Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That depends on what you mean.And some people just don't stand for anything, no principles of any kind. What should we call them?Sorry for coming in random, but I have always hated people who bash politicians for changing their positions.
It's a smart leader who will change their opinions when new evidence changes things with an issue.
It's a reetarded leader who stands pat on bad policy because they're afraid of Fox News calling them a flip flopper
God I hope his answer isn't as simple and useless as yoursDemocrats.And some people just don't stand for anything, no principles of any kind. What should we call them?Sorry for coming in random, but I have always hated people who bash politicians for changing their positions.
It's a smart leader who will change their opinions when new evidence changes things with an issue.
It's a reetarded leader who stands pat on bad policy because they're afraid of Fox News calling them a flip flopper
I vote both most of the time.And some people just don't stand for anything, no principles of any kind. What should we call them?Sorry for coming in random, but I have always hated people who bash politicians for changing their positions.
It's a smart leader who will change their opinions when new evidence changes things with an issue.
It's a reetarded leader who stands pat on bad policy because they're afraid of Fox News calling them a flip flopper
Republicrats.
Simple answers are the best he can do.God I hope his answer isn't as simple and useless as yoursDemocrats.And some people just don't stand for anything, no principles of any kind. What should we call them?Sorry for coming in random, but I have always hated people who bash politicians for changing their positions.
It's a smart leader who will change their opinions when new evidence changes things with an issue.
It's a reetarded leader who stands pat on bad policy because they're afraid of Fox News calling them a flip flopper
It was more of a general statement rather than a contextual one. It seems more than obvious that many politicians have no objectives or goals other than increasing their own power and influence, and in doing so will take whatever position is convenient at the time.That depends on what you mean.And some people just don't stand for anything, no principles of any kind. What should we call them?Sorry for coming in random, but I have always hated people who bash politicians for changing their positions.
It's a smart leader who will change their opinions when new evidence changes things with an issue.
It's a reetarded leader who stands pat on bad policy because they're afraid of Fox News calling them a flip flopper
If you mean "not being an evangelical conservative" means you just don't stand for anything, no principles of any kind....that's just people disagreeing with you.
If you're talking about politicians being in the tank for special interest...I'd blame that on the American voters who don't take the time to make their interests special.
But I should probably let me tell you what you mean
While I'm sure there is way to much of that....It was more of a general statement rather than a contextual one. It seems more than obvious that many politicians have no objectives or goals other than increasing their own power and influence, and in doing so will take whatever position is convenient at the time.That depends on what you mean.And some people just don't stand for anything, no principles of any kind. What should we call them?Sorry for coming in random, but I have always hated people who bash politicians for changing their positions.
It's a smart leader who will change their opinions when new evidence changes things with an issue.
It's a reetarded leader who stands pat on bad policy because they're afraid of Fox News calling them a flip flopper
If you mean "not being an evangelical conservative" means you just don't stand for anything, no principles of any kind....that's just people disagreeing with you.
If you're talking about politicians being in the tank for special interest...I'd blame that on the American voters who don't take the time to make their interests special.
But I should probably let me tell you what you mean
Plenty of blame to go around for everyone.And some people just don't stand for anything, no principles of any kind. What should we call them?Sorry for coming in random, but I have always hated people who bash politicians for changing their positions.
It's a smart leader who will change their opinions when new evidence changes things with an issue.
It's a reetarded leader who stands pat on bad policy because they're afraid of Fox News calling them a flip flopper
Republicrats.
Difficult to know whether they are being politically pragmatic or blatantly exploitive.While I'm sure there is way to much of that....It was more of a general statement rather than a contextual one. It seems more than obvious that many politicians have no objectives or goals other than increasing their own power and influence, and in doing so will take whatever position is convenient at the time.That depends on what you mean.And some people just don't stand for anything, no principles of any kind. What should we call them?Sorry for coming in random, but I have always hated people who bash politicians for changing their positions.
It's a smart leader who will change their opinions when new evidence changes things with an issue.
It's a reetarded leader who stands pat on bad policy because they're afraid of Fox News calling them a flip flopper
If you mean "not being an evangelical conservative" means you just don't stand for anything, no principles of any kind....that's just people disagreeing with you.
If you're talking about politicians being in the tank for special interest...I'd blame that on the American voters who don't take the time to make their interests special.
But I should probably let me tell you what you mean
I think politicians deal with what comes at them, which runs counter to the term "leadership"...but then again, the average citizen doesn't have time to present their interests to their representatives...once again, thus the term leadership. But inevitably, they have to work with what comes at them
How about this one.Liminal 13555411So if we follow your alleged logic: Hilary Clinton's lies justify whatever stupid shit Donald Trump is inclined to make up.
What HRC lies.
Where is there evidence of a lie in the video?
Are you being completely serious?
How about this one.Liminal 13555411So if we follow your alleged logic: Hilary Clinton's lies justify whatever stupid shit Donald Trump is inclined to make up.
What HRC lies.
Where is there evidence of a lie in the video?
Are you being completely serious?
Yes. Provide a specific lie that can be discussed here.
It is a shame Bill Clinton got us into Iraq by not enforcing the terms of the surrender.
Another Boldly Asserted falsehood, E?
You know what I say about Cherry Pickers without a tree, they are pulling it out there ass.
I clearly place blame on Bush Sr.
Of course had Bush sr. never of made April Gaspie Ambassador to Iraq Saddam never of would done the opposite of what she ordered.
When I see a progressive, I think hypocrite...
Further you would of allowed Saddam to build, keep and use, the Chemical Weapons Bill Clinton destroyed?So you believe the USA should not abide to the terms of treaties it signs?I disagree that Trump is a Liberal Democrat. He's a populist. He'll say anything.
Diplomacy often works in ways that aren't convenient, Saddam was always going to push and push and push. But he didn't need to be taken out, and if he was going to be taken out, then a decent post war policy was required.
You describe an invasion with tanks, murder, and rape as, "push, push, push", which is okay with you, even though we signed a treaty?
Further you would of allowed Saddam to build, keep and use, the Chemical Weapons Bill Clinton destroyed?
He supported it from the beginning and here's the proof. What a fucking peice of shit liar Trump is.
Saddam Hussein raped and tortured men and women, that is a necessary evil? You are sick!.
The containment of someone like Saddam was done because of the realization of what deposing Saddam would do to the region. He was a necessary evil. Bush didn't see it like that, and was found out to be wrong.
Saddam Hussein used Weapons of Mass Destruction on his own people, killing thousands of children, that was a necessary evil?
You are right, Bush didn't see it like that.
Where is there evidence of a lie in the video?
Are you being completely serious?
Yes. Provide a specific lie that can be discussed here.
No. You aren't being serious.
