Trump is currently addressing the March against Women's Reproductive Rights

[Redfish]

Trump is the most hated man in America right now....oh and the world as well.

LOL, not even close. you are a complete idiot. He is only hated by morons like you whose socialist agenda is threatened by his America-first policies (which are working)

only to uneducated uninformed trumptards.

try again.

We did not elect Trump to be popular, we elected him to get things done and fix the mess created by Obama, the Bushes, and Clinton. He is doing exactly what we sent him to DC to do.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Just for clarity regarding the OP. Murder of unborn human beings is not a reproductive right, it is murder for convenience.

clayton thinks this is funny. So I ask you clayton, if abortion before birth is OK, why not allow kids to be killed up to 2 years old if they become a problem for their mother? Same logic applies, right? What difference does it make if they are in or out of the womb?

No, ignorance and stupidity are worthy of ridicule, your post is consequently a joke and devoid of merit.

What is not funny, however, is conservative authoritarianism, the right’s contempt for privacy rights, their desire to compel conformity through force of law, and conservatives’ advocacy of more government interfering in citizens’ private lives.

LOL, your arrogance accompanied by your ignorance make you a complete fool. You talk about government interference, but you support the global warmers that want to control your thermostats, you ability to drive where you want, the kind of car you can drive, the size of your house, what you can eat, etc. you also want to deprive unborn human beings of their right to life and allow them to be murdered for convenience. You also support higher taxes in order to fund more government intrusion. You are a walking talking contradiction i.e a typical liberal.

The unborn have no right to life. The Constitution is clear on that.

No, it isn't. It has however been ruled upon and declared so. Technically , according to said "ruling" once they hit 24 weeks they have the same "rights" you do.

The states have the right to legalize abortion from conception to birth. They can't legalize aborting you.

 

[Issa]

Trump is the most hated man in America right now....oh and the world as well.

LOL, not even close. you are a complete idiot. He is only hated by morons like you whose socialist agenda is threatened by his America-first policies (which are working)

You are in denial. He is the most hated person on earth after maybe Satan.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Trump is the most hated man in America right now....oh and the world as well.

LOL, not even close. you are a complete idiot. He is only hated by morons like you whose socialist agenda is threatened by his America-first policies (which are working)

only to uneducated uninformed trumptards.

try again.

We did not elect Trump to be popular, we elected him to get things done and fix the mess created by Obama, the Bushes, and Clinton. He is doing exactly what we sent him to DC to do.

IOW you have no respect for what most Americans want. You want rule by minority.

 

[Redfish]

Just for clarity regarding the OP. Murder of unborn human beings is not a reproductive right, it is murder for convenience.

clayton thinks this is funny. So I ask you clayton, if abortion before birth is OK, why not allow kids to be killed up to 2 years old if they become a problem for their mother? Same logic applies, right? What difference does it make if they are in or out of the womb?

No, ignorance and stupidity are worthy of ridicule, your post is consequently a joke and devoid of merit.

What is not funny, however, is conservative authoritarianism, the right’s contempt for privacy rights, their desire to compel conformity through force of law, and conservatives’ advocacy of more government interfering in citizens’ private lives.

LOL, your arrogance accompanied by your ignorance make you a complete fool. You talk about government interference, but you support the global warmers that want to control your thermostats, you ability to drive where you want, the kind of car you can drive, the size of your house, what you can eat, etc. you also want to deprive unborn human beings of their right to life and allow them to be murdered for convenience. You also support higher taxes in order to fund more government intrusion. You are a walking talking contradiction i.e a typical liberal.

The unborn have no right to life. The Constitution is clear on that.

No, it isn't. It has however been ruled upon and declared so. Technically , according to said "ruling" once they hit 24 weeks they have the same "rights" you do.

SCOTUS rulings are not the constitution. NY carbonhead said the constitution says that the unborn have no rights. No 24 week limit, he/she/it said they had no civil rights. He/she/it lied, as he/she/it does continuously

 

[Doc1]

clayton thinks this is funny. So I ask you clayton, if abortion before birth is OK, why not allow kids to be killed up to 2 years old if they become a problem for their mother? Same logic applies, right? What difference does it make if they are in or out of the womb?

