Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Republicans invented the October Surprise. They've tried to employ it every election dating back to when they first made a deal with Iran to hold those poor American hostages until after the elections.Republicans invented the October Surprise. They've tried to employ it every election dating back to when they first made a deal with Iran to hold those poor American hostages until after the elections. Used them for politics. Then later the Iran Contra scandal. Reagan and Ollie North. RayGun gave the Iranians weapons. He armed our enemy in exchange for them helping him gain power. Carter would have won if not for that.
And how about Comey's announcement a week before the elections. I'm glad Trump threw that scumbag under the bus. Fuck Comey.
Right. GHW Bush flew in an SR-71 to talk to the Iranians. DURR!
Carter would have won if not for that.
Reagan won 44 states and 489 electoral votes.
He got 8.5 million more votes than the 2nd worst President in history.
And that was with an independent Republican 3rd party candidate getting 5.7 million votes.
Bush was head of the CIA yes. Why do you think Reagan awarded him with the VP spot?
Bush was head of the CIA yes.
And that's why they let him borrow an SR-71?
I don't know what a SR-71 has to do with the deal Republicans made with the Iranians to hold those hostages until after the election. Then make Ronny look tough by giving them back to him because he's another tv celebrity you idiots fell for.
I don't know what a SR-71 has to do with the deal Republicans made with the Iranians to hold those hostages until after the election.
The assclown who came up with the October Surprise fantasy said Bush flew an SR-71 to Paris to make the deal.
some recent research presented here gave me some insight into Donald Trump’s motivations to pursue the presidency. So, why did he want to become the President of the United States?
First and foremost, Trump is a narcissist – perhaps on the extreme end of the scale. In fact, Trump can be best classified as a Grandiose Narcissist.Grandiose narcissism is a flamboyant, assertive, and interpersonally dominant style, characterized by an inflated sense of self, overconfidence in making decisions, and an inability to learn from mistakes.
Research shows that narcissists are over-represented in high-level leadership positions, which can be a problem in and of itself, but back to Trump.
There are 3 basic motivations that explain why people take on leadership positions:
1. Affective motivation (“I enjoy leading”). This is the motivation to lead simply because one enjoys leadership activities.
2. Calculative motivation (“What’s in it for me?”). This motivation to lead focuses on the rewards or personal gains one will achieve through leading.
3. Normative motivation (“Other people think I’d be an effective leader”).This involves pressure from others to pursue leadership positions.
Trump’s motivation to run for President may have been fueled by all three of these. He professes to enjoy being in charge, and has for some time (affective motivation). His serious candidacy was spurred on by backers who encouraged him to run (normative motivation). And, there may also be calculative motivation, as his detractors claim – Trump and his family may reap financial benefits from his presidency.
How does Trump’s grandiose narcissism fuel his desire to be president?
Research suggests that grandiose narcissists seek leadership positions for a couple of prime reasons:
1. Self-Enhancement. Narcissists seek powerful leadership positions to prove their superiority and to enhance their image.
2. Basking in the Limelight. Throughout his adult life, Trump has sought media attention and the sheer amount of “free” coverage that he got certainly helped his campaign and the election.
So, the research on narcissism and motivation to lead explains Trump’s behavior fairly well. But what might cause Trump to eventually regret attaining the presidency? Well, Howard Stern may have said it best:
"I know something about Donald Trump, he really does want to be loved," Stern said. "He does want people to really love him. That drives him a lot. I think that he has a very sensitive ego and when you're president of the United States, people are going to be very very critical."
Donald Trump has a notoriously thin skin and although his narcissism causes a feeling of superiority, it is fragile and, in the end, he may regret his motivation to this high, and very visible and vulnerable, leadership position.
One of the best ever......skip to 1:23
Boy was he wrong. I guess we know now that Democrats don't rig elections. If we did we would have rigged 2016 and we certainly would have won 2000.
The Libs did TRY to rig 2016. Holding the Access Hollywood tape until the last possible moment when it was seen as too late for Trump to recover was a dirty trick designed to fix the election results.
