Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What offenses would you like to start with? The violation of the emoluments clause in that we don't know how many offenses there are? But I will give the example of Trump having the advantage of enriching himself by way of the Chinese investing $500 million dollars on Trump. That is a violation of office by serving "HIM", not "SERVING THE PEOPLE". The people get nothing out of that deal. Now, I want your counter argument as to exactly why and how that is not impeachable?And you are a poor soul with your finger up your ass eating sour grapes, so helpless to debate these impeachable offenses.You really are a sad bunch of pathetic losers.
what offenses?????
You keep just spouting opinions instead of concrete accusations.
It's mental masturbation, nothing more.
There is nothing in that article that suggests Trump is not a qualifier for impeachment, while his brand is associated, along with his family, in this deal.People better at the law than me have already answered the emoulments clause thing;
Opinion | Does the emoluments clause lawsuit against President Trump stand a chance?
and as for the Chinese thing, it Involves Trump branded parts of the properties, Trump has no actual connection to the $$.
China Contributes $500 Million to Trump-Linked Indonesia Project | National Review
Full transcript: FBI Director testifies on Russian interference in 2016 election
So We Find Out FBI Has Been Investigating Trump Since July
"The Russian active measures campaign may have begun as early as 2015, when Russian intelligence services launched a series of spear fishing attacks designed to penetrate the computers of a broad array of Washington based Democratic and Republican party organizations, think tanks and other entities. This continued at least through the winter of 2016.
While at first the hacking may have been intended solely for the collection of foreign intelligence. In mid-2016 the Russians weapon eyes the stolen data and used platforms established by the Intel services, such as D.C. leaks in existing third-party channels like WikiLeaks to dump the documents. The stolen documents were almost uniformly damaging to the candidate Putin despised, Hillary Clinton. And by forcing her campaign to constantly respond to the daily drip of disclosures, the releases greatly benefited Donald Trump's campaign.
None of these facts is seriously in question. And they're reflected in the consensus conclusion of our intelligence agencies.
We will never know whether the Russian intervention was determinative in such a close election. Indeed, it is unknowable in a campaign to which so many small changes could have dictated a different result. More importantly, and for the purposes of our investigation, it simply does not matter.
What does matter is this, the Russians successfully meddled in our democracy and our intelligence agencies have concluded they will do so again. Ours is not the first democracy to be attacked by the Russians in this way. Russian intelligence has been simile interfering in the internal and political affairs of our European and other allies for decades.
What is striking here is the degree to which the Russians were willing to undertake such an audacious and risky action against the most powerful nation on Earth. That ought to be a warning to us that if we thought that the Russians would not dare to so blatantly interfere in our affairs, we were wrong.
And if we do not do our very best to understand how the Russians accomplished this unprecedented attack on our democracy and what we need to do to protect ourselves in the future, we will only have ourselves to blame.
We know a lot about the Russian operation, about the way they amplified the damage their hacking and dumping of stolen documents was causing through the use of slick propaganda like R.T., the Kremlin's media arm. But there is a lot we don't know.
Most important, we do not yet know whether the Russians have the help of U.S. citizens including people associated with the Trump campaign. Many of the Trump's campaign personnel, including the president himself, have ties to Russia and Russian interests. This is of course no crime. On the other hand, if the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it aided or abetted the Russians, it would not only be a serious crime, it would also represent one of the most shocking betrayals of democracy in history."
What we know about the 21 states targeted by Russian hackers
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ut-the-21-states-targeted-by-russian-hackers/
10 Months After Election Day, Feds Tell States More About Russian Hacking
Nothing but a ton of assumptions, guesses and wishful thinking.
Brought to you by the MSM, created by the deep state, and eaten with a smile on the faces of the gullible idiots like you.
gullible idiots swallow anti-American russian troll farm talking points wholesale.
way to own it, idiot.
in the USA we live by rule of law and due process of the law, sorry traitor!
Old KGB spy manual reveals origin of fake-news strategy
Before ‘fake news,’ there was Soviet ‘disinformation’
Vladimir Putin’s Political Meddling Revives Old KGB Tactics
Considering you can't even prove what laws were broken, the rule of law is working just fine.
Trump is still President and you clowns are still spinning in neutral.
twat.
This coming from the guy who said "there are people who know more about the law than me". Talk about clowns and spinning. Have you considered joining the circus?
