Trump Tells Team to Target 10% Spending, 20% Fed Workers Cuts

[IcebergSlim]

If he cuts 10% of real spending, good for him! If he cuts 5%, good to. If he cuts 1%, that is even a hurray! Why? Because the annual budget has a raise in spending of at least 3% a year, so any cut, is better than no cut at all. And even if he cuts it from some departments, anything is better than nothing, since getting the size and spending of government under control is paramount.

well there are some in here that think in 100 days if he hasn't transformed the government, he's a failure. Wow. I don't even think that's long enough to cycle anything through one full cycle of record. But at 100 days he's a loser! And that isn't panicking by the way.

I just figure they are going to gaslight us for the next 4 years, no matter how successful he is, or is not. They can not have him deliver, because if he does, they are done for a generation. The only reason they have a up today, is because many young people have never really had a President who wasn't leftist. (in many cases, including Bush) They are skeptical! But if it works, that will be erased rather quickly!

Did I just read this?

Allow me to demonstrate "gaslighting"....

Which presidential terms saw the highest growth in employment?

I'll give you #1 and #2 (Clinton, and Clinton)

lol, what has that got to do with Obama? Told you before, Bush and Obama are kinsmen, they are one era. Reagan and Clinton were the other, with another useless Bush stuffed between them.

Why not just try to answer the question? It has NOTHING to do with Bush.....

notice how gaslighting has conditioned you to reflexively reject the facts....

 

[AntonToo]

Bullshit - 2009 budget was 1.3 Trillion, submitted by Bush in September 2008.

$900 Million Porkulus spending in 2009 - OBAMA

Of which only ~200 billion fell on 2009 1.45T deficit budget, the rest was Bush.

What you said about 2009 budget being squarely on Obama is bullshit.

It was Booooooooosssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

On the other hand, Obama's still President, but get over it and let him go! Nothing happening was his fault, it was Booooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

....You have some sort of Pavlovian response to the name of last president but of course Bush, WHO SUBMITTED 2009 BUDGET is relevant to discussion about 2009 budget.

And both the House and Senate who passed it were Democrat and Obama signed the Tarp that ballooned it. Man up, Bruce. You and the Republicans did all that together. Put the finger away

But BOOOOOOOOSH was an innocent bystander? Ridiculous.

2009 budget was in the works for a long while, to give Bush a full pass on it and dump it on incoming Obama is disingenuous to say the least.

 

[IcebergSlim]

Bullshit - 2009 budget was 1.3 Trillion, submitted by Bush in September 2008.

$900 Million Porkulus spending in 2009 - OBAMA

Seriously...

Are you proud of your ignorance?

Look up how much of the Stimulus was assigned to FY 2009....

The stimulus Obama signed?

Yes, the one Obama signed retard. Only 200b of it fell on 2009 budget.

So the rest was the budget enacted by the Democrat Congress, huh?

Your point being, Kaz?

(cause I know you are inclined to jejunosity like that)

 

[Weatherman2020]

Of which only ~200 billion fell on 2009 1.45T deficit budget, the rest was Bush.

What you said about 2009 budget being squarely on Obama is bullshit.

It was Booooooooosssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

On the other hand, Obama's still President, but get over it and let him go! Nothing happening was his fault, get over it, move on, it was Booooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

If FY 2009 was NOT under Scrub, then who the fuck submitted the budget request for it in Feb 2008?

You're hitting Stupid running this morning, Kaz.....

Obama and the Democrat Congress created a $900 Million Porkulus spending bill, dufus.

So basically what this stupid fk is saying is that obummer went in and did absolutely nothing. Wow betcha he's proud of that eh?

Uh.....that's Weatherman you're addressing.......if you are taking HIS word for it, you gotta be just as fucking stupid....

Dufus denies Obama was involved in the $900M Porkulus spending bill.

 

[IcebergSlim]

$900 Million Porkulus spending in 2009 - OBAMA

Of which only ~200 billion fell on 2009 1.45T deficit budget, the rest was Bush.

What you said about 2009 budget being squarely on Obama is bullshit.

It was Booooooooosssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

On the other hand, Obama's still President, but get over it and let him go! Nothing happening was his fault, it was Booooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

....You have some sort of Pavlovian response to the name of last president but of course Bush, WHO SUBMITTED 2009 BUDGET is relevant to discussion about 2009 budget.

And both the House and Senate who passed it were Democrat and Obama signed the Tarp that ballooned it. Man up, Bruce. You and the Republicans did all that together. Put the finger away

But BOOOOOOOOSH was an innocent bystander? Ridiculous.

