Trump classified documents trial date set for Aug. 14

The Clinton tapes will not be allowed into evidence, as it has nothing to do with the case against Mr. Trump.
...so you say, here is a different view, with a credible reference.

If you believe the most ardent defenders of newly indicted former president Donald Trump, there’s a silver bullet hiding in Bill Clinton’s sock drawer.
The reference to Clinton’s socks, which has cropped up not just in the former president’s Truth Social feed and at conservative news outlets but even in Trump court filings, stems from a 13-year-old case in which the right-leaning nonprofit Judicial Watch sought access to 79 audio tape recordings of Clinton interviews conducted by the historian Taylor Branch while Clinton was in office.
 
...so you say, here is a different view, with a credible reference.

If you believe the most ardent defenders of newly indicted former president Donald Trump, there’s a silver bullet hiding in Bill Clinton’s sock drawer.
The reference to Clinton’s socks, which has cropped up not just in the former president’s Truth Social feed and at conservative news outlets but even in Trump court filings, stems from a 13-year-old case in which the right-leaning nonprofit Judicial Watch sought access to 79 audio tape recordings of Clinton interviews conducted by the historian Taylor Branch while Clinton was in office.
From your link:
That theory is vigorously disputed by national security experts, including former National Archives litigation director Jason Baron, who is now a professor at the University of Maryland, and Bradley Moss of the Mark S. Zaid law firm.

Both Baron and Moss told me by email that there are clear distinctions between the audiotapes at issue in the Clinton case and the classified records in the Trump criminal case.

The Clinton tapes, Baron said, “were in the nature of a diary or journal in recorded form,” fitting the definition of a personal record in the Presidential Records Act. But the documents with classified markings that were seized from Mar-a-Lago, Baron said, “were official government records that should never have been transferred out of the government's hands.”

It can be discussed until you are blue in the face, but will not be allowed to be mentioned in Mr. Trump's case.
 
From your link:
That theory is vigorously disputed by national security experts, including former National Archives litigation director Jason Baron, who is now a professor at the University of Maryland, and Bradley Moss of the Mark S. Zaid law firm.
Both Baron and Moss told me by email that there are clear distinctions between the audiotapes at issue in the Clinton case and the classified records in the Trump criminal case.
The Clinton tapes, Baron said, “were in the nature of a diary or journal in recorded form,” fitting the definition of a personal record in the Presidential Records Act. But the documents with classified markings that were seized from Mar-a-Lago, Baron said, “were official government records that should never have been transferred out of the government's hands.”
It can be discussed until you are blue in the face, but will not be allowed to be mentioned in Mr. Trump's case.
If that's true, Fitton is giving Trump very bad advice. We'll see what the judge rules.
 
I still truly believe Trump is above the law. Some how, some way, he will just suck in all this attention focused on him and continue his insane shit show with about half of the Republican Party worshiping him. He was insisting last night, over and over he won in 2020.

There is literally no intelligent person that doesn't recognize the inherent and overwhelming chance for fraud with unvetted, unverifiable mail in ballots.
Most people on the planet have reasonable doubt.
 
There is literally no intelligent person that doesn't recognize the inherent and overwhelming chance for fraud with unvetted, unverifiable mail in ballots.
Most people on the planet have reasonable doubt.
No, they don't. Trump voted by mail in FL. There is no doubt he lost.
 
There is literally no intelligent person that doesn't recognize the inherent and overwhelming chance for fraud with unvetted, unverifiable mail in ballots.
Most people on the planet have reasonable doubt.
Really, Trump lost. Really.
 
A Florida federal judge on Tuesday scheduled the criminal trial of former President Donald Trump for his alleged illegal retention of classified government documents to begin Aug. 14.

But legal experts do not expect the trial to begin so early, given the time needed to resolve legal issues before a jury starts hearing testimony and being presented with evidence.

Trump classified documents trial date set for Aug. 14

Prepare yourselves for an onslaught of delaying tactics from the Orange Obstructionist.
Whining whining whining. That’s all you get from bug80. Well, that and dishonesty.

Preparing a defense takes time. Aug 14 is not a realistic date. You can expect many defense motions. Minimally required. Absolutely called for.

And of course, shit stains like bug80 will falsely label it as “obstructionism.”

Bug80, not only are you a bullshit flinging hack, but you make that obvious with each of your stupid posts.
 
Whining whining whining. That’s all you get from bug80. Well, that and dishonesty.

Preparing a defense takes time. Aug 14 is not a realistic date. You can expect many defense motions. Minimally required. Absolutely called for.

And of course, shit stains like bug80 will falsely label it as “obstructionism.”

Bug80, not only are you a bullshit flinging hack, but you make that obvious with each of your stupid posts.
If Trump really is not guilty why prepare a defense, just tell the truth?
 
Your ignorance is showing.

Preparing a defense requires a shit ton more than just “telling the truth.” :cuckoo:
I guess you are correct when it is Trump. How many times has the Trump truth changed since this started?
 
A Florida federal judge on Tuesday scheduled the criminal trial of former President Donald Trump for his alleged illegal retention of classified government documents to begin Aug. 14.

But legal experts do not expect the trial to begin so early, given the time needed to resolve legal issues before a jury starts hearing testimony and being presented with evidence.

Trump classified documents trial date set for Aug. 14

Prepare yourselves for an onslaught of delaying tactics from the Orange Obstructionist.
No time like a Stalinist show trial time.
 
If that's true, Fitton is giving Trump very bad advice. We'll see what the judge rules.

(A) Fitton isn't a lawyer.

(B) Fitton (embodied in Judicial Watch) - Lost the Clinton Tape case.

(C) Agree, he (an English Major) was giving bad advice but FPOTUS chose to listen to him instead of - you know - his actual lawyers.

(D) Clintons civil non-classified tapes under the PRA, will have not bearing on a criminal Espionage case.

WW
 
I guess you are correct when it is Trump. How many times has the Trump truth changed since this started?
You guess? Your tiny ability to grasp reality is only when Trump has been accused? Pinheads like you can’t imagine the possibility that he is actually innocent.

Your atrocious ignorance is all on you. But whether you like it or not, even politicians you happen to dislike deserve both substantive and procedural due process.
 
(A) Fitton isn't a lawyer.

(B) Fitton (embodied in Judicial Watch) - Lost the Clinton Tape case.

(C) Agree, he (an English Major) was giving bad advice but FPOTUS chose to listen to him instead of - you know - his actual lawyers.

(D) Clintons civil non-classified tapes under the PRA, will have not bearing on a criminal Espionage case.

WW
Criminal Espionage.

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

:evil:
 

Forum List

Back
Top