Trump goes there: insinuates that Megyn Kelly was menstruating during debate

As I predicted a while back, Trump has managed to identify what little morsel of dignity remains in contemporary American politics, and he's peed on it.

It looks like the 20% to to 25% of one party that is going to forgive every stupid, embarrassing thing he says will keep doing so. Yuck.

.
Nope.......the problem is many of these folks are this way or worse in private.

With Trump....it's out there for everyone to see. He doesn't need a teleprompter or a prepared speech to keep him from saying the wrong thing.

I can respect that......even though I don't agree with what he says 100%.

He's a spotlight shining on the dirty underside of politics. The backroom deals.....the selling out of the American people to the highest bidder.

Maybe some good will come from this.
 
How about our current President who calls the opposite party the enemy and refuses to represent the whole country?
What about it?

Our president is entitled to respond to his critics and hold the opposing party responsible for their actions. He was not using offensive terms, he was stating the obvious
The president has a political platform that he ran on. A majority of the voters supported that platform. Whining that he does not "represent" you is childish

It was very offensive and it is not about one person.
Get serious

Compare the political rhetoric coming from the Republican leadership about Obama and Obamas response and the presidents responses are timid
Bush was very respectful towards Clinton throughout his presidency. Obama constantly blames Bush for his failures.
Clinton didn't leave Bush stuck with the great recession, two wars and a nation hated by most of the world.
Only left him 911, and Obama was gonna fix all that mess. Right? Well what happened?
 
You were proven wrong. This wasn't the first time RW has said something like this. Your side has bigots. Live with it.
Did you ask him?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
It's not my business to allow him the chance to mitigate his bigoted statements. He's done this before and if it were a conservative making these statements, you would take it at face value. You can admit you made a mistake. I promise not to upbraid you for it.
OK, I'll ask.

rightwinger

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
OK...I'll answer

I was translating Trumps intent into crude terms to highlight the impact of what he said
What Trump said was repulsive and deserves derision.
His terminology in referring to women should not be tolerated
Exactly as I interpreted it. Unfortunately, many righties have problems with context....

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Trump says what we're thinking.

Not a Politically-correct bone in his body.
 
Which of those is asking us to be President?

How about our current President who calls the opposite party the enemy and refuses to represent the whole country?
What about it?

Our president is entitled to respond to his critics and hold the opposing party responsible for their actions. He was not using offensive terms, he was stating the obvious
The president has a political platform that he ran on. A majority of the voters supported that platform. Whining that he does not "represent" you is childish
Kinda reminds me of all the negative things that were said about Bush from democrat leaders about the successful surge in Iraq. Remember all the negative thing democrat leaders said about our great troops also. Very childish and anti American.
I don't remember that. I remember a lot of people saying the surge was temporary and would fall apart once we stopped handing over bags of money to the Sunni tribal leaders. The predictions came true. As soon as the bags of money stopped getting handed out the Sunni tribes turned. The surge troop bought some temporary time. Just enough for Bush to get out and drop the mess on the next guy.
Rewriting history again? The surge was the reason Obama successfully ended the Iraq war. Plenty of negative things were said about Bush from democrat leaders. History can be a liberals worst enemy.
The bags of money are not talked about. It's the dirty little secret that isn't a real secret. That Obama followed the advice of his commanders on the ground and continued the strategy that was being used to wind down the war for American combat forces is not a bad reflection on him. It is a good one, but it continued with the handing out of money to Sunni tribes. Do you deny bags of money and other funds being handed out to Sunni tribes during and as part of the surge? What part of my post was rewriting history?
 
Dear Lord, you just can't make this shit up. And he did this to a TV-anchor who has a HUGE Conservative following.

:wtf:

2016 Republican debate Donald Trump s Megyn Kelly war - POLITICO


After a day of escalating hostility, Trump took his attacks on Kelly to the next level on Friday night, apparently insinuating that the moderator had been menstruating when she questioned him during Thursday’s first Republican debate.

You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her — wherever,” he told anchor Don Lemon during an appearance on CNN.


It's pretty damned obvious.

I am making a prediction. I am predicting that this is not going to go well for Donald Trump and it is going to go just as badly for the Republican Party. This is misogyny pure. Had a Leftie said this about Megyn Kelly, Righties would be swinging from the rafters and screaming like banshees.

