Translating the doublespeak from liberals

[PaintMyHouse]

Oh my the far left propaganda machine is now working over time. Do they get paid more by posting certain keywords and names?

Just keep lying to yourself. That's why you are losing elections you should have won.

No, we lose elections because the Left practices prolific voter fraud!!

That kind of lie is why you keep losing.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Just keep lying to yourself. That's why you are losing elections you should have won.

No, we lose elections because the Left practices prolific voter fraud!!

That kind of lie is why you keep losing.

We lost because the liar in chief fooled a bunch of sheeple and because of voter fraud, can't escape it just because you lie saying it didn't happen. COMMIE!!!

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No, we lose elections because the Left practices prolific voter fraud!!

That kind of lie is why you keep losing.

We lost because the liar in chief fooled a bunch of sheeple and because of voter fraud, can't escape it just because you lie saying it didn't happen. COMMIE!!!

Someone missed his nap today. He's a cranky infant.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Overlords? Care to explain? In rational terms? Without the typical lib talking points?

See that rectum which your lips are attached to? That's your overlord.

Okay, it's probably tough for you to actually see the rectum, given the position you're in. But you can at least feel it and taste it.

I asked for an explanation of the term. Not some dumbfuck rhetorical response from an empty vessel.
Consider this highly offensive and in violation post reported to the mods.
I'm not going to take your shit.

 

[bripat9643]

Just keep lying to yourself. That's why you are losing elections you should have won.

No, we lose elections because the Left practices prolific voter fraud!!

That kind of lie is why you keep losing.

Wrong. Voter fraud is why every close election goes to Democrats.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No, we lose elections because the Left practices prolific voter fraud!!

That kind of lie is why you keep losing.

Wrong. Voter fraud is why every close election goes to Democrats.

Is it now? Show us. Start with Bush v Gore.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Naturally you can support this contention with public policy polling?

Ya know who answers those polls? People with nothing better to do than yak on the phone answering questions that are asked in a certain way so as to elicit a predetermined response.
People who are not working. People living off the dole. People who are uninformed.
Idiots who think in terms of 10 second soundbites.
Do you really think that if a pollster was honest and asked. " if so and so were to raise your taxes by 25%, would you vote for them?, the one being polled would say "yes"?

Riiiiggghttt...the polls are wrong, Romney's gonna win! Puhleese.

Can the OP's contention, that "Liberals know that their agenda isn't popular with the majority" be supported with facts? Did "non liberals" win the popular vote in 5 out of the last 6 Presidential elections? Did over a million more people vote for Democrats or Republicans in 2012?

Who said anything about Romney?
BTW, sweet cheeks, in 2000, your side was so convinced the polls were correct in that AlGore was a shoe in for POTUS, his camp filed one lawsuit after another to challenge the results when they realized they lost.
Guess the polls were wrong there as well.
Like I said, polls are for the uninformed.
Polls used to be a method whereby the public could get a chance to opine about the events of the day. Now polls ARE the news. That's ridiculous.
In fact, many polls, especially commissioned by left leaning entities are done so to steer and not research public opinion.
That's lazy.

 

[bripat9643]

That kind of lie is why you keep losing.

Wrong. Voter fraud is why every close election goes to Democrats.

Is it now? Show us. Start with Bush v Gore.

That is a perfect example of Democrat election fraud: counting the votes in Democrat counties over and over again until the count comes up with a win for the Democrat.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Wrong. Voter fraud is why every close election goes to Democrats.

Is it now? Show us. Start with Bush v Gore.

That is a perfect example of Democrat election fraud: counting the votes in Democrat counties over and over again until the count comes up with a win for the Democrat.

And who by chance won that?

 

[bripat9643]

Is it now? Show us. Start with Bush v Gore.

That is a perfect example of Democrat election fraud: counting the votes in Democrat counties over and over again until the count comes up with a win for the Democrat.

And who by chance won that?

Bush did only because the USSC put a stop to it.

 

[GreenBean]

Changed 17 times in 220 years? Sounds like it's living eh?

It's been changed hundreds of times by 5 lawyers on the Supreme Court.

Must be pretty live then? Dead things don't change much.

By that definition , there's a lot of dead Liberals out there who never change - brain dead that is.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

That is a perfect example of Democrat election fraud: counting the votes in Democrat counties over and over again until the count comes up with a win for the Democrat.

And who by chance won that?

Bush did only because the USSC put a stop to it.

Guess they don't all go to the Dems now do they?

 

[The2ndAmendment]

The fantasy is the one created by Rush, and Fox, and Sarah, that you live in. I live in the real world were decisions must be made and actions taken.

Oh my the far left propaganda machine is now working over time. Do they get paid more by posting certain keywords and names?

Just keep lying to yourself. That's why you are losing elections you should have won.

You've made 1,488 posts in less than 30 days, who is paying you to defend the Government?

 

[rdean]

Liberals know that their agenda isn't popular with the majority and if they were honest about what they'd like to do to this country, the liberal politicians would be given the boot pronto.

That is why they can't be upfront about their beliefs, and more importantly, their plans to transform this country.

When people are concerned about our second amendment rights being trampled, the favorite response from the left is that no one is going to take your precious guns and then they quickly change the subject and falsely claim that gun control will stop violence. In the first response, they already reveal themselves to be supportive of a total ban on guns. The correct response, for any constitution-loving American, would be 'Hell, no, we won't take guns, that would be wrong because it would infringe on the rights of millions of Americans." Of course, their response that we can keep our guns is said quite begrudgingly. They hate admitting that, at this time, they've no choice but to "allow" us to keep our guns. The argument that gun control or gun bans would make us safer has been sufficiently debunked numerous times, but it's an argument they will continue to push and will use every tragedy to push this false premise. They want our guns, have no doubt. That is why they admit we have this right, then turn around and say we don't because we are not militia members. Hmmm. Telling.