Republicans invented the October Surprise. They've tried to employ it every election dating back to when they first made a deal with Iran to hold those poor American hostages until after the elections. Used them for politics. Then later the Iran Contra scandal. Reagan and Ollie North. RayGun gave the Iranians weapons. He armed our enemy in exchange for them helping him gain power. Carter would have won if not for that.
And how about Comey's announcement a week before the elections. I'm glad Trump threw that scumbag under the bus. Fuck Comey.
That's of course a load of shit. President Reagan was investigated for years for the Iranian tale sewn out of whole cloth. Years of bullshit investigations which yielded bupkis.
Comey of course is a Deep State Hillary Clinton operative who actually publicly EXONERATED the broad a week before the election, even though 10's of thousands of emails containing national security secrets she was entrusted with were found on a convicted Paedophile's computer. And the whole supposed "investigation" took only a few days. The conniption that the left had when Trump fired the bum Comey shows his allegiance.
/----/ "Approved for a different use."/——/ He is transferring money already approved by Congress. But nice try./——/ The President can’t spend, squander or lose one thin dime. Congress controls spending, you nitwit.The baffling part of all this is how his cult followers still maintain that Trump should remain in charge of this nation's economy, in spite of his having achieved that rank of having lost more money writhin 10 years than any taxpayer in American history!
Maybe you should mention that to Trump. He issued an executive order to transfer money from the military, to build his wall. In addition to that, he is independently slapping on billions of dollars of tariffs, which is, in fact, a tax on the American public, without congress having a thing to do with it, Einstein.
Approved for a different use.
/——/ That doesn’t prove your point, try again Cupcake.
some recent research presented here gave me some insight into Donald Trump’s motivations to pursue the presidency. So, why did he want to become the President of the United States?
First and foremost, Trump is a narcissist – perhaps on the extreme end of the scale. In fact, Trump can be best classified as a Grandiose Narcissist.Grandiose narcissism is a flamboyant, assertive, and interpersonally dominant style, characterized by an inflated sense of self, overconfidence in making decisions, and an inability to learn from mistakes.
Research shows that narcissists are over-represented in high-level leadership positions, which can be a problem in and of itself, but back to Trump.
There are 3 basic motivations that explain why people take on leadership positions:
1. Affective motivation (“I enjoy leading”). This is the motivation to lead simply because one enjoys leadership activities.
2. Calculative motivation (“What’s in it for me?”). This motivation to lead focuses on the rewards or personal gains one will achieve through leading.
3. Normative motivation (“Other people think I’d be an effective leader”).This involves pressure from others to pursue leadership positions.
Trump’s motivation to run for President may have been fueled by all three of these. He professes to enjoy being in charge, and has for some time (affective motivation). His serious candidacy was spurred on by backers who encouraged him to run (normative motivation). And, there may also be calculative motivation, as his detractors claim – Trump and his family may reap financial benefits from his presidency.
How does Trump’s grandiose narcissism fuel his desire to be president?
Research suggests that grandiose narcissists seek leadership positions for a couple of prime reasons:
1. Self-Enhancement. Narcissists seek powerful leadership positions to prove their superiority and to enhance their image.
2. Basking in the Limelight. Throughout his adult life, Trump has sought media attention and the sheer amount of “free” coverage that he got certainly helped his campaign and the election.
So, the research on narcissism and motivation to lead explains Trump’s behavior fairly well. But what might cause Trump to eventually regret attaining the presidency? Well, Howard Stern may have said it best:
"I know something about Donald Trump, he really does want to be loved," Stern said. "He does want people to really love him. That drives him a lot. I think that he has a very sensitive ego and when you're president of the United States, people are going to be very very critical."
Donald Trump has a notoriously thin skin and although his narcissism causes a feeling of superiority, it is fragile and, in the end, he may regret his motivation to this high, and very visible and vulnerable, leadership position.
One of the best ever......skip to 1:23
Boy was he wrong. I guess we know now that Democrats don't rig elections. If we did we would have rigged 2016 and we certainly would have won 2000.
/——. How did Hildabeast win the primary if it wasn’t rigged against Crazy Bernie?
The Democratic party is a private organization. They can nominate whoever they want. And Bernie can run as an independent. Same with the GOP. They could have thrown Trump out and nominated Rubio if they wanted to.
