Trump Announces!!!

The constitution can be amended. Has been many times.

There’s a minimum age requirement, so why can’t there be a maximum one?
the min. limit is for wisdom,, I have seen 90 yr olds far smarter than most 35 yr olds,,

itds not like they are running a foot race,,
 
the min. limit is for wisdom,, I have seen 90 yr olds far smarter than most 35 yr olds,,

itds not like they are running a foot race,,
Being President is grueling physically. Maybe it’s not manual labor, but it takes a toll.

For all of human history, old men step aside for younger men when they reach a certain age. It’s not some outrageous injustice.
 
When did our fellow Americans become so weak? They cheat us once, we vow reprisal, a few drinks at the bar later, Americans say, "We'll get'em next time." They cheat us twice, Americans say, "We'll get'em next time, surely." Meanwhile, they continue to mutilate children, mindfuck our kids and destroy our country. We have no national identity. That's why we're easy marks for the Marxists. Oh well, enjoy living on a planet ruled by Satan. Perhaps you'll get them next time. Or the time after that. Ha, bloody, ha.
Sumpter Looming

War is politics by more effective means. Without at least the threat of Civil War or Revolution, politics is stuck on stupid. We've been pacified enough by the sissyboy chickenhawk Right Wingers, who wouldn't even fight Communism overseas and let it run wild at home. Time to dump them, along with the Blue State Globalist colony they let themselves get pushed over by.
 
Being President is grueling physically. Maybe it’s not manual labor, but it takes a toll.

For all of human history, old men step aside for younger men when they reach a certain age. It’s not some outrageous injustice.
it is an injustice when the older guy who is more qualified is forced to step down for the les qualified younger guy,,
 
The constitution can be amended. Has been many times.

There’s a minimum age requirement, so why can’t there be a maximum one?
I’ll call your presidential age limit idea and raise it double to add an amendment requiring a battery of presidential IQ, knowledge, and emotional tests prior to elections! This is the obvious way forward to ensure better candidates, yet we have no one fighting for any “proof of worth” measure on the hill. What a shocker that career politicians don’t want any part of any kind of presidential testing, because they know that would mean it could lead to their own caliber of worth being determined on paper. It’s a lot harder to lie on paper as opposed to making campaign promises, even trying to trick the test if you’re given a high grade test the tricksters usually oust themselves attempting deception.

Otherwise, as other posters have mentioned, some 90 year olds are more swift than 35 year olds. Individual brain capacity should be measured and evaluated regardless of candidate’s age. A one-size-fits-all (like saying all people 80 or over are too old) doesn’t work with individual brain assessment.

True, as most people age they develop and accumulate plaque in their brains, (overload connected to significant memory loss) but there are effective techniques to reduce plaque and some people accumulate much less than average, mostly due to a good genetic line.
 
Last edited:
Arma Virumque Cano

So, with Trump as a great Roman general, you finally realize that this election process is finally dead and war must be used instead.

More parallels can be seen in the fact that the battle, holding back the barbarian hordes (today, the Third World swarm of invaders)for the next 300 years, took place in what became Vienna, the site of the turning point against the jihad before the present one.
 

Forum List

Back
Top