Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People are responsible for increasing their own wages
Anyone can start making more money tomorrow if they want to
Where do you get this Bullshit?
And writing off business expenses is not a loophole.
LMAO. Then if writing business expenses off doesn't let you use a tax code advantage for business owners, why do you use It?
People who pay ZERO income tax when they have an income are getting a free ride
You poor baby. You ever notice how jealous you are of the poorest wage earners? It's weird.
Low wage earners use the tax code to their advantage just like you do.
I guess you will claim that IF you could write down your business profits to the point you owed no tax, you wouldn't do that. It would mean you got a free ride.
And you wouldn't do that would you.
LMAO.
Have you seen the debt? They need to.
Well then, follow your own advice. Next time you need your house painted and get three bids, make sure you hire the most expensive company. Or if you go out and get house insurance. Make sure you select the insurance company that has the highest premium.
Lead by example if you really think that employers should pay more money to employees than they are worth.
I think they should pay what they are worth, not collude to pay them less as in all the examples I provided.
That link you gave me was about companies agreeing not to poach high paid employees from each other not about colluding to lower wages for all their employees
So you really don't understand how workers get paid more in capitalism then.
It was not collusion to keep all their employees wages down as you claim but rather it was about non compete clauses
big difference
Well then, follow your own advice. Next time you need your house painted and get three bids, make sure you hire the most expensive company. Or if you go out and get house insurance. Make sure you select the insurance company that has the highest premium.
Lead by example if you really think that employers should pay more money to employees than they are worth.
I think they should pay what they are worth, not collude to pay them less as in all the examples I provided.
That link you gave me was about companies agreeing not to poach high paid employees from each other not about colluding to lower wages for all their employees
So you really don't understand how workers get paid more in capitalism then.
It was not collusion to keep all their employees wages down as you claim but rather it was about non compete clauses
big difference
No it isn't a big difference. Companies pay less if they don't have to worry about losing workers. You really don't understand how capitalism is supposed to work.
I think they should pay what they are worth, not collude to pay them less as in all the examples I provided.
That link you gave me was about companies agreeing not to poach high paid employees from each other not about colluding to lower wages for all their employees
So you really don't understand how workers get paid more in capitalism then.
It was not collusion to keep all their employees wages down as you claim but rather it was about non compete clauses
big difference
No it isn't a big difference. Companies pay less if they don't have to worry about losing workers. You really don't understand how capitalism is supposed to work.
It didn't impact every employee as you were saying
so it was no big deal and they still had to worry about losing people because they could have gone to any one of hundreds of IT companies that exist
That link you gave me was about companies agreeing not to poach high paid employees from each other not about colluding to lower wages for all their employees
So you really don't understand how workers get paid more in capitalism then.
It was not collusion to keep all their employees wages down as you claim but rather it was about non compete clauses
big difference
No it isn't a big difference. Companies pay less if they don't have to worry about losing workers. You really don't understand how capitalism is supposed to work.
It didn't impact every employee as you were saying
so it was no big deal and they still had to worry about losing people because they could have gone to any one of hundreds of IT companies that exist
Not the largest companies. What they were doing is illegal for a reason. Go learn about capitalism and then come discuss.
So you really don't understand how workers get paid more in capitalism then.
It was not collusion to keep all their employees wages down as you claim but rather it was about non compete clauses
big difference
No it isn't a big difference. Companies pay less if they don't have to worry about losing workers. You really don't understand how capitalism is supposed to work.
It didn't impact every employee as you were saying
so it was no big deal and they still had to worry about losing people because they could have gone to any one of hundreds of IT companies that exist
Not the largest companies. What they were doing is illegal for a reason. Go learn about capitalism and then come discuss.
Regardless of what you clam the law suit did not mention wage manipulation and like I said any of those employees could have left those companies at any time for work in what is the fastest growing industry in the country
Those 3 companies did not have any effect on the wages of anyone
It was not collusion to keep all their employees wages down as you claim but rather it was about non compete clauses
big difference
No it isn't a big difference. Companies pay less if they don't have to worry about losing workers. You really don't understand how capitalism is supposed to work.
It didn't impact every employee as you were saying
so it was no big deal and they still had to worry about losing people because they could have gone to any one of hundreds of IT companies that exist
Not the largest companies. What they were doing is illegal for a reason. Go learn about capitalism and then come discuss.
Regardless of what you clam the law suit did not mention wage manipulation and like I said any of those employees could have left those companies at any time for work in what is the fastest growing industry in the country
Those 3 companies did not have any effect on the wages of anyone
Anyone who understands capitalism knows that holds down wages. Go learn something moron. You are a crony capitalist.
No it isn't a big difference. Companies pay less if they don't have to worry about losing workers. You really don't understand how capitalism is supposed to work.