In fact, the GOP did this to Ron Paul. Did you know? He should have been the nominee but the GOP rigged it and gave it to Mitt Romney. Remember that? I do.
What did you see?Why is any of this important in any way? It was already known that Donald J. Trump was the poorest man on the planet in the early 1990's, but that he came back in a huge way to win bigly. He wrote a fantastic book about it all, "The Art of the Comeback" if you're interested.
In any event, it was all a long time ago, and we can see Trump's tremendous record since.
I see record low unemployment and record high markets due to the success of Trumponomics.
And if Trump were to lose next year's election, that would be the end of that.
Obama had record high markets too. I must of missed your posts saying how great he was.
When you borrow 1.5 trillion & pump it in the economy, things look pretty good until the debt becomes due.
If the economy is so great, why are we increasing deficits? Why is the fed still afraid to raise rates?
When you slash corporate tax rares well off companies & wealthy people, they have all this money to spend. They look to the market & it drivers up stock costs.
You go ahead & think people trading pieces of paper is the key to our economy.
Republicans invented the October Surprise. They've tried to employ it every election dating back to when they first made a deal with Iran to hold those poor American hostages until after the elections.Republicans invented the October Surprise. They've tried to employ it every election dating back to when they first made a deal with Iran to hold those poor American hostages until after the elections. Used them for politics. Then later the Iran Contra scandal. Reagan and Ollie North. RayGun gave the Iranians weapons. He armed our enemy in exchange for them helping him gain power. Carter would have won if not for that.
And how about Comey's announcement a week before the elections. I'm glad Trump threw that scumbag under the bus. Fuck Comey.
Right. GHW Bush flew in an SR-71 to talk to the Iranians. DURR!
Carter would have won if not for that.
Reagan won 44 states and 489 electoral votes.
He got 8.5 million more votes than the 2nd worst President in history.
And that was with an independent Republican 3rd party candidate getting 5.7 million votes.
Bush was head of the CIA yes. Why do you think Reagan awarded him with the VP spot?
Bush was head of the CIA yes.
And that's why they let him borrow an SR-71?
I don't know what a SR-71 has to do with the deal Republicans made with the Iranians to hold those hostages until after the election. Then make Ronny look tough by giving them back to him because he's another tv celebrity you idiots fell for.
No deal was made between Iran and President Reagan. That was just bullshit, you know. Carter didn't want to admit defeat either, no more that Clinton. So he invented this story. The D's never admit they lost. BTW, Carter did endorse Trump during the campaign of 2016.
Good businessmen come back from down times. Trump lost a ton of money...then he made a ton of money. Why you think that is "damning" mystifies me! Anyone who knows Trump's history knows that there was a real rough patch in the 80's and early 90's. It is what it is.
Trump has never made "a ton of money". None of Trump's business has ever been a success. All of his golf resorts are losing money Trump makes money except the East Coast courses where he spends his weekends. Trump makes money off his bankruptcies, his TV show, and laundering money for Russians. The rest of his businesses go broke.
Donald Trump is a conman.
You're rather amusing. If none of Trump's businesses had ever been a success...then his "brand" would not be worth millions to others. It is because he had a knack for promotion. He made his properties valuable because he understood what people desired and gave it to them. Have some of his businesses been flops? Oh, yeah...HUGE flops! But Trump has never been afraid of failing....most successful people aren't!
He hasn't suffered one bit from failing. The people he conned did.
During the Atlantic City casino boom in the 1980s, Philadelphia cabinet-builder Edward Friel Jr. landed a $400,000 contract to build the bases for slot machines, registration desks, bars and other cabinets at Harrah's at Trump Plaza.
The family cabinetry business, founded in the 1940s by Edward’s father, finished its work in 1984 and submitted its final bill to the general contractor for the Trump Organization, the resort’s builder.
Edward’s son, Paul, who was the firm’s accountant, still remembers the amount of that bill more than 30 years later: $83,600. The reason: the money never came. “That began the demise of the Edward J. Friel Company… which has been around since my grandfather,” he said.