No, ignorance and stupidity are worthy of ridicule, your post is consequently a joke and devoid of merit.

What is not funny, however, is conservative authoritarianism, the right’s contempt for privacy rights, their desire to compel conformity through force of law, and conservatives’ advocacy of more government interfering in citizens’ private lives.

LOL, your arrogance accompanied by your ignorance make you a complete fool. You talk about government interference, but you support the global warmers that want to control your thermostats, you ability to drive where you want, the kind of car you can drive, the size of your house, what you can eat, etc. you also want to deprive unborn human beings of their right to life and allow them to be murdered for convenience. You also support higher taxes in order to fund more government intrusion. You are a walking talking contradiction i.e a typical liberal.

The unborn have no right to life. The Constitution is clear on that.

No, it isn't. It has however been ruled upon and declared so. Technically , according to said "ruling" once they hit 24 weeks they have the same "rights" you do.

The states have the right to legalize abortion from conception to birth. They can't legalize aborting you.

Dodge away kid. Roe says 24 weeks

 

[NYcarbineer]

No, ignorance and stupidity are worthy of ridicule, your post is consequently a joke and devoid of merit.

What is not funny, however, is conservative authoritarianism, the right’s contempt for privacy rights, their desire to compel conformity through force of law, and conservatives’ advocacy of more government interfering in citizens’ private lives.

LOL, your arrogance accompanied by your ignorance make you a complete fool. You talk about government interference, but you support the global warmers that want to control your thermostats, you ability to drive where you want, the kind of car you can drive, the size of your house, what you can eat, etc. you also want to deprive unborn human beings of their right to life and allow them to be murdered for convenience. You also support higher taxes in order to fund more government intrusion. You are a walking talking contradiction i.e a typical liberal.

The unborn have no right to life. The Constitution is clear on that.

really? then why is someone who kills a pregnant woman charged with two counts or murder. If the unborn have no right to life, why does every state and the federal government indict such a murderer with two counts of murder?

Now, please quote the language in the constitution that says that unborn humans do not have the right to life. A real quote from the constitution, not some talking point or left wing judge's ruling.

There are no civil rights for fetuses anywhere in the Constitution.

there are rights for human beings. When does a fetus become a human being in your small mind?

there are no spelled out rights for 2 year olds either, so should you be able to kill them if they become a burden?

There are spelled out rights for 2 year olds because they are persons who have been born, who are citizens.

 

[Issa]

Trump is the most hated man in America right now....oh and the world as well.

LOL, not even close. you are a complete idiot. He is only hated by morons like you whose socialist agenda is threatened by his America-first policies (which are working)

only to uneducated uninformed trumptards.

try again.

We did not elect Trump to be popular, we elected him to get things done and fix the mess created by Obama, the Bushes, and Clinton. He is doing exactly what we sent him to DC to do.

You? The 27% dumbos of this country.

What great things? Amount spent on golfing or tweeting like a teenage girl? Or his cyber bullying ?

 

[NYcarbineer]

clayton thinks this is funny. So I ask you clayton, if abortion before birth is OK, why not allow kids to be killed up to 2 years old if they become a problem for their mother? Same logic applies, right? What difference does it make if they are in or out of the womb?

No, ignorance and stupidity are worthy of ridicule, your post is consequently a joke and devoid of merit.

What is not funny, however, is conservative authoritarianism, the right’s contempt for privacy rights, their desire to compel conformity through force of law, and conservatives’ advocacy of more government interfering in citizens’ private lives.

LOL, your arrogance accompanied by your ignorance make you a complete fool. You talk about government interference, but you support the global warmers that want to control your thermostats, you ability to drive where you want, the kind of car you can drive, the size of your house, what you can eat, etc. you also want to deprive unborn human beings of their right to life and allow them to be murdered for convenience. You also support higher taxes in order to fund more government intrusion. You are a walking talking contradiction i.e a typical liberal.