Full transcript: FBI Director testifies on Russian interference in 2016 election
So We Find Out FBI Has Been Investigating Trump Since July
"The Russian active measures campaign may have begun as early as 2015, when Russian intelligence services launched a series of spear fishing attacks designed to penetrate the computers of a broad array of Washington based Democratic and Republican party organizations, think tanks and other entities. This continued at least through the winter of 2016.
While at first the hacking may have been intended solely for the collection of foreign intelligence. In mid-2016 the Russians weapon eyes the stolen data and used platforms established by the Intel services, such as D.C. leaks in existing third-party channels like WikiLeaks to dump the documents. The stolen documents were almost uniformly damaging to the candidate Putin despised, Hillary Clinton. And by forcing her campaign to constantly respond to the daily drip of disclosures, the releases greatly benefited Donald Trump's campaign.
None of these facts is seriously in question. And they're reflected in the consensus conclusion of our intelligence agencies.
We will never know whether the Russian intervention was determinative in such a close election. Indeed, it is unknowable in a campaign to which so many small changes could have dictated a different result. More importantly, and for the purposes of our investigation, it simply does not matter.
What does matter is this, the Russians successfully meddled in our democracy and our intelligence agencies have concluded they will do so again. Ours is not the first democracy to be attacked by the Russians in this way. Russian intelligence has been simile interfering in the internal and political affairs of our European and other allies for decades.
What is striking here is the degree to which the Russians were willing to undertake such an audacious and risky action against the most powerful nation on Earth. That ought to be a warning to us that if we thought that the Russians would not dare to so blatantly interfere in our affairs, we were wrong.
And if we do not do our very best to understand how the Russians accomplished this unprecedented attack on our democracy and what we need to do to protect ourselves in the future, we will only have ourselves to blame.
We know a lot about the Russian operation, about the way they amplified the damage their hacking and dumping of stolen documents was causing through the use of slick propaganda like R.T., the Kremlin's media arm. But there is a lot we don't know.
Most important, we do not yet know whether the Russians have the help of U.S. citizens including people associated with the Trump campaign. Many of the Trump's campaign personnel, including the president himself, have ties to Russia and Russian interests. This is of course no crime. On the other hand, if the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it aided or abetted the Russians, it would not only be a serious crime, it would also represent one of the most shocking betrayals of democracy in history."
What we know about the 21 states targeted by Russian hackers
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ut-the-21-states-targeted-by-russian-hackers/
10 Months After Election Day, Feds Tell States More About Russian Hacking
Nothing but a ton of assumptions, guesses and wishful thinking.
Brought to you by the MSM, created by the deep state, and eaten with a smile on the faces of the gullible idiots like you.
gullible idiots swallow anti-American russian troll farm talking points wholesale.
way to own it, idiot.
in the USA we live by rule of law and due process of the law, sorry traitor!
Old KGB spy manual reveals origin of fake-news strategy
Before ‘fake news,’ there was Soviet ‘disinformation’
Vladimir Putin’s Political Meddling Revives Old KGB Tactics
Considering you can't even prove what laws were broken, the rule of law is working just fine.
Trump is still President and you clowns are still spinning in neutral.
twat.
what did you lose at today?Trump violates norms, is met with 'tepid' response: Boot
And by the way, some of these examples are illegal. The one that sticks out the most for me, is the $500 million dollar investment paid to Trump's interests from China. Talk about hypocrisy. Remember the days when Conservatives railed against Clinton for receiving $500,00 in speaking fees that went to their foundation , and claimed it went to his enrichment, but did not? But now, you have Trump enriching himself, violating the Emoluments clause, (ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_of_Nobility_Clause) and Congress says nothing or does nothing about it?
Folks, the Republican party along with Trump, continue to prove to us that they have no problem in violating every oath that they took when they were elected, and continue to double down on those violations. The country and the house that holds it together are on fire right now, and the pyromaniac Trump and his goons keep pouring gas on it. At this point, the only way to get rid of these maniacs, is to get rid of them, before the whole house burns to the ground.
The house is literally on fire because of Trump; House GOP to review classified info on FBI source
Trump, some in GOP work to politicize rule of law
Trump and the entire Republican party should be totally disgusted with what they have become.
