Trump Borders on Treason

[ABikerSailor]

Trump and his surrogates claimed that Obama and Hillary were the founders of ISIL. And, for several days, they doubled down on those claims.

Today he said he was being sarcastic.

Only problem is, sarcasm is saying something you don't believe in an ironic and snarky way. Does this mean that Obama and Hillary DIDN'T found ISIL?

And now...............he's yet again telling the military they will be called on to do something illegal. A few months back, it was ordering the military to waterboard prisoners. Now? He's saying that if a US citizen commits an act of terror here in the US, he would send them to GITMO for a military tribunal.

Only problem is, you can't put US citizens in front of a military tribunal, it goes against our justice system, because if they commit an act of terror in the US, and they are US citizens, the US courts have the jurisdiction and the responsibility.

If you want to keep the Constitution intact, Trump would be your last choice for president.

 

[TooTall]

Trump and his surrogates claimed that Obama and Hillary were the founders of ISIL. And, for several days, they doubled down on those claims.

Today he said he was being sarcastic.

Only problem is, sarcasm is saying something you don't believe in an ironic and snarky way. Does this mean that Obama and Hillary DIDN'T found ISIL?

And now...............he's yet again telling the military they will be called on to do something illegal. A few months back, it was ordering the military to waterboard prisoners. Now? He's saying that if a US citizen commits an act of terror here in the US, he would send them to GITMO for a military tribunal.

Only problem is, you can't put US citizens in front of a military tribunal, it goes against our justice system, because if they commit an act of terror in the US, and they are US citizens, the US courts have the jurisdiction and the responsibility.

If you want to keep the Constitution intact, Trump would be your last choice for president.

You do know that it was the CIA that waterboarded, not the military.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Trump and his surrogates claimed that Obama and Hillary were the founders of ISIL. And, for several days, they doubled down on those claims.

Today he said he was being sarcastic.

Only problem is, sarcasm is saying something you don't believe in an ironic and snarky way. Does this mean that Obama and Hillary DIDN'T found ISIL?

And now...............he's yet again telling the military they will be called on to do something illegal. A few months back, it was ordering the military to waterboard prisoners. Now? He's saying that if a US citizen commits an act of terror here in the US, he would send them to GITMO for a military tribunal.

Only problem is, you can't put US citizens in front of a military tribunal, it goes against our justice system, because if they commit an act of terror in the US, and they are US citizens, the US courts have the jurisdiction and the responsibility.

If you want to keep the Constitution intact, Trump would be your last choice for president.

You do know that it was the CIA that waterboarded, not the military.

You DO know it was Trump who said he would order the military to do waterboarding, right?

Donald Trump on waterboarding: 'Fight fire with fire' - CNNPolitics.com

Trump said he would order the military to do so, and now he's advocating locking up US citizens in GITMO (a clear violation of civil law).

 

[Votto]

If Trump is treasonous then what does that make hillary who exposed the Intel?
Democrats should not be allowed to vote.

When the dead and illegal aliens vote, who says they need to?

 

[TooTall]

Trump and his surrogates claimed that Obama and Hillary were the founders of ISIL. And, for several days, they doubled down on those claims.

Today he said he was being sarcastic.

Only problem is, sarcasm is saying something you don't believe in an ironic and snarky way. Does this mean that Obama and Hillary DIDN'T found ISIL?

And now...............he's yet again telling the military they will be called on to do something illegal. A few months back, it was ordering the military to waterboard prisoners. Now? He's saying that if a US citizen commits an act of terror here in the US, he would send them to GITMO for a military tribunal.

Only problem is, you can't put US citizens in front of a military tribunal, it goes against our justice system, because if they commit an act of terror in the US, and they are US citizens, the US courts have the jurisdiction and the responsibility.

If you want to keep the Constitution intact, Trump would be your last choice for president.

You do know that it was the CIA that waterboarded, not the military.