Donald Trump often portrays himself as a savior of the working class who will "protect your job." But a USA TODAY NETWORK analysis found he has been involved in more than 3,500 lawsuits over the past three decades — and a large number of those involve ordinary Americans, like the Friels, who say Trump or his companies have refused to pay them.
Got a link?
Like the free press I refuse to reveal my sources because they asked me to. Now lets look at his son in law. What kind of guy is this?
It’s now 18 months later, and it seems certain that Kushner is among the most corrupt and seditious figures ever to work in the White House. The son-in-law and top adviser to the president, the de facto U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia and would-be Middle East peacemaker, is no patriot. To the contrary, Kushner has shown nothing but contempt for the United States: violating its laws, lying to its law enforcement officials, and (possibly) selling its state policy for his own personal enrichment.
Despite criminal activity breathtaking in both scope and audacity, Kushner tends to receive preferential treatment from the media, like he’s royalty or a popular celebrity and not one of the most dangerous criminals in American history.
Weaponizing Data to Contaminate the Election
Meeting Illicitly With Russian Officials/Surrogates
Meeting With the President of a Sanctioned Bank
Lying on His SF-86 Security Clearance Form
Colluding With Tabloids to Attack Trump Critics
Lobbying for Qatari Blockade
Providing the Saudi Crown Prince With Classified Intelligence
Using Personal Email to Conduct Government Business
The party has rules. Bernie knew the rules. Nothing was rigged.some recent research presented here gave me some insight into Donald Trump’s motivations to pursue the presidency. So, why did he want to become the President of the United States?
First and foremost, Trump is a narcissist – perhaps on the extreme end of the scale. In fact, Trump can be best classified as a Grandiose Narcissist.Grandiose narcissism is a flamboyant, assertive, and interpersonally dominant style, characterized by an inflated sense of self, overconfidence in making decisions, and an inability to learn from mistakes.
Research shows that narcissists are over-represented in high-level leadership positions, which can be a problem in and of itself, but back to Trump.
There are 3 basic motivations that explain why people take on leadership positions:
1. Affective motivation (“I enjoy leading”). This is the motivation to lead simply because one enjoys leadership activities.
2. Calculative motivation (“What’s in it for me?”). This motivation to lead focuses on the rewards or personal gains one will achieve through leading.
3. Normative motivation (“Other people think I’d be an effective leader”).This involves pressure from others to pursue leadership positions.
Trump’s motivation to run for President may have been fueled by all three of these. He professes to enjoy being in charge, and has for some time (affective motivation). His serious candidacy was spurred on by backers who encouraged him to run (normative motivation). And, there may also be calculative motivation, as his detractors claim – Trump and his family may reap financial benefits from his presidency.
How does Trump’s grandiose narcissism fuel his desire to be president?
Research suggests that grandiose narcissists seek leadership positions for a couple of prime reasons:
1. Self-Enhancement. Narcissists seek powerful leadership positions to prove their superiority and to enhance their image.
2. Basking in the Limelight. Throughout his adult life, Trump has sought media attention and the sheer amount of “free” coverage that he got certainly helped his campaign and the election.
So, the research on narcissism and motivation to lead explains Trump’s behavior fairly well. But what might cause Trump to eventually regret attaining the presidency? Well, Howard Stern may have said it best:
"I know something about Donald Trump, he really does want to be loved," Stern said. "He does want people to really love him. That drives him a lot. I think that he has a very sensitive ego and when you're president of the United States, people are going to be very very critical."
Donald Trump has a notoriously thin skin and although his narcissism causes a feeling of superiority, it is fragile and, in the end, he may regret his motivation to this high, and very visible and vulnerable, leadership position.
One of the best ever......skip to 1:23
Boy was he wrong. I guess we know now that Democrats don't rig elections. If we did we would have rigged 2016 and we certainly would have won 2000.
/——. How did Hildabeast win the primary if it wasn’t rigged against Crazy Bernie?
The Democratic party is a private organization. They can nominate whoever they want. And Bernie can run as an independent. Same with the GOP. They could have thrown Trump out and nominated Rubio if they wanted to.
