RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
Good points. I think both Trump and a Rolling Stone should get what they deserve. Trump for taking his rudeness over the line and Rolling Stone for being completely dishonest and unreliable as journalism.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Trump defends himself on his ‘look at her face!’ slam on Fiorina
- Thread starter ClosedCaption
- Start date
007
Charter Member
I really don't a fuck if he called Fiorina a flea bit dog, so long as he sticks too his guns that he'll deport all the illegal aliens, he's got my support.
The radical muslim faggot marxist America hating shit stain fraud we have now in the white house has set the bar so low, Trump hasn't even stepped into the same league yet.
Fiorina does a big, fat, hanging bottom lip... just sayin'.
The radical muslim faggot marxist America hating shit stain fraud we have now in the white house has set the bar so low, Trump hasn't even stepped into the same league yet.
Fiorina does a big, fat, hanging bottom lip... just sayin'.
RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
What does tea party have to do with my post? I quoted RS's dishonest framing of Trump's words.Your stupidity over the Rolling Stones Magazine is exactly how conservatives/tea party work. They came out with a retraction of the story and apologized completely.
But you neglect that part. It doesn't fit into your stupid rhetoric.
Nice try.
Rolling Stone has proven to be a phony in the journalism business.
Nothing they report can be taken with any trust. It's going to have to come from somewhere else. If they want to report on music, I'll read. But that's it anymore.
On Fox News Thursday morning, Trump denied he was talking about Fiorina's looks, even as he conceded that the comments were reported accurately.
You're as dishonest as Rolling Stone. This was an attempted gotcha piece, not journalism. All for the benefit of dishonest, brainwashed political bigots like you.
The story's author framed the comments this way...
"And there, in a nutshell, is Trump's blessing and his curse: He can't seem to quit while he's ahead. The instincts that carried him out to a lead and have kept him far above the captious field are the same ones that landed him in ugly stews with ex-wives, business partners, networks, supermodels and many, many other famous women."
RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
Because Trump's explanation is that she doesn't look like she's capable to be president and RS's motive is that he meant it as a cosmetic thing.I don't disagree. If Trump truly meant it as an insult then he's through. If it is the Rolling Stone's distortion and political opportunity that it appears to be then they're through.Trump defends himself on his ‘look at her face!’ slam on Fiorina
Heres what Trump said:
"Look at that face!" Trump reportedly told Rolling Stone while talking about Fiorina, according to a profile published Wednesday "Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president?!"
NOW...Heres the "Its not what it looks like" lame explanation as if we dont understand "Look at that face" followed with "Would anyone vote for THAT?"
Business mogul Donald Trump on Thursday dismissed criticism over comments he made that appeared to take aim at GOP presidential candidate Carly Fiorina’s appearance, saying that he was only commenting on her “persona” and not her physical attractiveness.
On Fox News Thursday morning, Trump denied he was talking about Fiorina's looks, even as he conceded that the comments were reported accurately.
This is Mudwhistles face right now
"Probably I did say something like that about Carly," Trump said. "I'm talking about persona. I'm not talking about look."
LOL...So when he says LOOK he doesnt mean Look...and when he says FACE he means PERSONA
His defense is even dumber than the original insult. If 'persona' means how a person projects him or herself in public,
Fiorina is actually quite good in that regard.
Why do you keep saying "IF" like there is still a chance and you dont believe Trump when he says its correct? LOL
That's a significant distinction. Apparently you only have one closeminded interpretation.
ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
- Thread starter
- #45
Once again, Trump said it was all true. You keep holding on to this idea that RS did something wrong. I guess you gotta cope somehowGood points. I think both Trump and a Rolling Stone should get what they deserve. Trump for taking his rudeness over the line and Rolling Stone for being completely dishonest and unreliable as journalism.it really isn't - have you ever said "loot at that face" when you meant "pay attention to that persona"But his explanation of context is different from Rolling Stone. Doesn't truth mean anything to you?So trump confirming he said it... that means nothing to you?Rolling Stone has proven to be a phony in the journalism business.
Nothing they report can be taken with any trust. It's going to have to come from somewhere else. If they want to report on music, I'll read. But that's it anymore.
nope. nobody else, including trump, has done that either.
why do you find it difficult to believe that a man that runs a beauty pageant would judge women based on their looks?
gee, why would people think trump and his supporters are racist?I really don't a fuck if he called Fiorina a flea bit dog, so long as he sticks too his guns that he'll deport all the illegal aliens, he's got my support.