You DO know it was Trump who said he would order the military to do waterboarding, right?

Donald Trump on waterboarding: 'Fight fire with fire' - CNNPolitics.com

Trump said he would order the military to do so, and now he's advocating locking up US citizens in GITMO (a clear violation of civil law).

I read your articles and Trump said he would never order the military to violate the law, but he would attempt to broaden the law to allow waterboarding.

i did not find anything about sending US citizens to GITMO.

 

[WillowTree]

Trump and his surrogates claimed that Obama and Hillary were the founders of ISIL. And, for several days, they doubled down on those claims.

Today he said he was being sarcastic.

Only problem is, sarcasm is saying something you don't believe in an ironic and snarky way. Does this mean that Obama and Hillary DIDN'T found ISIL?

And now...............he's yet again telling the military they will be called on to do something illegal. A few months back, it was ordering the military to waterboard prisoners. Now? He's saying that if a US citizen commits an act of terror here in the US, he would send them to GITMO for a military tribunal.

Only problem is, you can't put US citizens in front of a military tribunal, it goes against our justice system, because if they commit an act of terror in the US, and they are US citizens, the US courts have the jurisdiction and the responsibility.

If you want to keep the Constitution intact, Trump would be your last choice for president.

Err, He can do like Obama did and just take them out with a missle.
.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Trump and his surrogates claimed that Obama and Hillary were the founders of ISIL. And, for several days, they doubled down on those claims.

Today he said he was being sarcastic.

Only problem is, sarcasm is saying something you don't believe in an ironic and snarky way. Does this mean that Obama and Hillary DIDN'T found ISIL?

And now...............he's yet again telling the military they will be called on to do something illegal. A few months back, it was ordering the military to waterboard prisoners. Now? He's saying that if a US citizen commits an act of terror here in the US, he would send them to GITMO for a military tribunal.

Only problem is, you can't put US citizens in front of a military tribunal, it goes against our justice system, because if they commit an act of terror in the US, and they are US citizens, the US courts have the jurisdiction and the responsibility.

If you want to keep the Constitution intact, Trump would be your last choice for president.

You do know that it was the CIA that waterboarded, not the military.

You DO know it was Trump who said he would order the military to do waterboarding, right?

Donald Trump on waterboarding: 'Fight fire with fire' - CNNPolitics.com

Trump said he would order the military to do so, and now he's advocating locking up US citizens in GITMO (a clear violation of civil law).

I read your articles and Trump said he would never order the military to violate the law, but he would attempt to broaden the law to allow waterboarding.

i did not find anything about sending US citizens to GITMO.

He can't allow waterboarding. It's against the Geneva conventions.

As far as not knowing about him wanting to send US citizens who commit terror acts here in the US? Where have you been for the past week, under a rock? Here's a link to help you out.

Trump: Americans could be tried in Guantánamo

 

[Brynmr]

Looking at the polls tells me what a pathetic bunch of people, claiming to be Americans, this country is made up of. We could be already lost.

 

[WillowTree]

Trump and his surrogates claimed that Obama and Hillary were the founders of ISIL. And, for several days, they doubled down on those claims.

Today he said he was being sarcastic.

Only problem is, sarcasm is saying something you don't believe in an ironic and snarky way. Does this mean that Obama and Hillary DIDN'T found ISIL?

And now...............he's yet again telling the military they will be called on to do something illegal. A few months back, it was ordering the military to waterboard prisoners. Now? He's saying that if a US citizen commits an act of terror here in the US, he would send them to GITMO for a military tribunal.

Only problem is, you can't put US citizens in front of a military tribunal, it goes against our justice system, because if they commit an act of terror in the US, and they are US citizens, the US courts have the jurisdiction and the responsibility.

If you want to keep the Constitution intact, Trump would be your last choice for president.

You do know that it was the CIA that waterboarded, not the military.

You DO know it was Trump who said he would order the military to do waterboarding, right?

