Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This isn't a criminal conviction, so I'm not sure what "permanent record" you're referring to.
Are you an imbecile?She wasn't old when he assaulted her. Are you an incel?
the verdict is not long. maybe you can find some time in your busy day of queefing around. and read it.You stated in post #1262 that regarding evidence the "the jury was quite specific". I simply asked for those specifics which you have refused to provide - the reason being that you are talking shit and CAN'T provide them.
Dumb ass.
Trump was convicted of crimes. Makes him a criminal.This ain’t a criminal case, you scumbag moron.
LOL!! You moron!Because you love Trump and support men who sexually assault women.
Do you support Trump right now?LOL!! You moron!
I did read it jack ass. The verdict simply states that the jury found him liable - it says NOTHING about what evidence led them to that conclusion and why.the verdict is not long. maybe you can find some time in your busy day of queefing around. and read it.
www.cbsnews.com
Really? What crimes was he convicted of and when?Trump was convicted of crimes. Makes him a criminal.
Trump was convicted of crimes. Makes him a criminal.
Impeachment connected with phony, leftist manufactured "Russia collusion" hoax.It follows you the rest of your life
Trump is liable for Sexual Assault
Lets see…where are we?
One term President, twice impeached, sexual assault
Quite a legacy
yeah. and they evaluated the evidence and were specific in their findings. to the dollar.I did read it jack ass. The verdict simply states that the jury found him liable - it says NOTHING about what evidence led them to that conclusion and why.
Read the full Trump-E. Jean Carroll verdict text here
Former President Donald Trump has been found liable for battery and defamation against author E. Jean Carroll in a civil trial in Manhattan.
Try again, dumb ass.
Who the fuck is talking about damages? The question was about EVIDENCE.yeah. and they evaluated the evidence and were specific in their findings. to the dollar.
Carroll v. Trump, 1:22-cv-10016 - CourtListener.com
Docket for Carroll v. Trump, 1:22-cv-10016 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.www.courtlistener.com
knock yourself out, fucktard.
Are you an imbecile?
yeah. and they evaluated the evidence and were specific in their findings. to the dollar.
Carroll v. Trump, 1:22-cv-10016 - CourtListener.com
Docket for Carroll v. Trump, 1:22-cv-10016 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
knock yourself out, fucktard.
pathetic. the jury saw the evidence and this enabled them to reach a verdict and put price tags on it.Who the fuck is talking about damages? The question was about EVIDENCE.
How fucking stupid are you?
Nope, he was found to be liable in a civil court. No crimes involved.
Sorry.
So the courts said he didn't rape her, but that he's guilty of defamation for not admitting that he did?
It follows you the rest of your life
Trump is liable for Sexual Assault
Lets see…where are we?
One term President, twice impeached, sexual assault
Quite a legacy