In fact, the GOP did this to Ron Paul. Did you know? He should have been the nominee but the GOP rigged it and gave it to Mitt Romney. Remember that? I do.
/----/ Of course they can, but you didn't answer my question. How did Hildabeast win the primary if it wasn’t rigged against Crazy Bernie?
Obama started with an economy shrinking at a rate over 6% & losing 800,000 jobs a month. I wish you diprticks would consider that for a change.
some recent research presented here gave me some insight into Donald Trump’s motivations to pursue the presidency. So, why did he want to become the President of the United States?
First and foremost, Trump is a narcissist – perhaps on the extreme end of the scale. In fact, Trump can be best classified as a Grandiose Narcissist.Grandiose narcissism is a flamboyant, assertive, and interpersonally dominant style, characterized by an inflated sense of self, overconfidence in making decisions, and an inability to learn from mistakes.
Research shows that narcissists are over-represented in high-level leadership positions, which can be a problem in and of itself, but back to Trump.
There are 3 basic motivations that explain why people take on leadership positions:
1. Affective motivation (“I enjoy leading”). This is the motivation to lead simply because one enjoys leadership activities.
2. Calculative motivation (“What’s in it for me?”). This motivation to lead focuses on the rewards or personal gains one will achieve through leading.
3. Normative motivation (“Other people think I’d be an effective leader”).This involves pressure from others to pursue leadership positions.
Trump’s motivation to run for President may have been fueled by all three of these. He professes to enjoy being in charge, and has for some time (affective motivation). His serious candidacy was spurred on by backers who encouraged him to run (normative motivation). And, there may also be calculative motivation, as his detractors claim – Trump and his family may reap financial benefits from his presidency.
How does Trump’s grandiose narcissism fuel his desire to be president?
Research suggests that grandiose narcissists seek leadership positions for a couple of prime reasons:
1. Self-Enhancement. Narcissists seek powerful leadership positions to prove their superiority and to enhance their image.
2. Basking in the Limelight. Throughout his adult life, Trump has sought media attention and the sheer amount of “free” coverage that he got certainly helped his campaign and the election.
So, the research on narcissism and motivation to lead explains Trump’s behavior fairly well. But what might cause Trump to eventually regret attaining the presidency? Well, Howard Stern may have said it best:
"I know something about Donald Trump, he really does want to be loved," Stern said. "He does want people to really love him. That drives him a lot. I think that he has a very sensitive ego and when you're president of the United States, people are going to be very very critical."
Donald Trump has a notoriously thin skin and although his narcissism causes a feeling of superiority, it is fragile and, in the end, he may regret his motivation to this high, and very visible and vulnerable, leadership position.
One of the best ever......skip to 1:23
Boy was he wrong. I guess we know now that Democrats don't rig elections. If we did we would have rigged 2016 and we certainly would have won 2000.
The Libs did TRY to rig 2016. Holding the Access Hollywood tape until the last possible moment when it was seen as too late for Trump to recover was a dirty trick designed to fix the election results.
Republicans invented the October Surprise. They've tried to employ it every election dating back to when they first made a deal with Iran to hold those poor American hostages until after the elections. Used them for politics. Then later the Iran Contra scandal. Reagan and Ollie North. RayGun gave the Iranians weapons. He armed our enemy in exchange for them helping him gain power. Carter would have won if not for that.
And how about Comey's announcement a week before the elections. I'm glad Trump threw that scumbag under the bus. Fuck Comey.
That's of course a load of shit. President Reagan was investigated for years for the Iranian tale sewn out of whole cloth. Years of bullshit investigations which yielded bupkis.
Comey of course is a Deep State Hillary Clinton operative who actually publicly EXONERATED the broad a week before the election, even though 10's of thousands of emails containing national security secrets she was entrusted with were found on a convicted Paedophile's computer. And the whole supposed "investigation" took only a few days. The conniption that the left had when Trump fired the bum Comey shows his allegiance.
What did you see?Why is any of this important in any way? It was already known that Donald J. Trump was the poorest man on the planet in the early 1990's, but that he came back in a huge way to win bigly. He wrote a fantastic book about it all, "The Art of the Comeback" if you're interested.