It didn't impact every employee as you were saying
so it was no big deal and they still had to worry about losing people because they could have gone to any one of hundreds of IT companies that exist
Not the largest companies. What they were doing is illegal for a reason. Go learn about capitalism and then come discuss.
Regardless of what you clam the law suit did not mention wage manipulation and like I said any of those employees could have left those companies at any time for work in what is the fastest growing industry in the country
Those 3 companies did not have any effect on the wages of anyone
Anyone who understands capitalism knows that holds down wages. Go learn something moron. You are a crony capitalist.
It doesn't those were non compete clauses between private entities if two or 3 businesses want to enter into a non compete it's none of your business and those employees are free to fine employment anywhere in the thousands of other companies that can use their skills
You get taxed on income in a business income is profit profit is defined as total revenue minus business expenses
that is not a loophole
It didn't impact every employee as you were saying
so it was no big deal and they still had to worry about losing people because they could have gone to any one of hundreds of IT companies that exist
Not the largest companies. What they were doing is illegal for a reason. Go learn about capitalism and then come discuss.
Regardless of what you clam the law suit did not mention wage manipulation and like I said any of those employees could have left those companies at any time for work in what is the fastest growing industry in the country
Those 3 companies did not have any effect on the wages of anyone
Anyone who understands capitalism knows that holds down wages. Go learn something moron. You are a crony capitalist.
It doesn't those were non compete clauses between private entities if two or 3 businesses want to enter into a non compete it's none of your business and those employees are free to fine employment anywhere in the thousands of other companies that can use their skills
It is illegal for a reason moron. You think they illegally colluded for no reason? You really are too stupid to debate.
You get taxed on income in a business income is profit profit is defined as total revenue minus business expenses
that is not a loophole
Feel free to show where I used the word "loophole".
But you DO take advantage of the provisions in the tax code for business. Right?
Just like the EITC isn't a loophole. It is a provision in the tax code for low wage earners.
Which you can't refute.
Even a fucking idiot like you could start making more money tomorrow but you'd rather whine that your employer isn't paying you enough
And that agreement effects wages moron. When people are poached they make more money. You don't change jobs for less money. You really don't understand capitalism.Not the largest companies. What they were doing is illegal for a reason. Go learn about capitalism and then come discuss.
Regardless of what you clam the law suit did not mention wage manipulation and like I said any of those employees could have left those companies at any time for work in what is the fastest growing industry in the country
Those 3 companies did not have any effect on the wages of anyone
Anyone who understands capitalism knows that holds down wages. Go learn something moron. You are a crony capitalist.
It doesn't those were non compete clauses between private entities if two or 3 businesses want to enter into a non compete it's none of your business and those employees are free to fine employment anywhere in the thousands of other companies that can use their skills
It is illegal for a reason moron. You think they illegally colluded for no reason? You really are too stupid to debate.
And it had absolutely no effect on wages
All it was was an agreement not to poach employees
Even a fucking idiot like you could start making more money tomorrow but you'd rather whine that your employer isn't paying you enough
Seeing as how I am my employer, I will take that idea up with my board of directors................
Ok. Meeting over.
They don't want me to raise rents right now. Oh well. I will be fine on my 6k monthly income.
Don't worry bout me. LMAO.
And that agreement effects wages moron. When people are poached they make more money. You don't change jobs for less money. You really don't understand capitalism.Regardless of what you clam the law suit did not mention wage manipulation and like I said any of those employees could have left those companies at any time for work in what is the fastest growing industry in the country
Those 3 companies did not have any effect on the wages of anyone
Anyone who understands capitalism knows that holds down wages. Go learn something moron. You are a crony capitalist.
It doesn't those were non compete clauses between private entities if two or 3 businesses want to enter into a non compete it's none of your business and those employees are free to fine employment anywhere in the thousands of other companies that can use their skills
It is illegal for a reason moron. You think they illegally colluded for no reason? You really are too stupid to debate.
And it had absolutely no effect on wages
All it was was an agreement not to poach employees
Why do you think they illegally colluded professor?
If you can't see that that is what I am talking about and that has nothing to do with the 80,000 page patently unfair tax code we have then I can't help you
If you can't see that that is what I am talking about and that has nothing to do with the 80,000 page patently unfair tax code we have then I can't help you
I see you take advantage of the tax code. Just like a low wage W2 earner does.
The fact you can't understand their is no difference may mean you are purposely obtuse........Or brain dead.
Btw, you should see what can be done with Sch E. It's beautiful.
I don't worry about you at all especially if you think 72 K a year is a good income
I don't worry about you at all especially if you think 72 K a year is a good income
Ah well combine it with my wife's 80 and we get by. No EITC for us. Damn it. LMAO.
What did you make in profit last year. 300k 400k? Come on, lie to me. From a guy who can't even MENTION what kind of business he has. Me thinks you might be a liar.
No one running a business, making 500k year, wastes as much time arguing Bullshit on a message board as you do. No one.
