.
I have supported it, while all you have done is said "nuh uh".
The racists didn't have no where to go when Democrats abandoned them and supported the Civil Rights Act... they went to the Republicans that kept taking about State's Rights and fielded a candidate that opposed it.
...
I have the facts, evidence and history...you have " nuh uh". I have the words of Nixon's own syrategist. You have "nuh uh".[
You do have historians by the hundreds.
Yet, when I call you to support what those "hundreds of historians" claim,
the best you have is "goldwater voted against a bill that passed" and some rhetoric.
You do not flip a region from one party to the next with weak shit like that.
The Dems were a split party, comprised on liberal elites in the north buying the votes of poor immigrants with social spending and a machine in the south, based on the declining power of white racism.
When it gave up that unnatural alliance, the racists has no where to go. They were left without a voice.
BUT, teh South, without the alliance between the part machine and the racists, really had nothing to hold it to the liberal north eastern dems who dominated the national party.
Especially with the way the south has been changing, becoming more urban and less poor, relatively speaking.
YOu can't support the claims of those hundreds of historians because the claims are false.
I have supported it, while all you have done is said "nuh uh".
The racists didn't have no where to go when Democrats abandoned them and supported the Civil Rights Act... they went to the Republicans that kept taking about State's Rights and fielded a candidate that opposed it.
...
No, they didn't. The new gop votes were in the more progressive cities and middle class.
The old rural democrats stayed in the party till they died out, and were replaced by the next generation, decades later.
When you went looking for examples to support the southern strategy, you thought you would find all kind of policies that you would point to, did you not?
But, all you got is one vote and magic code words.
I have the facts, evidence and history...you have " nuh uh". I have the words of Nixon's own syrategist. You have "nuh uh".[
You do have historians by the hundreds.
Yet, when I call you to support what those "hundreds of historians" claim,
the best you have is "goldwater voted against a bill that passed" and some rhetoric.
You do not flip a region from one party to the next with weak shit like that.
The Dems were a split party, comprised on liberal elites in the north buying the votes of poor immigrants with social spending and a machine in the south, based on the declining power of white racism.
When it gave up that unnatural alliance, the racists has no where to go. They were left without a voice.
BUT, teh South, without the alliance between the part machine and the racists, really had nothing to hold it to the liberal north eastern dems who dominated the national party.
Especially with the way the south has been changing, becoming more urban and less poor, relatively speaking.
YOu can't support the claims of those hundreds of historians because the claims are false.
I have supported it, while all you have done is said "nuh uh".
The racists didn't have no where to go when Democrats abandoned them and supported the Civil Rights Act... they went to the Republicans that kept taking about State's Rights and fielded a candidate that opposed it.
...
No, they didn't. The new gop votes were in the more progressive cities and middle class.
The old rural democrats stayed in the party till they died out, and were replaced by the next generation, decades later.
When you went looking for examples to support the southern strategy, you thought you would find all kind of policies that you would point to, did you not?
But, all you got is one vote and magic code words.
You seem to think they had to say out loud "hey racist white southerners, the GOP has a home for you. " or else it didn't happen. It happened.
This is all little more than professional wrestling.Says the guy who has provided zero to support his claims. Mounds of evidence, but you think "pooh, pooh" is a valid argument?What a joke.
I have the facts, evidence and history...you have " nuh uh". I have the words of Nixon's own syrategist. You have "nuh uh".[
You do have historians by the hundreds.
Yet, when I call you to support what those "hundreds of historians" claim,
the best you have is "goldwater voted against a bill that passed" and some rhetoric.
You do not flip a region from one party to the next with weak shit like that.
The Dems were a split party, comprised on liberal elites in the north buying the votes of poor immigrants with social spending and a machine in the south, based on the declining power of white racism.
When it gave up that unnatural alliance, the racists has no where to go. They were left without a voice.
BUT, teh South, without the alliance between the part machine and the racists, really had nothing to hold it to the liberal north eastern dems who dominated the national party.
Especially with the way the south has been changing, becoming more urban and less poor, relatively speaking.
YOu can't support the claims of those hundreds of historians because the claims are false.
I have supported it, while all you have done is said "nuh uh".
The racists didn't have no where to go when Democrats abandoned them and supported the Civil Rights Act... they went to the Republicans that kept taking about State's Rights and fielded a candidate that opposed it.
...
No, they didn't. The new gop votes were in the more progressive cities and middle class.
The old rural democrats stayed in the party till they died out, and were replaced by the next generation, decades later.
When you went looking for examples to support the southern strategy, you thought you would find all kind of policies that you would point to, did you not?
But, all you got is one vote and magic code words.
You seem to think they had to say out loud "hey racist white southerners, the GOP has a home for you. " or else it didn't happen. It happened.