The radical muslim faggot marxist America hating shit stain fraud we have now in the white house has set the bar so low, Trump hasn't even stepped into the same league yet.
Fiorina does a big, fat, hanging bottom lip... just sayin'.
he specifically mentioned her face. that's not bearing or persona. come on, this is about as ridiculous as his excuse for his comments about meghan kelley menstruating.Because Trump's explanation is that she doesn't look like she's capable to be president and RS's motive is that he meant it as a cosmetic thing.I don't disagree. If Trump truly meant it as an insult then he's through. If it is the Rolling Stone's distortion and political opportunity that it appears to be then they're through.Trump defends himself on his ‘look at her face!’ slam on Fiorina
Heres what Trump said:
"Look at that face!" Trump reportedly told Rolling Stone while talking about Fiorina, according to a profile published Wednesday "Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president?!"
NOW...Heres the "Its not what it looks like" lame explanation as if we dont understand "Look at that face" followed with "Would anyone vote for THAT?"
Business mogul Donald Trump on Thursday dismissed criticism over comments he made that appeared to take aim at GOP presidential candidate Carly Fiorina’s appearance, saying that he was only commenting on her “persona” and not her physical attractiveness.
On Fox News Thursday morning, Trump denied he was talking about Fiorina's looks, even as he conceded that the comments were reported accurately.
This is Mudwhistles face right now
"Probably I did say something like that about Carly," Trump said. "I'm talking about persona. I'm not talking about look."
LOL...So when he says LOOK he doesnt mean Look...and when he says FACE he means PERSONA
His defense is even dumber than the original insult. If 'persona' means how a person projects him or herself in public,
Fiorina is actually quite good in that regard.
Why do you keep saying "IF" like there is still a chance and you dont believe Trump when he says its correct? LOL
That's a significant distinction. Apparently you only have one closeminded interpretation.
RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
Trump said he said the words but their meaning and context is in question. Rolling Stone has demonstrated dishonesty so their credibility is dubious. Trump is an egomaniac who never accepts blame or fault.Once again, Trump said it was all true. You keep holding on to this idea that RS did something wrong. I guess you gotta cope somehowGood points. I think both Trump and a Rolling Stone should get what they deserve. Trump for taking his rudeness over the line and Rolling Stone for being completely dishonest and unreliable as journalism.it really isn't - have you ever said "loot at that face" when you meant "pay attention to that persona"But his explanation of context is different from Rolling Stone. Doesn't truth mean anything to you?So trump confirming he said it... that means nothing to you?Rolling Stone has proven to be a phony in the journalism business.
Nothing they report can be taken with any trust. It's going to have to come from somewhere else. If they want to report on music, I'll read. But that's it anymore.
nope. nobody else, including trump, has done that either.
why do you find it difficult to believe that a man that runs a beauty pageant would judge women based on their looks?
You have your mind made up and I'm keeping mine open.
ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
- Thread starter
- #49
Look at her face...and by her face I mean not her face. Thats the ticket!
ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
- Thread starter
- #50
Trump said he said the words but their meaning and context is in question. Rolling Stone has demonstrated dishonesty so their credibility is dubious. Trump is an egomaniac who never accepts blame or fault.Once again, Trump said it was all true. You keep holding on to this idea that RS did something wrong. I guess you gotta cope somehowGood points. I think both Trump and a Rolling Stone should get what they deserve. Trump for taking his rudeness over the line and Rolling Stone for being completely dishonest and unreliable as journalism.it really isn't - have you ever said "loot at that face" when you meant "pay attention to that persona"But his explanation of context is different from Rolling Stone. Doesn't truth mean anything to you?So trump confirming he said it... that means nothing to you?
nope. nobody else, including trump, has done that either.
why do you find it difficult to believe that a man that runs a beauty pageant would judge women based on their looks?
You have your mind made up and I'm keeping mine open.