Donald Trump on waterboarding: 'Fight fire with fire' - CNNPolitics.com

Trump said he would order the military to do so, and now he's advocating locking up US citizens in GITMO (a clear violation of civil law).

I read your articles and Trump said he would never order the military to violate the law, but he would attempt to broaden the law to allow waterboarding.

i did not find anything about sending US citizens to GITMO.

He can't allow waterboarding. It's against the Geneva conventions.

As far as not knowing about him wanting to send US citizens who commit terror acts here in the US? Where have you been for the past week, under a rock? Here's a link to help you out.

Trump: Americans could be tried in Guantánamo

Where does it say it's against the Geneva Convention?

 

[ABikerSailor]

Trump and his surrogates claimed that Obama and Hillary were the founders of ISIL. And, for several days, they doubled down on those claims.

Today he said he was being sarcastic.

Only problem is, sarcasm is saying something you don't believe in an ironic and snarky way. Does this mean that Obama and Hillary DIDN'T found ISIL?

And now...............he's yet again telling the military they will be called on to do something illegal. A few months back, it was ordering the military to waterboard prisoners. Now? He's saying that if a US citizen commits an act of terror here in the US, he would send them to GITMO for a military tribunal.

Only problem is, you can't put US citizens in front of a military tribunal, it goes against our justice system, because if they commit an act of terror in the US, and they are US citizens, the US courts have the jurisdiction and the responsibility.

If you want to keep the Constitution intact, Trump would be your last choice for president.

You do know that it was the CIA that waterboarded, not the military.

You DO know it was Trump who said he would order the military to do waterboarding, right?

Donald Trump on waterboarding: 'Fight fire with fire' - CNNPolitics.com

Trump said he would order the military to do so, and now he's advocating locking up US citizens in GITMO (a clear violation of civil law).

I read your articles and Trump said he would never order the military to violate the law, but he would attempt to broaden the law to allow waterboarding.

i did not find anything about sending US citizens to GITMO.

He can't allow waterboarding. It's against the Geneva conventions.

As far as not knowing about him wanting to send US citizens who commit terror acts here in the US? Where have you been for the past week, under a rock? Here's a link to help you out.

Trump: Americans could be tried in Guantánamo

Where does it say it's against the Geneva Convention?

It's in the section under torture. Geez...............you civilians sure are ignorant about what the military can and can't do.

 

[WillowTree]

You do know that it was the CIA that waterboarded, not the military.

You DO know it was Trump who said he would order the military to do waterboarding, right?

Donald Trump on waterboarding: 'Fight fire with fire' - CNNPolitics.com

Trump said he would order the military to do so, and now he's advocating locking up US citizens in GITMO (a clear violation of civil law).

I read your articles and Trump said he would never order the military to violate the law, but he would attempt to broaden the law to allow waterboarding.

i did not find anything about sending US citizens to GITMO.

He can't allow waterboarding. It's against the Geneva conventions.

As far as not knowing about him wanting to send US citizens who commit terror acts here in the US? Where have you been for the past week, under a rock? Here's a link to help you out.

Trump: Americans could be tried in Guantánamo

Where does it say it's against the Geneva Convention?

It's in the section under torture. Geez...............you civilians sure are ignorant about what the military can and can't do.

Really? Then why did John McCain get hung from the ceiling from his arms?

 

[HUGGY]

You do know that it was the CIA that waterboarded, not the military.

You DO know it was Trump who said he would order the military to do waterboarding, right?

Donald Trump on waterboarding: 'Fight fire with fire' - CNNPolitics.com

Trump said he would order the military to do so, and now he's advocating locking up US citizens in GITMO (a clear violation of civil law).

I read your articles and Trump said he would never order the military to violate the law, but he would attempt to broaden the law to allow waterboarding.

i did not find anything about sending US citizens to GITMO.

He can't allow waterboarding. It's against the Geneva conventions.