The unborn have no right to life. The Constitution is clear on that.

No, it isn't. It has however been ruled upon and declared so. Technically , according to said "ruling" once they hit 24 weeks they have the same "rights" you do.

SCOTUS rulings are not the constitution. NY carbonhead said the constitution says that the unborn have no rights. No 24 week limit, he/she/it said they had no civil rights. He/she/it lied, as he/she/it does continuously

Cite the articles in the Constitution that reference the unborn.

 

[Doc1]

clayton thinks this is funny. So I ask you clayton, if abortion before birth is OK, why not allow kids to be killed up to 2 years old if they become a problem for their mother? Same logic applies, right? What difference does it make if they are in or out of the womb?

No, ignorance and stupidity are worthy of ridicule, your post is consequently a joke and devoid of merit.

What is not funny, however, is conservative authoritarianism, the right’s contempt for privacy rights, their desire to compel conformity through force of law, and conservatives’ advocacy of more government interfering in citizens’ private lives.

LOL, your arrogance accompanied by your ignorance make you a complete fool. You talk about government interference, but you support the global warmers that want to control your thermostats, you ability to drive where you want, the kind of car you can drive, the size of your house, what you can eat, etc. you also want to deprive unborn human beings of their right to life and allow them to be murdered for convenience. You also support higher taxes in order to fund more government intrusion. You are a walking talking contradiction i.e a typical liberal.

The unborn have no right to life. The Constitution is clear on that.

No, it isn't. It has however been ruled upon and declared so. Technically , according to said "ruling" once they hit 24 weeks they have the same "rights" you do.

SCOTUS rulings are not the constitution. NY carbonhead said the constitution says that the unborn have no rights. No 24 week limit, he/she/it said they had no civil rights. He/she/it lied, as he/she/it does continuously

Oh I agree, but Roe expressly says 24 weeks.

 

[Redfish]

Trump is the most hated man in America right now....oh and the world as well.

LOL, not even close. you are a complete idiot. He is only hated by morons like you whose socialist agenda is threatened by his America-first policies (which are working)

only to uneducated uninformed trumptards.

try again.

We did not elect Trump to be popular, we elected him to get things done and fix the mess created by Obama, the Bushes, and Clinton. He is doing exactly what we sent him to DC to do.

IOW you have no respect for what most Americans want. You want rule by minority.

I want rule by majority, in accordance with our constitution and our existing body of law. Got news for you, Most americans do not agree with your left wing ideas. the media is lying to you when they tell you that they do.

 

[easyt65]

clayton thinks this is funny. So I ask you clayton, if abortion before birth is OK, why not allow kids to be killed up to 2 years old if they become a problem for their mother? Same logic applies, right? What difference does it make if they are in or out of the womb?

No, ignorance and stupidity are worthy of ridicule, your post is consequently a joke and devoid of merit.

What is not funny, however, is conservative authoritarianism, the right’s contempt for privacy rights, their desire to compel conformity through force of law, and conservatives’ advocacy of more government interfering in citizens’ private lives.

LOL, your arrogance accompanied by your ignorance make you a complete fool. You talk about government interference, but you support the global warmers that want to control your thermostats, you ability to drive where you want, the kind of car you can drive, the size of your house, what you can eat, etc. you also want to deprive unborn human beings of their right to life and allow them to be murdered for convenience. You also support higher taxes in order to fund more government intrusion. You are a walking talking contradiction i.e a typical liberal.

The unborn have no right to life. The Constitution is clear on that.

No, it isn't. It has however been ruled upon and declared so. Technically , according to said "ruling" once they hit 24 weeks they have the same "rights" you do.

The states have the right to legalize abortion from conception to birth. They can't legalize aborting you.

Actually states can not make laws more strict than Federal Law, and states can not ignore Federal laws....