No, you're demonstrating dishonesty by saying they are dishonest without pointing out the dishonesty
RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
Isn't the face the part that provides unspoken expression? Besides silent farting, that is.he specifically mentioned her face. that's not bearing or persona. come on, this is about as ridiculous as his excuse for his comments about meghan kelley menstruating.Because Trump's explanation is that she doesn't look like she's capable to be president and RS's motive is that he meant it as a cosmetic thing.I don't disagree. If Trump truly meant it as an insult then he's through. If it is the Rolling Stone's distortion and political opportunity that it appears to be then they're through.Trump defends himself on his ‘look at her face!’ slam on Fiorina
Heres what Trump said:
"Look at that face!" Trump reportedly told Rolling Stone while talking about Fiorina, according to a profile published Wednesday "Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president?!"
NOW...Heres the "Its not what it looks like" lame explanation as if we dont understand "Look at that face" followed with "Would anyone vote for THAT?"
Business mogul Donald Trump on Thursday dismissed criticism over comments he made that appeared to take aim at GOP presidential candidate Carly Fiorina’s appearance, saying that he was only commenting on her “persona” and not her physical attractiveness.
On Fox News Thursday morning, Trump denied he was talking about Fiorina's looks, even as he conceded that the comments were reported accurately.
This is Mudwhistles face right now
"Probably I did say something like that about Carly," Trump said. "I'm talking about persona. I'm not talking about look."
LOL...So when he says LOOK he doesnt mean Look...and when he says FACE he means PERSONA
His defense is even dumber than the original insult. If 'persona' means how a person projects him or herself in public,
Fiorina is actually quite good in that regard.
Why do you keep saying "IF" like there is still a chance and you dont believe Trump when he says its correct? LOL
That's a significant distinction. Apparently you only have one closeminded interpretation.
RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
UVA rape?Trump said he said the words but their meaning and context is in question. Rolling Stone has demonstrated dishonesty so their credibility is dubious. Trump is an egomaniac who never accepts blame or fault.Once again, Trump said it was all true. You keep holding on to this idea that RS did something wrong. I guess you gotta cope somehowGood points. I think both Trump and a Rolling Stone should get what they deserve. Trump for taking his rudeness over the line and Rolling Stone for being completely dishonest and unreliable as journalism.it really isn't - have you ever said "loot at that face" when you meant "pay attention to that persona"But his explanation of context is different from Rolling Stone. Doesn't truth mean anything to you?
nope. nobody else, including trump, has done that either.
why do you find it difficult to believe that a man that runs a beauty pageant would judge women based on their looks?
You have your mind made up and I'm keeping mine open.
No, you're demonstrating dishonesty by saying they are dishonest without pointing out the dishonesty
007
Charter Member
"Racist?" ... pfft ...gee, why would people think trump and his supporters are racist?I really don't a fuck if he called Fiorina a flea bit dog, so long as he sticks too his guns that he'll deport all the illegal aliens, he's got my support.
The radical muslim faggot marxist America hating shit stain fraud we have now in the white house has set the bar so low, Trump hasn't even stepped into the same league yet.
Fiorina does a big, fat, hanging bottom lip... just sayin'.
Because someone believes in borders, national sovereignty and the law, that makes them a RACIST? ... HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAA... !!
What a moron.
1stRambo
Gold Member
- Feb 8, 2015
- 6,221
- 1,019
- 255
I don't disagree. If Trump truly meant it as an insult then he's through. If it is the Rolling Stone's distortion and political opportunity that it appears to be then they're through.Trump defends himself on his ‘look at her face!’ slam on Fiorina
Heres what Trump said:
"Look at that face!" Trump reportedly told Rolling Stone while talking about Fiorina, according to a profile published Wednesday "Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president?!"
NOW...Heres the "Its not what it looks like" lame explanation as if we dont understand "Look at that face" followed with "Would anyone vote for THAT?"
Business mogul Donald Trump on Thursday dismissed criticism over comments he made that appeared to take aim at GOP presidential candidate Carly Fiorina’s appearance, saying that he was only commenting on her “persona” and not her physical attractiveness.
On Fox News Thursday morning, Trump denied he was talking about Fiorina's looks, even as he conceded that the comments were reported accurately.
This is Mudwhistles face right now
"Probably I did say something like that about Carly," Trump said. "I'm talking about persona. I'm not talking about look."
LOL...So when he says LOOK he doesnt mean Look...and when he says FACE he means PERSONA
His defense is even dumber than the original insult. If 'persona' means how a person projects him or herself in public,
Fiorina is actually quite good in that regard.