As far as not knowing about him wanting to send US citizens who commit terror acts here in the US? Where have you been for the past week, under a rock? Here's a link to help you out.

Trump: Americans could be tried in Guantánamo

Where does it say it's against the Geneva Convention?

It's in the section under torture. Geez...............you civilians sure are ignorant about what the military can and can't do.

Ignorant? No...they just flat don't care. Trump has them whipped up into such a blood lust frenzy they really don't care if we break international laws on torture. If Trump DID directly order torture under the Geneva Conventions guidelines he would be subject to arrest and trial at the Haig.

 

[TooTall]

Trump and his surrogates claimed that Obama and Hillary were the founders of ISIL. And, for several days, they doubled down on those claims.

Today he said he was being sarcastic.

Only problem is, sarcasm is saying something you don't believe in an ironic and snarky way. Does this mean that Obama and Hillary DIDN'T found ISIL?

And now...............he's yet again telling the military they will be called on to do something illegal. A few months back, it was ordering the military to waterboard prisoners. Now? He's saying that if a US citizen commits an act of terror here in the US, he would send them to GITMO for a military tribunal.

Only problem is, you can't put US citizens in front of a military tribunal, it goes against our justice system, because if they commit an act of terror in the US, and they are US citizens, the US courts have the jurisdiction and the responsibility.

If you want to keep the Constitution intact, Trump would be your last choice for president.

You do know that it was the CIA that waterboarded, not the military.

You DO know it was Trump who said he would order the military to do waterboarding, right?

Donald Trump on waterboarding: 'Fight fire with fire' - CNNPolitics.com

Trump said he would order the military to do so, and now he's advocating locking up US citizens in GITMO (a clear violation of civil law).

I read your articles and Trump said he would never order the military to violate the law, but he would attempt to broaden the law to allow waterboarding.

i did not find anything about sending US citizens to GITMO.

He can't allow waterboarding. It's against the Geneva conventions.

As far as not knowing about him wanting to send US citizens who commit terror acts here in the US? Where have you been for the past week, under a rock? Here's a link to help you out.

Trump: Americans could be tried in Guantánamo

I didn't get my copy of the Miami Herald dated AUGUST 11, 2016 5:54 PM.

 

[WillowTree]

Hum! So, if water boarding would save your loved ones from a terrorist attack you would be against it?

 

[TooTall]

Trump and his surrogates claimed that Obama and Hillary were the founders of ISIL. And, for several days, they doubled down on those claims.

Today he said he was being sarcastic.

Only problem is, sarcasm is saying something you don't believe in an ironic and snarky way. Does this mean that Obama and Hillary DIDN'T found ISIL?

And now...............he's yet again telling the military they will be called on to do something illegal. A few months back, it was ordering the military to waterboard prisoners. Now? He's saying that if a US citizen commits an act of terror here in the US, he would send them to GITMO for a military tribunal.

Only problem is, you can't put US citizens in front of a military tribunal, it goes against our justice system, because if they commit an act of terror in the US, and they are US citizens, the US courts have the jurisdiction and the responsibility.

If you want to keep the Constitution intact, Trump would be your last choice for president.

You do know that it was the CIA that waterboarded, not the military.

You DO know it was Trump who said he would order the military to do waterboarding, right?

Donald Trump on waterboarding: 'Fight fire with fire' - CNNPolitics.com

Trump said he would order the military to do so, and now he's advocating locking up US citizens in GITMO (a clear violation of civil law).

I read your articles and Trump said he would never order the military to violate the law, but he would attempt to broaden the law to allow waterboarding.

i did not find anything about sending US citizens to GITMO.

He can't allow waterboarding. It's against the Geneva conventions.

As far as not knowing about him wanting to send US citizens who commit terror acts here in the US? Where have you been for the past week, under a rock? Here's a link to help you out.

Trump: Americans could be tried in Guantánamo

Where does it say it's against the Geneva Convention?