This is going to work wonders for the GOP in the female vote in 2016.

Thanks, Trump!


Edit: here's the video of his comments.

lmao..... this is getting comical now the clown parade on here is defending Fox



Nobody is defending Fox. They did their usual hatchet job, only this time their target was Trump, and his response was a childish, disgusting comeback. They can both be wrong, and they were.
Let me comprehend what you said.... The only way to get through to low information. Voters is go to entertainment and that's exactly what trump is doing, he is being a showman, trying to spark interest



No. I didn't say anything about any of that. I said they were both wrong. Fox did a hatchet job on Trump, and Trump is a pig.

Actually, FOX was hard on all of the candidates, but Donnie the talking Toupee opened his mouth so much that the lion's share of attention went to him.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
 
The left has had horrific things to say about Megyn and her network. A whole helluva lot worse than 'she might have been menstruating' ...heck, I'm with Donald... Something must have been wrong with her. This was a chance to look at the candidates running for President of the United States and hear their points of views on issues pertaining to our country... not some reality show gossip and banter about Rosie O'Donnell. Her question was intentionally written to make a vicious attack on Trump. It was just the sort of question some pea-brain liberal might ask... Not Megyn Kelly.

Fox News lost a TON of credibility with me last night. It was a shameful attempt at something you can't call a 'debate' by any definition of the word. It was... let's ambush Trump, throw difficult questions at Carson, make Huckabee sound like a liberal, get Cruz to talk about Jesus, Rand to talk about NSA, Walker to talk about unions, Rubio to sob over immigrants... then make Jeb, Christie and Kasich look as 'presidential' as possible!


Please provide links with quotes.

I have never heard a Leftie say even one misogynistic thing about Megyn Kelly, ever.

Please, have at it. I can wait.

No they just post pictures of her in silky lingerie and say they would do her.

Not misogynistic at all. Nope.


Why do you think she posed for those pictures in the first place?
If Kelly wants to be taken seriously as a journalist you don't pose for pictures like that
God damn you are gay as shit. So confused now you are going after Kelly?

Who is your target bitch? Trump or Kelly, this is so fascinating, you don't know even know who to attack.:)
Kelly needs to choose her path. If she wants to be taken seriously as a journalist, you don't pose in lingerie
Look at Diane Sawyer as an example
 
Which of those is asking us to be President?

How about our current President who calls the opposite party the enemy and refuses to represent the whole country?
What about it?

Our president is entitled to respond to his critics and hold the opposing party responsible for their actions. He was not using offensive terms, he was stating the obvious
The president has a political platform that he ran on. A majority of the voters supported that platform. Whining that he does not "represent" you is childish

It was very offensive and it is not about one person.
Get serious

Compare the political rhetoric coming from the Republican leadership about Obama and Obamas response and the presidents responses are timid
Bush was very respectful towards Clinton throughout his presidency. Obama constantly blames Bush for his failures.
This is also a lie. Obama has barely mentioned 43 during his presidency. Try again, but first, consider getting back on topic. Thanks.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
 
Please provide links with quotes.

I have never heard a Leftie say even one misogynistic thing about Megyn Kelly, ever.

Please, have at it. I can wait.

No they just post pictures of her in silky lingerie and say they would do her.

Not misogynistic at all. Nope.


Why do you think she posed for those pictures in the first place?
If Kelly wants to be taken seriously as a journalist you don't pose for pictures like that
God damn you are gay as shit. So confused now you are going after Kelly?

Who is your target bitch? Trump or Kelly, this is so fascinating, you don't know even know who to attack.:)
Kelly needs to choose her path. If she wants to be taken seriously as a journalist, you don't pose in lingerie
Look at Diane Sawyer as an example

What proof do you have that it was not her head that was photo shopped onto a lingerie model?
 
You were proven wrong. This wasn't the first time RW has said something like this. Your side has bigots. Live with it.
Did you ask him?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
It's not my business to allow him the chance to mitigate his bigoted statements. He's done this before and if it were a conservative making these statements, you would take it at face value. You can admit you made a mistake. I promise not to upbraid you for it.
OK, I'll ask.

rightwinger

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
OK...I'll answer

I was translating Trumps intent into crude terms to highlight the impact of what he said
What Trump said was repulsive and deserves derision.
His terminology in referring to women should not be tolerated
Exactly as I interpreted it. Unfortunately, many righties have problems with context....