Why do you keep saying "IF" like there is still a chance and you dont believe Trump when he says its correct? LOL
Yo, get over it, Trump is on a mission, and all of the Mini Socialist can`t do a damn thing! Love It!!!
"GTP"
Sorry, I missed that. Which post did you do that in?What does tea party have to do with my post? I quoted RS's dishonest framing of Trump's words.Your stupidity over the Rolling Stones Magazine is exactly how conservatives/tea party work. They came out with a retraction of the story and apologized completely.
But you neglect that part. It doesn't fit into your stupid rhetoric.
Nice try.
Rolling Stone has proven to be a phony in the journalism business.
Nothing they report can be taken with any trust. It's going to have to come from somewhere else. If they want to report on music, I'll read. But that's it anymore.
On Fox News Thursday morning, Trump denied he was talking about Fiorina's looks, even as he conceded that the comments were reported accurately.
You're as dishonest as Rolling Stone. This was an attempted gotcha piece, not journalism. All for the benefit of dishonest, brainwashed political bigots like you.
The story's author framed the comments this way...
"And there, in a nutshell, is Trump's blessing and his curse: He can't seem to quit while he's ahead. The instincts that carried him out to a lead and have kept him far above the captious field are the same ones that landed him in ugly stews with ex-wives, business partners, networks, supermodels and many, many other famous women."
bendog
Diamond Member
He is like a souring American Bald Eagle
https://s.yimg.com/fz/api/res/1.2/t...ssed/0812/0803161453271better_photo_eagle.jpg
https://s.yimg.com/fz/api/res/1.2/t...ssed/0812/0803161453271better_photo_eagle.jpg
That eagle is not sour. Nor is it soaring. Please don't insult our national symbol by comparing it to Trump or any other asshole.He is like a souring American Bald Eagle
[img"https://s.yimg.com/fz/api/res/1.2/0...com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Bald-Eagle.jpg"
ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
- Thread starter
- #58
UVA rape?Trump said he said the words but their meaning and context is in question. Rolling Stone has demonstrated dishonesty so their credibility is dubious. Trump is an egomaniac who never accepts blame or fault.Once again, Trump said it was all true. You keep holding on to this idea that RS did something wrong. I guess you gotta cope somehowGood points. I think both Trump and a Rolling Stone should get what they deserve. Trump for taking his rudeness over the line and Rolling Stone for being completely dishonest and unreliable as journalism.it really isn't - have you ever said "loot at that face" when you meant "pay attention to that persona"
nope. nobody else, including trump, has done that either.
why do you find it difficult to believe that a man that runs a beauty pageant would judge women based on their looks?
You have your mind made up and I'm keeping mine open.
No, you're demonstrating dishonesty by saying they are dishonest without pointing out the dishonesty
Trump?
paulitician
Platinum Member
- Oct 7, 2011
- 38,401
- 4,162
- 1,130
Ha, Trump has to chill a bit. Gettin a little too aggressive. I like what he's about, but these kind of comments can only hurt him. He's got to understand that.
RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
Troll on.Sorry, I missed that. Which post did you do that in?What does tea party have to do with my post? I quoted RS's dishonest framing of Trump's words.Your stupidity over the Rolling Stones Magazine is exactly how conservatives/tea party work. They came out with a retraction of the story and apologized completely.
But you neglect that part. It doesn't fit into your stupid rhetoric.
Nice try.
Rolling Stone has proven to be a phony in the journalism business.
Nothing they report can be taken with any trust. It's going to have to come from somewhere else. If they want to report on music, I'll read. But that's it anymore.
On Fox News Thursday morning, Trump denied he was talking about Fiorina's looks, even as he conceded that the comments were reported accurately.
You're as dishonest as Rolling Stone. This was an attempted gotcha piece, not journalism. All for the benefit of dishonest, brainwashed political bigots like you.
The story's author framed the comments this way...
"And there, in a nutshell, is Trump's blessing and his curse: He can't seem to quit while he's ahead. The instincts that carried him out to a lead and have kept him far above the captious field are the same ones that landed him in ugly stews with ex-wives, business partners, networks, supermodels and many, many other famous women."
Similar threads
- Replies
- 58
- Views
- 578
- Replies
- 12
- Views
- 321
- Replies
- 133
- Views
- 900
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 206
- Views
- 914
- Replies
- 107
- Views
- 897
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8371
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 477
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-