In any event, it was all a long time ago, and we can see Trump's tremendous record since.
I see record low unemployment and record high markets due to the success of Trumponomics.
And if Trump were to lose next year's election, that would be the end of that.
Obama had record high markets too. I must of missed your posts saying how great he was.
When you borrow 1.5 trillion & pump it in the economy, things look pretty good until the debt becomes due.
If the economy is so great, why are we increasing deficits? Why is the fed still afraid to raise rates?
When you slash corporate tax rares well off companies & wealthy people, they have all this money to spend. They look to the market & it drivers up stock costs.
You go ahead & think people trading pieces of paper is the key to our economy.
Ah, Dave? The Fed has raised rates six times in the two years that Trump has been in office. That's four more times than they raised them from the time Obama was elected until Trump was elected!
Republicans invented the October Surprise. They've tried to employ it every election dating back to when they first made a deal with Iran to hold those poor American hostages until after the elections.
Right. GHW Bush flew in an SR-71 to talk to the Iranians. DURR!
Carter would have won if not for that.
Reagan won 44 states and 489 electoral votes.
He got 8.5 million more votes than the 2nd worst President in history.
And that was with an independent Republican 3rd party candidate getting 5.7 million votes.
Bush was head of the CIA yes. Why do you think Reagan awarded him with the VP spot?
Bush was head of the CIA yes.
And that's why they let him borrow an SR-71?
I don't know what a SR-71 has to do with the deal Republicans made with the Iranians to hold those hostages until after the election. Then make Ronny look tough by giving them back to him because he's another tv celebrity you idiots fell for.
No deal was made between Iran and President Reagan. That was just bullshit, you know. Carter didn't want to admit defeat either, no more that Clinton. So he invented this story. The D's never admit they lost. BTW, Carter did endorse Trump during the campaign of 2016.
Everything in your post is a lie. Reagan's staffers most certainly did make a deal of weapons for hostages. Over 100 Reagan Administration officials were charged and many went to jail. Try reading about Iran-Contra, fool!
Carter admitted defeat. No question.
Carter has NEVER endorsed Trump.
Dude is worth around 3 Billion today, he is doing something right.The NYT got hold of “transcripts” from Trump’s tax returns from the late 80’s and early 90’s.
He lost a shit ton of money. A top money loser. One of America’s biggest losers.
Decade in the Red: Trump Tax Figures Show Over $1 Billion in Business Losses
This is damning.
No it isn't anyone with a brain knows that when you risk a lot of money, you can lose or gain a lot of money. Nine out of ten businesses fail, that is why I don't begrudge those who make it big.
Dude simply lost a ton of money. Good businessmen make money.
The party has rules. Bernie knew the rules. Nothing was rigged.
One of the best ever......skip to 1:23
Boy was he wrong. I guess we know now that Democrats don't rig elections. If we did we would have rigged 2016 and we certainly would have won 2000.
/——. How did Hildabeast win the primary if it wasn’t rigged against Crazy Bernie?
The Democratic party is a private organization. They can nominate whoever they want. And Bernie can run as an independent. Same with the GOP. They could have thrown Trump out and nominated Rubio if they wanted to.
In fact, the GOP did this to Ron Paul. Did you know? He should have been the nominee but the GOP rigged it and gave it to Mitt Romney. Remember that? I do.
/----/ Of course they can, but you didn't answer my question. How did Hildabeast win the primary if it wasn’t rigged against Crazy Bernie?
Dude is worth around 3 Billion today, he is doing something right.The NYT got hold of “transcripts” from Trump’s tax returns from the late 80’s and early 90’s.
He lost a shit ton of money. A top money loser. One of America’s biggest losers.
Decade in the Red: Trump Tax Figures Show Over $1 Billion in Business Losses
This is damning.
No it isn't anyone with a brain knows that when you risk a lot of money, you can lose or gain a lot of money. Nine out of ten businesses fail, that is why I don't begrudge those who make it big.
Dude simply lost a ton of money. Good businessmen make money.
What is your net worth?
Yes Carter admitted defeat after he lost. Will Trump?Republicans invented the October Surprise. They've tried to employ it every election dating back to when they first made a deal with Iran to hold those poor American hostages until after the elections.
