Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They're weak. So weak that they could be fooled by the most obvious con man this country has ever seen. And so weak that they can't bring themselves to admit it.In Trump's own words:
“You see the mob takes the Fifth,” he said. “If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”
So Trump said that, then he took the 5th 400 times. And you are too much of a sheep to see a problem here
You are dumb as dirt, literally you are stupid. Obviously you have a red state education and fail to see the problem here.
Trump had his chance to tell his side of the story instead of playing the victim card. He's a chickenshit with a big mouth who took the 5th.They disagree with the religion and speech in the 1st Amendment. They hate the 2nd Amendment and now the 5th Amendment that protects Americans from self incrimination is under fire. WTF?
.Finally came up with a response other then a thumbs down or Fake News symbol, idiot troll?
So, to the "fake news" idiots.How many times, and how many millions of dollars, has Trump paid to "settle"? Obviously, they "got him" already, and more than once.
www.nbcnews.com
Riiiight. Like creating a fake set of electors, or that a VP can refuse to certify election results from the states. Hell, I bet Trump could even tell you what "section" of the Constitution applies to the executive branch.At least Trump KNOWS the Constitution and how to use it properly.
Trump's exact words:You're basically saying that 5th Amendment protections are a problem, but the bottom line remains, it's not illegal to make a statement condemning an action, then turn around and do that action. Sure, yell hypocrite all you want, nearly every politician is solidly in that camp.
Oh, so the Donald didn't do it, just his piece of shit "Junior". Got it, that is so much better."There also was no part of the state’s lawsuit that dealt with allegations that the Trump Foundation “stole from a kids cancer charity,”
Social Posts Distort Facts on Trump Charities - FactCheck.org
Posts on social media falsely claim that the Trump family is "disallowed from operating ANY charity" in New York because they "stole from a kids cancer charity." That inaccurately describes the outcome of a court case involving the Donald J. Trump Foundation, and conflates it with allegations...www.factcheck.org
www.forbes.com
I just received a boatload of squealies from you....
Obsessing on that ass.
You obsess on that ass more that BULLDOG obsesses on his fake Ivanka's tits.
This is fun to watch.
.
I did not say idiots could not draw inference. I said pleading the 5th does not make one guilty.You have no idea what you're talking about.
Everyone knows that if a defendant pleads the Fifth in a criminal case, the defendant’s silence cannot be used against her to draw an inference of guilt. This means that a defendant can assert the Fifth Amendment without fearing that it will have a negative impact on her criminal case. However, no similar prohibition exists in the civil context. Instead, the Supreme Court has expressly stated that the Fifth Amendment does not prohibit adverse inferences against parties who plead the Fifth in a civil action. See Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976). Although some states, such as Oregon and Delaware have chosen to prohibit adverse inferences in civil state cases, federal law and the majority of the states, including New York, where Trump pleaded the Fifth, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, allow the judge or jury to draw adverse inferences once a defendant pleads the Fifth in a civil case.
Pleading the Fifth and Civil Litigation: Is It a Good Idea? | The Legal Intelligencer
Cretin.
It is really rich for that fatass idiot to sit there and lament about the legal proceedings when he has operated as a bully, filing frivolous lawsuits, sicking Jones Day on a contractor simply trying to get paid, stiffing lawyers, contractors, and damn near anyone and then hiding behind the skirts of the court. He is the definition of a paper tiger, all bluster, no guts.When your interrogators are politically biased hacks, using some sham civil case as a thin cover to lay traps for you, it only makes sense to give them nothing.
In any event, they didn’t care what the answers might have been. All they were really seeking was for some dimwit, like the author of this thread’s OP, to keep saying that Trump took the Fifth a lot of times.
You slack jaws are impervious to edification.I did not say idiots could not draw inference. I said pleading the 5th does not make one guilty.
Name one case where the lawyer told the jury, "The defendent pled tbe 5th, and that is direct evidence of his guilt' and his statement being FACTUAL.
If you falsely accuse me of something and have no evidence / no case I don't have to say shit.
I can just sit there, smirk / laugh at you, and let my attorney rip you a new one.
translation Trump ...
.
It's not a legal "problem", it's a hypocrisy "problem". Now, if you want to get all excited about a politician being a hypocrite, I have a rainbow farting unicorn in my backyard that I'll sell you, cheap. Acceptable? Hardly. Inescapable? Yes.Trump's exact words:
“You see the mob takes the Fifth,” he said. “If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”
-Trump
Its a problem when you say that, then go and plead the 5th 400 times. Its a prblem that you somehow think that is acceptable.
.I just received a boatload of squealies from you...
TRUMP!'s a hypocrite. We know that and I don't think anyone said he wasn't. He's also narcissistic, a bully, petty, vengeful, and probably wears white after Labor Day. He still did a good job as president and would still be preferable to the Mr Potatohead currently in the White House.They're weak. So weak that they could be fooled by the most obvious con man this country has ever seen. And so weak that they can't bring themselves to admit it.
The only person who is weaker than they are, is the man who has fooled them.
No...You're an obsessed loser....
Just being your cheerleader.
Can't let your morale sag as you contemplate what a shitting loser you worship in the White House.
No need to thank me. I'd do it even if you weren't s loser.
That's a pretty good attempt at crafting a thought provoking post, by the way.
.
Just say 'thank you' for the ediucation I have imparted and go the f* away.You slack jaws are impervious to edification.
.No...You're an obsessed loser...