Congressional Republicans who stick by Trump and protect him will be remembered as the villains of Washington’s unfolding drama. They are the ones enabling an epic White House end run around the constitution.
Instead of holding Trump to account, Republicans are joining him in a cynical attempt to tarnish the FBI and undermine the criminal investigation into Russian election meddling.
Trump's attack on the FBI is an attack on the US constitution itself
Wow, guilt by association, how authoritarian of you.
The FBI dug it's own hole, Trump is just laughing at them as they try to climb out of it.
Congressional Republicans who stick by Trump and protect him will be remembered as the villains of Washington’s unfolding drama. They are the ones enabling an epic White House end run around the constitution.
Instead of holding Trump to account, Republicans are joining him in a cynical attempt to tarnish the FBI and undermine the criminal investigation into Russian election meddling.
Trump's attack on the FBI is an attack on the US constitution itself
Wow, guilt by association, how authoritarian of you.
The FBI dug it's own hole, Trump is just laughing at them as they try to climb out of it.
Really. Congress did not approve his cabinet picks, they do nothing to over ride his EOs.
Congress has a DUTY to watch over the Executive Branch.
A Duty.
The FBI did its job. Trump wants to see what info they have on him. He lies & makes up a story & you don't care.
Would you care if he he traded US aid for the right to build a Trump resort?
Would you care if he traded a One China policy for the trademark rights to the Trump name in China?
Would you care if he traded the lives of future generations for donations from the fossil fuel industry?
Would you care if he tore children from their parents when they came here for asylum?
Would you care if one of your relatives died in an industial accident because regulations were cut?
Evidently not.
WTF do you care about? Your wallet? You think Trump is going to give you money?
The burden is on the law, which they have already done. You will see it in the report, unless the cowards on the Right won't release it.What offenses would you like to start with? The violation of the emoluments clause in that we don't know how many offenses there are? But I will give the example of Trump having the advantage of enriching himself by way of the Chinese investing $500 million dollars on Trump. That is a violation of office by serving "HIM", not "SERVING THE PEOPLE". The people get nothing out of that deal. Now, I want your counter argument as to exactly why and how that is not impeachable?And you are a poor soul with your finger up your ass eating sour grapes, so helpless to debate these impeachable offenses.
what offenses?????
You keep just spouting opinions instead of concrete accusations.
It's mental masturbation, nothing more.
There is nothing in that article that suggests Trump is not a qualifier for impeachment, while his brand is associated, along with his family, in this deal.People better at the law than me have already answered the emoulments clause thing;
Opinion | Does the emoluments clause lawsuit against President Trump stand a chance?
and as for the Chinese thing, it Involves Trump branded parts of the properties, Trump has no actual connection to the $$.
China Contributes $500 Million to Trump-Linked Indonesia Project | National Review
First, learn to use the quote function properly.
Second, one has to PROVE impeachment, and the burden in this thread is on dipshits like you to PROVE there is a case for impeachment.
Unless that happens you are just another useless progressive poseur cuck, who isn't worth anyone's time.
hack.
Could you expand on that? how does Trump (as opposed to our country) not profit from the China deal, the building of Trump branded golf course. not talking about if legal or not, & please leave Obama Clinton or G Washington out of the information.What offenses would you like to start with? The violation of the emoluments clause in that we don't know how many offenses there are? But I will give the example of Trump having the advantage of enriching himself by way of the Chinese investing $500 million dollars on Trump. That is a violation of office by serving "HIM", not "SERVING THE PEOPLE". The people get nothing out of that deal. Now, I want your counter argument as to exactly why and how that is not impeachable?And you are a poor soul with your finger up your ass eating sour grapes, so helpless to debate these impeachable offenses.This is going to end badly for them in so many different ways. I'm with Lawrence O'donnell on this. Rosenstein is basically letting Trump play into his hand, because Rosenstein knows that he is playing with a child with evil on the brain. Trump, in this stunt thought he could get him to resign, but instead what Trump will get, is an IG report that reveals nothing. Lawrence: DOJ adapts against Trump attacks
You really are a sad bunch of pathetic losers.
what offenses?????
You keep just spouting opinions instead of concrete accusations.
It's mental masturbation, nothing more.
People better at the law than me have already answered the emoulments clause thing
Opinion | Does the emoluments clause lawsuit against President Trump stand a chance?
and as for the Chinese thing, it Involves Trump branded parts of the properties, Trump has no actual connection to the $$.