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
I've stated this in the past

I am dumbfounded by the inability of conservatives to understand the complexities of the English language
Everything is taken literally. Context is beyond their comprehension. Sarcasm and satire? Right over their heads
 
What about it?

Our president is entitled to respond to his critics and hold the opposing party responsible for their actions. He was not using offensive terms, he was stating the obvious
The president has a political platform that he ran on. A majority of the voters supported that platform. Whining that he does not "represent" you is childish

It was very offensive and it is not about one person.
Get serious

Compare the political rhetoric coming from the Republican leadership about Obama and Obamas response and the presidents responses are timid
Bush was very respectful towards Clinton throughout his presidency. Obama constantly blames Bush for his failures.
Clinton didn't leave Bush stuck with the great recession, two wars and a nation hated by most of the world.
Only left him 911, and Obama was gonna fix all that mess. Right? Well what happened?
Uhm, no. 911 happened 9 months after 43 took office. Your math is faulty. Either that or you simply chose to lie.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
 
What about it?

Our president is entitled to respond to his critics and hold the opposing party responsible for their actions. He was not using offensive terms, he was stating the obvious
The president has a political platform that he ran on. A majority of the voters supported that platform. Whining that he does not "represent" you is childish

It was very offensive and it is not about one person.
Get serious

Compare the political rhetoric coming from the Republican leadership about Obama and Obamas response and the presidents responses are timid
Bush was very respectful towards Clinton throughout his presidency. Obama constantly blames Bush for his failures.
Clinton didn't leave Bush stuck with the great recession, two wars and a nation hated by most of the world.
Only left him 911, and Obama was gonna fix all that mess. Right? Well what happened?
Clinton left Bush a anti terrorist chief who was banging on White House doors and sending memo's about a coming terrorist attack from al Qaeda that included hi jacking of one or more passenger aircraft. Bush and his top security adviser Condi Rice ignored the guy and did absolutely nothing to prepare for the predicted attack.
 
No they just post pictures of her in silky lingerie and say they would do her.

Not misogynistic at all. Nope.


Why do you think she posed for those pictures in the first place?
If Kelly wants to be taken seriously as a journalist you don't pose for pictures like that
God damn you are gay as shit. So confused now you are going after Kelly?

Who is your target bitch? Trump or Kelly, this is so fascinating, you don't know even know who to attack.:)
Kelly needs to choose her path. If she wants to be taken seriously as a journalist, you don't pose in lingerie
Look at Diane Sawyer as an example

What proof do you have that it was not her head that was photo shopped onto a lingerie model?
If that is the case, then I apologize for my gullibility

If she intentionally posed for the picture, I think it detracts from her credibility as a journalist
 
Did you ask him?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
It's not my business to allow him the chance to mitigate his bigoted statements. He's done this before and if it were a conservative making these statements, you would take it at face value. You can admit you made a mistake. I promise not to upbraid you for it.
OK, I'll ask.

rightwinger

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
OK...I'll answer

I was translating Trumps intent into crude terms to highlight the impact of what he said
What Trump said was repulsive and deserves derision.
His terminology in referring to women should not be tolerated
Exactly as I interpreted it. Unfortunately, many righties have problems with context....

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
I've stated this in the past

I am dumbfounded by the inability of conservatives to understand the complexities of the English language
Everything is taken literally. Context is beyond their comprehension. Sarcasm and satire? Right over their heads
Indeed.

Or maybe because they are so unbelievably insecure, they latch onto anything to possibly bitch about.

It's kind of sad...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
 
As I predicted a while back, Trump has managed to identify what little morsel of dignity remains in contemporary American politics, and he's peed on it.

It looks like the 20% to to 25% of one party that is going to forgive every stupid, embarrassing thing he says will keep doing so. Yuck.

.
Nope.......the problem is many of these folks are this way or worse in private.

With Trump....it's out there for everyone to see. He doesn't need a teleprompter or a prepared speech to keep him from saying the wrong thing.

I can respect that......even though I don't agree with what he says 100%.

He's a spotlight shining on the dirty underside of politics. The backroom deals.....the selling out of the American people to the highest bidder.

Maybe some good will come from this.
Yeah, he did expose the nasty underbelly of politics and money, nice and clear.

