john doe 101
Platinum Member
- Sep 6, 2021
- 15,008
- 7,749
- 938
Yeah, you're trash.LOW END.
I repeat.
"LOW END"
The bigotry just takes your breath away
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, you're trash.LOW END.
I repeat.
"LOW END"
The bigotry just takes your breath away
When the pollsters look like they're gonna be caught holding the bag--say, late October--we'll see what's what. Right now, the crooked media and the other Kamala fluffers are rigging everything to make it seem like she's popular.
Yeah it gets pretty old. After November trump will just be another 80 year old yelling at the sky.We're clearly entering the 'polls are fake' phase of any Trump election. Soon we'll be entering the 'election is rigged' phase. Followed by the 'they stole the election'. Followed by Trump brand gold sneakers that he promotes while rage tweeting from a toilet in Florida.
Who said i was a democrat? I've never said that.
We're clearly entering the 'polls are fake' phase of any Trump election.
I certainly didnt vote for Trump. Because I'm not trash.What, you shill for them but don't even VOTE for them?
Yikes
I concur.
Which always gets us inexorably closer to the point where everyone coalesces around the idea that polls ARE fake because Trump wins.
Good job.
I certainly didnt vote for Trump. Because I'm not trash.
Given that Trump isn't president and lost the last election by a landslide, I don't think
You're a horrific thing.You're the perfect Democrat voter. They have convinced you that the world is all black and white cowboy hats--good guys and bad guys. You believe this so fully that you have no problem typing out "LOW END WHITES", because they wear the black hats and you have a white one on.
The Democrats thought doing this to weak thinkers would work to their advantage. It might, politically, for a while. In the end it will destroy us
True.
Your premise is utterly inaccurate...
And you don't think.
He should debate as the Biden one was pure gold.
It’s obviously strategic to not do it, so might be the right move.He should because he agreed to the debate. And backing out would appear weak.
It’s obviously strategic to not do it, so might be the right move.
View attachment 1001637
If y'all think running from Harris conveys the 'winner' energy that you want, go for it.
She needs the debate more than him. Like i said i would like to see him debate her. Not giving her the platform might be a good strategic move. Let her debate him on fox if she wants it so bad..If y'all think running from Harris conveys the 'winner' energy that you want, go for it.
I'm certainly not going to complain. I'll point and laugh. I'll mock. But I won't complain.
Is this a new meaning of the phrase, where not having agreed to something is 'backing out' of something one never entered?already backed out of the FOX debate.
Do you need me to explain it to you? Happy to if you really didn’t understandSomewhere, in some universe, that made sense...
To someone.
Doing so badly in the polls as she is, right.She needs the debate more than him.