China Contributes $500 Million to Trump-Linked Indonesia Project | National Review
They can't, or they would have done so already.Could you expand on that? how does Trump (as opposed to our country) not profit from the China deal, the building of Trump branded golf course. not talking about if legal or not, & please leave Obama Clinton or G Washington out of the information.What offenses would you like to start with? The violation of the emoluments clause in that we don't know how many offenses there are? But I will give the example of Trump having the advantage of enriching himself by way of the Chinese investing $500 million dollars on Trump. That is a violation of office by serving "HIM", not "SERVING THE PEOPLE". The people get nothing out of that deal. Now, I want your counter argument as to exactly why and how that is not impeachable?And you are a poor soul with your finger up your ass eating sour grapes, so helpless to debate these impeachable offenses.You really are a sad bunch of pathetic losers.
what offenses?????
You keep just spouting opinions instead of concrete accusations.
It's mental masturbation, nothing more.
People better at the law than me have already answered the emoulments clause thing
Opinion | Does the emoluments clause lawsuit against President Trump stand a chance?
and as for the Chinese thing, it Involves Trump branded parts of the properties, Trump has no actual connection to the $$.
China Contributes $500 Million to Trump-Linked Indonesia Project | National Review
It's not what I lost. It's what I didn't get. Did I get to use a government position for my personal enrichment at tax payer expense? No? Did you? I doubt it. So now, who is the stupid fuck that allowed that to happen? Are you people really this damn stupid?what did you lose at today?Trump violates norms, is met with 'tepid' response: Boot
And by the way, some of these examples are illegal. The one that sticks out the most for me, is the $500 million dollar investment paid to Trump's interests from China. Talk about hypocrisy. Remember the days when Conservatives railed against Clinton for receiving $500,00 in speaking fees that went to their foundation , and claimed it went to his enrichment, but did not? But now, you have Trump enriching himself, violating the Emoluments clause, (ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_of_Nobility_Clause) and Congress says nothing or does nothing about it?
Folks, the Republican party along with Trump, continue to prove to us that they have no problem in violating every oath that they took when they were elected, and continue to double down on those violations. The country and the house that holds it together are on fire right now, and the pyromaniac Trump and his goons keep pouring gas on it. At this point, the only way to get rid of these maniacs, is to get rid of them, before the whole house burns to the ground.
The house is literally on fire because of Trump; House GOP to review classified info on FBI source
Trump, some in GOP work to politicize rule of law
Trump and the entire Republican party should be totally disgusted with what they have become.
The burden is on the law, which they have already done. You will see it in the report, unless the cowards on the Right won't release it.What offenses would you like to start with? The violation of the emoluments clause in that we don't know how many offenses there are? But I will give the example of Trump having the advantage of enriching himself by way of the Chinese investing $500 million dollars on Trump. That is a violation of office by serving "HIM", not "SERVING THE PEOPLE". The people get nothing out of that deal. Now, I want your counter argument as to exactly why and how that is not impeachable?what offenses?????
You keep just spouting opinions instead of concrete accusations.
It's mental masturbation, nothing more.
There is nothing in that article that suggests Trump is not a qualifier for impeachment, while his brand is associated, along with his family, in this deal.People better at the law than me have already answered the emoulments clause thing;
Opinion | Does the emoluments clause lawsuit against President Trump stand a chance?
and as for the Chinese thing, it Involves Trump branded parts of the properties, Trump has no actual connection to the $$.
China Contributes $500 Million to Trump-Linked Indonesia Project | National Review
First, learn to use the quote function properly.
Second, one has to PROVE impeachment, and the burden in this thread is on dipshits like you to PROVE there is a case for impeachment.
Unless that happens you are just another useless progressive poseur cuck, who isn't worth anyone's time.
hack.
Could you expand on that? how does Trump (as opposed to our country) not profit from the China deal, the building of Trump branded golf course. not talking about if legal or not, & please leave Obama Clinton or G Washington out of the information.What offenses would you like to start with? The violation of the emoluments clause in that we don't know how many offenses there are? But I will give the example of Trump having the advantage of enriching himself by way of the Chinese investing $500 million dollars on Trump. That is a violation of office by serving "HIM", not "SERVING THE PEOPLE". The people get nothing out of that deal. Now, I want your counter argument as to exactly why and how that is not impeachable?And you are a poor soul with your finger up your ass eating sour grapes, so helpless to debate these impeachable offenses.You really are a sad bunch of pathetic losers.
what offenses?????