TARP and the Stimulus were entirely discretionary........they had nothing to do with the smoking wreckage produced by Supply Side Idiocy, Part Deux.....nothing at all...and Scrub will be redeemed!

 

[imawhosure]

If he cuts 10% of real spending, good for him! If he cuts 5%, good to. If he cuts 1%, that is even a hurray! Why? Because the annual budget has a raise in spending of at least 3% a year, so any cut, is better than no cut at all. And even if he cuts it from some departments, anything is better than nothing, since getting the size and spending of government under control is paramount.

well there are some in here that think in 100 days if he hasn't transformed the government, he's a failure. Wow. I don't even think that's long enough to cycle anything through one full cycle of record. But at 100 days he's a loser! And that isn't panicking by the way.

I just figure they are going to gaslight us for the next 4 years, no matter how successful he is, or is not. They can not have him deliver, because if he does, they are done for a generation. The only reason they have a up today, is because many young people have never really had a President who wasn't leftist. (in many cases, including Bush) They are skeptical! But if it works, that will be erased rather quickly!

Did I just read this?

Allow me to demonstrate "gaslighting"....

Which presidential terms saw the highest growth in employment?

I'll give you #1 and #2 (Clinton, and Clinton)

lol, what has that got to do with Obama? Told you before, Bush and Obama are kinsmen, they are one era. Reagan and Clinton were the other, with another useless Bush stuffed between them.

Why not just try to answer the question? It has NOTHING to do with Bush.....

notice how gaslighting has conditioned you to reflexively reject the facts....

your one or 2 sentence reply does nothing. You know who you are, and I am not engaging a gaslighter again. Come back when you and your Dems have some power-)

 

[Weatherman2020]

$900 Million Porkulus spending in 2009 - OBAMA

Of which only ~200 billion fell on 2009 1.45T deficit budget, the rest was Bush.

What you said about 2009 budget being squarely on Obama is bullshit.

It was Booooooooosssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

On the other hand, Obama's still President, but get over it and let him go! Nothing happening was his fault, it was Booooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

....You have some sort of Pavlovian response to the name of last president but of course Bush, WHO SUBMITTED 2009 BUDGET is relevant to discussion about 2009 budget.

And both the House and Senate who passed it were Democrat and Obama signed the Tarp that ballooned it. Man up, Bruce. You and the Republicans did all that together. Put the finger away

But BOOOOOOOOSH was an innocent bystander? Ridiculous.

2009 budget was in the works for a long while, to give Bush a full pass on it and dump it on incoming Obama is disingenuous to say the least.

 

[AntonToo]

Of which only ~200 billion fell on 2009 1.45T deficit budget, the rest was Bush.

What you said about 2009 budget being squarely on Obama is bullshit.

It was Booooooooosssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

On the other hand, Obama's still President, but get over it and let him go! Nothing happening was his fault, it was Booooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

....You have some sort of Pavlovian response to the name of last president but of course Bush, WHO SUBMITTED 2009 BUDGET is relevant to discussion about 2009 budget.

And both the House and Senate who passed it were Democrat and Obama signed the Tarp that ballooned it. Man up, Bruce. You and the Republicans did all that together. Put the finger away

But BOOOOOOOOSH was an innocent bystander? Ridiculous.

2009 budget was in the works for a long while, to give Bush a full pass on it and dump it on incoming Obama is disingenuous to say the least.

View attachment 107286

Realy dumbass comment from a dumbass poster, no surprises here.

 

[kaz]

Obama has the worst spending record on the books.
View attachment 107283

Bullshit - 2009 budget was 1.3 Trillion, submitted by Bush in September 2008.

$900 Million Porkulus spending in 2009 - OBAMA

Seriously...

Are you proud of your ignorance?

Look up how much of the Stimulus was assigned to FY 2009....

The stimulus Obama signed?

GREAT NEWS, KAZ!

Your level has found you...

Winner x 1 Weatherman2020

How old are you really?

 

[kaz]

$900 Million Porkulus spending in 2009 - OBAMA

Seriously...

Are you proud of your ignorance?

Look up how much of the Stimulus was assigned to FY 2009....

The stimulus Obama signed?

Kaz,

You KNOW this will end with you in tears.....

Yes....that was the Stimulus Obama signed.....what about it?

it failed?

Sez who?

