Trump Says He Will Be Filing a “Major Motion” Soon in Response to FBI Raid on Mar-a-Lago

[pknopp]

Not one liberal has described what "particularly" means. IT means to be precise in description so as not to mistake it for something else. This means they had to describe exactly what they were looking for, which they did not. They use broad terms that are not "particular". This warrant is about to blow up in the DOJ's face.

Wrong. If the police pull a car over and smell pot they can get a warrant to search that car. If they find heroin also, the person will be prosecuted over the heroin also.

 

[bodecea]

OK... why don't you elaborate... what do you find "traitorous" about what I post here on this board?

Gee, he should report you to the proper authorities then... unless he's just lying.

 

[Nostra]

I dealt with classified material, when did you?

Ok Mr. Expert, is it illegal to have SAP info on an unsecure email server?

 

[bodecea]

Wrong. If the police pull a car over and smell pot they can get a warrant to search that car. If they find heroin also, the person will be prosecuted over the heroin also.

That poster doesn't have a clue.

 

[Kondor3]

I know a whole lot of far left wackos are going to lose their shit when the warrant is found unconstitutional, and the DOJ is ordered to return all of the property.

Good luck with that..,.

 

[bodecea]

Ok Mr. Expert, is it illegal to have SAP info on an unsecure email server?

This is in discussion of trump and the recent Mar-a-Lago search?....how?

 

[Kondor3]

Ok Mr. Expert, is it illegal to have SAP info on an unsecure email server?

What do mail servers have to do with whether or not Rump broke the law or whether his motion has any chance of succeeding?

 

[Lesh]

Where's the declassification paperwork?

Or what witnesses does he have?

And why was Kash Patel trying to get NARA to DEclassify them?

 

[pknopp]

That poster doesn't have a clue.

Yes they do. They just feel this compulsion to lie.

 

[Lesh]

Ok Mr. Expert, is it illegal to have SAP info on an unsecure email server?

I had SAP on my work laptop for years.

Really sucks. Most counterintuitive software on the planet

 

[Lastamender]

OK... why don't you elaborate... what do you find "traitorous" about what I post here on this board? Or even just on this thread?

You support Biden. That is all that is needed.

 

[Lastamender]

Gee, he should report you to the proper authorities then... unless he's just lying.

The proper authorities are bought and paid for.

 

[meaner gene]

It clearly violated the 4th amendment. That is all you need.

Actually caselaw says that the raid was perfectly legal. That they didn't need a separate search warrant for the safe.

The courts have already spoken on such search warrants.

 

[Lastamender]

Actually caselaw says that the raid was perfectly legal. That they didn't need a separate search warrant for the safe.

The courts have already spoken on such search warrants.

And your legal degree is from where?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Trump Says He Will Be Filing a “Major Motion”

lol

 

[Lesh]

And your legal degree is from where?

He's quoting from a legal website

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

It clearly violated the 4th amendment. That is all you need.

This is a lie.

 

[meaner gene]

And your legal degree is from where?

I don't need a legal degree, just the ability to read a courts opinion.

https://www.courts.wa.gov/content/petitions/96010-1%20Petition%20for%20Review.pdf

Police Liability for Damages to Buildings in the Process of Searches in Exigent Circumstances | MTAS

November 17, 2010 Dear City Attorney: You have the following question: Are the police liable for damages done to private property that occur when they obtain entry to a building and seize a person’s property under a search warrant or under exigent circumstances?

www.mtas.tennessee.edu

They both ruled on the propriety of searches like at Mar-a-lago. Saying that a warrant authorizing search of premises, is all the particularly needed.

 

[Moonglow]

How soon?

 

[Lastamender]

He's quoting from a legal website

Who cares. Do you know the law is subject to more than one interpretation? You do now.