You keep just spouting opinions instead of concrete accusations.
It's mental masturbation, nothing more.
People better at the law than me have already answered the emoulments clause thing
Opinion | Does the emoluments clause lawsuit against President Trump stand a chance?
and as for the Chinese thing, it Involves Trump branded parts of the properties, Trump has no actual connection to the $$.
China Contributes $500 Million to Trump-Linked Indonesia Project | National Review
when you care about the crimes of obama holler.And Republicans could care less.Presidents Day reminds us of George Washington's presidential vision.
And Trump's disrespect.
The presidency that Washington personified was adopted by all subsequent presidents.
Until last year.
Trump has made a mockery of Washington's presidential model
Lol! You and your bubble deserve each other.The burden is on the law, which they have already done. You will see it in the report, unless the cowards on the Right won't release it.What offenses would you like to start with? The violation of the emoluments clause in that we don't know how many offenses there are? But I will give the example of Trump having the advantage of enriching himself by way of the Chinese investing $500 million dollars on Trump. That is a violation of office by serving "HIM", not "SERVING THE PEOPLE". The people get nothing out of that deal. Now, I want your counter argument as to exactly why and how that is not impeachable?
There is nothing in that article that suggests Trump is not a qualifier for impeachment, while his brand is associated, along with his family, in this deal.People better at the law than me have already answered the emoulments clause thing;
Opinion | Does the emoluments clause lawsuit against President Trump stand a chance?
and as for the Chinese thing, it Involves Trump branded parts of the properties, Trump has no actual connection to the $$.
China Contributes $500 Million to Trump-Linked Indonesia Project | National Review
First, learn to use the quote function properly.
Second, one has to PROVE impeachment, and the burden in this thread is on dipshits like you to PROVE there is a case for impeachment.
Unless that happens you are just another useless progressive poseur cuck, who isn't worth anyone's time.
hack.
Nothing has been proven or even shown to be remotely factual in any of these scenarios.
And another "report" that will finally prove everything.... LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.
When you can tell us about Obama`s charges and convictions we`ll be listening. Real stuff, not Breitbart fantasies.when you care about the crimes of obama holler.And Republicans could care less.Presidents Day reminds us of George Washington's presidential vision.
And Trump's disrespect.
The presidency that Washington personified was adopted by all subsequent presidents.
Until last year.
Trump has made a mockery of Washington's presidential model
When you prove them, "holler".when you care about the crimes of obama holler.And Republicans could care less.Presidents Day reminds us of George Washington's presidential vision.
And Trump's disrespect.
The presidency that Washington personified was adopted by all subsequent presidents.
Until last year.
Trump has made a mockery of Washington's presidential model
Lol! You and your bubble deserve each other.The burden is on the law, which they have already done. You will see it in the report, unless the cowards on the Right won't release it.There is nothing in that article that suggests Trump is not a qualifier for impeachment, while his brand is associated, along with his family, in this deal.
First, learn to use the quote function properly.
Second, one has to PROVE impeachment, and the burden in this thread is on dipshits like you to PROVE there is a case for impeachment.
Unless that happens you are just another useless progressive poseur cuck, who isn't worth anyone's time.
hack.
Nothing has been proven or even shown to be remotely factual in any of these scenarios.
And another "report" that will finally prove everything.... LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.
what did I say it would take? 2 weeks for you to drop your act? took 2 days, told you ya couldn't pretend for too long, and now you are just another foul mouthed liberal churned out by the public education systemIt's not what I lost. It's what I didn't get. Did I get to use a government position for my personal enrichment at tax payer expense? No? Did you? I doubt it. So now, who is the stupid fuck that allowed that to happen? Are you people really this damn stupid?
and what has been proven on trump again?When you prove them, "holler".when you care about the crimes of obama holler.And Republicans could care less.Presidents Day reminds us of George Washington's presidential vision.
And Trump's disrespect.
The presidency that Washington personified was adopted by all subsequent presidents.
Until last year.
Trump has made a mockery of Washington's presidential model