I'm asking you to support the claim that the gop pandered to southern racists. So far you have offered ONE vote by Goldwater and rhetoric.
To really support the claim we need major policy or large scale spending over decades.
You don't flip whole states with a failed vote to stop passage and empty words.
Pointing to lot so people that believe as you believe, while not being able to support the claim, just shows that it is a SUCCESSFUL LIE, not that it is true.
You have facts?I have the facts, evidence and history...you have " nuh uh". I have the words of Nixon's own syrategist. You have "nuh uh".[
You do have historians by the hundreds.
Yet, when I call you to support what those "hundreds of historians" claim,
the best you have is "goldwater voted against a bill that passed" and some rhetoric.
You do not flip a region from one party to the next with weak shit like that.
The Dems were a split party, comprised on liberal elites in the north buying the votes of poor immigrants with social spending and a machine in the south, based on the declining power of white racism.
When it gave up that unnatural alliance, the racists has no where to go. They were left without a voice.
BUT, teh South, without the alliance between the part machine and the racists, really had nothing to hold it to the liberal north eastern dems who dominated the national party.
Especially with the way the south has been changing, becoming more urban and less poor, relatively speaking.
YOu can't support the claims of those hundreds of historians because the claims are false.
I have supported it, while all you have done is said "nuh uh".
The racists didn't have no where to go when Democrats abandoned them and supported the Civil Rights Act... they went to the Republicans that kept taking about State's Rights and fielded a candidate that opposed it.
...
No, they didn't. The new gop votes were in the more progressive cities and middle class.
The old rural democrats stayed in the party till they died out, and were replaced by the next generation, decades later.
When you went looking for examples to support the southern strategy, you thought you would find all kind of policies that you would point to, did you not?
But, all you got is one vote and magic code words.
You seem to think they had to say out loud "hey racist white southerners, the GOP has a home for you. " or else it didn't happen. It happened.
No, Southerners opposed it. It was a North vs South issue.You have facts?I have the facts, evidence and history...you have " nuh uh". I have the words of Nixon's own syrategist. You have "nuh uh".[
You do have historians by the hundreds.
Yet, when I call you to support what those "hundreds of historians" claim,
the best you have is "goldwater voted against a bill that passed" and some rhetoric.
You do not flip a region from one party to the next with weak shit like that.
The Dems were a split party, comprised on liberal elites in the north buying the votes of poor immigrants with social spending and a machine in the south, based on the declining power of white racism.
When it gave up that unnatural alliance, the racists has no where to go. They were left without a voice.
BUT, teh South, without the alliance between the part machine and the racists, really had nothing to hold it to the liberal north eastern dems who dominated the national party.
Especially with the way the south has been changing, becoming more urban and less poor, relatively speaking.
YOu can't support the claims of those hundreds of historians because the claims are false.
I have supported it, while all you have done is said "nuh uh".
The racists didn't have no where to go when Democrats abandoned them and supported the Civil Rights Act... they went to the Republicans that kept taking about State's Rights and fielded a candidate that opposed it.
...
No, they didn't. The new gop votes were in the more progressive cities and middle class.
The old rural democrats stayed in the party till they died out, and were replaced by the next generation, decades later.
When you went looking for examples to support the southern strategy, you thought you would find all kind of policies that you would point to, did you not?
But, all you got is one vote and magic code words.
You seem to think they had to say out loud "hey racist white southerners, the GOP has a home for you. " or else it didn't happen. It happened.
Here are some facts for ya:
Dims filibustered the Civil Rights Act, led by Veggie Joe's mentor and Al Gore's dad.
Dims had a KKK leader in the Senate until 2010.
The KKK endorsed and donated to Hitlery.
White Supremacists endorsed Veggie Joe.
The Dim party is the party of racists.
Dimwingers filibustered it.No, Southerners opposed it. It was a North vs South issue.You have facts?I have the facts, evidence and history...you have " nuh uh". I have the words of Nixon's own syrategist. You have "nuh uh".[
You do have historians by the hundreds.
Yet, when I call you to support what those "hundreds of historians" claim,
the best you have is "goldwater voted against a bill that passed" and some rhetoric.
You do not flip a region from one party to the next with weak shit like that.
The Dems were a split party, comprised on liberal elites in the north buying the votes of poor immigrants with social spending and a machine in the south, based on the declining power of white racism.
When it gave up that unnatural alliance, the racists has no where to go. They were left without a voice.
BUT, teh South, without the alliance between the part machine and the racists, really had nothing to hold it to the liberal north eastern dems who dominated the national party.
Especially with the way the south has been changing, becoming more urban and less poor, relatively speaking.
YOu can't support the claims of those hundreds of historians because the claims are false.
