Trump Says He Will Be Filing a “Major Motion” Soon in Response to FBI Raid on Mar-a-Lago

[struth]

They've been present in every court room.

As they should be, they have a great interest in making sure the Govt loses their bid to keep this sealed.

 

[Billo_Really]

As they should be, they have a great interest in making sure the Govt loses their bid to keep this sealed.

It's not going to matter. The documents will be so heavily redacted that none of it will make sense.

 

[struth]

It's not going to matter. The documents will be so heavily redacted that none of it will make sense.

Nah, they tried to make that claim, but the judge rejected it, said they had til Thursday at noon to turn over what they wanted redacted, and the Judge would make that determination.

 

[Billo_Really]

Nah, they tried to make that claim, but the judge rejected it, said they had til Thursday at noon to turn over what they wanted redacted, and the Judge would make that determination.

Yeah, and when the judge gets it, most of it will be redacted.

 

[OKTexas]

The president has to TAKE CARE of the Law of the land.... Look up the TAKE CARE CLAUSE of the constitution......no president is above the Law. The presidential records act, under the law, requires the president, to turn over all records in the whitehouse and on his personal phones, that involved him being president, and not personal messages involving going to exercising class with his daughter....the law, is spelled out.

This is NOT as Richard Nixon always claimed...if the President does it, then it is not illegal....that was shot down Constitutionally, long ago!

Your case is actually about personal items and emails of the president....there are laws that define what is a personal item and not a government item, that Presidents are suppose to follow....for each individual document.

There are items that are government items that are very personal to our presidents... In that case, there are also laws that govern this... The president is suppose to present to the archives the original govt item where they want to keep the original....like Kim j Un's letter......in those cases the National Archives may allow a president to keep the government item, once they make a copy, for their records.

Trump is NOT following the Take Care Clause to follow ALL the Laws of the United States!

Then why aren't you calling for xidens impeachment for his failure to enforce the law? In fact he's using taxpayer funds to facilitate human trafficking.

But as the judge said, the PRA is a civil statute and there is no scheme in the law that would allow for records or property to be seized from a former president.

.

 

[struth]

Yeah, and when the judge gets it, most of it will be redacted.

Nah, he's already rejected that idea. I am sure you, and your fellow cultist are hoping that much, but doesn't look like the Judge is going along with that idea

 

[Billo_Really]

Nah, he's already rejected that idea. I am sure you, and your fellow cultist are hoping that much, but doesn't look like the Judge is going along with that idea

Judge or no judge, you cannot release top secret information or anything related to an ongoing investigation.

 

[struth]

Judge or no judge, you cannot release top secret information or anything related to an ongoing investigation.

They never argued anything about top secret information...and yes you can release information about ongoing investigations. The Govt can argue to try and keep it under seal, as they tried to here...ultimately losing because the Court didn't find their arugment all that meaningful, but was willing to let them redact some individual names...which frankly, is no big deal.

They have til Thursday at noon to provide the Court with this information, sounds like the :Court is getting a little annoyed with their delays and stonewalling tactics.

 

[OKTexas]

Not true....MAGA,-liars

Prove it commie.

.

 

[Billo_Really]

They never argued anything about top secret information...and yes you can release information about ongoing investigations. The Govt can argue to try and keep it under seal, as they tried to here...ultimately losing because the Court didn't find their arugment all that meaningful, but was willing to let them redact some individual names...which frankly, is no big deal.

They have til Thursday at noon to provide the Court with this information, sounds like the :Court is getting a little annoyed with their delays and stonewalling tactics.

In order to even get a search warrant, you have to show probable cause that a crime has been committed. You cannot show how you got that information. Your side is on a witch hunt!

 

[Billo_Really]

Prove it commie.

.

Fuck man, you have a bright Shiney banner too!

 

[OKTexas]

No prosecutor would charge her with a crime, because they would LOSE in court....because the LAW was not clearly broken....according to Comey.

So lying to congress isn't clearly breaking the law?

.

 

[struth]

In order to even get a search warrant, you have to show probable cause that a crime has been committed. You cannot show how you got that information. Your side is on a witch hunt!

Yes, and the Govt is trying to keep the affadivt they provided to show PC under seal....they are losing...thankfully

 

[Care4all]

That wasn't the plan though....if she was arrested she couldn't run. He let her off and the fake Russia collusion was supposed to get Hildabeast the easy win.
Comey is a RINO at best, more Dim than anything else. Are you stupid or something Forrest??

Petraeus did much worse, and he wasn't jailed....

 

[Billo_Really]

Yes, and the Govt is trying to keep the affadivt they provided to show PC under seal....they are losing...thankfully

This is not about the government. This is about Trump breaking the law and being prosecuted for that. The Trump arrest is coming; time to embrace the horror!

 

[Care4all]

So lying to congress isn't clearly breaking the law?

.

she did not lie to congress....that was republicans lying about saying she lied to congress!!!

get your facts straight, instead of all twisted!!!


and no, Comey did not say, that SHE lied....that was Gowdy, setting Comey up, for a campaign ad he was putting together.....

 

[jbrownson0831]

Petraeus did much worse, and he wasn't jailed....

Petraeus did much worse, and he wasn't jailed....

Much worse than a private server housing top secret information then destroying all the evidence?

 

[jbrownson0831]

she did not lie to congress....that was republicans lying about saying she lied to congress!!!

get your facts straight, instead of all twisted!!!


and no, Comey did not say, that SHE lied....that was Gowdy, setting Comey up, for a campaign ad he was putting together.....

Please.....

 

[struth]

This is not about the government. This is about Trump breaking the law and being prosecuted for that. The Trump arrest is coming; time to embrace the horror!

haha yea…we’ve heard that for over half a decade

 

[Billo_Really]

haha yea…we’ve heard that for over half a decade

He was was going to sell nuclear secrets to the Russian's, no different than the Rosenbergs.