 

[Redfish]

No, ignorance and stupidity are worthy of ridicule, your post is consequently a joke and devoid of merit.

What is not funny, however, is conservative authoritarianism, the right’s contempt for privacy rights, their desire to compel conformity through force of law, and conservatives’ advocacy of more government interfering in citizens’ private lives.

LOL, your arrogance accompanied by your ignorance make you a complete fool. You talk about government interference, but you support the global warmers that want to control your thermostats, you ability to drive where you want, the kind of car you can drive, the size of your house, what you can eat, etc. you also want to deprive unborn human beings of their right to life and allow them to be murdered for convenience. You also support higher taxes in order to fund more government intrusion. You are a walking talking contradiction i.e a typical liberal.

The unborn have no right to life. The Constitution is clear on that.

No, it isn't. It has however been ruled upon and declared so. Technically , according to said "ruling" once they hit 24 weeks they have the same "rights" you do.

SCOTUS rulings are not the constitution. NY carbonhead said the constitution says that the unborn have no rights. No 24 week limit, he/she/it said they had no civil rights. He/she/it lied, as he/she/it does continuously

Cite the articles in the Constitution that reference the unborn.

that's what I asked of you. You brought it up. Waiting for your quotes from the constitution.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Trump is the most hated man in America right now....oh and the world as well.

LOL, not even close. you are a complete idiot. He is only hated by morons like you whose socialist agenda is threatened by his America-first policies (which are working)

only to uneducated uninformed trumptards.

try again.

We did not elect Trump to be popular, we elected him to get things done and fix the mess created by Obama, the Bushes, and Clinton. He is doing exactly what we sent him to DC to do.

IOW you have no respect for what most Americans want. You want rule by minority.

I want rule by majority, in accordance with our constitution and our existing body of law. Got news for you, Most americans do not agree with your left wing ideas. the media is lying to you when they tell you that they do.

What leftwing ideas of mine do most Americans oppose? And cite evidence to support your claim.

 

[jillian]

Trump is the most hated man in America right now....oh and the world as well.

LOL, not even close. you are a complete idiot. He is only hated by morons like you whose socialist agenda is threatened by his America-first policies (which are working)

only to uneducated uninformed trumptards.

try again.

We did not elect Trump to be popular, we elected him to get things done and fix the mess created by Obama, the Bushes, and Clinton. He is doing exactly what we sent him to DC to do.

IOW you have no respect for what most Americans want. You want rule by minority.

the last president we had won twice with 52% of the vote and they obstructed that, too.

they think THEY'RE "the people".... even though they don't reflect anything that the average American wants or believes in. but angry, uneducated misogynist bigots are like that.

 

[Doc1]

LOL, not even close. you are a complete idiot. He is only hated by morons like you whose socialist agenda is threatened by his America-first policies (which are working)

only to uneducated uninformed trumptards.

try again.

We did not elect Trump to be popular, we elected him to get things done and fix the mess created by Obama, the Bushes, and Clinton. He is doing exactly what we sent him to DC to do.

IOW you have no respect for what most Americans want. You want rule by minority.

I want rule by majority, in accordance with our constitution and our existing body of law. Got news for you, Most americans do not agree with your left wing ideas. the media is lying to you when they tell you that they do.

What leftwing ideas of mine do most Americans oppose? And cite evidence to support your claim.

Rhetorical question, right?

 

[NYcarbineer]

No, ignorance and stupidity are worthy of ridicule, your post is consequently a joke and devoid of merit.

What is not funny, however, is conservative authoritarianism, the right’s contempt for privacy rights, their desire to compel conformity through force of law, and conservatives’ advocacy of more government interfering in citizens’ private lives.

LOL, your arrogance accompanied by your ignorance make you a complete fool. You talk about government interference, but you support the global warmers that want to control your thermostats, you ability to drive where you want, the kind of car you can drive, the size of your house, what you can eat, etc. you also want to deprive unborn human beings of their right to life and allow them to be murdered for convenience. You also support higher taxes in order to fund more government intrusion. You are a walking talking contradiction i.e a typical liberal.