Also, he made a good point, that he single-handedly put illegal immigration on the front burner.

He didn't necessarily do it in a way that helps the GOP, but I guess we'll see.

.
 
As I predicted a while back, Trump has managed to identify what little morsel of dignity remains in contemporary American politics, and he's peed on it.

It looks like the 20% to to 25% of one party that is going to forgive every stupid, embarrassing thing he says will keep doing so. Yuck.

.
Nope.......the problem is many of these folks are this way or worse in private.

With Trump....it's out there for everyone to see. He doesn't need a teleprompter or a prepared speech to keep him from saying the wrong thing.

I can respect that......even though I don't agree with what he says 100%.

He's a spotlight shining on the dirty underside of politics. The backroom deals.....the selling out of the American people to the highest bidder.

Maybe some good will come from this.
Yeah, he did expose the nasty underbelly of politics and money, nice and clear.

Also, he made a good point, that he single-handedly put illegal immigration on the front burner.

He didn't necessarily do it in a way that helps the GOP, but I guess we'll see.

.
I consider that as bullshit. Immigration has been a big issue since long before Trump made his speech about Mexico sending rapist. Remember the ebola scare and the terrorist coming across the border. How about the kids getting dumped on us.
Trump brought more attention to an already hot topic. It is already falling back to where it was as the initial attention from his stupid statements grow into old news. But the idea that if not for him we wouldn't be talking about illegal immigration is a lie he has perpetrated and others are reinforcing. He is taking credit for something he doesn't deserve credit for.
 
No they just post pictures of her in silky lingerie and say they would do her.

Not misogynistic at all. Nope.


Why do you think she posed for those pictures in the first place?
If Kelly wants to be taken seriously as a journalist you don't pose for pictures like that
God damn you are gay as shit. So confused now you are going after Kelly?

Who is your target bitch? Trump or Kelly, this is so fascinating, you don't know even know who to attack.:)
Kelly needs to choose her path. If she wants to be taken seriously as a journalist, you don't pose in lingerie
Look at Diane Sawyer as an example

What proof do you have that it was not her head that was photo shopped onto a lingerie model?

There are articles that prove that it was her. Google Megyn Kelly lingerie to see it.

That said, I don't think that posing in lingerie disqualifies a person for serious journalism. It is possible to be both smart and beautiful.
 
It's not my business to allow him the chance to mitigate his bigoted statements. He's done this before and if it were a conservative making these statements, you would take it at face value. You can admit you made a mistake. I promise not to upbraid you for it.
OK, I'll ask.

rightwinger

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
OK...I'll answer

I was translating Trumps intent into crude terms to highlight the impact of what he said
What Trump said was repulsive and deserves derision.
His terminology in referring to women should not be tolerated
Exactly as I interpreted it. Unfortunately, many righties have problems with context....

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
I've stated this in the past

I am dumbfounded by the inability of conservatives to understand the complexities of the English language
Everything is taken literally. Context is beyond their comprehension. Sarcasm and satire? Right over their heads
Indeed.

Or maybe because they are so unbelievably insecure, they latch onto anything to possibly bitch about.

It's kind of sad...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
It just seems so pervasive among conservatives at all levels

When did they lose their sense of humor?
 
Did the left have a hissy when their "journalists" were calling Conservative women sluts?
 
Naked news is big business. They have it as regular news cast in some places. FOX is way behind when it comes to T & A news casting.
 
How about our current President who calls the opposite party the enemy and refuses to represent the whole country?
What about it?

Our president is entitled to respond to his critics and hold the opposing party responsible for their actions. He was not using offensive terms, he was stating the obvious
The president has a political platform that he ran on. A majority of the voters supported that platform. Whining that he does not "represent" you is childish

It was very offensive and it is not about one person.
Get serious

Compare the political rhetoric coming from the Republican leadership about Obama and Obamas response and the presidents responses are timid
Bush was very respectful towards Clinton throughout his presidency. Obama constantly blames Bush for his failures.
This is also a lie. Obama has barely mentioned 43 during his presidency. Try again, but first, consider getting back on topic. Thanks.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Economy
Afganistan
Bp oil spill
Solyndra
Deficit
Hurricane
The election of Scott Brown
Debt
Anti Americanism
Iran
Economy
Just to name a few, anyone else want to add?
 

Forum List

Back
Top