Sez that we had the weakest recovery from a recession since WWII

 

[Weatherman2020]

It was Booooooooosssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

On the other hand, Obama's still President, but get over it and let him go! Nothing happening was his fault, it was Booooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

....You have some sort of Pavlovian response to the name of last president but of course Bush, WHO SUBMITTED 2009 BUDGET is relevant to discussion about 2009 budget.

And both the House and Senate who passed it were Democrat and Obama signed the Tarp that ballooned it. Man up, Bruce. You and the Republicans did all that together. Put the finger away

But BOOOOOOOOSH was an innocent bystander? Ridiculous.

2009 budget was in the works for a long while, to give Bush a full pass on it and dump it on incoming Obama is disingenuous to say the least.

View attachment 107286

Realy dumbass comment from a dumbass poster, no surprises here.

Says the dufus who thinks Obama had nothing to do with the $900 Million Porkulus bill.

 

[AntonToo]

Seriously...

Are you proud of your ignorance?

Look up how much of the Stimulus was assigned to FY 2009....

The stimulus Obama signed?

Kaz,

You KNOW this will end with you in tears.....

Yes....that was the Stimulus Obama signed.....what about it?

it failed?

Sez who?

Sez that we had the weakest recovery from a recession since WWII

You mean Great Depression...to which Great Recession is second only to?

We didn't have same recessions, why should they have same recovery?

Is there some knowledge on how long 4-6 Trillion dollars of real estate value lost takes to recover from that you are operating from?

Is there some good reason to compare this recovery to one in early 2000 that was lifted by huge real estate bubble growth? Or maybe the one Reagan had for completely different economic reasons?

 

[kaz]

Of which only ~200 billion fell on 2009 1.45T deficit budget, the rest was Bush.

What you said about 2009 budget being squarely on Obama is bullshit.

It was Booooooooosssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

On the other hand, Obama's still President, but get over it and let him go! Nothing happening was his fault, get over it, move on, it was Booooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

If FY 2009 was NOT under Scrub, then who the fuck submitted the budget request for it in Feb 2008?

You're hitting Stupid running this morning, Kaz.....

Obama and the Democrat Congress created a $900 Million Porkulus spending bill, dufus.

So basically what this stupid fk is saying is that obummer went in and did absolutely nothing. Wow betcha he's proud of that eh?

Uh.....that's Weatherman you're addressing.......if you are taking HIS word for it, you gotta be just as fucking stupid....

Well, since you were trained to pump financial products and you use that to free the elderly from big chunks of their retirement in exchange for self interested mediocre investment advice, one is better off not listening to you, either

 

[kaz]

$900 Million Porkulus spending in 2009 - OBAMA

Of which only ~200 billion fell on 2009 1.45T deficit budget, the rest was Bush.

What you said about 2009 budget being squarely on Obama is bullshit.

It was Booooooooosssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

On the other hand, Obama's still President, but get over it and let him go! Nothing happening was his fault, it was Booooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

....You have some sort of Pavlovian response to the name of last president but of course Bush, WHO SUBMITTED 2009 BUDGET is relevant to discussion about 2009 budget.

And both the House and Senate who passed it were Democrat and Obama signed the Tarp that ballooned it. Man up, Bruce. You and the Republicans did all that together. Put the finger away

But BOOOOOOOOSH was an innocent bystander? Ridiculous.

2009 budget was in the works for a long while, to give Bush a full pass on it and dump it on incoming Obama is disingenuous to say the least.

Um ... what? Read the blue, moron

TARP signed by - W and Obama

Senate - Democrat
House - Democrat

You, I can't believe you think they are both at fault, it was the Republicans, you are so partisan

LOL, what an idiot

 

[kaz]

$900 Million Porkulus spending in 2009 - OBAMA

Seriously...

Are you proud of your ignorance?

Look up how much of the Stimulus was assigned to FY 2009....

The stimulus Obama signed?

Yes, the one Obama signed retard. Only 200b of it fell on 2009 budget.

So the rest was the budget enacted by the Democrat Congress, huh?

Your point being, Kaz?

(cause I know you are inclined to jejunosity like that)

That both parties did it? Not the sharpest pebble on the beach, are you?

 

[AntonToo]

Of which only ~200 billion fell on 2009 1.45T deficit budget, the rest was Bush.

What you said about 2009 budget being squarely on Obama is bullshit.

It was Booooooooosssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

On the other hand, Obama's still President, but get over it and let him go! Nothing happening was his fault, it was Booooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

....You have some sort of Pavlovian response to the name of last president but of course Bush, WHO SUBMITTED 2009 BUDGET is relevant to discussion about 2009 budget.

