Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,443
- 81,359
What part of that is illegal? What part refers to implicates Joe?
Be specific and link the proof.
15 yard penalty for unnecessary roughness, asking for proof.
![usa-today-8760079.0.jpg](https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/43N7jDMOFVHXOiqJhPhONjZmzSw=/0x81:1812x1100/1600x900/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47549769/usa-today-8760079.0.jpg)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What part of that is illegal? What part refers to implicates Joe?
Be specific and link the proof.
She's a whore and a fucking liar. Do you think she'll sue me now? Nope. I'm not wealthy. You don't really know how this works, huh. Or if you do then you're playing dumb.
You need to stop believing what you’re told and research for yourself. He was found liable based on hearsay evidence. There is absolutely no physical evidence that he raped or molested a single woman, only their claims that he did. These are partisan political attacks, every one of them, designed to keep him in court and out of the Oval Office.
As for him saying he had the right to grab someone, you are misrepresenting what was said in both the tape and the deposition. He said throughout history it has been the case that famous people can grab whomever they want without repercussions. It’s not entitlement. He didn’t claim he did so against their will. His point was that women, in his experience, SEEK that kind of attention from famous men. I can’t say if that’s true as I am neither materialistic nor a fame-seeking Hollywood whore.
You lost me with the rest of your screed about alt-right phony scandals. No clue what you’re referencing .
You must have overlooked past threads.
What crimes has He been convicted of?
Its a MAZE of LLC's, and yes, if anyone is secretly transfering money, not reporting it to the IRS, and they are getting it from criminals in enemy foreign nations, and they arent providing any explanation for what service they provided to earn 10 fucking million+ dollars, they should be investigated.And there you have it.
Do you think anyone in the federal government who has family members with LLCs that made money internationally should be investigated by Comer?
The person I was responding to (was it you?) ended his comment with "Fuck him".
I was just echoing that spirit.
This isn't a criminal conviction, so I'm not sure what "permanent record" you're referring to.This will go on his permanent record
5 million for a multi billionaire.
Oh yea, he really paid LOL
You might want to Google the definition of "evidence".
All your clowns were screaming rape...rape......how many on suicide watch now?
It is a jury of drone robotic hive minded demoidiots like yourself.
wow. An instant repeat of your lie. How singularly unimpressive if you. As usual.
Verdict for first time legally brands a former US president as a sexual predator....
No shit. I didn't realize that.Yeah, "fuck him," as in, fuck Trump, not fuck you.
So again I point out... you're taking this rather personal. How odd.
Right, like it matters in nycLOL
The reality is -- you have no idea which jurors were selected for this case.
I got over that when he became president. Why didn't you answer my question?
Absolutely no one. $5 million. This will be the most expensive piece at ass Trump never had.
Right, like it matters in nyc
What is a maze of LLCs? What does that even mean?Its a MAZE of LLC's, and yes, if anyone is secretly transfering money, not reporting it to the IRS, and they are getting it from criminals in enemy foreign nations, and they arent providing any explanation for what service they provided to earn 10 fucking million+ dollars they should be investigated.
Again, that is not the subject, nor supposedly why he lost the case against him. The jury decided on the preponderance of the testimony by both sides.And again, whining about the fact you hate his personality instead of what he tried to do for the folks who live in this country. Liberal judges need to be fought, it is perfectly lawful to question election results and not certify an election pending investigation, we learned that from you Dems. J6 was not seditious at all, that is a clear fact.
Any trial based on 30-35 year old hearsay should never take place. That's common sense.
No shit. I didn't realize that.
The Democrats already had the talking points for this handed out and it is very evident they are simply going to scream what about trump!
What is a maze of LLCs? What does that even mean?
Can you link the proof they didn't report this to the IRS?
Ok, so the former guy has shitloads of LLCs, and received money from much of them while lying about a Chinese bank account he had...and
How about this?
"The returns also show Trump claimed foreign tax credits for taxes paid on business ventures around the world, including licensing arrangements for the use of his name on development projects and his golf courses in Scotland and Ireland."
Do you think Comer should come investigate Trump?