Right. GHW Bush flew in an SR-71 to talk to the Iranians. DURR!
Carter would have won if not for that.
Reagan won 44 states and 489 electoral votes.
He got 8.5 million more votes than the 2nd worst President in history.
And that was with an independent Republican 3rd party candidate getting 5.7 million votes.
Bush was head of the CIA yes. Why do you think Reagan awarded him with the VP spot?
Bush was head of the CIA yes.
And that's why they let him borrow an SR-71?
I don't know what a SR-71 has to do with the deal Republicans made with the Iranians to hold those hostages until after the election. Then make Ronny look tough by giving them back to him because he's another tv celebrity you idiots fell for.
No deal was made between Iran and President Reagan. That was just bullshit, you know. Carter didn't want to admit defeat either, no more that Clinton. So he invented this story. The D's never admit they lost. BTW, Carter did endorse Trump during the campaign of 2016.
Everything in your post is a lie. Reagan's staffers most certainly did make a deal of weapons for hostages. Over 100 Reagan Administration officials were charged and many went to jail. Try reading about Iran-Contra, fool!
Carter admitted defeat. No question.
Carter has NEVER endorsed Trump.
/—-/ The sole purpose of Super Delegates is so the Party leaders can over rule the will of the dem voters.The party has rules. Bernie knew the rules. Nothing was rigged./----/ Of course they can, but you didn't answer my question. How did Hildabeast win the primary if it wasn’t rigged against Crazy Bernie?/——. How did Hildabeast win the primary if it wasn’t rigged against Crazy Bernie?Boy was he wrong. I guess we know now that Democrats don't rig elections. If we did we would have rigged 2016 and we certainly would have won 2000.
The Democratic party is a private organization. They can nominate whoever they want. And Bernie can run as an independent. Same with the GOP. They could have thrown Trump out and nominated Rubio if they wanted to.
In fact, the GOP did this to Ron Paul. Did you know? He should have been the nominee but the GOP rigged it and gave it to Mitt Romney. Remember that? I do.
The party has rules. Bernie knew the rules. Nothing was rigged.
One of the best ever......skip to 1:23
Boy was he wrong. I guess we know now that Democrats don't rig elections. If we did we would have rigged 2016 and we certainly would have won 2000.
/——. How did Hildabeast win the primary if it wasn’t rigged against Crazy Bernie?
The Democratic party is a private organization. They can nominate whoever they want. And Bernie can run as an independent. Same with the GOP. They could have thrown Trump out and nominated Rubio if they wanted to.
In fact, the GOP did this to Ron Paul. Did you know? He should have been the nominee but the GOP rigged it and gave it to Mitt Romney. Remember that? I do.
/----/ Of course they can, but you didn't answer my question. How did Hildabeast win the primary if it wasn’t rigged against Crazy Bernie?
/—-/ The sole purpose of Super Delegates is so the Party leaders can over rule the will of the dem voters.The party has rules. Bernie knew the rules. Nothing was rigged./----/ Of course they can, but you didn't answer my question. How did Hildabeast win the primary if it wasn’t rigged against Crazy Bernie?/——. How did Hildabeast win the primary if it wasn’t rigged against Crazy Bernie?Boy was he wrong. I guess we know now that Democrats don't rig elections. If we did we would have rigged 2016 and we certainly would have won 2000.
The Democratic party is a private organization. They can nominate whoever they want. And Bernie can run as an independent. Same with the GOP. They could have thrown Trump out and nominated Rubio if they wanted to.
In fact, the GOP did this to Ron Paul. Did you know? He should have been the nominee but the GOP rigged it and gave it to Mitt Romney. Remember that? I do.
Only 500,000 jobs a month? ONLY?Obama started with an economy shrinking at a rate over 6% & losing 800,000 jobs a month. I wish you diprticks would consider that for a change.
Of course, that's bullshit.
Even Fake News CNN admits to only 500,000 jobs per month being lost during the last few months of the George W. Bush administration.
Not 800,000
Total 2008 job loss: 2.6 million - Jan. 9, 2009