ISIS doesn't qualify for Geneva Convention rules. And they damned sure don't go by them.

 

[WillowTree]

You do know that it was the CIA that waterboarded, not the military.

You DO know it was Trump who said he would order the military to do waterboarding, right?

Donald Trump on waterboarding: 'Fight fire with fire' - CNNPolitics.com

Trump said he would order the military to do so, and now he's advocating locking up US citizens in GITMO (a clear violation of civil law).

I read your articles and Trump said he would never order the military to violate the law, but he would attempt to broaden the law to allow waterboarding.

i did not find anything about sending US citizens to GITMO.

He can't allow waterboarding. It's against the Geneva conventions.

As far as not knowing about him wanting to send US citizens who commit terror acts here in the US? Where have you been for the past week, under a rock? Here's a link to help you out.

Trump: Americans could be tried in Guantánamo

Where does it say it's against the Geneva Convention?

ISIS doesn't qualify for Geneva Convention rules. And they damned sure don't go by them.

What about Kalid Sheik Mohammed? It mystifies me why libtards are willing to sacrifice their families to save an old goat like that.

 

[TooTall]

You DO know it was Trump who said he would order the military to do waterboarding, right?

Donald Trump on waterboarding: 'Fight fire with fire' - CNNPolitics.com

Trump said he would order the military to do so, and now he's advocating locking up US citizens in GITMO (a clear violation of civil law).

I read your articles and Trump said he would never order the military to violate the law, but he would attempt to broaden the law to allow waterboarding.

i did not find anything about sending US citizens to GITMO.

He can't allow waterboarding. It's against the Geneva conventions.

As far as not knowing about him wanting to send US citizens who commit terror acts here in the US? Where have you been for the past week, under a rock? Here's a link to help you out.

Trump: Americans could be tried in Guantánamo

Where does it say it's against the Geneva Convention?

It's in the section under torture. Geez...............you civilians sure are ignorant about what the military can and can't do.

Ignorant? No...they just flat don't care. Trump has them whipped up into such a blood lust frenzy they really don't care if we break international laws on torture. If Trump DID directly order torture under the Geneva Conventions guidelines he would be subject to arrest and trial at the Haig.

I have to admit that if an Islamist terrorist is thought to be in a house with 5 of his kids and 3 of his wives, Obama sends in a Hellfire missile from a drone. I wonder if that is covered in the Geneva Conventions.

 

[HUGGY]

You do know that it was the CIA that waterboarded, not the military.

You DO know it was Trump who said he would order the military to do waterboarding, right?

Donald Trump on waterboarding: 'Fight fire with fire' - CNNPolitics.com

Trump said he would order the military to do so, and now he's advocating locking up US citizens in GITMO (a clear violation of civil law).

I read your articles and Trump said he would never order the military to violate the law, but he would attempt to broaden the law to allow waterboarding.

i did not find anything about sending US citizens to GITMO.

He can't allow waterboarding. It's against the Geneva conventions.

As far as not knowing about him wanting to send US citizens who commit terror acts here in the US? Where have you been for the past week, under a rock? Here's a link to help you out.

Trump: Americans could be tried in Guantánamo

Where does it say it's against the Geneva Convention?

ISIS doesn't qualify for Geneva Convention rules. And they damned sure don't go by them.

In the field you probably have a good point. Once captured I think the responsibility goes to the capturing country.

 

[ABikerSailor]

You DO know it was Trump who said he would order the military to do waterboarding, right?

Donald Trump on waterboarding: 'Fight fire with fire' - CNNPolitics.com

Trump said he would order the military to do so, and now he's advocating locking up US citizens in GITMO (a clear violation of civil law).

I read your articles and Trump said he would never order the military to violate the law, but he would attempt to broaden the law to allow waterboarding.

i did not find anything about sending US citizens to GITMO.

He can't allow waterboarding. It's against the Geneva conventions.