The unborn have no right to life. The Constitution is clear on that.

No, it isn't. It has however been ruled upon and declared so. Technically , according to said "ruling" once they hit 24 weeks they have the same "rights" you do.

The states have the right to legalize abortion from conception to birth. They can't legalize aborting you.

Actually states can not make laws more strict than Federal Law, and states can not ignore Federal laws....

What's 'more strict' about a state law that makes abortion legal in some cases beyond 24 weeks?

 

[Redfish]

No, ignorance and stupidity are worthy of ridicule, your post is consequently a joke and devoid of merit.

What is not funny, however, is conservative authoritarianism, the right’s contempt for privacy rights, their desire to compel conformity through force of law, and conservatives’ advocacy of more government interfering in citizens’ private lives.

LOL, your arrogance accompanied by your ignorance make you a complete fool. You talk about government interference, but you support the global warmers that want to control your thermostats, you ability to drive where you want, the kind of car you can drive, the size of your house, what you can eat, etc. you also want to deprive unborn human beings of their right to life and allow them to be murdered for convenience. You also support higher taxes in order to fund more government intrusion. You are a walking talking contradiction i.e a typical liberal.

The unborn have no right to life. The Constitution is clear on that.

No, it isn't. It has however been ruled upon and declared so. Technically , according to said "ruling" once they hit 24 weeks they have the same "rights" you do.

SCOTUS rulings are not the constitution. NY carbonhead said the constitution says that the unborn have no rights. No 24 week limit, he/she/it said they had no civil rights. He/she/it lied, as he/she/it does continuously

Oh I agree, but Roe expressly says 24 weeks.

yep, I wonder if NY carbon knows that his/her/its mother was pro-life. If she was pro-choice, he/she/it would not be here.

 

[jillian]

clayton thinks this is funny. So I ask you clayton, if abortion before birth is OK, why not allow kids to be killed up to 2 years old if they become a problem for their mother? Same logic applies, right? What difference does it make if they are in or out of the womb?

No, ignorance and stupidity are worthy of ridicule, your post is consequently a joke and devoid of merit.

What is not funny, however, is conservative authoritarianism, the right’s contempt for privacy rights, their desire to compel conformity through force of law, and conservatives’ advocacy of more government interfering in citizens’ private lives.

LOL, your arrogance accompanied by your ignorance make you a complete fool. You talk about government interference, but you support the global warmers that want to control your thermostats, you ability to drive where you want, the kind of car you can drive, the size of your house, what you can eat, etc. you also want to deprive unborn human beings of their right to life and allow them to be murdered for convenience. You also support higher taxes in order to fund more government intrusion. You are a walking talking contradiction i.e a typical liberal.

The unborn have no right to life. The Constitution is clear on that.

No, it isn't. It has however been ruled upon and declared so. Technically , according to said "ruling" once they hit 24 weeks they have the same "rights" you do.

SCOTUS rulings are not the constitution. NY carbonhead said the constitution says that the unborn have no rights. No 24 week limit, he/she/it said they had no civil rights. He/she/it lied, as he/she/it does continuously

actually, brain dead wingnut, our laws are made up of the constitution, statutes AND caselaw. That is what a commom law system of government (which is what we have) is. Only code countries like France rely solely on statute.

is there anything that you DO know?

 

[NYcarbineer]

only to uneducated uninformed trumptards.

try again.

We did not elect Trump to be popular, we elected him to get things done and fix the mess created by Obama, the Bushes, and Clinton. He is doing exactly what we sent him to DC to do.

IOW you have no respect for what most Americans want. You want rule by minority.

I want rule by majority, in accordance with our constitution and our existing body of law. Got news for you, Most americans do not agree with your left wing ideas. the media is lying to you when they tell you that they do.

What leftwing ideas of mine do most Americans oppose? And cite evidence to support your claim.

Rhetorical question, right?

No. It's a question he should answer to back up his accusation.