Nothing is accidental when the far left passes legislation. With Obamacare, all we've heard is excuses about unintended consequences that no one knew existed in the law. Yea, right. Obamacare was carefully written and there is a reason it was passed the way it was. No one was supposed to have a chance to read it before it was unconstitutionally shoved through. Even moderate Dems would have balked at the content of this onerous law. There are harmful things in the bill, which will cause hardships for people, especially the poor. It's no accident and certainly not unintended. One law regards home health care. The idea behind home health care was a good one. It saved billions in costs because the patients didn't have to go to a doctor's office or hospital to obtain routine care. Every state now has home health care workers who go to people's homes to monitor their recovery, take blood tests and other things that allow the person to stay in their home and the cost is low compared to what it would be if people had to seek care at medical facitilites. In the Obamacare law, home health care is going to slowly get phased out. People needing routine daily care will end up in nursing homes. Those that quality for Medicaid are going to have their homes confiscated by the state to cover the cost of the nursing home. That means people can't stay in their homes and their children will not inherit the family homes.

A few years back, Great Britain liberals talked about the crisis of housing shortages and their biggest complaint was 'under-occupied' homes. That is where an elderly couple still live in the family home and, according to liberals, have more room than they need. The idea is to force people to move to smaller homes, making the larger ones available to bigger families. And the people would have no choice in the matter. Never mind that the elderly people intended to leave their homes to their children, who may have larger families.

Liberals here balked when the question was bought up about whether they would do that here. No denials and they gave the usual response that no one was going to take your home. Now we see language in the Obamacare law that allows them to do just that. Again, the correct response to the question should have been, "Hell, no, you don't take people's property. This is America and we have rights." But, instead of a sharp defense of rights, we get lame denials. They are followed by assurances, uttered begrudgingly, that our rights won't be trampled. It reveals a lot about them.

Whenever you hear a liberal respond with a roll of their eyes and a denial that they intend to do this or that, beware. True patriots are quick to defend rights and call such socialist or communist ideas ridiculous and un-American. You'll never hear that kind of support for our constitution and bill of rights from a liberal. They merely acknowldge that we currently have such rights and tell us they can't do anything. Can't and won't are two different things and the legislation passed behind closed doors is giving them the power to change what they don't like about our country.

We have also heard that other countries opted to confiscate people's savings and retirement accounts. The liberals, who have had their eye on people's IRA accounts, said don't be ridiculous. No one is going to take all your money. They add, if they do take over IRA accounts, it will only be to protect them. The government has yet to take over anything and have it be successful. They get their hands on money and the money disappears. Yea, they want to help keep people's retirement safe. If we want it safe, no politician should be allowed to get anywhere near it.

No one is going to take your guns. No one is going to take your property. No one is going to take your money. No one is going to take your health insurance away. No one is going to trample your rights.

I am thinking that 'no one' is code for the radicals who currently enjoy power in this country. 'No one' has been passing a lot of oppressive legislation and no one is transforming this country into a liberal cesspool. No one is killing jobs deliberately. No one is destroying middle class. No one wants socialism.

I'm sure no one will regurgitate more talking points to insult me for posting this.

Good job. You hit all the talking points. You sound' completely batshit crazy.

Liberals don't need to make up bullshit. We have the GOP's disastrous record and failed policies as proof.

 

[KNB]

Do all of you Teabaggers really believe the shit that you write?

 

[thereisnospoon]

Is it now? Show us. Start with Bush v Gore.

That is a perfect example of Democrat election fraud: counting the votes in Democrat counties over and over again until the count comes up with a win for the Democrat.

And who by chance won that?

These were democrat controlled districts.
The one glaring fact that you libs cannot evade is after several different methods were tried to repeat the so called dimpled chad, the only way it could be repeated was by placing several voting cards in the machine. A clear indication there was cheating going on. And in a democrat controlled district....well one can easily draw their own conclusion. Either way, those disputed cards were tossed because of the swirl...And rightly so.

 

[Iceweasel]

That kind of lie is why you keep losing.

Wrong. Voter fraud is why every close election goes to Democrats.

Is it now? Show us. Start with Bush v Gore.

Look it up. Bush won, the burden is on you to show he didn't. The Dems with the help of ACORN cheated us out of a Republican governor. Dino Rossi won, so they had a recount. Rossi still won so they had another recount. This time they threw illegal ballots into the mix to get their gal in and she "won" by the slimmest margin in a gubernotorial race. It was impossible to tell the good ballots from the bad ones so we would have needed another election so Dino bowed out, probably realizing they weren't going to let him have it.

 

[bedowin62]

OMG; left-wing nutjobs are still raning about Bush v Gore?

the case where the Left pulled "chads" out of their ass trying to steal an election?

do they know the person that INVENTED that ballot is a lifelong Democrat

do they know when she invented the butterfly ballot she called for any card not punched all the way through be DISCARDED?

DO LEFT-WING NUTJOBS know there NEVER WAS A SUCH THING AS A HANGING OR PREGNANT CHAD?



idiots and hypocrites

 

[Iceweasel]

It's as funny as it was then. Liberals are too stupid to punch a ballot so it's the Republican's fault.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Do all of you Teabaggers really believe the shit that you write?

Another meaningless drive by post.
Is that all you have to add to the discussion?