As far as not knowing about him wanting to send US citizens who commit terror acts here in the US? Where have you been for the past week, under a rock? Here's a link to help you out.

Trump: Americans could be tried in Guantánamo

Where does it say it's against the Geneva Convention?

ISIS doesn't qualify for Geneva Convention rules. And they damned sure don't go by them.

In the field you probably have a good point. Once captured I think the responsibility goes to the capturing country.

Spot on Huggy. And if the capturing country is a treaty member of the Geneva Conventions (we and most other advanced countries are), then we have to abide by them in the treatment of our prisoners.

 

[Flopper]

And of course that qualifies him to be commander in chief of the armed forces, and the leader of the free world, right?

Do tell.... What part of "community organizer" qualified Obama for Commander in Chief of the armed forces, and leader of the free world? The part where he sued Citibank to make bad loans?

The whole reason our founding fathers wanted a limited executive branch, was because they understood that no single individual would ever be supremely qualified in every single aspect of governance.

Which presidency throughout all human history, would you claim was completely qualified in all things? Every aspect of the economy, every aspect of international diplomacy, every aspect of military, every aspect of domestic law, every aspect of race?

Which guy was that perfect?

The fact you even think in these terms, is exactly why we were never supposed to vote on the president. But since you have demand democracy, instead of a republic, then you get what you get.

I noticed you neglect the 10 years he spent as a state and US Senator, his work as teacher of constitutional law, as well as his education at the Harvard School Law and President of the Harvard Law Review and prefer to concentrate on the 3 years he worked part time as a community organizer.

Do you really think Trump's skills in filing military deferments qualify him as Commander and Chief, his dozens of law suits against those that disrespect him has given him in depth knowledge of our constitution and laws, his time spent golfing and selling property around the world has given him a firm foundation in geopolitics. The fact is Donald Trump is well qualified to run a property development and real estate firm. If we ever need a president to develop resorts and casinos, Trump's the man.

I'll take real world experience, over an ivory tower of imbeciles, any day.

You think that working as a teacher, or working as a lawyer, qualifies you for Commander and Chief?

Bull crap. Facing the harsh realities of the real world, where you don't get paid by tax payers regardless of if you win or lose, and where you don't get tenure to talk to students with no risk of failure.... that's worth more than anything Obama did.

Depth of knowledge of what? How to write an 'affordable care act' that made care less affordable? How to stimulate the economy for $Trillions of dollars, and end up with higher rates of unemployment than the worst imaged outcome, and dragging it out for years longer than was ever estimated?

So he can get a peace prize, and then bomb Syria, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Yemen and Afghanistan?

I'm more comfortable with a president, who knows he doesn't know it all, and has a list of advisors, than I am with one who claims to know it all, and clearly has proven he doesn't.

I hate to break the news to you but the job of the president is political from the day he takes office to the day he leaves. Every decision he makes will be political. If it make sense to you to put someone in the office that is a political neophyte, with no understanding of how the government and congress actually work, and has to look in the dictionary for definition of geopolitics, then you have no idea what the job of the president really entails.

Understanding the cultures, the history and driving forces of our allies and enemies, an understanding of American foreign policy, it's successes and failures, a knowledge of the personalities, and key issues for members of congress, an understating of government fiscal policy, monetary policy, and finance, a basic knowledge of our laws and how they relate to the constitution, and a working knowledge of the components of the executives branch are critical to the work of the president. This is the real world experience and knowledge anyone applying for the president's job needs. It's impossible for any president to have all the knowledge and experience he needs, but for a person to come to the office with nothing he needs is a hell of problem.

Donald Trump's experience developing and managing real estate is about as applicable to the job of the president as the experience of Joe the plumber.

Well, you pointed out that Obama had "all this experience" and look what that got use ....... screwed.

Or do you want to blame that on the fact that Valerie Jarrett was really running the show ?

The corollary to your argument is someone with no experience would have done better which is idiotic.