And both the House and Senate who passed it were Democrat and Obama signed the Tarp that ballooned it. Man up, Bruce. You and the Republicans did all that together. Put the finger away

But BOOOOOOOOSH was an innocent bystander? Ridiculous.

2009 budget was in the works for a long while, to give Bush a full pass on it and dump it on incoming Obama is disingenuous to say the least.

Um ... what? Read the blue, moron

Dumbass, do you understand the POINT of what we are discussing?

The point is responsibility for 2009 budget of Obama VS Bush.

Weatherman disingenuously tried to pin it all on Obama and instead of stating your disagreement with him you keep preaching they-all-did-it!!!

 

[kaz]

It was Booooooooosssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

On the other hand, Obama's still President, but get over it and let him go! Nothing happening was his fault, get over it, move on, it was Booooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

If FY 2009 was NOT under Scrub, then who the fuck submitted the budget request for it in Feb 2008?

You're hitting Stupid running this morning, Kaz.....

Obama and the Democrat Congress created a $900 Million Porkulus spending bill, dufus.

So basically what this stupid fk is saying is that obummer went in and did absolutely nothing. Wow betcha he's proud of that eh?

Uh.....that's Weatherman you're addressing.......if you are taking HIS word for it, you gotta be just as fucking stupid....

Dufus denies Obama was involved in the $900M Porkulus spending bill.

And that both houses of congress were Democrat

 

[AntonToo]

If FY 2009 was NOT under Scrub, then who the fuck submitted the budget request for it in Feb 2008?

You're hitting Stupid running this morning, Kaz.....

Obama and the Democrat Congress created a $900 Million Porkulus spending bill, dufus.

So basically what this stupid fk is saying is that obummer went in and did absolutely nothing. Wow betcha he's proud of that eh?

Uh.....that's Weatherman you're addressing.......if you are taking HIS word for it, you gotta be just as fucking stupid....

Dufus denies Obama was involved in the $900M Porkulus spending bill.

And that both houses of congress were Democrat

Fucking idiots slim has specifically said that yes it was Obama's stimulus, but only small part of it fell on 2009 budget.

 

[Weatherman2020]

It was Booooooooosssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

On the other hand, Obama's still President, but get over it and let him go! Nothing happening was his fault, it was Booooooooooosssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

....You have some sort of Pavlovian response to the name of last president but of course Bush, WHO SUBMITTED 2009 BUDGET is relevant to discussion about 2009 budget.

And both the House and Senate who passed it were Democrat and Obama signed the Tarp that ballooned it. Man up, Bruce. You and the Republicans did all that together. Put the finger away

But BOOOOOOOOSH was an innocent bystander? Ridiculous.

2009 budget was in the works for a long while, to give Bush a full pass on it and dump it on incoming Obama is disingenuous to say the least.

Um ... what? Read the blue, moron

Dumbass, do you understand the POINT of what we are discussing?

The point is responsibility for 2009 budget of Obama VS Bush.

Weatherman disingenuously tried to pin it all on Obama and instead of stating your disagreement with him you keep preaching they-all-did-it!!!

The point is 2009 spending under Obama, and Obama having the highest spending per GDP since WW2, dufus.

 

[IcebergSlim]

well there are some in here that think in 100 days if he hasn't transformed the government, he's a failure. Wow. I don't even think that's long enough to cycle anything through one full cycle of record. But at 100 days he's a loser! And that isn't panicking by the way.

I just figure they are going to gaslight us for the next 4 years, no matter how successful he is, or is not. They can not have him deliver, because if he does, they are done for a generation. The only reason they have a up today, is because many young people have never really had a President who wasn't leftist. (in many cases, including Bush) They are skeptical! But if it works, that will be erased rather quickly!

Did I just read this?

Allow me to demonstrate "gaslighting"....

Which presidential terms saw the highest growth in employment?

I'll give you #1 and #2 (Clinton, and Clinton)

lol, what has that got to do with Obama? Told you before, Bush and Obama are kinsmen, they are one era. Reagan and Clinton were the other, with another useless Bush stuffed between them.

Why not just try to answer the question? It has NOTHING to do with Bush.....

notice how gaslighting has conditioned you to reflexively reject the facts....

your one or 2 sentence reply does nothing. You know who you are, and I am not engaging a gaslighter again. Come back when you and your Dems have some power-)

I've made my point..

You know who you are, and I am not engaging a gaslighter again.

I'm the guy who recently disabused you of a bunch of other ignorance you held dear and directed you to the Source of Truth....