I have supported it, while all you have done is said "nuh uh".
The racists didn't have no where to go when Democrats abandoned them and supported the Civil Rights Act... they went to the Republicans that kept taking about State's Rights and fielded a candidate that opposed it.
...
No, they didn't. The new gop votes were in the more progressive cities and middle class.
The old rural democrats stayed in the party till they died out, and were replaced by the next generation, decades later.
When you went looking for examples to support the southern strategy, you thought you would find all kind of policies that you would point to, did you not?
But, all you got is one vote and magic code words.
You seem to think they had to say out loud "hey racist white southerners, the GOP has a home for you. " or else it didn't happen. It happened.
Here are some facts for ya:
Dims filibustered the Civil Rights Act, led by Veggie Joe's mentor and Al Gore's dad.
Dims had a KKK leader in the Senate until 2010.
The KKK endorsed and donated to Hitlery.
White Supremacists endorsed Veggie Joe.
The Dim party is the party of racists.
YOUR party is the party of racists, Dummy.Republicans wrongly believe that the rest of America is as bigoted, racist and white supremacist as they are.
They'll soon come to realize the error of their ways when their party comes to screeching halt in '22.
Trump's entire legitimacy as a leader is based on the lie that somehow this election was stolen from him ... in gop states, by gop state party officials who actually voted for him, after gop state legislatures made it easier to mail in votes during a pandemic he ignored.This is all little more than professional wrestling.Says the guy who has provided zero to support his claims. Mounds of evidence, but you think "pooh, pooh" is a valid argument?What a joke.
Where this country is, on this topic, today, is clear. The Trumpsters are going to deny it all day, and therefore they're going to enable it, all day.
They don't see a thing.
Right now the conversation is little more than noise. Sadly.
This is all little more than professional wrestling.Says the guy who has provided zero to support his claims. Mounds of evidence, but you think "pooh, pooh" is a valid argument?What a joke.
Where this country is, on this topic, today, is clear. The Trumpsters are going to deny it all day, and therefore they're going to enable it, all day.
They don't see a thing.
Right now the conversation is little more than noise. Sadly.
I have the facts, evidence and history...you have " nuh uh". I have the words of Nixon's own syrategist. You have "nuh uh".[
You do have historians by the hundreds.
Yet, when I call you to support what those "hundreds of historians" claim,
the best you have is "goldwater voted against a bill that passed" and some rhetoric.
You do not flip a region from one party to the next with weak shit like that.
The Dems were a split party, comprised on liberal elites in the north buying the votes of poor immigrants with social spending and a machine in the south, based on the declining power of white racism.
When it gave up that unnatural alliance, the racists has no where to go. They were left without a voice.
BUT, teh South, without the alliance between the part machine and the racists, really had nothing to hold it to the liberal north eastern dems who dominated the national party.
Especially with the way the south has been changing, becoming more urban and less poor, relatively speaking.
YOu can't support the claims of those hundreds of historians because the claims are false.
I have supported it, while all you have done is said "nuh uh".
The racists didn't have no where to go when Democrats abandoned them and supported the Civil Rights Act... they went to the Republicans that kept taking about State's Rights and fielded a candidate that opposed it.
...
No, they didn't. The new gop votes were in the more progressive cities and middle class.
The old rural democrats stayed in the party till they died out, and were replaced by the next generation, decades later.
When you went looking for examples to support the southern strategy, you thought you would find all kind of policies that you would point to, did you not?
But, all you got is one vote and magic code words.
You seem to think they had to say out loud "hey racist white southerners, the GOP has a home for you. " or else it didn't happen. It happened.
I'm asking you to support the claim that the gop pandered to southern racists. So far you have offered ONE vote by Goldwater and rhetoric.
To really support the claim we need major policy or large scale spending over decades.
You don't flip whole states with a failed vote to stop passage and empty words.
Pointing to lot so people that believe as you believe, while not being able to support the claim, just shows that it is a SUCCESSFUL LIE, not that it is true.
Trump has proven that rhetoric is all you need.
Was Robert Byrd ever censured?
This is all little more than professional wrestling.Says the guy who has provided zero to support his claims. Mounds of evidence, but you think "pooh, pooh" is a valid argument?What a joke.
Where this country is, on this topic, today, is clear. The Trumpsters are going to deny it all day, and therefore they're going to enable it, all day.
They don't see a thing.
Right now the conversation is little more than noise. Sadly.
Seawytch is trying to support the Southern Strategy claim.
So far, he has pointed to one vote against a civil rights bill and rhetoric.
NO actual policies. No money. NOthing, really big at all. But he thinks he is doing a great job.
You want to give it a shot?
That was a rhetorical question, of course.